{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T16:59:57Z","timestamp":1785517197420,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]],"date-time":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1776643200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]],"date-time":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1776643200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J GEN INTERN MED"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The carceral healthcare system is reckoning with a rapidly aging patient population. This is significant because elderly patients are more likely to have medical conditions that render them unable to make their own decisions. Existing laws and ethical guidelines mandate relying on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates to make medical decisions for patients who lack decision-making capacity. Yet, providing healthcare to incarcerated patients who lack decisional capacity\u00a0is especially challenging. As a result, practices vary, and correctional officials, such as wardens or guards, are frequently involved in making medical decisions for incarcerated patients who lack decision-making capacity. The present paper thus considers what qualities make for effective surrogate decision-makers and whether correctional officials tend to possess them. We conclude that correctional officials frequently lack these qualities before exploring other approaches to surrogate decision-making. We identify several approaches with greater potential to ensure that incarcerated individuals\u2019 treatment is consistent with their preferences and values.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]],"date-time":"2026-04-20T19:02:28Z","timestamp":1776711748000},"page":"2956-2960","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Surrogate Decision-Making in Carceral Healthcare"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Anurima","family":"Chattopadhyay","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Karel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9359-4439","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David","family":"Wendler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"10393_CR1","unstructured":"Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prisoners in 2022 \u2013 statistical tables. 2023. https:\/\/bjs.ojp.gov\/document\/p22st.pdf."},{"key":"10393_CR2","unstructured":"Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prisoners in 1992 \u2013 statistical tables. 1993. https:\/\/bjs.ojp.gov\/content\/pub\/pdf\/p92.pdf."},{"issue":"3","key":"10393_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2013.13315","volume":"174","author":"AM Torke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Torke AM, Sachs GA, Helft PR, et al. Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):370-377.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR4","first-page":"10","volume":"36","author":"S Wynn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wynn S. Decisions by surrogates: an overview of surrogate consent laws in the United States. Bifocal. 2014;36(1):10-14.","journal-title":"Bifocal."},{"issue":"5","key":"10393_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.19288","volume":"73","author":"JD Dixon","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dixon JD, Josyula AV, Javier NM, et al. American Geriatrics Society position statement: making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025;73(5):1353-1364.","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR6","first-page":"119","volume":"19","author":"J Natterman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Natterman J, Rayne P. The prisoner in a private hospital setting: what providers should know. J Health Care Law and Policy. 2017;19(1):119\u2013147.","journal-title":"J Health Care Law and Policy."},{"key":"10393_CR7","unstructured":"Bureau of Prisons. Program statement \u2013 patient care. 2024. https:\/\/www.bop.gov\/policy\/progstat\/6031.05.pdf."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.5794","volume":"184","author":"S Batbold","year":"2024","unstructured":"Batbold S, Duke JD, Riggan KA, DeMartino ES. Decision-making for hospitalized incarcerated patients lacking decisional capacity. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(1):28-35.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10393_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1108\/IJPH-06-2021-0060","volume":"18","author":"V Helmly","year":"2022","unstructured":"Helmly V, Garica M, Williams B, Howell BA. A review and content analysis of US Department of Corrections end-of-life decision making policies. Int J Prison Health. 2022;18(2):165-175.","journal-title":"Int J Prison Health."},{"issue":"4","key":"10393_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1177\/107834580401100402","volume":"11","author":"SF Levine","year":"2005","unstructured":"Levine SF. Improving end-of-life care of prisoners. J Correct Health Care. 2005;11(4):317-331.","journal-title":"J Correct Health Care."},{"issue":"7","key":"10393_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1244","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2017.0175","volume":"36","author":"KN Yadav","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Aff. 2017;36(7):1244-1251.","journal-title":"Health Aff."},{"issue":"8","key":"10393_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.298.8.894","volume":"298","author":"JF Linder","year":"2007","unstructured":"Linder JF, Meyers FJ. Palliative care for prison inmates: \u201cdon\u2019t let me die in prison.\u201d JAMA. 2007;298(8):894-901.","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"issue":"12","key":"10393_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2382","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.15624","volume":"66","author":"R Ekaireb","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ekaireb R, Ahalt C, Sudore R, Metzger L, Williams B. We take care of patients, but we don\u2019t advocate for them: advance care planning in prison or jail. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(12):2382-2388.","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc."},{"issue":"3","key":"10393_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1080\/15524256.2016.1200517","volume":"12","author":"M Stensland","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stensland M, Sanders S. Detained and dying: ethical issues surrounding end-of-life care in prison. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2016;12(3):259-276.","journal-title":"J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care."},{"issue":"4","key":"10393_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1177\/1043986205281727","volume":"21","author":"NG La Vigne","year":"2005","unstructured":"La Vigne NG, Nasser RL, Brooks LE, Castro JL. Examining the effect of incarceration and in-prison family contact on prisoners\u2019 family relationships. J Contemp Crim Justice. 2005;21(4):314-335.","journal-title":"J Contemp Crim Justice."},{"issue":"7","key":"10393_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1001\/amajethics.2019.617","volume":"21","author":"M Tobey","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tobey M, Simon L. Who should make decisions for unrepresented patients who are incarcerated?. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):617-624.","journal-title":"AMA J Ethics."},{"key":"10393_CR17","unstructured":"Bureau of Prisons. Visiting regulations. 2015. https:\/\/www.bop.gov\/policy\/progstat\/5267_09.pdf."},{"issue":"9","key":"10393_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-007-0252-y","volume":"22","author":"EK Vig","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vig EK, Starks H, Taylor JS, Hopley EK, Fryer-Edwards K. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1274-1279.","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00010","volume":"149","author":"JT Berger","year":"2008","unstructured":"Berger JT, DeRenzo EG, Schwartz J. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(1):48-53.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10393_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2011.300374","volume":"102","author":"J Pont","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pont J, St\u00f6ver H, Wolff H. Dual loyalty in prison health care. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(3):475-480.","journal-title":"Am J Public Health."},{"issue":"5","key":"10393_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2013.301845","volume":"104","author":"MM Goldstein","year":"2014","unstructured":"Goldstein MM. Health information privacy and health information technology in the US correctional setting. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):803-809.","journal-title":"Am J Public Health."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1080\/07481187.2017.1303552","volume":"42","author":"S Sanders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sanders S, Stensland M, Juraco K. Agency behind bars: advance care planning with aging and dying offenders. Death Stud. 2018;42(1):45-51.","journal-title":"Death Stud."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1080\/10401334.2012.641492","volume":"24","author":"I Min","year":"2012","unstructured":"Min I, Schonberg D, Anderson M. A review of primary care training programs in correctional health for physicians. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(1):81-89.","journal-title":"Teach Learn Med."},{"key":"10393_CR24","unstructured":"Teaster PB, EF Wood, Karp N, Lawrence SA, Schmidt WC, Mendiondo MS. Wards of the state: a national study of public guardianship. 2005. https:\/\/globalag.igc.org\/elderrights\/us\/wardofstatefinal.pdf."},{"key":"10393_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1976","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1308197","volume":"369","author":"TM Pope","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pope TM. Making medical decisions for patients without surrogates. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1976-1978.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"issue":"8","key":"10393_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2053","DOI":"10.1097\/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1","volume":"34","author":"DB White","year":"2006","unstructured":"White DB, Curtis JR, Lo B, Luce JM. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2053-2059.","journal-title":"Crit Care Med."},{"key":"10393_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pope, TM, Sellers, T. Legal briefing: the unbefriended -- making healthcare decisions for patients without proxies. J Clin Ethics. 2012;23:84\u201396, 23(2):177\u2013192.","DOI":"10.1086\/JCE201223213"},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR28","first-page":"1","volume":"24","author":"M Kapp","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kapp M. The voluntary status of nursing facility admissions: legal, practice, and public policy implications. N Engl J Crim & Civ Confinement. 1998;24(1):1-35.","journal-title":"N Engl J Crim & Civ Confinement."},{"issue":"5","key":"10393_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.166.5.493","volume":"166","author":"DI Shalowitz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-497.","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med."},{"issue":"5","key":"10393_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008","volume":"154","author":"D Wendler","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):336-346.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10393_CR31","first-page":"175","volume":"22","author":"MS Smith","year":"2014","unstructured":"Smith MS, Taylor LA, Wake A. Healthcare decision-making for mentally incapacitated incarcerated individuals. Elder Law J. 2014;22(1):175-207.","journal-title":"Elder Law J."},{"issue":"7","key":"10393_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2023.2296402","volume":"24","author":"BD Earp","year":"2024","unstructured":"Earp BD, Mann SP, Allen J, et al. A personalized patient preference predictor for substituted judgments in healthcare: technically feasible and ethically desirable. Am J Bioeth. 2024;24(7):13-26.","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth."},{"issue":"2","key":"10393_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2021.01423","volume":"41","author":"M Sun","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sun M, Oliwa T, Peek ME, Tung EL. Negative patient descriptors: documenting racial bias in the electronic health record. Health Aff. 2022;41(2):203-211.","journal-title":"Health Aff."},{"key":"10393_CR34","unstructured":"Prison Policy Initiative. Updated charts show the magnitude of prison and jail racial disparities, pretrial populations, correctional control, and more. 2023. https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2023\/09\/27\/updated_race_data\/."}],"container-title":["Journal of General Internal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T16:07:45Z","timestamp":1785514065000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10393"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10393-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0884-8734","1525-1497"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0884-8734","type":"print"},{"value":"1525-1497","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 April 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The contributions of the NIH authors were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Disclaimer","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}