{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:52:57Z","timestamp":1786981977256,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["CURR MED SCI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]],"date-time":"2020-10-29T14:03:09Z","timestamp":1603980189000},"page":"951-959","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook\u2019s Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Hui","family":"Du","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Na","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chan-yun","family":"Xiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guo-qiang","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yun","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"419621","key":"2274_CR1","first-page":"1","volume":"2014","author":"OL Lawani","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lawani OL, Onyebuchi AK, Iyoke CA, et al. Obstetric outcome and significance of labour induction in a health resource poor setting. J Obstet Gynecol Int, 2014,2014(419621):1\u20135","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR2","first-page":"386","volume":"114","author":"Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics ACOP","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics ACOP ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 114(1):386\u2013397","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2274_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486.e481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","volume":"206","author":"SK Laughon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, et al. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012,206(6):486.e481\u2013486.e489","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2274_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e65612","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0065612","volume":"8","author":"JP Vogel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vogel JP, Souza JP, G\u00fclmezoglu AM. Patterns and outcomes of induction of labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health. PloS One, 2013,8(6):e65612","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"2274_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02065.x","volume":"116","author":"E Mozurkewich","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, et al. Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review. BJOG, 2009,116(5):626\u2013636","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"2274_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","volume":"105","author":"FP Vrouenraets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol, 2005,105(4):690\u2013697","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2274_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309.e301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.014","volume":"206","author":"MG Rosenstein","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rosenstein MG, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age in women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012,206(4):309.e301\u2013309.e307","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9713","key":"2274_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5","volume":"375","author":"P Lumbiganon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007\u201308. Lancet, 2010,375(9713):490\u2013499","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"2274_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4492-8","volume":"296","author":"J Duro-G\u00f3mez","year":"2017","unstructured":"Duro-G\u00f3mez J, Garrido-Oyarz\u00fan MF, Rodr\u00edguez-Mar\u00edn AB, et al. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook\u2019s balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017,296(4):777\u2013781","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"9","key":"2274_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15047","volume":"125","author":"M Diederen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, et al. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG, 2018,125(9):1086\u20131095","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-4061-5","volume":"21","author":"MR Wise","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wise MR, Marriott J, Battin M, et al. Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 2020,21(1):1\u201311","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0550-z","volume":"15","author":"C Wilkinson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wilkinson C, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015,15(1):126\u2013133","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12846","volume":"122","author":"C Wilkinson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E 2 (OPRA study). BJOG, 2015,122(1):94\u2013104","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"2274_CR14","first-page":"1","volume":"210","author":"M Jozwiak","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012,210(3):1\u20133","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","volume":"170","author":"M Jozwiak","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Rengerink KO, Ten Eikelder ML, et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013,170(1):137\u2013145","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2274_CR16","first-page":"No.: CD003101","volume":"1","author":"J Thomas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, et al. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014,1(6):No.: CD003101","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"2274_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.853730","volume":"34","author":"W Chen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chen W, Zhou Y, Pu X, et al. Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014,34(3):255\u2013258","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2274_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3547-3","volume":"1","author":"C Du","year":"2015","unstructured":"Du C, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015,1(6):1221\u20131227","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR19","first-page":"80","volume":"37","author":"H Ren","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ren H, Fan JH, Zhang L, et al. Clinical study of double-balloon catheter in full-term pregnancy to promote cevical maturity. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ, 2017,37(1):80\u201384","journal-title":"Shanghai Jiaotong Univ"},{"issue":"8","key":"2274_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","volume":"35","author":"E L\u00f8kkegaard","year":"2015","unstructured":"L\u00f8kkegaard E, Lundstr\u00f8m M, Kj\u00e6r M, et al. Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2015,35(8):797\u2013802","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2274_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0152","volume":"42","author":"K Suffecool","year":"2014","unstructured":"Suffecool K, Rosenn BM, Kam S, et al. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Perinat Med, 2014,42(2):213\u2013218","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"2274_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1136\/eb-2012-101021","volume":"18","author":"AC Sciscione","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sciscione AC, Ruhstaller K. Double-balloon catheter results in higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h when compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert. Evid Based Med, 2013,18(4):140\u2013141","journal-title":"Evid Based Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"2274_CR23","first-page":"521","volume":"45","author":"J Grange","year":"2017","unstructured":"Grange J, Dimet J, Vital M, et al. Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, 2017,45(10):521\u2013527","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2274_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","volume":"123","author":"RK Edwards","year":"2014","unstructured":"Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Berger JL, et al. Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2014,123(6):1280\u20131287","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2274_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125.e121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020","volume":"207","author":"A Cromi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, et al. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012,207(2):125.e121\u2013125.e127","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2274_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12334","volume":"45","author":"NS Carlson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Carlson NS, Corwin EJ, Hernandez TL, et al. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: a retrospective cohort study. Birth, 2018,45(2):159\u2013168","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"2Part1","key":"2274_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","volume":"114","author":"L Pevzner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, et al. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,114(2 Part 1):261\u2013267","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2274_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001097","volume":"126","author":"CM Scifres","year":"2015","unstructured":"Scifres CM, Feghali M, Dumont T, et al. Large-for-gestational-age ultrasound diagnosis and risk for cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol, 2015,126(5):978\u2013986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2274_CR29","first-page":"452","volume":"103","author":"FS Nuthalapaty","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,103(3):452\u2013456","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2274_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12588","volume":"57","author":"M Beckmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beckmann M, Gibbons K, Flenady V, et al. Predictors of mode of birth and duration of labour following induction using prostaglandin vaginal gel. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2017,57(2):168\u2013175","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2274_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007","volume":"203","author":"J Ivars","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ivars J, Garabedian C, Devos P, et al.. Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016,203:309\u2013314","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2274_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","volume":"114","author":"Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists","year":"2009","unstructured":"Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,114(2):386\u2013397","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2274_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1416351","volume":"32","author":"L Zhao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhao L, Lin Y, Jiang TT, et al. Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China. J Matern Fetal Med, 2019,32(10):1721\u20131727","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"2274_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1159\/000350798","volume":"76","author":"GH Son","year":"2013","unstructured":"Son GH, Kim JH, Kwon JY, et al. Risk factors for cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation. Gynecol Obstet Inves, 2013,76(4):254\u2013259","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Inves"},{"issue":"1","key":"2274_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4929-8","volume":"299","author":"YR Liu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Liu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, et al. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019,299(1):7\u201312","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Current Medical Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,2]],"date-time":"2020-11-02T20:03:48Z","timestamp":1604347428000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2274"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11596-020-2274-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["2096-5230","2523-899X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2096-5230","type":"print"},{"value":"2523-899X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 October 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}