{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T10:40:36Z","timestamp":1790073636490,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":104,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724025600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724025600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"K\u00e4the Zingg-Schwichtenberg Fund","award":["KZS 07\/20"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["KZS 07\/20"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008375","name":"University of Basel","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008375","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethical Inquiry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Prenatal ultrasound is a non-invasive diagnostic examination. Despite the recognized diagnostic value, this technology raises complex ethical questions. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis that coherently maps the ethical challenges raised by prenatal ultrasound examination, both 2D and 3D. We performed a systematic literature review. Six databases were systematically searched. The results highlight how concerns related to beneficence, informed consent, and autonomy are mainly related to routine use of prenatal ultrasound in the clinical context, while considerations linked to overmedicalization of pregnancy, discrimination, and fetal ontology were often reported in relation to the impact ultrasound is having on medicine and society. Ethical issues in the context of pre-abortion ultrasound, obstetric practices in low-income settings, and keepsake ultrasound imaging were also greatly discussed. Since prenatal ultrasound practices critically impact pregnant people\u2019s autonomy and their role within pregnancy, we conclude that information providing strategies should be developed to appropriately inform pregnant people about the nature, purpose, risks, and choices revolving around prenatal ultrasound. In addition, as it is becoming increasingly difficult to separate the social and clinical dimensions of prenatal ultrasound, future research should focus on examining if and how such dimensions should be reconciled.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T14:03:08Z","timestamp":1724076188000},"page":"195-212","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["\u201cA Picture Paints a Thousand Words\u201d\u2014A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"Favaretto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6537-9793","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M.","family":"Rost","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2013.06.004","volume":"37","author":"JS Abramowicz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Abramowicz, J.S. 2013. Benefits and risks of ultrasound in pregnancy. Seminars in Perinatology 37(5): 295\u2013300.","journal-title":"Seminars in Perinatology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2178-x","volume":"19","author":"A \u00c5hman","year":"2019","unstructured":"\u00c5hman, A., K. Edvardsson, T.A. Fagerli, et al. 2019. A much valued tool that also brings ethical dilemmas\u2014a qualitative study of Norwegian midwives\u2019 experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1): 33.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10360_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0743-5","volume":"15","author":"A \u00c5hman","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u00c5hman, A., M. Persson, K. Edvardsson, et al. 2015. Two sides of the same coin\u2014an interview study of Swedish obstetricians\u2019 experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15: 304.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2009.12.011","volume":"81","author":"A Ahman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ahman, A., K. Runestam, and A. Sarkadi. 2010. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women\u2019s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Education and Counseling 81(1): 87\u201393.","journal-title":"Patient Education and Counseling"},{"key":"10360_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/b14980","volume-title":"Practical ultrasound: An illustrated guide","author":"J Alty","year":"2013","unstructured":"Alty, J., and E. Hoey. 2013. Practical ultrasound: An illustrated guide, 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.","edition":"2"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2010.10.015","volume":"28","author":"I Aune","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aune, I., and A. M\u00f6ller. 2012. \u201cI want a choice, but I don\u2019t want to decide\u201d - A qualitative study of pregnant women\u2019s experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies. Midwifery 28(1): 14\u201323.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"25","key":"10360_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(05)25164-9","volume":"13","author":"H Bashour","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bashour, H., R. Hafez and A. Abdulsalam. 2005. Syrian women\u2019s perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy. Reproductive Health Matters 13(25): 147\u2013154.","journal-title":"Reproductive Health Matters"},{"key":"10360_CR8","volume-title":"Principles of biomedical ethics","author":"TL Beauchamp","year":"2001","unstructured":"Beauchamp, T.L. and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 8th ed. Oxford University Press.","edition":"8"},{"issue":"sup31","key":"10360_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(08)31372-X","volume":"16","author":"HH Bijma","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bijma, H.H., A. van der Heide and H.I.J. Wildschut. 2008. Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Reproductive Health Matters 16 (sup31): 82\u201389.","journal-title":"Reproductive Health Matters"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00960084","volume":"1","author":"R Black","year":"1992","unstructured":"Black, R. 1992. Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1(1): 45\u201354.","journal-title":"Journal of Genetic Counseling"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1023\/B:JOMH.0000007447.19765.ee","volume":"25","author":"J Boucher","year":"2004","unstructured":"Boucher, J. 2004. Ultrasound: a window to the womb?: Obstetric ultrasound and the abortion rights debate. Journal of Medical Humanities 25(1): 7\u201319.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Humanities"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-015-9635-8","volume":"19","author":"S Brauer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brauer, S. 2016. Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 19(1): 45\u201354.","journal-title":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy."},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1177\/8756479304269948","volume":"20","author":"J Burlbaw","year":"2004","unstructured":"Burlbaw, J. 2004. Focusing on the issues: obstetric sonography -- that\u2019s entertainment? Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 20(6): 444\u2013448.","journal-title":"Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR14","first-page":"31","volume":"16","author":"S Burrow","year":"2012","unstructured":"Burrow, S. 2012. Reproductive autonomy and reproductive technology. Techn\u00e9: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16(1): 31\u201344.","journal-title":"Techn\u00e9: Research in Philosophy and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10360_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1313499","volume":"370","author":"RA Charo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Charo, R.A. 2014. Physicians and the (woman\u2019s) body politic. New England Journal of Medicine 370(3): 193\u2013195.","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(02)00078-7","volume":"30","author":"ST Chasen","year":"2003","unstructured":"Chasen, S.T., and D.W. Skupski. 2003. Ethical dimensions of nuchal translucency screening. Clinics in Perinatology 30(1): 95\u2013102.","journal-title":"Clinics in Perinatology"},{"issue":"9","key":"10360_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1989.8.9.493","volume":"8","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"1989","unstructured":"Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1989. Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 8(9): 493\u2013497.","journal-title":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1991.01010018.x","volume":"1","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"1991","unstructured":"Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1991. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 1(1): 18\u201320.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.08050293.x","volume":"8","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"1996","unstructured":"Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1996. Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 8(5): 293\u2013294.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.024","volume":"192","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 2005. An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging: A case for the medicalization of fetal imaging. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192(1): 31\u201333.","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90735-7","volume":"161","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"1989","unstructured":"Chervenak, F.A., L.B. McCullough, and J.L. Chervenak. 1989. Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 161(4): 857\u2013860.","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"8","key":"10360_CR22","first-page":"370","volume":"10","author":"K Coles","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coles, K. 2007. Recreational scans: harmless curiosity? RCM midwives: The official journal of the Royal College of Midwives 10(8): 370\u2013371.","journal-title":"RCM midwives: The official journal of the Royal College of Midwives"},{"issue":"10","key":"10360_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2018.09.005","volume":"28","author":"J Curado","year":"2018","unstructured":"Curado, J., and A. Bhide. 2018. The use of ultrasound in the antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 28(10): 301\u2013307.","journal-title":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine"},{"issue":"9","key":"10360_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1038\/nrg3036","volume":"12","author":"A de Jong","year":"2011","unstructured":"de Jong, A., W.J. Dondorp, S.G.M. Frints, C.E.M. de Die-Smulders and G.M.W.R. de Wert. 2011. Advances in prenatal screening: The ethical dimension. Nature Reviews Genetics 12(9): 657\u2013663.","journal-title":"Nature Reviews Genetics"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.5172\/hesr.2006.15.4.397","volume":"15","author":"S Donovan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Donovan, S. 2006. Inescapable burden of choice? The impact of a culture of prenatal screening on women\u2019s experiences of pregnancy. Health Sociology Review 15(4): 397\u2013405.","journal-title":"Health Sociology Review"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jradnu.2016.02.006","volume":"35","author":"D Dowdy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dowdy, D. 2016. Keepsake ultrasound: Taking another look. Journal of Radiology Nursing 35(2): 119\u2013132.","journal-title":"Journal of Radiology Nursing"},{"key":"10360_CR27","unstructured":"Duden, B. 1993. Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Translated by L. Hoinacki. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"10360_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2017.12.001","volume":"15","author":"K Edvardsson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Edvardsson, K., A. \u00c5hman, T.A. Fagerli et al. 2018. Norwegian obstetricians\u2019 experiences of the use of ultrasound in pregnancy management. A qualitative study. Sex & Reproductive Healthcare 15: 69\u201376.","journal-title":"Sex & Reproductive Healthcare"},{"key":"10360_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.09.009","volume":"42","author":"K Edvardsson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Edvardsson, K., A. Lalos, A. \u00c5hman, R. Small, S. Graner and I. Mogren. 2016. Increasing possibilities\u2014Increasing dilemmas: A qualitative study of Swedish midwives\u2019 experiences of ultrasound use in pregnancy. Midwifery 42: 46\u201353.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10360_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0632-y","volume":"15","author":"K Edvardsson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Edvardsson, K., I. Mogren, A. Lalos, M. Persson, and R. Small. 2015a. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives\u2019 views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 15: 195.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-015-0023-y","volume":"16","author":"K Edvardsson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Edvardsson, K., R. Small, A. Lalos, M. Persson, and I. Mogren. 2015b. Ultrasound\u2019s \u201cwindow on the womb\u201d brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians\u2019 experiences in Australia. BMC Medical Ethics 16(1): 31.","journal-title":"BMC Medical Ethics"},{"key":"10360_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-363","volume":"14","author":"K Edvardsson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Edvardsson, K., R. Small, M. Persson, A. Lalos, and I. Mogren. 2014. \u201cUltrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can\u2019t see everything\u201d: A qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14: 363.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1258\/ult.2011.011056","volume":"20","author":"H Edwards","year":"2012","unstructured":"Edwards, H., and N. Thomson. 2012. Social and practical implications of fetal sex determination using ultrasound. Ultrasound 20(1): 49\u201353.","journal-title":"Ultrasound"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhz039","volume":"45","author":"M Favaretto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Favaretto, M., D.F. Vears, and P. Borry. 2020. On the epistemic status of prenatal ultrasound: Are ultrasound scans photographic pictures? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45(2): 231\u2013250.","journal-title":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6327","volume":"34","author":"R Favre","year":"2009","unstructured":"Favre, R., V. Guige, A.S. Weingertner, et al. 2009. Is the non-respect of ethical principles by health professionals during first-trimester sonographic Down syndrome screening damaging to patient autonomy? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 34(1): 25\u201332.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compcom.2016.11.004","volume":"43","author":"EA Frost","year":"2017","unstructured":"Frost, E.A., and A.M. Haas. 2017. Seeing and knowing the womb: A technofeminist reframing of fetal ultrasound toward a decolonization of our bodies. Computers and Composition 43(1): 88\u2013105.","journal-title":"Computers and Composition"},{"issue":"11","key":"10360_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2007.02.015","volume":"64","author":"T Gammeltoft","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gammeltoft, T., and H.T. Nguyen. 2007. Fetal conditions and fatal decisions: Ethical dilemmas in ultrasound screening in Vietnam. Social Science & Medicine 64(11): 2248\u20132259.","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"issue":"10","key":"10360_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2045","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(02)00200-9","volume":"56","author":"L Getz","year":"2003","unstructured":"Getz, L., and A.L. Kirkengen. 2003. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: Advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas. Social Science & Medicine 56(10): 2045\u20132057.","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"issue":"64","key":"10360_CR39","first-page":"22","volume":"17","author":"HM Giebel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Giebel, H.M. 2020. Ultrasound viewers\u2019 attribution of moral status to fetal humans: A case for presumptive rationality. Diametros 17(64): 22\u201335.","journal-title":"Diametros"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"10360_CR40","first-page":"377","volume":"26","author":"SF Gilbert","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gilbert, S.F., and R. Howes-Mischel. 2004. \u201cShow me your original face before you were born\u201d: The convergence of public fetuses and sacred DNA. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26(3-4): 377\u2013394.","journal-title":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1159\/000324540","volume":"30","author":"G Gorincour","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gorincour, G., S. Tassy, U. Sim\u00e9oni, and P. Le Coz. 2011. Ethical issues on pregnancy termination: Impact of new imaging modalities. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 30(1): 1\u20138.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-6712.2009.00727.x","volume":"24","author":"H Gottfreosdottir","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gottfreosdottir, H., and K. Bjornsdottir (2010). \u201cHave you had the test?\u201dA discourse analysis of media presentation of prenatal screening in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 24(2): 414\u2013421.","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences"},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.484111","volume":"30","author":"O Graham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Graham, O., S. Ankrett, and S.R. Killick. 2010. Viewing ultrasound scan images prior to termination of pregnancy: Choice for women or conflict for ultrasonographers? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 30(5): 484\u2013488.","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2646","volume":"27","author":"C Gudex","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gudex, C., B.L. Nielsen, and M. Madsen. 2006. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 27(2): 145\u2013150.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13309.x","volume":"107","author":"E Hemminki","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hemminki, E., H. Toiviainen, and P. Santalahti. 2000. Views of Finnish doctors on fetal screening. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 107(5): 656\u2013662.","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10360_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2020.100508","volume":"24","author":"S Holmlund","year":"2020","unstructured":"Holmlund, S., P.T. Lan, K. Edvardsson, et al. 2020. Sub-optimal use of ultrasound examinations may result in underperformance of Vietnamese maternity care\u2014a qualitative study of midwives\u2019 experiences and views. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 24: 100508.","journal-title":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare"},{"issue":"3","key":"10360_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2013.10.005","volume":"28","author":"D Howe","year":"2014","unstructured":"Howe, D. 2014. Ethics of prenatal ultrasound. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 28(3): 443\u2013451.","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1016378415514","volume":"11","author":"RJ Kohut","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kohut, R.J., D. Dewey, and E.J. Love. 2002. Women\u2019s knowledge of prenatal ultrasound and informed Choice. Journal of Genetic Counseling 11(4): 265\u2013276.","journal-title":"Journal of Genetic Counseling"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1177\/004947550703700203","volume":"37","author":"EJ Kongnyuy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kongnyuy, E.J., and N. van den Broek. 2007. The use of ultrasonography in obstetrics in developing countries. Tropical Doctor 37(2): 70\u201372.","journal-title":"Tropical Doctor"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1080\/10462937.2010.524708","volume":"3","author":"CH Krol\u00f8kke","year":"2011","unstructured":"Krol\u00f8kke, C.H. 2011. Biotourist performances: Doing parenting during the ultrasound. Text and Performance Quarterly 3(1): 15\u201336.","journal-title":"Text and Performance Quarterly"},{"key":"10360_CR51","unstructured":"Kukla, R., and K. Wayne. 2018. Pregnancy, birth, and medicine. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2018\/entries\/ethics-pregnancy\/.\u00a0Accessed 10 August 2023."},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.090","volume":"196","author":"A Kurjak","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kurjak, A., G. Azumendi, W. Andonotopo, and A. Salihagic-Kadic. 2007a. Three-and four-dimensional ultrasonography for the structural and functional evaluation of the fetal face. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 196(1): 16\u201328.","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2007.002","volume":"35","author":"A Kurjak","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kurjak, A., B. Miskovic, W. Andonotopo, M. Stanojevic, G. Azumendi, and H. Vrcic. 2007b. How useful is 3D and 4D ultrasound in perinatal medicine? Journal of Perinatal Medicine 35(1): 10\u201327.","journal-title":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12700","volume":"41","author":"KY Leung","year":"2015","unstructured":"Leung, K.Y., C.F. Poon, A.R. Teotico, et al. 2015. Recommendations on routine mid-trimester anomaly scan. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research 41(5): 653\u2013661.","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research"},{"key":"10360_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4939-8889-1_1","volume":"1885","author":"B Levy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Levy, B., and M. Stosic (2019). Traditional prenatal diagnosis: Past to present. Methods in Molecular Biology 1885: 3\u201322.","journal-title":"Methods in Molecular Biology"},{"issue":"10","key":"10360_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1097\/00006205-199810000-00003","volume":"23","author":"SW Lowe","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lowe, S.W., R.H. Pruitt, P.T. Smart, and R.L. Dooley. 1998. Routine use of ultrasound during pregnancy. Nurse Practitioner 23(10): 60\u201366.","journal-title":"Nurse Practitioner"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00025.x","volume":"17","author":"J Lumley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Lumley, J. 1990. Through a glass darkly: Ultrasound and prenatal bonding. Birth 17(4): 214\u2013217.","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"7","key":"10360_CR58","first-page":"4","volume":"49","author":"D Markov","year":"2010","unstructured":"Markov, D., E. Pavlova, D. Atanassova, P. Markov, and S. Ivanov. 2010. First trimester prenatal diagnosis of structural fetal anomalies with three dimensional ultrasound\u2014possibilities and limitations. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 49(7): 4\u201310.","journal-title":"Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia"},{"issue":"7160","key":"10360_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7160.694","volume":"317","author":"A McFadyen","year":"1998","unstructured":"McFadyen, A., J. Gledhill, B. Whitlow, and D. Economides. 1998. First trimester ultrasound screening carries ethical and psychological implications. British Medical Journal 317(7160): 694\u2013695.","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"issue":"7","key":"10360_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-5994.2005.00861.x","volume":"35","author":"C Mills","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mills, C. 2005. Technology, embodiment and abortion. Internal Medicine Journal 35(7): 427\u2013428.","journal-title":"Internal Medicine Journal"},{"issue":"12","key":"10360_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1080\/15265160802559187","volume":"8","author":"C Mills","year":"2008","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2008. Images and emotion in abortion debates. American Journal of Bioethics 8(12): 61\u201362.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"key":"10360_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1427-4_6","volume-title":"Futures of Reproduction","author":"C Mills","year":"2011","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2011. Ultrasound, embodiment and abortion. In Futures of Reproduction, 101\u2013121. Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR63","first-page":"1","volume":"6","author":"C Mills","year":"2018","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2018. Seeing, feeling, doing: Mandatory ultrasound laws, empathy and abortion. Journal of Practical Ethics 6(2): 1\u201331.","journal-title":"Journal of Practical Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10360_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318265e101","volume":"120","author":"H Minkoff","year":"2012","unstructured":"Minkoff, H., and J. Ecker. 2012. When legislators play doctor: The ethics of mandatory preabortion ultrasound examinations. Obstetrics and Gynecology 120(3): 647\u2013649.","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000107288.44622.2a","volume":"103","author":"H Minkoff","year":"2004","unstructured":"Minkoff, H., K.R. Powderly, F. Chervenak, and L.B. McCullough. 2004. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103(2): 387\u2013392.","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","volume":"4","author":"D Moher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moher, D., L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, et al. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews 4(1): 1\u20139.","journal-title":"Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10360_CR67","first-page":"36","volume":"9","author":"AG Mubuuke","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mubuuke, A.G. 2011. An exploratory study of the views of Ugandan women and health practitioners on the use of sonography to establish fetal sex. The Pan African Medical Journal 9: 36.","journal-title":"The Pan African Medical Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-020-09985-w","volume":"24","author":"P Nakou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nakou, P. 2021. Is routine prenatal screening and testing fundamentally incompatible with a commitment to reproductive choice? Learning from the historical context. Medicine, Healthcare, And Philosophy 24(1): 73\u201383.","journal-title":"Medicine, Healthcare, And Philosophy"},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1177\/875647939701300609","volume":"13","author":"K Paul","year":"1997","unstructured":"Paul, K., and C. Nawrocki. 1997. Sociopolitical symposium. Prenatal ultrasound videos: Entertainment or excess? Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 13(6): 309\u2013312.","journal-title":"Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.2307\/3177802","volume":"13","author":"RP Petchesky","year":"1987","unstructured":"Petchesky, R.P. 1987. Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies 13(2): 263\u2013292.","journal-title":"Feminist Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.20529\/IJME.2018.041","volume":"4","author":"G Phutke","year":"2019","unstructured":"Phutke, G., T. Laux, P. Jain, and Y. Jain. 2019. Ultrasound in rural India: A failure of the best intentions. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 4(1): 39\u201345.","journal-title":"Indian Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"7","key":"10360_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2614","volume":"26","author":"C Ram\u00f3n y Cajal","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ram\u00f3n y Cajal, C., and R. Mart\u00ednez. 2005. Prenatal observation of fetal defecation using four\u2010dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 26(7): 794\u2013795.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhp039","volume":"34","author":"MS Raucher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Raucher, M.S. 2009. What they mean by \u201cgood science\u201d: The medical community\u2019s response to boutique fetal ultrasounds. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34(5): 528\u2013544.","journal-title":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9566.2011.01345.x","volume":"34","author":"J Roberts","year":"2012","unstructured":"Roberts, J. 2012. \u201cWakey wakey baby\u201d: Narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans. Sociology of Health & Illness 34(2): 299\u2013314.","journal-title":"Sociology of Health & Illness"},{"issue":"3","key":"10360_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1177\/0038038515591945","volume":"51","author":"J Roberts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Roberts, J., F. Griffiths, and A. Verran. 2015. Seeing the baby, doing family: Commercial ultrasound as family practice? Sociology 51(3): 527\u2013542.","journal-title":"Sociology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1353\/ken.2012.0002","volume":"22","author":"J Rocha","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rocha, J. 2012. Autonomous abortions: The inhibiting of women\u2019s autonomy through legal ultrasound requirements. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22(1): 35\u201358.","journal-title":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal"},{"key":"10360_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Samerski, S. 2015. Pregnancy, personhood, and the making of the fetus. In The Oxford handbook of feminist theory, edited by L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth, Chapter 33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199328581.013.36"},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1177\/089124394008002006","volume":"8","author":"M Sandelowski","year":"1994","unstructured":"Sandelowski, M. 1994. Separate, but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother\/fatherhood. Gender & Society 8(2): 230\u2013245.","journal-title":"Gender & Society"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/00004650-199807000-00003","volume":"12","author":"M Sandelowski","year":"1998","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 1998. Looking to care or caring to look? Technology and the rise of spectacular nursing. Holistic Nursing Practice 12(4): 1\u201311.","journal-title":"Holistic Nursing Practice"},{"key":"10360_CR80","first-page":"351","volume":"56","author":"C Sanger","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sanger, C. 2008. Seeing and believing: Mandatory ultrasound and the path to protected choice. UCLA Law Review 56: 351\u2013408.","journal-title":"UCLA Law Review"},{"key":"10360_CR81","unstructured":"Semczyszyn, N. 2010. Signal into vision: Medical imaging as instrumentally aided perception. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia."},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.06.001","volume":"26","author":"W Sepulveda","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sepulveda, W., R. Ximenes, A.E. Wong, F. Sepulveda, and P. Martinez-Ten. 2012. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in clinical practice: Applications in prenatal diagnosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 26(5): 593\u2013624.","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818f0c0c","volume":"112","author":"SE Simonsen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Simonsen, S.E., D.W. Branch, and N.C. Rose. 2008. The complexity of fetal imaging: Reconciling clinical care with patient entertainment. Obstetrics & Gynecology 112(6): 1351\u20131354.","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(18)30314-2","volume":"21","author":"DW Skupski","year":"1994","unstructured":"Skupski, D.W., F.A. Chervenak, and L.B. McCullough. 1994. Is routine ultrasound screening for all patients? Clinics in Perinatology 21(4): 707\u2013722.","journal-title":"Clinics in Perinatology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1001\/virtualmentor.2014.16.4.jdsc1-1404","volume":"16","author":"J Steinauer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Steinauer, J., and C. Sufrin (2014). Legislating abortion care. AMA Journal of Ethics 16(4): 265\u2013269.","journal-title":"AMA Journal of Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1177\/0959353516679688","volume":"27","author":"N Stephenson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stephenson, N., C. Mills, and K. McLeod. 2017. \u201cSimply providing information\u201d: Negotiating the ethical dilemmas of obstetric ultrasound, prenatal testing and selective termination of pregnancy. Feminism & Psychology 27(1): 72\u201391.","journal-title":"Feminism & Psychology"},{"issue":"13","key":"10360_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1700","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.289.13.1700","volume":"289","author":"N Stormer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Stormer, N. 2003. Seeing the fetus: The role of technology and image in the maternal-fetal relationship. JAMA 289(13): 1700.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1177\/875647930201800405","volume":"18","author":"PA Sullivan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sullivan, P.A. 2002. Public perceptions and politics: When diagnostic medical ultrasound is employed as a nondiagnostic, nonmedical tool. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 18(4): 211\u2013217.","journal-title":"Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography"},{"key":"10360_CR89","volume-title":"Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation","author":"JS Taylor","year":"1998","unstructured":"Taylor, J.S. 1998. Image of contradiction: Obstetrical ultrasound in the American culture. In Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation, edited by S. Franklin and H. Ragon\u00e9. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"10360_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.2307\/3178541","volume":"26","author":"JS Taylor","year":"2000","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2000. Of sonograms and baby prams: Prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy, and consumption. Feminist Studies 26(2): 391\u2013418.","journal-title":"Feminist Studies"},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1177\/8756479302238392","volume":"18","author":"JS Taylor","year":"2002","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2002. The public life of the fetal sonogram and the work of the sonographer. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 18(6): 367\u2013379.","journal-title":"Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography"},{"key":"10360_CR92","volume-title":"The public life of the fetal sonogram","author":"JS Taylor","year":"2008","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2008. The public life of the fetal sonogram. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press."},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9566.12554","volume":"39","author":"GM Thomas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Thomas, G.M., J. Roberts, and F.E. Griffiths 2017. Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations. Sociology of Health & Illness 39(6): 893\u2013907.","journal-title":"Sociology of Health & Illness"},{"issue":"7","key":"10360_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211540","volume":"26","author":"JE Van der Zalm","year":"2006","unstructured":"Van der Zalm, J.E., and P.J. Byrne. 2006. Seeing baby: Women\u2019s experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis. Journal of Perinatology 26(7): 403\u2013408.","journal-title":"Journal of Perinatology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s10746-007-9079-0","volume":"31","author":"P-P Verbeek","year":"2008","unstructured":"Verbeek, P.-P. 2008. Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies 31(1): 11\u201326.","journal-title":"Human Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.293.1.25","volume":"293","author":"R Voelker","year":"2005","unstructured":"Voelker, R. 2005. The business of baby pictures: Controversy brews over \u201ckeepsake\u201d fetal ultrasounds. JAMA 293(1): 25\u201327.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10360_CR97","first-page":"47","volume":"13","author":"C Whitbeck","year":"1987","unstructured":"Whitbeck, C. 1987. Fetal imaging and fetal monitoring: Finding the ethical issues. Women & Health 13(1-2): 47\u201357.","journal-title":"Women & Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"10360_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD007058","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007058.pub3","volume":"2015","author":"M Whitworth","year":"2015","unstructured":"Whitworth, M., L. Bricker, and C. Mullan. 2015. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015(7): CD007058\u2013CD007058.","journal-title":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews"},{"issue":"1","key":"10360_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9566.2006.00480.x","volume":"28","author":"C Williams","year":"2006","unstructured":"Williams, C. 2006. Dilemmas in fetal medicine: Premature application of technology or responding to women\u2019s choice? Sociology of Health & Illness 28(1): 1\u201320.","journal-title":"Sociology of Health & Illness"},{"issue":"3","key":"10360_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.289","volume":"22","author":"C Williams","year":"2002","unstructured":"Williams, C., P. Alderson, and B. Farsides. 2002. Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: A qualitative case study. Prenatal Diagnosis 22(3): 216\u2013220.","journal-title":"Prenatal Diagnosis"},{"key":"10360_CR101","unstructured":"World Health Organization. 2018. Ultrasound examination. In WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/9789241549912."},{"issue":"5","key":"10360_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1177\/0969733009106655","volume":"16","author":"LJL Yin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yin, L.J.L., and P.S.M. Che. 2009. Ethical analysis of non-medical fetal ultrasound. Nursing Ethics 16(5): 637\u2013646.","journal-title":"Nursing Ethics"},{"issue":"6","key":"10360_CR103","first-page":"488","volume":"12","author":"RKN Yuen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Yuen, R.K.N., S.T.S. Lam, and D. Allison. 2006. Bioethics and prenatal diagnosis of foetal diseases. Hong Kong Medical Journal 12(6): 488.","journal-title":"Hong Kong Medical Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"10360_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013837511115","volume":"9","author":"I Zechmeister","year":"2001","unstructured":"Zechmeister, I. 2001. Foetal images: The power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women\u2019s reproductive freedom. Health Care Analysis 9(4): 387\u2013400.","journal-title":"Health Care Analysis"}],"container-title":["Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,2]],"date-time":"2025-07-02T08:02:43Z","timestamp":1751443363000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"references-count":104,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10360"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-024-10360-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1176-7529","1872-4353"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1176-7529","type":"print"},{"value":"1872-4353","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 March 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 August 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of Interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent"}}]}}