{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T21:02:38Z","timestamp":1785445358359,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J GEN INTERN MED"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Unrepresented patients, those lacking decision-making capacity and an available legally authorized surrogate, experience significant ethical and clinical vulnerabilities, including delays in care and high-intensity decision-making. Physicians often assume decisional authority for these patients, yet empirical data on how institutional consent frameworks influence physician behavior are limited.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To examine changes in the frequency and types of non-emergent routine procedural consents for unrepresented patients before and after a policy shift from clergy-based consent to dual-physician authorization.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective observational cohort study comparing procedural consent practices across two sequential 1-year periods before and after a legislative change in Texas (September 1, 2022\u2013August 31, 2024) in a large safety-net healthcare system.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Adult unrepresented patients were identified using procedural consent documentation as a proxy for unrepresented status. A total of 106 unrepresented patient consents were identified in the pre-policy period and 359 in the post-policy period.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Primary outcomes included the volume and proportion of procedural consents for unrepresented patients and the frequency of specific procedures. Secondary measures included patient demographics, ICU utilization, in-hospital mortality, and ethics consultation rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Key Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patients were predominantly male (74.8%\u201383.9%), frequently unhoused (30.2%\u201333.9%), and commonly required ICU care (70.3%\u201382.3%). Unrepresented patient consents increased from 106 of 64,694 (0.16%) in the first time period to 359 of 65,564 (0.58%) in the second time period (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.0001). Renal replacement therapy consents increased from 3 to 36 (relative risk, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.11\u201311.28;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.019). Ethics consultation was infrequent in both periods (10%\u201312%).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Implementation of dual-physician authorization was associated with a significant increase in procedural consents for unrepresented patients and greater provision of renal replacement therapy. These findings suggest that consent frameworks can meaningfully influence physicians\u2019 consent practices. Health systems adopting dual-physician authorization should consider standardized ethical oversight to balance timely care with accountability and respect for patient values.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T20:52:06Z","timestamp":1785444726000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Consent Practices for Unrepresented Patients After Implementation of Dual-Physician Authorization in a Safety-Net Healthcare System"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0380-7363","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Holland","family":"Kaplan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luay","family":"Boulahouache","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sai","family":"Sarnala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryan","family":"Ward","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"10671_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pope TM, Bennett J, Carson SS, et al. Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unrepresented Patients in the ICU. An Official American Thoracic Society\/American Geriatrics Society Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(10):1182\u20131192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1164\/rccm.202003-0512ST.","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.202003-0512ST"},{"key":"10671_CR2","unstructured":"Pope TM. Unbefriended And Unrepresented: Better Medical Decision Making For Incapacitated Patients Without Healthcare Surrogates. Georgia State University Law Review. 2017;33."},{"issue":"3","key":"10671_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1080\/08959420.2020.1851433","volume":"34","author":"CC Catlin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Catlin CC, Connors HL, Teaster PB, et al. Unrepresented Adults Face Adverse Healthcare Consequences: The Role of Guardians, Public Guardianship Reform, and Alternative Policy Solutions. J Aging Soc Pol. 2022;34(3):418-437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08959420.2020.1851433.","journal-title":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy."},{"issue":"9","key":"10671_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.12788\/jhm.2946","volume":"13","author":"DN Ricotta","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ricotta DN, Parris JJ, Parris RS, et al. The Burden of Guardianship: A Matched Cohort Study. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(9):595-601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12788\/jhm.2946.","journal-title":"Journal of Hospital Medicine."},{"issue":"4","key":"10671_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/01.JHQ.0000462680.47759.53","volume":"38","author":"JJ Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen JJ, Finn CT, Homa K, et al. Discharge Delays for Patients Requiring In-Hospital Guardianship: A Cohort Analysis. J Healthc Qual. 2016;38(4):235-242.","journal-title":"Journal for Healthcare Quality."},{"issue":"1","key":"10671_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006","volume":"147","author":"DB White","year":"2007","unstructured":"White DB, Curtis JR, Wolf LE, et al. Life Support for Patients without a Surrogate Decision Maker: Who Decides? Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):34-40. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med."},{"key":"10671_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"White DB, Curtis JR, Lo B, et al. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers*: Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2053\u20132059. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1"},{"key":"10671_CR8","unstructured":"Karp N, Wood E. Incapacitated and Alone: Health Care Decision-Making for the Unbefriended Elderly. American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging."},{"issue":"7","key":"10671_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E582","DOI":"10.1001\/amajethics.2019.582","volume":"21","author":"Thaddeus Mason Pope","year":"2019","unstructured":"Thaddeus Mason Pope. Five Things Clinicians Should Know When Caring for Unrepresented Patients. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E582-586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/amajethics.2019.582.","journal-title":"AMA Journal of Ethics."},{"key":"10671_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"DeMartino ES, Dudzinski DM, Doyle CK, et al. Who Decides When a Patient Can\u2019t? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. Malina D, ed. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1478\u20131482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMms1611497.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMms1611497"},{"issue":"3","key":"10671_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E135","DOI":"10.1097\/NJH.0000000000001117","volume":"27","author":"M Kinsinger","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kinsinger M, Song J, Topaz M, et al. Opportunities for Improvement in Caring for Critically Ill Patients Who Are Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates: A Nested Case-Control Study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2025;27(3):E135-E142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/NJH.0000000000001117.","journal-title":"J Hosp Palliat Nurs."},{"key":"10671_CR12","unstructured":"Finkel F, Dey A, Sotomayor CR, et al. Obstacles to Timely Decision-Making for Unrepresented Critical Care Patients Without Capacity and Associated Staff Moral Distress: A Single-Center Quality Improvement Study."},{"issue":"3","key":"10671_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E135","DOI":"10.1097\/NJH.0000000000001117","volume":"27","author":"M Kinsinger","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kinsinger M, Song J, Topaz M, et al. Opportunities for Improvement in Caring for Critically Ill Patients Who Are Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates: A Nested Case-Control Study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2025;27(3):E135-E142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/NJH.0000000000001117.","journal-title":"J Hosp Palliat Nurs."},{"issue":"2","key":"10671_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-017-9773-1","volume":"14","author":"AM Courtwright","year":"2017","unstructured":"Courtwright AM, Abrams J, Robinson EM. The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients. Bioeth Inq. 2017;14(2):241-250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9773-1.","journal-title":"Bioethical Inquiry."},{"issue":"7","key":"10671_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E559","DOI":"10.1001\/amajethics.2019.559","volume":"21","author":"T Dempsey","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dempsey T, DeMartino E. How Should Clinicians Navigate Decision Making for Unrepresented Patients? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E559-565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/amajethics.2019.559.","journal-title":"AMA Journal of Ethics."},{"issue":"2","key":"10671_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-017-9773-1","volume":"14","author":"AM Courtwright","year":"2017","unstructured":"Courtwright AM, Abrams J, Robinson EM. The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients. Bioeth Inq. 2017;14(2):241-250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9773-1.","journal-title":"Bioethical Inquiry."},{"issue":"2","key":"10671_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1086\/JCE2015262180","volume":"26","author":"TM Pope","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pope TM. Legal Briefing: Adult Orphans and the Unbefriended: Making Medical Decisions for Unrepresented Patients without Surrogates. J Clin Ethics. 2015;26(2):180-188.","journal-title":"J Clin Ethics."},{"key":"10671_CR18","unstructured":"Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 313 \u201cConsent to Medical Treatment Act.\u201d"},{"issue":"1","key":"10671_CR19","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"Z Sager","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sager Z, Catlin C, Connors H, et al. Making End-of-Life Care Decisions for Older Adults Subject to Guardianship. Elder Law J. 2019;27(1):1-34.","journal-title":"Elder Law J."},{"issue":"8","key":"10671_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1111\/imj.15916","volume":"53","author":"J Connolly","year":"2023","unstructured":"Connolly J, Peisah C. Waiting for guardianship in a public hospital geriatric inpatient unit: a mixed methods observational case series. Int Med J. 2023;53(8):1339-1346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/imj.15916.","journal-title":"Internal Medicine Journal."},{"issue":"8","key":"10671_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.2450","volume":"183","author":"E Dzeng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dzeng E, Batten JN, Dohan D, Blythe J, Ritchie CS, Curtis JR. Hospital Culture and Intensity of End-of-Life Care at 3 Academic Medical Centers. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(8):839. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.2450.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10671_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1080\/01634372.2024.2424421","volume":"68","author":"N McIntosh","year":"2025","unstructured":"McIntosh N, VandenBergh L, Mills WL. The Impact of a Guardianship Social Worker on Inpatient Time-To-Guardianship and Costs: Preliminary Findings. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2025;68(2):269-278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01634372.2024.2424421.","journal-title":"Journal of Gerontological Social Work."},{"issue":"3","key":"10671_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psym.2020.06.016","volume":"62","author":"S Syed","year":"2021","unstructured":"Syed S, Barot N, Lazo-Belangue J. Ethical, Compassionate, and Cost-Effective Approach to Health Care Decisions of Unrepresented Patients: A Bioethics Quality Improvement Project. J\u00a0Acad Consult-Liaison Psychiatry. 2021;62(3):330-336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psym.2020.06.016.","journal-title":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry."},{"issue":"5","key":"10671_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.19288","volume":"73","author":"JD Dixon","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dixon JD, Josyula AV, Javier NM, et al. American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025;73(5):1353-1364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jgs.19288.","journal-title":"J American Geriatrics Society."},{"key":"10671_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pope TM, Bennett J, Carson SS, et al. Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unrepresented Patients in the ICU. An Official American Thoracic Society\/American Geriatrics Society Policy Statement. Am J Respiratory Crit Care Med. 2020;201(10):1182\u20131192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1164\/rccm.202003-0512ST.","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.202003-0512ST"},{"key":"10671_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ward R, Kaplan H. Dual-Physician Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients: Legal and Ethical Obligations for the Second Nontreating Physician. J Clin Ethics. 2025;36(2).","DOI":"10.1086\/734767"}],"container-title":["Journal of General Internal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T20:52:09Z","timestamp":1785444729000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["10671"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-026-10671-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0884-8734","1525-1497"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0884-8734","type":"print"},{"value":"1525-1497","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 July 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}