{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T07:34:23Z","timestamp":1777361663458,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]],"date-time":"2023-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684886400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]],"date-time":"2023-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684886400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000054","name":"National Cancer Institute","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R21 CA227776"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R21 CA227776"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000054","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J GEN INTERN MED"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Little is known about patient or provider experience and perceptions of stopping surveillance among older adults with a history of colon polyps. While guidelines recommend ceasing routine colorectal cancer screening in adults \u2009&gt;\u200975\u00a0years and those with limited life expectancy, guidance for ceasing surveillance colonoscopy in those with prior colon polyps suggests individualizing recommendations.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Identify processes, experiences, and gaps around individualizing decisions to stop or continue surveillance colonoscopy for older adults and areas for improvement.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Phenomenological qualitative study design using recorded semi-structured interviews from May 2020 through March 2021.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>15 patients aged \u2009\u2265\u200965 in polyp surveillance, 12 primary care providers (PCPs), and 13 gastroenterologists (GIs).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Approach<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Data were analyzed using a mixed deductive (directed content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach to identify themes related to stopping or continuing surveillance colonoscopies.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Key Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Analysis resulted in 24 themes and were clustered into three main categories: health and clinical considerations; communication and roles; and system-level processes or structures. Overall, the study found support for discussions around age 75\u201380 on stopping surveillance colonoscopy with considerations for health and life expectancy and that PCPs should take a primary role. However, systems and processes for scheduling surveillance colonoscopies largely bypass PCPs which reduces opportunities to both individualize recommendations and facilitate patients\u2019 decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study identified gaps in processes to implement current guidelines for individualizing surveillance colonoscopy as adults grow older, including opportunities to discuss stopping. Increasing the role of PCPs in polyp surveillance as patients grow older provides more opportunities for individualized recommendations, so patients can consider their own preferences, ask questions, and make a more informed choice for themselves. Changing existing systems and processes and creating supportive tools for shared decision-making specific to older adults with polyps would improve how surveillance colonoscopy is individualized in this population.\n<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]],"date-time":"2023-05-24T18:02:16Z","timestamp":1684951336000},"page":"2761-2767","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Multi-level Factors Influencing Decisions About Stopping Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults: a Qualitative Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Karen E.","family":"Schifferdecker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nithya Puttige","family":"Ramesh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Louise C.","family":"Walter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Audrey H.","family":"Calderwood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"8225_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(3):463-485.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2020.01.014.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2020.01.014."},{"key":"8225_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Atkin WS, Valori R, Kuipers EJ, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy. 2012;44(SUPPL3):SE151\u2013SE163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0032-1309795.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1309795."},{"key":"8225_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I, Bouvier AM, Faivre J, Bonithon-Kopp C. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut. 2012;61(8):1180-1186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gutjnl-2011-300295.","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2011-300295."},{"key":"8225_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(3):463-485.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2020.01.014.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2020.01.014."},{"key":"8225_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Adams MA, Rubenstein JH, Holleman R, et al. Rising use of surveillance colonoscopy and potential impacts. Am J Manag Care. 2022;28(5):229\u2013231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37765\/AJMC.2022.89144.","DOI":"10.37765\/AJMC.2022.89144."},{"key":"8225_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Calderwood AH, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, Onega T, Walter LC. Association of life expectancy with surveillance colonoscopy findings and follow-up recommendations in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. Published online 2023:1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.0078.","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.0078."},{"key":"8225_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lieberman DA, Williams JL, Holub JL, et al. Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000 to 2011. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(1):133-143.e3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2014.01.014.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2014.01.014."},{"key":"8225_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC\u2019s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1670-1677. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.gastro.2004.09.051.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.gastro.2004.09.051."},{"key":"8225_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joseph DA, Meester RGS, Zauber AG, Manninen DL. Colorectal cancer screening\u202f: estimated future colonoscopy need and current volume and capacity. Cancer. 2018;122(16):2479-2486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cncr.30070.","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.30070."},{"key":"8225_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(12):849-857. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008.","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008."},{"key":"8225_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM, Walter LC, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(4):885-896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2011.06.023.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2011.06.023."},{"key":"8225_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A, et al. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(6):863-876.e33. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2019.07.033.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2019.07.033."},{"key":"8225_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965-1977. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.6238.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.6238."},{"key":"8225_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):844-857. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.gastro.2012.06.001.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.gastro.2012.06.001."},{"key":"8225_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Calderwood AH, Robertson DJ. Stopping surveillance in gastrointestinal conditions: thoughts on the scope of the problem and potential solutions. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(2):345-349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.gastro.2022.04.009.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.gastro.2022.04.009."},{"key":"8225_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Calderwood AH, Cazares K, Connor SO. Older adult perspectives toward surveillance colonoscopy: a qualitative study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54(1):70-75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001203.","DOI":"10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001203."},{"key":"8225_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schoenborn NL, Boyd CM, Massare J, Park R, Choi Y, Pollack CE. Primary care clinician decision-making around surveillance colonoscopies in older adults with prior adenomas. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(5):796-798. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3122\/JABFM.2020.05.200075.","DOI":"10.3122\/JABFM.2020.05.200075."},{"key":"8225_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method\u202f: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1372-1380.","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732307307031"},{"key":"8225_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig Jonathan. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349\u2013357.","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042"},{"key":"8225_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Butterly LF, Siegel RL, Fedewa S, Robinson CM, Jemal A, Anderson JC. Colonoscopy outcomes in average-risk screening equivalent young adults: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(1):171\u2013179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14309\/ajg.0000000000000820.","DOI":"10.14309\/ajg.0000000000000820."},{"key":"8225_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Greene MA, Butterly LF, Goodrich M, et al. Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(2):334-340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2011.03.1250.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2011.03.1250."},{"key":"8225_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Calderwood AH, Cazares K, Connor SO. Older adult perspectives toward surveillance colonoscopy: a qualitative study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54(1):70-75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001203.","DOI":"10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001203."},{"key":"8225_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Le ST, Lash BR, Schroy PC, Calderwood AH. Physician perceptions of surveillance follow-up colonoscopy in older adults. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(3):371-373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3122\/jabfm.2017.03.160386.","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2017.03.160386."},{"key":"8225_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maratt JK, Lewis CL, Saffar D, et al. Veterans \u2019 attitudes towards de-intensification of surveillance colonoscopy for low-risk adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(12):1999-2000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cgh.2018.03.029.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2018.03.029."},{"key":"8225_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maratt JK, Matthias MS, Gowan TM, et al. 728: Low-risk adenoma surveillance decision-making: perspectives from patients and providers. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(7):S-187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0016-5085(22)60447-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0016-5085(22)60447-5."},{"key":"8225_CR26","unstructured":"SocioCultural Research Consultants L. Dedoose Version, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Published online 2021."},{"key":"8225_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2008.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452230153"},{"key":"8225_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732305276687.","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687."},{"key":"8225_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80-92. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/160940690600500107.","DOI":"10.1177\/160940690600500107."},{"key":"8225_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maratt JK, Matthias MS, Gowan TM, et al. 728: Low-risk adenoma surveillance decision-making: perspectives from patients and providers. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(7):S-187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0016-5085(22)60447-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0016-5085(22)60447-5."},{"key":"8225_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Le ST, Lash BR, Schroy PC, Calderwood AH. Physician perceptions of surveillance follow-up colonoscopy in older adults. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(3):371-373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3122\/jabfm.2017.03.160386.","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2017.03.160386."},{"key":"8225_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750-2756. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.285.21.2750.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.21.2750."}],"container-title":["Journal of General Internal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,18]],"date-time":"2023-09-18T15:11:10Z","timestamp":1695049870000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]}},"alternative-id":["8225"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08225-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0884-8734","1525-1497"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0884-8734","type":"print"},{"value":"1525-1497","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 December 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 April 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}