{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,24]],"date-time":"2026-04-24T21:55:38Z","timestamp":1777067738652,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]],"date-time":"2019-06-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]],"date-time":"2019-06-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561593600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiol med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]],"date-time":"2019-06-27T08:24:23Z","timestamp":1561623863000},"page":"1006-1017","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"124","author":[{"given":"Mar\u00eda del Mar","family":"Travieso-Aja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Maldonado-Saluzzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pedro","family":"Naranjo-Santana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Ruiz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wilsa","family":"Severino-Rond\u00f3n","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mario","family":"Rodr\u00edguez Rodr\u00edguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"V\u00edctor","family":"Vega Ben\u00edtez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4153-3028","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Octavio","family":"P\u00e9rez-Luzardo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"1056_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21492","volume":"68","author":"F Bray","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394\u2013424. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21492","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"1056_CR2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"WHO position paper on mammography screening","author":"WHO","year":"2014","unstructured":"WHO (2014) WHO position paper on mammography screening. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 1\u201384"},{"issue":"12","key":"1056_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4371","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4336-0","volume":"26","author":"UC Lalji","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lalji UC, Houben IP, Prevos R, Gommers S, van Goethem M, Vanwetswinkel S, Pijnappel R, Steeman R, Frotscher C, Mok W, Nelemans P, Smidt ML, Beets-Tan RG, Wildberger JE, Lobbes MB (2016) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study. Eur Radiol 26(12):4371\u20134379. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-016-4336-0","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2017.08.005","volume":"39","author":"BK Patel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Patel BK, Lobbes MBI, Lewin J (2018) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 39(1):70\u201379. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.sult.2017.08.005","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"key":"1056_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-3007-7","volume":"24","author":"EM Fallenberg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, Engelken F, Krohn M, Singh JM, Ingold-Heppner B, Winzer KJ, Bick U, Renz DM (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol 24:256\u2013264. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-013-3007-7","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R94","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3210","volume":"14","author":"C Dromain","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg EM, Jong RA, Koomen M, Hendrick RE, Tardivon A, Toledano A (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14(3):R94. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/bcr3210","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"1056_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1668","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3154-5","volume":"24","author":"MB Lobbes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J, Nijssen EC, Nelemans PJ, van Roozendaal L, Smidt ML, Heuts E, Wildberger JE (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol 24(7):1668\u20131676. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3154-5","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1056_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rx.2014.05.003","volume":"56","author":"MM Travieso Aja","year":"2014","unstructured":"Travieso Aja MM, Rodriguez Rodriguez M, Alayon Hernandez S, Vega Benitez V, Luzardo OP (2014) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography. Radiologia 56(5):390\u2013399. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rx.2014.05.003","journal-title":"Radiologia"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2017.10.017","volume":"73","author":"MDM Travieso-Aja","year":"2018","unstructured":"Travieso-Aja MDM, Naranjo-Santana P, Fernandez-Ruiz C, Severino-Rondon W, Maldonado-Saluzzi D, Rodriguez Rodriguez M, Vega-Benitez V, Luzardo OP (2018) Factors affecting the precision of lesion sizing with contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. Clin Radiol 73(3):296\u2013303. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2017.10.017","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"1056_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5567-7","volume":"23","author":"M Ali-Mucheru","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ali-Mucheru M, Pockaj B, Patel B, Pizzitola V, Wasif N, Stucky CC, Gray R (2016) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):649\u2013655. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-016-5567-7","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1056_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.7150\/jca.10705","volume":"6","author":"MB Lobbes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lobbes MB, Lalji UC, Nelemans PJ, Houben I, Smidt ML, Heuts E, de Vries B, Wildberger JE, Beets-Tan RG (2015) The quality of tumor size assessment by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI. J Cancer 6(2):144\u2013150. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7150\/jca.10705","journal-title":"J Cancer"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"1056_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0720-048X(12)70068-2","volume":"81","author":"F Thibault","year":"2012","unstructured":"Thibault F, Balleyguier C, Tardivon A, Dromain C (2012) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI? Eur J Radiol 81(Suppl 1):S162\u2013S164. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0720-048X(12)70068-2","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1056_CR13","unstructured":"Lewin J, Jochelson MS (2018) White paper on contrast enhanced digital mammography. White Papers of the Society of Breast Imaging"},{"key":"1056_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.07.004","volume":"94","author":"IPL Houben","year":"2017","unstructured":"Houben IPL, Van de Voorde P, Jeukens C, Wildberger JE, Kooreman LF, Smidt ML, Lobbes MBI (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits. Eur J Radiol 94:31\u201337. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.07.004","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1056_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2016.08.013","volume":"98","author":"L Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li L, Roth R, Germaine P, Ren S, Lee M, Hunter K, Tinney E, Liao L (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging 98(2):113\u2013123. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diii.2016.08.013","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"1056_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.07.003","volume":"46","author":"BK Patel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patel BK, Naylor ME, Kosiorek HE, Lopez-Alvarez YM, Miller AM, Pizzitola VJ, Pockaj BA (2017) Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion. Clin Imaging 46:44\u201352. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.07.003","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-016-0681-8","volume":"24","author":"M Mori","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S, Daniels MI, Watanabe C, Hirose M, Nakamura S (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer 24(1):104\u2013110. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12282-016-0681-8","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"key":"1056_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185117735561","volume":"59","author":"V Richter","year":"2018","unstructured":"Richter V, Hatterman V, Preibsch H, Bahrs SD, Hahn M, Nikolaou K, Wiesinger B (2018) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients with MRI contraindications. Acta Radiol 59:798\u2013805. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0284185117735561","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12681","volume":"23","author":"TC Lewis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lewis TC, Pizzitola VJ, Giurescu ME, Eversman WG, Lorans R, Robinson KA, Patel BK (2017) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: a single-institution experience of the first 208 cases. Breast J 23(1):67\u201376. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12681","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"1056_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.04.008","volume":"28","author":"AS Tagliafico","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Rossi F, Signori A, Sormani MP, Valdora F, Calabrese M, Houssami N (2016) Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 28:13\u201319. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.breast.2016.04.008","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"2","key":"1056_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.18749","volume":"210","author":"MF Covington","year":"2018","unstructured":"Covington MF, Pizzitola VJ, Lorans R, Pockaj BA, Northfelt DW, Appleton CM, Patel BK (2018) The Future of contrast-enhanced mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(2):292\u2013300. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.17.18749","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2013.10.002","volume":"95","author":"S Badr","year":"2014","unstructured":"Badr S, Laurent N, Regis C, Boulanger L, Lemaille S, Poncelet E (2014) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(3):245\u2013258. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diii.2013.10.002","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"1056_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160157","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20160157","volume":"89","author":"RM Kamal","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kamal RM, Helal MH, Mansour SM, Haggag MA, Nada OM, Farahat IG, Alieldin NH (2016) Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? Br J Radiol 89:20160157. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20160157","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1056_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.03.005","volume":"84","author":"RM Kamal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kamal RM, Helal MH, Wessam R, Mansour SM, Godda I, Alieldin N (2015) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 84(6):1049\u20131055. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.03.005","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1056_CR25","volume-title":"ACR BI-RADS\u00ae atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system","author":"CJ D\u2019Orsi","year":"2013","unstructured":"D\u2019Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (2013) ACR BI-RADS\u00ae atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2291010898","volume":"229","author":"NA Obuchowski","year":"2003","unstructured":"Obuchowski NA (2003) Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 229(1):3\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2291010898","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1056_CR27","unstructured":"Wallis M, Borrelli C, Cohen S, Duncan A, Given-Wilson R, Jenkins J, Kearins O, Pinder S, Sharma N, Sibbering M, Steel J, Turnbull A (2016) Clinical guidance for breast cancer screening assessment. Public Health England, London. \n                    https:\/\/associationofbreastsurgery.org.uk\/media\/1414\/nhs-bsp-clinical-guidance-for-breast-cancer-screening-assessment.pdf"},{"issue":"4","key":"1056_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3904-z","volume":"26","author":"YC Cheung","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cheung YC, Tsai HP, Lo YF, Ueng SH, Huang PC, Chen SC (2016) Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis. Eur Radiol 26(4):1082\u20131089. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3904-z","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1056_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.05.009","volume":"71","author":"SL Tennant","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tennant SL, James JJ, Cornford EJ, Chen Y, Burrell HC, Hamilton LJ, Girio-Fragkoulakis C (2016) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting. Clin Radiol 71(11):1148\u20131155. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2016.05.009","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1186\/s40064-016-2385-0","volume":"5","author":"Q Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang Q, Li K, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou Z, Feng Y (2016) Preclinical study of diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI for breast diseases in China. Springerplus 5(1):763. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40064-016-2385-0","journal-title":"Springerplus"},{"key":"1056_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4650-6","author":"EM Fallenberg","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fallenberg EM, Schmitzberger FF, Amer H, Ingold-Heppner B, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Engelken F, Mann RM, Renz DM, Bick U, Hamm B, Dromain C (2016) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI\u2014clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation. Eur Radiol. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-016-4650-6","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1056_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.893018","volume":"21","author":"E Luczynska","year":"2015","unstructured":"Luczynska E, Heinze-Paluchowska S, Hendrick E, Dyczek S, Rys J, Herman K, Blecharz P, Jakubowicz J (2015) Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. Med Sci Monit 21:1358\u20131367. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/MSM.893018","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2016161106","volume":"283","author":"B Bennani-Baiti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA (2017) MR imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in mammographic microcalcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 283(3):692\u2013701. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2016161106","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1056_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-010-1326-9","volume":"126","author":"LR Medeiros","year":"2011","unstructured":"Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD, Edelweiss MI, Edelweiss M, Silva FR, Winnnikow EP, Simoes Pires PD, Rosa MI (2011) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(2):273\u2013285. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-010-1326-9","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W292","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.6049","volume":"198","author":"CM Checka","year":"2012","unstructured":"Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H (2012) The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(3):W292\u2013W295. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.10.6049","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1056_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0971","volume":"164","author":"HD Nelson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nelson HD, O\u2019Meara ES, Kerlikowske K, Balch S, Miglioretti D (2016) Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med 164(4):226\u2013235. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M15-0971","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"1056_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12446","author":"MD Travieso Aja","year":"2016","unstructured":"Travieso Aja MD, Santana Lopez G, Rodriguez Rodriguez M, Luzardo OP (2016) Is contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) helpful in differentiating diabetic mastopathy from breast carcinoma? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12446","journal-title":"J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1056_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2014.06.012","volume":"21","author":"KS Blum","year":"2014","unstructured":"Blum KS, Rubbert C, Mathys B, Antoch G, Mohrmann S, Obenauer S (2014) Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results. Acad Radiol 21(11):1363\u20131369. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acra.2014.06.012","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e32190","DOI":"10.5812\/iranjradiol.32190","volume":"13","author":"MD Travieso Aja","year":"2016","unstructured":"Travieso Aja MD, Munoz P, Rodriguez Rodriguez M, Vega Benitez V, Luzardo OP (2016) A case of a concurrent and co-located invasive carcinoma and a fibroadenoma to illustrate the potential of dual-energy, contrast-enhanced digital mammography on the diagnosis of complex breast lesions. Iran J Radiol 13(3):e32190. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5812\/iranjradiol.32190","journal-title":"Iran J Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121084","volume":"266","author":"MS Jochelson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS, Heerdt AS, Thornton C, Moskowitz CS, Ferrara J, Morris EA (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266(3):743\u2013751. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.12121084","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1056_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12774","author":"A McGuire","year":"2017","unstructured":"McGuire A, O\u2019Leary DP, Livingstone V, Khan Z, O\u2019Connell F, Paul H, Relihan N, Ryan M (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectrum mammography\u2014a useful adjunct to digital mammography in predicting tumor size. Breast J. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12774","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"1","key":"1056_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12680","volume":"23","author":"B Katz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Katz B, Raker C, Edmonson D, Gass J, Stuckey A, Rizack T (2017) Predicting breast tumor size for pre-operative planning: which imaging modality is best? Breast J 23(1):52\u201358. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12680","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"1056_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-13-328","volume":"13","author":"IV Gruber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gruber IV, Rueckert M, Kagan KO, Staebler A, Siegmann KC, Hartkopf A, Wallwiener D, Hahn M (2013) Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 13:328. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2407-13-328","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"1056_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185114524089","volume":"56","author":"S Mennella","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mennella S, Garlaschi A, Paparo F, Perillo M, Celenza M, Massa T, Rollandi GA, Garlaschi G (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: factors affecting the accuracy of preoperative lesion sizing. Acta Radiol 56(3):260\u2013268. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0284185114524089","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1056_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3816","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4424-4","volume":"22","author":"HW Lai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lai HW, Chen DR, Wu YC, Chen CJ, Lee CW, Kuo SJ, Chen ST, Wu HK (2015) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with sonography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor size: a concordance analysis with histopathologically determined tumor size. Ann Surg Oncol 22(12):3816\u20133823. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-015-4424-4","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1056_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3935-5","volume":"26","author":"M Rominger","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rominger M, Berg D, Frauenfelder T, Ramaswamy A, Timmesfeld N (2016) Which factors influence MRI-pathology concordance of tumour size measurements in breast cancer? Eur Radiol 26(5):1457\u20131465. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3935-5","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1056_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185117698860","author":"SH Baek","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baek SH, Choi WJ, Cha JH, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Chae EY (2017) Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0284185117698860","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"}],"container-title":["La radiologia medica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,25]],"date-time":"2020-06-25T23:25:52Z","timestamp":1593127552000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1056"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11547-019-01056-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-8362","1826-6983"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0033-8362","type":"print"},{"value":"1826-6983","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 November 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 June 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 June 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}