{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T11:20:48Z","timestamp":1787656848692,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774915200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774915200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T19:14:56Z","timestamp":1774984496000},"page":"3385-3394","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The impact of size: a systematic review and meta-analysis of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 2171 adult patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"58","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-5585-5180","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea G.","family":"Palacios-Navas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-2233-6106","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luis A.","family":"Esparza-Miranda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arath J.","family":"Campos-Mu\u00f1oz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yoshua","family":"Flores-Bravo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-6324-1429","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adolfo","family":"Calder\u00f3n-Fern\u00e1ndez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mar\u00eda","family":"de la Luz Nev\u00e1rez-Rivera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank R.","family":"S\u00e1nchez-Villacr\u00e9s","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-6983-9116","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alejandro","family":"Calvillo-Ramirez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"5114_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.1976.11882084","volume":"10","author":"I Fernstr\u00f6m","year":"1976","unstructured":"Fernstr\u00f6m I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21681805.1976.11882084","journal-title":"Scand J Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"5114_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.292.6524.879","volume":"292","author":"C Charig","year":"1986","unstructured":"Charig C, Webb D, Payne S, Wickham J (1986) Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. BMJ 292:879\u2013882. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.292.6524.879","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"5114_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1578","DOI":"10.1097\/00005392-199705000-00010","volume":"157","author":"GC Bellman","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578\u20131582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005392-199705000-00010","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"5114_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-84806-1","volume":"15","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Li X, Yang G, Liu L, Zhang X, Li W (2025) Therapeutic experience and key techniques of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Sci Rep 15:1106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-84806-1","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"5114_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"5114_CR6","unstructured":"Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ (2024). cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6. Cochrane:www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook"},{"key":"5114_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"5114_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/s0090-4295(01)01225-0","volume":"58","author":"MI Feng","year":"2001","unstructured":"Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC (2001) Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58:345\u2013350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0090-4295(01)01225-0","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5114_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.4103\/iju.IJU_52_17","volume":"33","author":"S Bhat","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bhat S, Lal J, Paul F (2017) A randomized controlled study comparing the standard, tubeless, and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures for renal stones from a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Urol 33:310\u2013314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/iju.IJU_52_17","journal-title":"Indian J Urol"},{"key":"5114_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1177\/03915603231203434","volume":"91","author":"VB Kamble","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kamble VB, Gupta S, Pal DK (2024) Comparative analysis of standard, tubeless and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study. Urologia 91:326\u2013331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03915603231203434","journal-title":"Urologia"},{"key":"5114_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.09.042","volume":"79","author":"AM Shoma","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shoma AM, Elshal AM (2012) Nephrostomy tube placement after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: critical evaluation through a prospective randomized study. Urology 79:771\u2013776. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2011.09.042","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5114_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0269","volume":"22","author":"I Singh","year":"2008","unstructured":"Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol 22:427\u2013434. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2007.0269","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0118","volume":"22","author":"MS Agrawal","year":"2008","unstructured":"Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, Bansal S, Yadav A, Goyal J (2008) A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:439\u2013442. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2007.0118","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-024-01575-2","volume":"52","author":"O Mohamed","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mohamed O, Ibrahim TAA, Sultan S, El-Gharabawy M, Noureldin Y, Hamri SB et al (2024) Evaluating the safety of bipolar nephrostomy tract cauterization \u201cBNTC\u201d towards a safe tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 52:106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-024-01575-2","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"10","key":"5114_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2859","DOI":"10.53350\/pjmhs2115102859","volume":"15","author":"A Channa","year":"2021","unstructured":"Channa A, Mazhar SS, Khalique A, Pardip A, GMustafa et al (2021) Complications of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PJHMS 15(10):2859\u20132862. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53350\/pjmhs2115102859","journal-title":"PJHMS"},{"key":"5114_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000130752.97414.c8","volume":"172","author":"MR Desai","year":"2004","unstructured":"Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, Mhaskar SS, Wani KA, Patel SH et al (2004) A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172:565\u2013567. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.ju.0000130752.97414.c8","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"5114_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14260\/JEMDS\/2019\/440","author":"N Ramasamy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ramasamy N, Balasubramanyan JK, Thirunavukarasu C, Kumerasan N, Reddy G (2019) Efficacy and safety of standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomya randomized controlled study. J Evol Med Dent Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14260\/JEMDS\/2019\/440","journal-title":"J Evol Med Dent Sci"},{"key":"5114_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x","volume":"106","author":"S Mishra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Kurien A, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Desai M (2010) Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL: Prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless pcnl. BJU Int 106:1045\u20131048. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"5114_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0444","volume":"31","author":"H Jiang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jiang H, Huang D, Yao S, Liu S (2017) Improving drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy based on health-related quality of life: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol 31:1131\u20131138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2017.0444","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-011-0367-9","volume":"39","author":"F Marchant","year":"2011","unstructured":"Marchant F, Recabal P, Fern\u00e1ndez MI, Osorio F, Benavides J (2011) Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective comparative study. Urol Res 39:477\u2013481. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-011-0367-9","journal-title":"Urol Res"},{"key":"5114_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0216","volume":"21","author":"M Sofikerim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Huri E, Er\u015fekerci E, Karacagil M (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol 21:967\u2013972. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2006.0216","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.766","volume":"20","author":"M Choi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Choi M, Brusky J, Weaver J, Amantia M, Bellman GC (2006) Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small-bore tube. J Endourol 20:766\u2013770. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2006.20.766","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0875","volume":"33","author":"M G\u00f6nen","year":"2019","unstructured":"G\u00f6nen M, Arslan \u00d6E, D\u00f6nmez M\u0130, Halat A\u00d6, Sezgin T (2019) Ureteral catheter versus nephrostomy tube for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia: a prospectively randomized trial. J Endourol 33:291\u2013294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2018.0875","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.33719\/yud.508649","author":"H Kocakgol","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kocakgol H, Adanur S, Yilmaz AH, Ozkaya F, Karabulut I, Polat O et al (2019) Standart perk\u00fctan nefrolitotomi ve t\u00fcps\u00fcz perk\u00fctan nefrolitotomi sonu\u00e7larinin kar\u015fila\u015ftirilmasi: prospektif randomize \u00e7ift k\u00f6r \u00e7ali\u015fma. Yeni \u00dcroloji Dergisi. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33719\/yud.508649","journal-title":"Yeni \u00dcroloji Dergisi"},{"key":"5114_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-006-9040-6","volume":"39","author":"A Tefekli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-006-9040-6","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"5114_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0235","volume":"30","author":"PT Zhao","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhao PT, Hoenig DM, Smith AD, Okeke Z (2016) A randomized controlled comparison of nephrostomy drainage vs ureteral stent following percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the Wisconsin StoneQOL. J Endourol 30:1275\u20131284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2016.0235","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14950","volume":"125","author":"H Goldberg","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goldberg H, Nevo A, Shtabholtz Y, Lubin M, Baniel J, Margel D et al (2020) Tubeless supra-costal percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with significantly less hydrothorax: a prospective randomized clinical study: Tubeless PCNL randomized trial. BJU Int 125:276\u2013283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14950","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"5114_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1433","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0350","volume":"22","author":"HN Shah","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Kharodawala S, Hegde SS, Bansal MB (2008) A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless. J Endourol 22:1433\u20131439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2007.0350","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.4236\/jbm.2019.73006","volume":"07","author":"MI Ali","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ali MI, Saha PK, Chowdhury SA, Kamal N, Rahman M, Hossain S et al (2019) Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with or without nephrostomy tube: a comparative study. J Biosci Med 07:52\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4236\/jbm.2019.73006","journal-title":"J Biosci Med"},{"key":"5114_CR30","unstructured":"Basiri A, Ahmadnia H, Moghaddam S (2006) The efficacy of conventional PCNL and two modifications to standard procedure. JPMA;56: 302\u2013305. Available: https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/6885962"},{"key":"5114_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.5958\/2321-1024.2019.00019.9","volume":"7","author":"N Garg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Garg N, Agrawal B, Garg N, Agrawal M (2019) A comparative study of standard PCNL vs tubeless PCNL at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Contemp Surg 7:31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5958\/2321-1024.2019.00019.9","journal-title":"Int J Contemp Surg"},{"key":"5114_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.4274\/jus.1878","volume":"5","author":"A Siddiq","year":"2018","unstructured":"Siddiq A, El Khalid S, Mahmud SM, Saulat S, Khan SA, Mithani MH (2018) Supracostal PCNL-standard nephrostomy with day long pain versus painless tubeless. J Urol Surg 5:73\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4274\/jus.1878","journal-title":"J Urol Surg"},{"key":"5114_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.39211","volume":"15","author":"K Surag","year":"2023","unstructured":"Surag K, Singh A, Sharma P, Pai V, Choudhary A, Patil S (2023) Comparing tubeless and tubed approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for moderate renal calculi: outcomes on safety, efficacy, pain management, recovery time, and cost-effectiveness. Cureus 15:e39211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.39211","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"5114_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.3126\/jssn.v20i2.24380","volume":"20","author":"PR Chalise","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chalise PR, Luitel B, Chapagain S, Poudyal S, Gyawali PR, Sharma UK et al (2017) Is nephrostomy tube a rule following all Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? a prospective randomized study. J Soc Surg Nepal 20:43\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3126\/jssn.v20i2.24380","journal-title":"J Soc Surg Nepal"},{"key":"5114_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20164403","author":"A Khan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khan A, Rahiman M, Verma A, Bhargava R (2017) Tubeless per cutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it the present standard of care? Int Surg J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20164403","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"5114_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.82723","volume":"17","author":"A Mushtaq","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mushtaq A, Wani S, Shaheen FA, Hamid A, Khawaja AR, Malik SA et al (2025) Evaluation of the GUYS, S.t.o.n.e., and S-ReSC scores in predicting the Outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective study. Cureus 17:e82723. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.82723","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"5114_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1089\/089277904322836613","volume":"18","author":"M Desai","year":"2004","unstructured":"Desai M, Sharma R, Gupta P (2004) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new standard in the management of renal stones? J Endourol 18:897\u2013902","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5114_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.01.016","volume":"43","author":"Z-J Chen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen Z-J, Yan Y-J, Zhou J-J (2020) Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg 43:60\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.01.016","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"5114_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"03","DOI":"10.31782\/ijcrr.2022.141601","volume":"14","author":"A Nawaz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nawaz A, Kaku SA, Khumukcham S (2022) A comparative study of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) \u2013 a randomized controlled study. Int J Curr Res Rev 14:03\u201307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31782\/ijcrr.2022.141601","journal-title":"Int J Curr Res Rev"},{"key":"5114_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16601","volume":"135","author":"K Du","year":"2025","unstructured":"Du K, Uy M, Cheng A, Millan B, Shayegan B, Matsumoto E (2025) Comparing ambulatory to inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 135:380\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16601","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"5114_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2024.09.036","volume":"195","author":"A Calvillo-Ramirez","year":"2025","unstructured":"Calvillo-Ramirez A, Angulo-Lozano JC, Acevedo-Rodriguez JE, Vidal-Valderrama CE, Antunez-Perez R (2025) Comparative outcomes of day-case percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus conventional inpatient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology 195:214\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2024.09.036","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5114_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.61919\/jhrr.v4i1.495","volume":"4","author":"A Nawaz","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nawaz A, Sohail M, Shah S, Khan MI, Ullah A (2024) A cross-sectional study comparing tubed PCNL and tubeless PCNL: an experience at the Institute of kidney diseases (IKD), Peshawar. J Health Rehabil Res 4:933\u2013937. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61919\/jhrr.v4i1.495","journal-title":"J Health Rehabil Res"},{"key":"5114_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.5152\/balkanmedj.2012.082","volume":"29","author":"K Ozdedeli","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ozdedeli K, Cek M (2012) Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Balkan Med J 29:230\u2013235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/balkanmedj.2012.082","journal-title":"Balkan Med J"},{"key":"5114_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-025-01798-4","volume":"25","author":"H Fang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Fang H, Wang Z, Wei K, Liu X, Wu S, Hua Y et al (2025) Safety and efficacy of standard vs. tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric populations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 25:110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01798-4","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"5114_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-022-01349-8","volume":"50","author":"C Wan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wan C, Wang D, Xiang J, Yang B, Xu J, Zhou G et al (2022) Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 50:523\u2013533. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-022-01349-8","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"key":"5114_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E388","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.8333","volume":"17","author":"T Paneque","year":"2023","unstructured":"Paneque T, Richey J, Abdelrazek A, Morgan K, Fitz-Gerald J, Swinney S et al (2023) Current advances in pain regimens for percutaneous nephrolithotomy a comprehensive review. Can Urol Assoc J 17:E388\u2013E394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5489\/cuaj.8333","journal-title":"Can Urol Assoc J"},{"key":"5114_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.rr7103a1","volume":"71","author":"D Dowell","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dowell D, Ragan KR, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Chou R (2022) CDC clinical practice guideline for prescribing opioids for pain\u2014United States, 2022. MMWR Recomm Rep 71:1\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.rr7103a1","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"key":"5114_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-023-03872-y","volume":"56","author":"Y Hao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hao Y, Shen X, Han D, Hao Z, Chen D (2024) Tubeless PCNL versus standard PCNL for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a propensity score matching analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 56:1281\u20131288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-023-03872-y","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"5114_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3892\/etm.2021.9645","volume":"21","author":"B Jiao","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jiao B, Luo Z, Huang T, Zhang G, Yu J (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive vs. standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the surgical management of renal stones. Exp Ther Med 21:213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3892\/etm.2021.9645","journal-title":"Exp Ther Med"},{"key":"5114_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347","volume":"48","author":"P Qin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Qin P, Zhang D, Huang T, Fang L, Cheng Y (2022) Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 48:637\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"5114_CR51","unstructured":"Singh I, Tiwari SP, Garg G, Gupta S (2019) Effect of Nephrostomy Tube Calibre (12 F vs . 24 F) on the Safety and Outcome of PCNL-A Prospective Randomized Study. Available: https:\/\/www.semanticscholar.org\/paper\/Effect-of-Nephrostomy-Tube-Calibre-(-12-F-vs-.-24-F-Singh\/fd07a184357bd975d89ab65dd998eb689b6d9366"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T10:40:19Z","timestamp":1787654419000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5114"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05114-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 February 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}