{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:52:54Z","timestamp":1786981974457,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,1]],"date-time":"2019-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1551398400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,1]],"date-time":"2019-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1551398400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["jgisurgery.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,21]],"date-time":"2018-11-21T15:01:31Z","timestamp":1542812491000},"page":"618-625","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Gaik S.","family":"Quah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guy D.","family":"Eslick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1743-7052","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael R.","family":"Cox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1007\/s002689910045","article-title":"Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis","volume":"24","author":"Svanes","year":"2000","journal-title":"World J Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1159\/000264653","article-title":"Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment","volume":"27","author":"Bertleff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Dig Surg."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800770916","article-title":"Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"77","author":"Mouret","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13517013317752","article-title":"Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"17","author":"Antoniou","year":"2013","journal-title":"JSLS."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13976","DOI":"10.1038\/srep13976","article-title":"An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer","volume":"5","author":"Zhou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Sci Rep."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-003-8266-y","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Lau","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surg Endosc."},{"issue":"Pt A","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.07.077","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"33","author":"Tan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0045","first-page":"CD004778","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease","volume":"2","author":"Sanabria","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"339","author":"Group P","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.2307\/2983604","article-title":"Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test","volume":"1","author":"F Y","year":"1934","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780090403","article-title":"Yates\u2019s correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables","volume":"9","author":"Haviland","year":"1990","journal-title":"Stat Med."},{"issue":"7414","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"issue":"7109","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?","volume":"17","author":"Jadad","year":"1996","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199608000-00004","article-title":"A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique","volume":"224","author":"Lau","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(98)00006-3","article-title":"A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair","volume":"175","author":"Lau","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200203000-00001","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"235","author":"Siu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.3109\/08941939.2012.762073","article-title":"Peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcer and immune response","volume":"26","author":"Schietroma","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Invest Surg."},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-013-0853-0","article-title":"Saraj. Laparoscopic Peptic Ulcer Perforation Closure: the Preferred Choice","volume":"77","author":"Shah","year":"2015","journal-title":"Indian J Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2015.07.021","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcers","volume":"159","author":"Ge","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surgery."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1368","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0054-y","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial","volume":"33","author":"Bertleff","year":"2009","journal-title":"World J Surg."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2701","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i9.2701","article-title":"Laparoscopic approach in gastrointestinal emergencies","volume":"22","author":"Jimenez Rodriguez","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1929","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-012-1972-9","article-title":"Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis","volume":"16","author":"Ohtani","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.04.083","article-title":"Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Coccolini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpg.2013.11.006","article-title":"Laparoscopy in the acute abdomen","volume":"28","author":"Navez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i2.668","article-title":"Advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma","volume":"22","author":"Mandrioli","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.1998.00531.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic management of acute peritonitis","volume":"85","author":"Navez","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1097\/00129689-200110000-00005","article-title":"Laparoscopic approach for acute appendicular peritonitis: efficacy and safety: a report of 96 consecutive cases","volume":"11","author":"Navez","year":"2001","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.1992.tb06921.x","article-title":"Open cholecystectomy: a control group for comparison with laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"62","author":"Cox","year":"1992","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Surg."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0155","unstructured":"Ephgrave KS, Kleiman-Wexler R, Pfaller M, Booth B, Werkmeister L, Young S. Postoperative pneumonia: a prospective study of risk factors and morbidity. Surgery. 1993;114(4):815\u20139; discussion 9\u201321."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee C-Z, Kao L-T, Lin H-C, Wei P-L. Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy: a nationwide study. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13(250).","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-015-0666-7"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5155","article-title":"Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"92","author":"Lunevicius","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0765-z","article-title":"Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature","volume":"24","author":"Bertleff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0175","first-page":"CD011391","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer","volume":"4","author":"Riviere","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.03.042","article-title":"Laparoscopic surgery versus open resection in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"214","author":"Xiong","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Surg."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1603","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-015-2325-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann\u2019s reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"30","author":"Celentano","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/s12876-016-0453-0","article-title":"Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis","volume":"16","author":"Ukai","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.136.4.438","article-title":"Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis","volume":"136","author":"Krisher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arch Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/S1091-255X(97)80108-4","article-title":"Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies","volume":"1","author":"Paik","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1177\/2050640616661931","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"5","author":"Dai","year":"2017","journal-title":"United European Gastroenterol J."},{"key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0210","unstructured":"Quah GS EG, Cox MR. . Laparoscopic vs. Open Surgery for Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Surg 2018;88(S1):55\u20136."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199321850-00007","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder","volume":"218","author":"Cox","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1590\/S1807-59322011000300009","article-title":"What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations","volume":"66","author":"Genc","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clinics (Sao Paulo)."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12924466007926","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later","volume":"14","author":"Sakpal","year":"2010","journal-title":"JSLS."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9028","article-title":"Quality-of-care initiative in patients treated surgically for perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"100","author":"Moller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0235","first-page":"298","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastroduodenal ulcer following emergency surgery","volume":"387","author":"Kujath","year":"2002","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.2188\/jea.JE20120056","article-title":"Incidence and short-term mortality from perforated peptic ulcer in Korea: a population-based study","volume":"22","author":"Bae","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Epidemiol."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-011-1482-1","article-title":"Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"15","author":"Thorsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-008-9796-1","article-title":"Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality","volume":"33","author":"Lohsiriwat","year":"2009","journal-title":"World J Surg."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800761105","article-title":"Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions","volume":"76","author":"Irvin","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8_bb0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-014-2485-5","article-title":"What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems","volume":"18","author":"Thorsen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg."}],"container-title":["Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1091255X23019297?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1091255X23019297?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T19:56:10Z","timestamp":1761076570000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1091255X23019297"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1091255X23019297"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1091-255X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1091-255X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2018 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by ELSEVIER INC. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}