{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T13:39:36Z","timestamp":1740145176014,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,11]],"date-time":"2017-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1512950400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethical Inquiry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,11]],"date-time":"2017-12-11T03:10:54Z","timestamp":1512961854000},"page":"33-37","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Knowing, Anticipating, Even Facilitating but Still not Intending: Another Challenge to Double Effect Reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2096-5905","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Duckett","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1093\/ajj\/52.1.259","volume":"52","author":"R Anderson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Anderson, R. 2007. Boyle and the principle of double effect. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 52(1): 259\u2013272.","journal-title":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence"},{"key":"9827_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-137-51293-2","volume-title":"A course in behavioral economics. London","author":"E Angner","year":"2016","unstructured":"Angner, E. 2016. A course in behavioral economics. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan."},{"key":"9827_CR3","volume-title":"Summa theologica Part II (Secunda secundae)","author":"ST Aquinas","year":"2006","unstructured":"Aquinas, St Thomas. 2006. Summa theologica Part II (Secunda secundae). Project Gutenberg. Translated by The Fathers of the English Dominican Province."},{"key":"9827_CR4","volume-title":"Principles of biomedical ethics. New York","author":"TL Beauchamp","year":"2013","unstructured":"Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"9827_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1086\/292183","volume":"90","author":"JM Boyle","year":"1980","unstructured":"Boyle, J.M. 1980. Toward understanding the principle of double effect. Ethics 90(4): 527\u2013538.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"9827_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/16.5.475","volume":"16","author":"JM Boyle","year":"1991","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u20141991. Who is entitled to double effect? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16(5): 475\u2013494.","journal-title":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1023\/B:META.0000025096.25317.22","volume":"25","author":"JM Boyle","year":"2004","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u20142004. Medical ethics and double effect: The case of terminal sedation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25(1): 51\u201360.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1353\/tho.1997.0048","volume":"61","author":"TA Cavanaugh","year":"1997","unstructured":"Cavanaugh, T.A. 1997. Aquinas\u2019s account of double effect. The Thomist 61(1): 107\u2013121.","journal-title":"The Thomist"},{"issue":"5","key":"9827_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/16.5.495","volume":"16","author":"A Donagan","year":"1991","unstructured":"Donagan, A. 1991. Moral absolutism and the double-effect exception: Reflections on Joseph Boyle\u2019s \u201cWho is entitled to double-effect?\u201d Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16(5): 495\u2013509.","journal-title":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2011.01895.x","volume":"27","author":"CD Douglas","year":"2013","unstructured":"Douglas, C.D., I.H. Kerridge, and R.A. Ankeny. 2013. Narratives of \u201cterminal sedation,\u201d and the importance of the intention-foresight distinction in palliative care practice. Bioethics 27(1): 1\u201311.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9827_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhu011","volume":"39","author":"CD Douglas","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u20142014. Double meanings will not save the principle of double effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39(3): 304\u2013316.","journal-title":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"9827_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180108080602","volume":"17","author":"A Goldworth","year":"2008","unstructured":"Goldworth, A. 2008. Deception and the principle of double effect. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17(4): 471\u2013472.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"9827_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S24","DOI":"10.1177\/082585970001601S06","volume":"16","author":"LA Hawryluck","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hawryluck, L.A., and W.R.C. Harvey. 2000. Analgesia, virtue, and the principle of double effect. Journal of Palliative Care 16: S24\u201330.","journal-title":"Journal of Palliative Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"9827_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjspcare-2012-000431","volume":"3","author":"N Juth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Juth, N., A. Lindblad, N. Lyn\u00f6e, M. Sj\u00f6strand, G. Helgesson. 2013. Moral differences in deep continuous palliative sedation and euthanasia. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 3(2): 203\u2013206.","journal-title":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"9827_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1177\/004056399305400205","volume":"54","author":"JF Keenan","year":"1993","unstructured":"Keenan, J.F. 1993. The function of the principle of double effect. Theological Studies 54(2): 294\u2013315.","journal-title":"Theological Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1093\/ajj\/12.1.132","volume":"12","author":"P Knauer","year":"1967","unstructured":"Knauer, P. 1967. The hermeneutic function of the principle of double effect. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 12(1): 132\u2013162.","journal-title":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence"},{"issue":"7","key":"9827_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12001","volume":"28","author":"A Lindblad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lindblad, A., N. Lyn\u00f6e, and N. Juth. 2014. End-of-life decisions and the reinvented rule of double effect: A critical analysis. Bioethics 28(7): 368\u2013377.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9827_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1177\/004056394901000102","volume":"10","author":"JT Mangan","year":"1949","unstructured":"Mangan, J.T. 1949. An historical analysis of the principle of double effect. Theological Studies 10(1): 41\u201361.","journal-title":"Theological Studies"},{"issue":"5","key":"9827_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/16.5.515","volume":"16","author":"DB Marquis","year":"1991","unstructured":"Marquis, D.B. 1991. Four versions of double effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16(5): 515\u2013544.","journal-title":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"2","key":"9827_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1086\/233472","volume":"111","author":"A McIntyre","year":"2001","unstructured":"McIntyre, A. 2001. Doing away with double effect Ethics 111(2): 219\u2013255.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"9827_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511780578","volume-title":"Elements of moral cognition: Rawls\u2019 linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. Cambridge","author":"JM Mikhail","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mikhail, J.M. 2011. Elements of moral cognition: Rawls\u2019 linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9827_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1111\/nous.12033","volume":"49","author":"DK Nelkin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nelkin, D.K., and S.C. Rickless. 2015. So close, yet so far: Why solutions to the closeness problem for the doctrine of double effect fall short. No\u00fbs 49(2): 376\u2013409.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"issue":"4","key":"9827_CR23","first-page":"334","volume":"18","author":"WS Quinn","year":"1989","unstructured":"Quinn, W.S. 1989. Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18(4): 334\u2013351.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Public Affairs"},{"issue":"3","key":"9827_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.12503","volume":"22","author":"K Raus","year":"2016","unstructured":"Raus, K., and S. Sterckx 2016. How defining clinical practices may influence their evaluation: The case of continuous sedation at the end of life. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22(3): 425\u2013432.","journal-title":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice"},{"issue":"3","key":"9827_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1093\/cb\/cbs021","volume":"18","author":"PA Reed","year":"2012","unstructured":"Reed, P.A. 2012. The danger of double effect. Christian Bioethics 18(3): 287\u2013300.","journal-title":"Christian Bioethics"},{"key":"9827_CR26","unstructured":"Schroth, J. 2014. Bibliography on the principle of double effect. http:\/\/www.ethikseite.de\/bib\/bpdw.pdf . Accessed November 4, 2017"},{"key":"9827_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511975950","volume-title":"Practical ethics","author":"P Singer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Singer, P. 2011. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9827_CR28","volume-title":"Inquiry into end of life choices: Final report","author":"Victoria Parliament Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Victoria Parliament Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee. 2016. Inquiry into end of life choices: Final report. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,7]],"date-time":"2019-10-07T16:31:41Z","timestamp":1570465901000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,11]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9827"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-017-9827-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1176-7529","1872-4353"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1176-7529"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1872-4353"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,11]]}}}