{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,11]],"date-time":"2026-06-11T08:04:02Z","timestamp":1781165042422,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]],"date-time":"2025-06-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750896000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]],"date-time":"2025-06-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750896000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) remains a common concern associated with cesarean delivery (CD). Recently, efforts have been made to expedite recovery after CD through Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) pathways. We aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of an ERAC protocol impacts the incidence of POUR after CD.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement (QI) study of patients undergoing CD before and after implementation of an ERAC protocol. CD patients requiring general anesthesia, significantly complicated CD, and patients with chronic pain disorders were excluded. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as failure of spontaneous voiding 6\u00a0hours (h) after Foley catheter removal. Secondary outcomes were the duration of Foley catheter placement and replacement of Foley catheter.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Three hundred-eight patients were included. The incidence of POUR was similar between groups pre-ERAC (44, 22.6%) vs post-ERAC (36, 31.8%),\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.08. Time to Foley removal following CD was significantly decreased in the post-ERAC cohort [10.1\u00a0h (7.2, 13.7) vs. 12.5\u00a0h (10.9, 17.8)] (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Need for Foley catheter replacement occurred at a similar rate (pre-ERAC: 1.0%; post-ERAC: 0.9%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.7).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There was no significant difference in POUR after implementing an ERAC protocol, although a trend toward increased incidence was noted. Post-ERAC implementation resulted in a significant decrease in the duration of Foley catheter placement.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]],"date-time":"2025-06-26T03:35:10Z","timestamp":1750908910000},"page":"61-66","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol on postoperative urinary retention"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"58","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6529-3305","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M. Kaitlyn","family":"Coghlan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liviu","family":"Cojocaru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Alton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Autusa","family":"Pahlavan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ariel","family":"Trilling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hyunuk","family":"Seung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bhavani","family":"Kodali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Crimmins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katherine","family":"Goetzinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"4610_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.048","volume":"223","author":"G Nelson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nelson G, Dowdy SC (2020) Level I evidence establishes enhanced recovery after surgery as standard of care in gynecologic surgery: now is the time to implement! Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:473\u2013474","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4610_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.003","volume":"223","author":"F Ferrari","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ferrari F, Forte S, Sbalzer N et al (2020) Validation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gynecologic surgery: an Italian randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:543.e1\u2013543.e14","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4610_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002307","volume":"268","author":"TS Wahl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wahl TS, Goss LE, Morris MS et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) eliminates racial disparities in postoperative length of stay after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 268(6):1026\u20131035","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4610_CR4","unstructured":"Pfuntner A, Weir L, Stocks C (2013) Most frequent procedures performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010: Statistical Brief #149. 2013 Feb. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs"},{"issue":"2","key":"4610_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1007\/s40140-021-00442-9","volume":"11","author":"K Patel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Patel K, Zakowski M (2021) Enhanced recovery after cesarean: current and emerging trends. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 11(2):136\u2013144","journal-title":"Curr Anesthesiol Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"4610_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.015","volume":"219","author":"RD Wilson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL et al (2018) Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(6):523.e1\u2013523.e15","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4610_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.006","volume":"219","author":"AB Caughey","year":"2018","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA et al (2018) Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(6):533\u2013544","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4610_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.012","volume":"221","author":"GA Macones","year":"2019","unstructured":"Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL et al (2019) Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol 221(3):247.e1\u2013247.e9","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4610_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-1775560","volume":"41","author":"L Cojocaru","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cojocaru L, Alton S, Pahlavan A et al (2024) A prospective longitudinal quality initiative toward improved enhanced recovery after cesarean pathways. Am J Perinatol 41(3):229\u2013240","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4610_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.05.037","volume":"99","author":"C Liang","year":"2007","unstructured":"Liang C, Chang Y, Chang S et al (2007) Postpartum urinary retention after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(3):229\u2013232","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"12","key":"4610_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2418-6","volume":"25","author":"FEM Mulder","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mulder FEM, Hakvoort RA, Schoffelmeer MA et al (2014) Postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review of adverse effects and management. Int Urogynecol J 25(12):1605\u20131612","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4610_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1537","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.623","volume":"192","author":"AI Sokol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sokol AI, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD et al (2005) Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1537\u20131543","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4610_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182638c3a","volume":"120","author":"N Smorgick","year":"2012","unstructured":"Smorgick N, DeLancey J, Patzkowsky K et al (2012) Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 120:581\u2013586","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4610_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22196","volume":"31","author":"JM Lewis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lewis JM, Yalla SV, Stanitski KE et al (2012) Spectrum of urodynamic abnormalities and renal function changes in adult men with non-neurogenic urinary retention. Neurourol Urodyn 31:544\u2013548","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4610_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1159\/000019999","volume":"36","author":"S Bross","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bross S, Schumacher S, Scheepe JR et al (1999) Effects of acute urinary bladder overdistension on bladder response during sacral neurostimulation. Eur Urol 36:354\u2013359","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"4610_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22224","volume":"31","author":"H Madersbacher","year":"2012","unstructured":"Madersbacher H, Cardozo L, Chapple C et al (2012) What are the causes and consequences of bladder overdistension? Neurourol Urodyn 31:317\u2013321","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"1","key":"4610_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.060","volume":"228","author":"AC Nutaitis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nutaitis AC, Meckes NA, Madsen AM et al (2023) Postpartum urinary retention: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 228(1):14\u201321","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4610_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1111\/luts.12362","volume":"13","author":"M Barba","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barba M, Frigerio M, Manodoro S et al (2021) Postpartum urinary retention: absolute prediction model. Low Urin Tract Symp 13:257\u2013263","journal-title":"Low Urin Tract Symp"},{"issue":"5","key":"4610_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e140","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002633","volume":"131","author":"A Stuebe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stuebe A, Auguste T, Gulati M (2018) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: optimizing postpartum care. Obstet Gynecol 131(5):e140\u2013e150","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4610_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1424","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2021.07.001","volume":"8","author":"S Crisafulli","year":"2022","unstructured":"Crisafulli S, Cutroneo PM, Verhamme K et al (2022) Drug-induced urinary retention: an analysis of a National Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Database. Eur Urol Focus 8(5):1424\u20131432","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"4610_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e39","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001141","volume":"28","author":"EK Welch","year":"2022","unstructured":"Welch EK, Dengler KL, DiCarlo-Meacham AM et al (2022) Effects of preoperative gabapentin on clinical outcomes after outpatient midurethral sling placement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 28(3):e39\u2013e43","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"4610_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01252.x","volume":"36","author":"C Liang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Liang C, Chang S, Wong S et al (2010) Effects of postoperative analgesia on postpartum urinary retention in women undergoing cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36:991\u2013995","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,11]],"date-time":"2026-01-11T20:01:56Z","timestamp":1768161716000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["4610"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04610-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 February 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 June 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Maryland, Baltimore under protocol HP-00088872, and informed consent was obtained from patients included.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}