{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T11:20:56Z","timestamp":1787656856338,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775692800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775692800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T08:21:05Z","timestamp":1775722865000},"page":"3609-3621","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The evolution of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a comprehensive meta-analysis of suction-assisted versus conventional techniques against mini-PCNL for 2\u20133\u00a0cm renal stones"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"58","author":[{"given":"Runze","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yulong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Baining","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hanchuan","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huachen","family":"Wen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhongbao","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-0216-9567","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yong","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"5134_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2008-6","volume":"35","author":"I Sorokin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sorokin I et al (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301\u20131320","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.04.001","volume":"3","author":"OA Raheem","year":"2017","unstructured":"Raheem OA et al (2017) Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. Eur Urol Focus 3(1):18\u201326","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"5134_CR3","unstructured":"Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Pet\u0159\u00edk A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G (2024) EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5134_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.090","volume":"196","author":"D Assimos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Assimos D et al (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association\/Endourological Society Guideline. PART I J Urol 196(4):1153\u20131160","journal-title":"PART I J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5134_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.091","volume":"196","author":"D Assimos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Assimos D et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association\/Endourological Society guideline, PART II. J Urol 196(4):1161\u20131169","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2020.09.026","volume":"79","author":"G Zeng","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zeng G et al (2021) Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a noninferior modality to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 20\u201340mm renal calculi: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 79(1):114\u2013121","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5134_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0895","volume":"31","author":"RM Geraghty","year":"2017","unstructured":"Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547\u2013556","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-017-1030-x","volume":"46","author":"S Doizi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doizi S, Traxer O (2018) Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks. Urolithiasis 46(1):47\u201358","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0510","volume":"45","author":"Z Zewu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zewu Z et al (2019) Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediatesize renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 45(1):10\u201322","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-026-06356-7","volume":"44","author":"Y Li","year":"2026","unstructured":"Li Y et al (2026) Efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery with a flexible and navigable suction sheath (FANS-RIRS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) for 2\u20133 cm renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol 44(1):238","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5134_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5025","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000003697","volume":"112","author":"B Wei","year":"2026","unstructured":"Wei B et al (2026) A comparative analysis of flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 112(2):5025\u20135037","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"5134_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5134_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008","volume":"358","author":"BJ Shea","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shea BJ et al (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5134_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5134_CR15","volume-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses","author":"GA Wells","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea BJ, O\u2019Connell D et al (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa"},{"key":"5134_CR16","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors) (2023) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook"},{"key":"5134_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d4002","volume":"343","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sterne JA et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7109","key":"5134_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","volume":"315","author":"M Egger","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egger M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629\u2013634","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"5134_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.2307\/2533446","volume":"50","author":"CB Begg","year":"1994","unstructured":"Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50(4):1088\u20131101","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"7650","key":"5134_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","volume":"336","author":"GH Guyatt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924\u2013926","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5134_CR21","first-page":"e70114","volume":"6","author":"G Zeng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zeng G et al (2025) Flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2\u20133 cm renal stones: an international, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial. Eur Urol 6:e70114","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01799-w","volume":"53","author":"Z Yang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yang Z et al (2025) Intelligent pressure-controlled retrograde intrarenal surgery versus microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat 2\u20133 cm renal calculi. Urolithiasis 53(1):129","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"5","key":"5134_CR23","first-page":"225","volume":"22","author":"G Deng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Deng G et al (2025) Comparison of the efficacy of ureteroscopy through a flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with tubeless-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of 3\u20132 cm renal calculi. Urol J 22(5):225\u2013230","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-024-01539-6","volume":"52","author":"DJ Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang DJ et al (2024) RIRS with FV-UAS vs. MPCNL for 2\u20133-cm upper urinary tract stones: a prospective study. Urolithiasis 52(1):31","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1007\/s10157-024-02588-2","volume":"29","author":"J Qi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Qi J, Ni D, Shen J (2024) Applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 2\u20133 cm diameter renal calculi. Clin Exp Nephrol 29(1):105\u2013112","journal-title":"Clin Exp Nephrol"},{"key":"5134_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.56434\/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.22","author":"Q Xia","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xia Q et al (2023) Effect of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy on surgical outcomes, renal function and quality of life of patients with 2\u20133 cm renal calculi. Arch Esp Urol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.56434\/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.22","journal-title":"Arch Esp Urol"},{"issue":"22","key":"5134_CR27","first-page":"11115","volume":"27","author":"Z Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Z et al (2023) Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2\u20133 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 27(22):11115\u201311121","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"5134_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2022.0513","volume":"33","author":"MA Ibis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ibis MA et al (2023) What is the ideal treatment for 20\u201330\u2009mm kidney stones? Comparative outcomes of 1197 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 33(6):542\u2013548","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"2","key":"5134_CR29","first-page":"135","volume":"76","author":"N Fiorello","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fiorello N et al (2023) Treatment of 2\u20134 cm kidney stones: multicentre experience Comparison of safety, efficacy, and costs of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Cent European J Urol 76(2):135\u2013140","journal-title":"Cent European J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5134_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.15347","volume":"31","author":"Y Chen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chen Y et al (2023) Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2\u20133 cm renal stones. Int J Urol 31(3):281\u2013286","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5134_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2141","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-022-03255-9","volume":"54","author":"MA Ibis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ibis MA et al (2022) Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy \u0131n the management of relatively large (20\u201330 mm) stones? A critical evaluation. Int Urol Nephrol 54(9):2141\u20132148","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5134_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1293","DOI":"10.1159\/000521373","volume":"106","author":"X Deng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Deng X et al (2022) Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure versus mini PCNL for the treatment of 2\u20133-cm kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Urol Int 106(12):1293\u20131297","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5134_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03872-6","volume":"40","author":"X Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu X et al (2021) Comparison of two techniques for the management of 2\u20133 cm lower pole renal calculi in obese patients. World J Urol 40(2):513\u2013518","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5134_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2020.0860","volume":"31","author":"M Erkoc","year":"2021","unstructured":"Erkoc M, Bozkurt M (2021) Comparison of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal pelvic stones of 2\u20133 cm. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 31(6):605\u2013609","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"2","key":"5134_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-019-01134-0","volume":"48","author":"Z Zhao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhao Z et al (2019) An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2\u20133 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 48(2):167\u2013173","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"5","key":"5134_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350619849782","volume":"26","author":"H Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen H et al (2019) The comparison study of flexible ureteroscopic suctioning lithotripsy with intelligent pressure control versus minimally invasive percutaneous suctioning nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi of 2 to 3 cm in size. Surg Innov 26(5):528\u2013535","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"5134_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.11.063","volume":"115","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang Y et al (2018) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of lower calyceal calculi of 2\u20133 cm in patients with solitary kidney. Urology 115:65\u201370","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"8","key":"5134_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2258-y","volume":"36","author":"H-Q Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chen H-Q et al (2018) Comparative study of the treatment of 20\u201330 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients. World J Urol 36(8):1309\u20131314","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR39","first-page":"70","volume":"11","author":"GH Zeng","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zeng GH et al (2024) International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Mil Med Res 11(1):70","journal-title":"Mil Med Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"5134_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0347","volume":"48","author":"P Qin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Qin P et al (2022) Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 48(4):637\u2013648","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-025-01799-3","volume":"25","author":"I Alnadhari","year":"2025","unstructured":"Alnadhari I et al (2025) Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 25(1):115","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.07.003","volume":"67","author":"S De","year":"2015","unstructured":"De S et al (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125\u2013137","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"5134_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000003697","author":"B Wei","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wei B et al (2025) A comparative analysis of flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000003697","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"5134_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8052013","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/8052013","volume":"2020","author":"D Lai","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lai D et al (2020) RIRS with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath versus MPCNL for the Treatment of 2\u20134 cm Renal Stone. Biomed Res Int 2020:8052013","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"5134_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2455-8","volume":"37","author":"Z Zhu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhu Z et al (2019) Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World J Urol 37(5):921\u2013929","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05334-1","volume":"42","author":"B Ballesta Martinez","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ballesta Martinez B et al (2024) Pressure reduction and suction characteristics of the new digital single use flexible ureteroscope with suction: an in-vitro experimental study. World J Urol 42(1):638","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5134_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2316","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-019-01962-z","volume":"44","author":"H Monahan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Monahan H et al (2019) Risk factors associated with significant bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies: a review of 2204 cases. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(6):2316\u20132322","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol (NY)"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1186\/s12882-019-1595-4","volume":"20","author":"A Athavale","year":"2019","unstructured":"Athavale A et al (2019) Desmopressin and bleeding risk after percutaneous kidney biopsy. BMC Nephrol 20(1):413","journal-title":"BMC Nephrol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05444-4","volume":"43","author":"KW Chen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chen KW et al (2025) Real time monitoring of intrarenal pressures while using the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath. World J Urol 43(1):76","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5134_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.5173\/ceju.2025.0092","volume":"78","author":"A Tsaturyan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Tsaturyan A et al (2025) Measurement and comparison of intrarenal pressures during retrograde intrarenal surgery using novel flexible ureteroscopes with integrated direct in-scope suction: an experimental ex vivo study. Cent Eur J Urol 78(3):394\u2013400","journal-title":"Cent Eur J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5134_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16095","volume":"132","author":"A Hong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hong A et al (2023) Mechanism of urosepsis: relationship between intrarenal pressures and pyelovenous backflow. BJU Int 132(5):512\u2013519","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-04968-5","volume":"42","author":"HY Koo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Koo HY et al (2024) Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for retrograde intrarenal stone surgery in newbie surgeons. World J Urol 42(1):261","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5134_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01865-3","volume":"53","author":"A Bakayoko","year":"2025","unstructured":"Bakayoko A et al (2025) Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study. Urolithiasis 53(1):182","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"8","key":"5134_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2258-y","volume":"36","author":"HQ Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chen HQ et al (2018) Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients. World J Urol 36(8):1309\u20131314","journal-title":"World J Urol"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T10:40:50Z","timestamp":1787654450000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5134"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05134-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"All authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial relationships, or non-financial interests that could inappropriately influence this work.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes data from previously published randomized controlled trials and observational studies. No new human subjects or primary data were collected, so formal approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee was not required. All analyses adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Funding information for each included study was extracted during data abstraction and is available upon request. No funding sources of the included studies influenced the selection, analysis, or interpretation of results in this review.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Disclosure of included studies' funding sources","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}