{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T01:40:13Z","timestamp":1792460413681,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792281600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792281600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"name":"the Postdoctor Research Fund of West China Hospital, Sichuan University","award":["2025HXBH134"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2025HXBH134"]}]},{"name":"the National Natural Science Foundation of China","award":["82372831,82403963, 82170785"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82372831,82403963, 82170785"]}]},{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan, China","award":["2025ZNSFSC1892"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2025ZNSFSC1892"]}]},{"name":"National Key Research and Development Program","award":["2024YFB3311703-1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2024YFB3311703-1"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T12:14:42Z","timestamp":1792325682000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Guoqing","family":"Zhu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bin","family":"Zeng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weizhen","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weichao","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sheng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wei","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xingyu","family":"Xiong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hang","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"5438_CR1","volume":"76","author":"H Sung","year":"2026","unstructured":"Sung H et al (2026) Global cancer statistics 2024: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 34 cancers in 186 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 76(4):e70090","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2025.02.020","volume":"87","author":"A Bex","year":"2025","unstructured":"Bex A et al (2025) European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2025 update. Eur Urol 87(6):683\u2013696","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5438_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02935-z","volume":"38","author":"R Abaza","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abaza R, Gerhard RS, Martinez O (2020) Feasibility of adopting retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy after extensive transperitoneal experience. World J Urol 38(5):1087\u20131092","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5438_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0023","volume":"27","author":"A Hughes-Hallett","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hughes-Hallett A et al (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869\u2013874","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5438_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2018.08.003","volume":"4","author":"L Marconi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Marconi L, Challacombe B (2018) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: retro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol Focus 4(5):632\u2013635","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"4","key":"5438_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.03.010","volume":"4","author":"C Camp","year":"2018","unstructured":"Camp C et al (2018) Short-term outcomes and costs following partial nephrectomy in England: a population-based study. Eur Urol Focus 4(4):579\u2013585","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"5438_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2022.03.015","volume":"40","author":"U Carbonara","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carbonara U et al (2022) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 40:27\u201337","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","volume":"19","author":"RZ Rong","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rong RZ et al (2025) Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies. J Robot Surg 19(1):56","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-04796-7","volume":"42","author":"N Shrivastava","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shrivastava N et al (2024) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 42(1):83","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5438_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"25","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603\u2013605","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"5438_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5438_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5438_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02903-7","volume":"38","author":"HR Mittakanti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mittakanti HR et al (2020) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol 38(5):1093\u20131099","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5438_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4295","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07919-4","volume":"35","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Porpiglia F et al (2021) Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project). Surg Endosc 35(8):4295\u20134304","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2023.06.004","volume":"9","author":"JM Rich","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rich JM et al (2023) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an analysis from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium. Eur Urol Focus 9(6):1059\u20131064","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-014-1312-7","volume":"32","author":"SH Choo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Choo SH et al (2014) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol 32(6):1523\u20131529","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2018.12.010","volume":"4","author":"P Dell'Oglio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dell\u2019Oglio P et al (2021) The impact of surgical strategy in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it beneficial to treat anterior tumours with transperitoneal access and posterior tumours with retroperitoneal access? Eur Urol Oncol 4(1):112\u2013116","journal-title":"Eur Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01798-2","volume":"18","author":"NJ Lanzotti","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lanzotti NJ et al (2024) Robotic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for anterior renal mass nephron-sparing surgery. J Robot Surg 18(1):75","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0603","volume":"31","author":"MJ Maurice","year":"2017","unstructured":"Maurice MJ et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31(2):158\u2013162","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5438_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2021.21008","volume":"47","author":"A Eraky","year":"2021","unstructured":"Eraky A et al (2021) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center matched-pair analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach. Turk J Urol 47(4):305\u2013312","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-022-01162-w","volume":"22","author":"H Tang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tang H et al (2022) Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy through transabdominal or retroperitoneal approaches in patients with T1b renal tumor. BMC Urol 22(1):208","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"5438_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.06.026","volume":"120","author":"S Arora","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arora S et al (2018) Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting. Urology 120:131\u2013137","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000483","volume":"28","author":"AA Laviana","year":"2018","unstructured":"Laviana AA et al (2018) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing. Curr Opin Urol 28(2):108\u2013114","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2020.08.012","volume":"7","author":"NN Harke","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harke NN et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7(6):1363\u20131370","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"11","key":"5438_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4175","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03741-2","volume":"39","author":"U Carbonara","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carbonara U et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis. World J Urol 39(11):4175\u20134182","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5438_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0076","volume":"29","author":"EH Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim EH et al (2015) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol 29(10):1137\u20131142","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16653","volume":"135","author":"S K\u00e4lble","year":"2025","unstructured":"K\u00e4lble S et al (2025) Randomised controlled feasibility trial of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the ROPARN study. BJU Int 135(6):977\u2013986","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01860-7","volume":"18","author":"R Bertolo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bertolo R et al (2024) Postoperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matched comparison focused on patient mobilization, return to bowel function, and pain. J Robot Surg 18(1):96","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01086-3","volume":"15","author":"T Takagi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Takagi T et al (2021) Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. J Robot Surg 15(1):99\u2013104","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12020722","volume":"12","author":"W Zhao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhao W et al (2023) Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for patients with completely lower pole renal tumors. J Clin Med 12(2):722","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"5438_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2021.773345","volume":"11","author":"L Gu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gu L et al (2021) Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for patients with complete upper pole renal tumors. Front Oncol 11:773345","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5438_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0641","volume":"27","author":"K Tanaka","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tanaka K et al (2013) Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan. J Endourol 27(11):1384\u20131388","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5438_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2062-0","volume":"35","author":"SP Stroup","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stroup SP et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35(11):1721\u20131728","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.14424","volume":"28","author":"Y Kobari","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kobari Y et al (2021) Comparison of postoperative recovery after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of T1 renal tumors through retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach: a Japanese single institutional analysis. Int J Urol 28(2):183\u2013188","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.07.045","volume":"84","author":"GE Gin","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gin GE et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor complexity. Urology 84(6):1355\u20131360","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"5438_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2283","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-04101-4","volume":"40","author":"G Sharma","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sharma G et al (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis of VCQI database. World J Urol 40(9):2283\u20132291","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2019.0410","volume":"34","author":"CI Choi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Choi CI et al (2020) Comparison by pentafecta criteria of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for large renal tumors. J Endourol 34(2):175\u2013183","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65.e21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2025.07.027","volume":"44","author":"C Zhang","year":"2026","unstructured":"Zhang C et al (2026) Assessing pentafecta achievement and survival of retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for anterior tumors: an update on the outcomes of a long-term follow-up. Urol Oncol 44(1):65.e21-65.e29","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5438_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.70625","volume":"14","author":"F Shu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Shu F et al (2025) A predictive model for surgical approach selection in robotic partial nephrectomy and its perioperative outcomes based on single-center retrospective data. Cancer Med 14(3):e70625","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2018.0313","volume":"29","author":"DJ Paulucci","year":"2019","unstructured":"Paulucci DJ et al (2019) A multi-institutional propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 posterior tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(1):29\u201334","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"2","key":"5438_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2022.11.023","volume":"41","author":"KE Okhawere","year":"2023","unstructured":"Okhawere KE et al (2023) A comparison of outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with completely endophytic kidney tumors. Urol Oncol 41(2):111.e1-111.e6","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4","volume":"19","author":"MT Awan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Awan MT et al (2025) A comparative analysis of pre-operative factors, intra-operative events and post-operative outcomes assessing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for robotic partial nephrectomy in T1 renal cancer: a multicenter international experience. J Robot Surg 19(1):543","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"5438_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3299","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.3888","volume":"10","author":"J Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou J et al (2021) Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better? Cancer Med 10(10):3299\u20133308","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"5438_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2563","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01685-w","volume":"17","author":"A Bourgi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bourgi A et al (2023) A comparison of perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 17(6):2563\u20132574","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"5438_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2020.592193","volume":"10","author":"D Zhu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhu D et al (2020) Comparison of outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis based on comparative studies. Front Oncol 10:592193","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5438_CR46","first-page":"15","volume":"77","author":"S Katsimperis","year":"2024","unstructured":"Katsimperis S et al (2024) The use of indocyanine green in partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. Cent European J Urol 77(1):15\u201321","journal-title":"Cent European J Urol"},{"key":"5438_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1630319","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1630319","volume":"12","author":"T Silvestri","year":"2025","unstructured":"Silvestri T et al (2025) Multiport anterior retroperitoneal access for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an innovative technique for renal tumour. Front Surg 12:1630319","journal-title":"Front Surg"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T01:02:57Z","timestamp":1792458177000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]]},"references-count":47,"alternative-id":["5438"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-026-05438-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 August 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 October 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}