{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T06:06:19Z","timestamp":1788933979432,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788912000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788912000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100019864","name":"Universidade Nove De Julho","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100019864","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Low-pressure (LP) pneumoperitoneum (intra-abdominal pressure [IAP] &lt;12\u00a0mmHg) has been proposed to reduce pain after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but earlier syntheses combined randomized with non-randomized data, pooled mixed urological procedures, or applied variable pressure definitions. We synthesized the randomized evidence restricted to RARP.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched to 30 April 2026. RCTs comparing IAP &lt;12\u00a0mmHg with IAP \u226512\u00a0mmHg in adults undergoing RARP were eligible. Every extracted value was verified against the source publication. Mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios were pooled under random-effects models with Hartung\u2013Knapp sensitivity analyses; trial sequential analysis used outcome-appropriate required information sizes, and certainty was rated with GRADE.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Five RCTs enrolling 576 patients (280 LP, 296 SP) were included. Pain did not differ at the earliest postoperative assessment (3 trials,\n                      <jats:italic>n=<\/jats:italic>\n                      277; MD \u22120.43 points, 95% CI \u22121.14 to 0.28) nor at 1, 6, 12 or 24\u00a0h, and opioid consumption was unchanged. The information needed to detect a 1-point pain difference had been accrued without the trial sequential monitoring boundary being crossed. LP was associated with greater blood loss (MD +44.7\u00a0mL, +6.0 to +83.5) and longer surgery (MD +7.5\u00a0min, +1.2 to +13.9), with no difference in transfusion, complications, ileus or length of stay.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Randomized evidence shows no analgesic benefit of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in RARP at any assessed time point, and the associated increases in blood loss and operative time are too small to matter clinically. Current evidence supports neither routine adoption nor avoidance; pressure should be individualized to surgical exposure, bleeding risk, and cardiopulmonary tolerance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>PROSPERO CRD420261396874<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T05:08:45Z","timestamp":1788930525000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Yuri","family":"Ramirez-Paliza","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Omar","family":"Kasimieh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valberto","family":"Sanha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Silviane Leite","family":"Melo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guilherme Franceschini","family":"Machado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Murilo","family":"de Almeida Luz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 Arnaldo","family":"Shiomi da Cruz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR1","first-page":"17","volume":"73","author":"RL Siegel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73(1):17\u201348","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"4\u20135","key":"5383_CR2","first-page":"362","volume":"3","author":"G Gandaglia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A et al (2017) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the next standard of care? Eur Urol Focus 3(4\u20135):362\u2013364","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"5383_CR3","volume-title":"Cancer facts & figures 2023","author":"American Cancer Society","year":"2023","unstructured":"American Cancer Society (2023) Cancer facts & figures 2023. American Cancer Society, Atlanta"},{"issue":"4","key":"5383_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq018","volume":"104","author":"AF Kalmar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF et al (2010) Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO\u2082 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 104(4):433\u2013439","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-003-9086-9","volume":"18","author":"D Meininger","year":"2004","unstructured":"Meininger D, Byhahn C, Wolfram M et al (2004) Prolonged intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide in patients undergoing totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 18(5):829\u2013833","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"9","key":"5383_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-2250-z","volume":"19","author":"CP Henny","year":"2005","unstructured":"Henny CP, Hofland J (2005) Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 19(9):1163\u20131171","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"5383_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2012.03.003","volume":"24","author":"H Awad","year":"2012","unstructured":"Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M et al (2012) Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 24(6):494\u2013504","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2014.66.1.3","volume":"66","author":"JR Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee JR (2014) Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 66(1):3\u201311","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR9","first-page":"71","volume":"14","author":"MD Dunn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dunn MD, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 14(1):71\u201382","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5383_CR10","first-page":"107","volume":"4","author":"M Perrin","year":"2004","unstructured":"Perrin M, Fletcher A (2004) Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 4(4):107\u2013110","journal-title":"Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain"},{"issue":"3","key":"5383_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/79.3.369","volume":"79","author":"JI Alexander","year":"1997","unstructured":"Alexander JI (1997) Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 79(3):369\u2013378","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"12","key":"5383_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2011.597","volume":"146","author":"HW Tsai","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tsai HW, Chen YJ, Ho CM et al (2011) Maneuvers to decrease laparoscopy-induced shoulder and upper abdominal pain: a randomized controlled study. Arch Surg 146(12):1360\u20131366","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5383_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182937980","volume":"24","author":"N Vijayaraghavan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vijayaraghavan N, Sistla SC, Kundra P et al (2014) Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(2):127\u2013133","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000000360","volume":"33","author":"MV Madsen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Madsen MV, Istre O, Staehr-Rye AK et al (2016) Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockade and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33(5):341\u2013347","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000000316","volume":"119","author":"AK Staehr-Rye","year":"2014","unstructured":"Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J et al (2014) Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 119(5):1084\u20131092","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000000471","volume":"120","author":"AF Kopman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kopman AF, Naguib M (2015) Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg 120(1):51\u201358","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5383_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-022-01445-2","volume":"17","author":"OM El-Taji","year":"2023","unstructured":"El-Taji OM, Howell-Etienne J, Taktak S, Hanchanale V (2023) Lower vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 17(2):303\u2013312","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"5383_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/4974027","author":"Y Yang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yang Y, Duan Y, Wan X et al (2022) The impact of intra-abdominal pressure on perioperative outcomes in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/4974027","journal-title":"J Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4454-9","volume":"30","author":"DM Ozdemir-van Brunschot","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ozdemir-van Brunschot DM, van Laarhoven KC, Scheffer GJ et al (2016) What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review Surg Endosc 30(5):2049\u20132065","journal-title":"A systematic review Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"5383_CR20","first-page":"233","volume":"121","author":"NR Bhatt","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bhatt NR, Sheridan G, Walsh K et al (2018) Postoperative pain is not reduced by low-pressure laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in urological surgery. BJU Int 121(2):233\u2013244","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01349-7","volume":"16","author":"A West","year":"2022","unstructured":"West A, Hayes J, Bernstein DE et al (2022) Clinical outcomes of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive urological surgery. J Robot Surg 16(5):1183\u20131192","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02221-8","volume":"19","author":"Y Baheer","year":"2025","unstructured":"Baheer Y, Isherwood L, Warner R et al (2025) Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on post-operative pain in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 19(1):72","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"5383_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5383_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","volume":"27","author":"D Luo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 27(6):1785\u20131805","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"5383_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5383_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300117","volume":"22","author":"S Balduzzi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Balduzzi S, R\u00fccker G, Schwarzer G (2019) How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health 22(4):153\u2013160","journal-title":"Evid Based Ment Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"5383_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","volume":"36","author":"W Viechtbauer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36(3):1\u201348","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1164","volume":"7","author":"AA Veroniki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W et al (2016) Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 7(1):55\u201379","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"7414","key":"5383_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557\u2013560","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5383_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d549","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d549","volume":"342","author":"RD Riley","year":"2011","unstructured":"Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (2011) Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 342:d549","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5383_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-017-0315-7","volume":"17","author":"J Wetterslev","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C (2017) Trial sequential analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:39","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"5383_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05038-6","volume":"42","author":"K Keating","year":"2024","unstructured":"Keating K, Holdren C, Eames R et al (2024) The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy part II: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial. World J Urol 42(1):347","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5383_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002729","volume":"208","author":"R Abaza","year":"2022","unstructured":"Abaza R, Ferroni MC (2022) Randomized trial of ultralow vs standard pneumoperitoneum during robotic prostatectomy. J Urol 208(3):626\u2013632","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5383_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03486-4","volume":"39","author":"M Rohloff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rohloff M, Peifer G, Shakuri-Rad J, Maatman TJ (2021) The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial. World J Urol 39(9):2469\u20132474","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5383_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16099","volume":"132","author":"H Alhusseinawi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Alhusseinawi H, Sander L, Rosenvinge PM et al (2023) Low- versus standard-pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised, triple-blinded study. BJU Int 132(5):560\u2013567","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5383_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.14744\/tjtes.2024.78617","volume":"30","author":"M Manici","year":"2024","unstructured":"Manici M, Aykanat IC, Simsek D et al (2024) Anesthesiological and surgical perspectives on using 8 mmHg versus 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 30(6):430\u2013436","journal-title":"Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5383_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16397","volume":"134","author":"GT Reijnders-Boerboom","year":"2024","unstructured":"Reijnders-Boerboom GT, Jacobs LM, Helder LS et al (2024) Recovery and immune function after low pressure pneumoperitoneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 134(3):416\u2013425","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-02061-y","volume":"18","author":"Z Wen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wen Z, Zhang Y, Yang YX, Yang L (2024) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the safety and effectiveness of the AirSeal system with traditional pneumoperitoneum systems in robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Robot Surg 18(1):311","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"5383_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1400","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000000289","volume":"109","author":"G Reijnders-Boerboom","year":"2023","unstructured":"Reijnders-Boerboom G, Albers KI, Jacobs LMC et al (2023) Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 109:1400\u20131411","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5383_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1411","volume":"12","author":"LA McGuinness","year":"2021","unstructured":"McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT (2021) Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 12(1):55\u201361","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T05:08:47Z","timestamp":1788930527000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["5383"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05383-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 July 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published randomized controlled trials and did not involve new data collection from human participants; institutional ethics committee approval was therefore not required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. All data were obtained from previously published randomized controlled trials in which informed consent was reported by the original investigators.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. This manuscript does not contain any individual person\u2019s data in any form.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to publish","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}