{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T11:03:15Z","timestamp":1792494195576,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672790400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672790400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006447","name":"University of Zurich","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006447","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiol med"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To compare the positive predictive values (PPVs) of BI-RADS categories used to assess pure mammographic calcifications in women with and without a previous history of breast cancer (PHBC).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In this retrospective study, all consecutive pure mammographic calcifications (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009320) undergoing a stereotactic biopsy between 2016 and 2018 were identified. Mammograms were evaluated in consensus by two radiologists according to BI-RADS and blinded to patient history and pathology results. Final pathologic results were used as the standard of reference. PPV of BI-RADS categories were compared between the two groups. Data were evaluated using standard statistics, Mann\u2013Whitney <jats:italic>U<\/jats:italic> tests and Chi-square tests.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Two hundred sixty-eight patients (274 lesions, median age 54\u00a0years, inter-quartile range, 50\u201365\u00a0years) with a PHBC (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200946) and without a PHBC (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009222) were included. Overall PPVs were the following: BI-RADS 2, 0% (0 of 56); BI-RADS 3, 9.1% (1 of 11); BI-RADS 4a, 16.2% (6 of 37); BI-RADS 4b, 37.5% (48 of 128); BI-RADS 4c, 47.3% (18 of 38) and BI-RADS 5, 100% (4 of 4). The PPV of BI-RADS categories was similar in patients with and without a PHBC (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009.715). Calcifications were more often malignant in patients with a PHBC older than 10\u00a0years (47.3%, 9 of 19) compared to 1\u20132\u00a0years (25%, 1 of 4), 2\u20135\u00a0years (20%, 2 of 10) and 5\u201310\u00a0years (0%, of 13) from the first breast cancer (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009.005).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>PPV of mammographic calcifications is similar in women with or without PHBC when BI-RADS classification is strictly applied. A higher risk of malignancy was observed in patients with a PHBC longer than 10\u00a0years.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T11:34:38Z","timestamp":1672832078000},"page":"149-159","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Mammographic calcifications undergoing percutaneous biopsy: outcome in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"128","author":[{"given":"Valeria","family":"Bertani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Berger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Eberhard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristina","family":"L\u00e5ng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martina","family":"Urbani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manuela","family":"La Grassa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Balestreri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Boss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Frauenfelder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3923-8115","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Magda","family":"Marcon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"1583_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2466","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2008.19.8424","volume":"27","author":"SJ Anderson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ et al (2009) Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2466\u20132473. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2008.19.8424","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"1583_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.21551","volume":"106","author":"Y Komoike","year":"2006","unstructured":"Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y et al (2006) Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases. Cancer 106:35\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cncr.21551","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"1583_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2019182475","volume":"292","author":"KJ Wernli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wernli KJ, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al (2019) Surveillance breast MRI and mammography: comparison in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Radiology 292:311\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2019182475","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2017.11.034","volume":"15","author":"DL Monticciolo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L et al (2018) Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 15:408\u2013414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2017.11.034","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"1583_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdz173","volume":"30","author":"F Cardoso","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al (2019) Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 30:1194\u20131220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdz173","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"key":"1583_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-008-0023-4","volume":"114","author":"WL Lu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lu WL, Jansen L, Post WJ, Bonnema J, Van de Velde JC, De Bock GH (2009) Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:403\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-008-0023-4","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"1583_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-008-9986-4","volume":"114","author":"L Paszat","year":"2009","unstructured":"Paszat L, Sutradhar R, Grunfeld E et al (2009) Outcomes of surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a population-based case series. Breast Canceres Treat 114:169\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-008-9986-4","journal-title":"Breast Canceres Treat"},{"key":"1583_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2017.854","volume":"178","author":"DSM Buist","year":"2018","unstructured":"Buist DSM, Abraham L, Lee CI et al (2018) Breast biopsy intensity and findings following breast cancer screening in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer. JAMA Intern Med 178:458\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamainternmed.2017.854","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"1583_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa022152","volume":"347","author":"B Fisher","year":"2002","unstructured":"Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233\u20131241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa022152","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"1583_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa020989","volume":"347","author":"U Veronesi","year":"2002","unstructured":"Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227\u20131232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa020989","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"1583_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.7298","volume":"198","author":"T Chansakul","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ (2012) The postconservation breast: part 1, expected imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 198:321\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.10.7298","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12111461","volume":"265","author":"AM Bluekens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 265:707\u2013714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.12111461","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR13","unstructured":"Sickles E DOC, Bassett LW, et al. (2013) BI-RADS: Mammography, 5th edn. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS\u2013breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston"},{"key":"1583_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1378","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.3423","volume":"194","author":"CK Bent","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bent CK, Bassett LW, D\u2019Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1378\u20131383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.09.3423","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2212010164","volume":"221","author":"WA Berg","year":"2001","unstructured":"Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495\u2013503. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2212010164","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2422052130","volume":"242","author":"ES Burnside","year":"2007","unstructured":"Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388\u2013395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2422052130","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-010-1106-6","volume":"124","author":"DS Buist","year":"2010","unstructured":"Buist DS, Abraham LA, Barlow WE et al (2010) Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:863\u2013873. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-010-1106-6","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"1583_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.188","volume":"305","author":"N Houssami","year":"2011","unstructured":"Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 305:790\u2013799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2011.188","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"1583_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3000","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.08.007","volume":"45","author":"W Lu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lu W, Schaapveld M, Jansen L et al (2009) The value of surveillance mammography of the contralateral breast in patients with a history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3000\u20133007. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.08.007","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"1583_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.11887","volume":"100","author":"U Kettritz","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I et al (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 100:245\u2013251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cncr.11887","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"1583_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.171.1.9648759","volume":"171","author":"L Liberman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:35\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.171.1.9648759","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1144","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1313102","volume":"184","author":"M Rominger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N (2012) Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round\/punctate microcalcifications. Rofo 184:1144\u20131152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0032-1313102","journal-title":"Rofo"},{"key":"1583_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1769","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.174.6.1741769","volume":"174","author":"WA Berg","year":"2000","unstructured":"Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1769\u20131777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.174.6.1741769","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2392042127","volume":"239","author":"E Lazarus","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385\u2013391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2392042127","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2016.09.010","volume":"24","author":"AY Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee AY, Wisner DJ, Aminololama-Shakeri S et al (2017) Inter-reader variability in the use of BI-RADS descriptors for suspicious findings on diagnostic mammography: a multi-institution study of 10 academic radiologists. Acad Radiol 24:60\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acra.2016.09.010","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"1583_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.07.011","volume":"81","author":"JM Timmers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek AL, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ (2012) A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists. Eur J Radiol 81:2184\u20132188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.07.011","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1583_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017170770","volume":"287","author":"M Elezaby","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elezaby M, Li G, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Burnside ES, DeMartini WB (2018) ACR BI-RADS assessment category 4 subdivisions in diagnostic mammography: utilization and outcomes in the national mammography database. Radiology 287:416\u2013422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2017170770","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1583_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/95.4.302","volume":"95","author":"E Tan-Chiu","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tan-Chiu E, Wang J, Costantino JP et al (2003) Effects of tamoxifen on benign breast disease in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:302\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/95.4.302","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"1583_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2007.11.029","volume":"71","author":"B Kreike","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T et al (2008) Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1014\u20131021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2007.11.029","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"key":"1583_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-016-0676-8","volume":"121","author":"L Bucchi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bucchi L, Belli P, Benelli E et al (2016) (2016) Recommendations for breast imaging follow-up of women with a previous history of breast cancer: position paper from the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa) and the Italian College of Breast Radiologist (ICBR) by SIRM. Radiol Med 121:891\u2013896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11547-016-0676-8","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"1583_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.6881","volume":"198","author":"T Chansakul","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ (2012) The postconservation breast: part 2, Imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:331\u2013343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.11.6881","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.16.16300","volume":"208","author":"DL Lam","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lam DL, Houssami N, Lee JM (2017) Imaging surveillance after primary breast cancer treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:676\u2013686. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.16.16300","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1583_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2019182599","volume":"292","author":"LJ Grimm","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grimm LJ, Miller MM, Thomas SM et al (2019) Growth dynamics of mammographic calcifications: differentiating ductal carcinoma in situ from benign breast disease. Radiology 292:77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2019182599","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["La radiologia medica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,19]],"date-time":"2023-02-19T07:58:34Z","timestamp":1676793514000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]}},"alternative-id":["1583"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11547-022-01583-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1826-6983"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1826-6983","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 August 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The institutional review board approved this retrospective study (CRO-2019-83). The requirement for written informed consent was waived.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}