{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T16:08:41Z","timestamp":1791389321467,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]],"date-time":"2025-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753056000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]],"date-time":"2025-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753056000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"National University Ireland, Galway"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethical Inquiry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>It is now possible for AI systems to generate novel inventions without meaningful human direction and control. Should such inventions be patented? The prevailing consensus, confirmed in recent test cases and official guidance, is that patent law only covers inventions by natural persons (i.e., humans). This, however, sometimes creates an odd situation in which AI-generated inventions cannot be patented, nor can the humans responsible for those systems gain patent rights indirectly through the operation of the law. In this article, we argue against this prevailing consensus. We present five reasons for thinking that AI-generated inventions should be patentable and that AI systems should be legally recognized as inventors. In making this argument, we do not claim that modern AI systems have acquired some significant legal or moral status that is equivalent to humans. Our argument is more practical in nature. We argue that failing to recognize AI inventorship will have negative repercussions for economic development and innovation, at a time when AI assistance is needed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]],"date-time":"2025-07-21T16:36:38Z","timestamp":1753115798000},"page":"515-525","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Why We Should Recognize AI as an Inventor"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"A. S.","family":"Bay\u0131nd\u0131r","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5879-3160","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Danaher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10429_CR1","first-page":"1079","volume":"57","author":"R Abbott","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abbott, R. 2016. I think, therefore I invent: Creative computers and the future of patent law.\u00a0Boston College Law Review\u00a057(4): 1079\u20131126.","journal-title":"Boston College Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR2","unstructured":"\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2020.\u00a0The reasonable robot: Artificial intelligence and law.\u00a0Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"10429_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ali, F. 2020. Digitalised invention, decentralised patents system: The impact of blockchain and artificial intelligence on the patent prosecution. SSRN Working Paper 1\u201330. https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3590336. Accessed 20 June 2025.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3590336"},{"key":"10429_CR4","volume-title":"Yapay \u00d6\u011frenme: Yeni Yapay Zek\u00e2","author":"E Alpayd\u0131n","year":"2020","unstructured":"Alpayd\u0131n, E.\u00a02020.\u00a0Yapay \u00d6\u011frenme: Yeni Yapay Zek\u00e2.\u00a0\u0130stanbul: Can Sanat Publishing."},{"key":"10429_CR5","unstructured":"Collison, P., and M. Nielsen.\u00a02018. Science is getting less bang for its buck.\u00a0The Atlantic, November 16. https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/science\/archive\/2018\/11\/diminishing-returns-science\/575665\/. Accessed February 27, 2024."},{"key":"10429_CR6","first-page":"411","volume-title":"Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence","author":"JA Cubert","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cubert, J.A., and R.G.A. Bone. 2018. The law of intellectual property created by artificial intelligence. In Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence, edited by W. Barfield and U. Pagallo, 411\u2013427. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing."},{"key":"10429_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cuntz, A., C. Fink, and H. Stamm. 2024. Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: An economic perspective. Economic Research Working Paper No. 77\/2024. WIPO and IPI.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4858320"},{"key":"10429_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Rassenfosse, G., A.B. Jaffe, and M. Wasserman. Forthcoming. AI-generated inventions: Implications for the patent system. Southern California Law Review. https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=4434054. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4434054. Accessed 20 June 2025.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4434054"},{"issue":"1","key":"10429_CR9","first-page":"147","volume":"125","author":"TY Ebrahim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ebrahim, T.Y. 2020. Artificial intelligence inventions & patent disclosure.\u00a0Penn State Law Review\u00a0125(1): 147\u2013221.","journal-title":"Penn State Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR10","unstructured":"Eisenberg, A. 1999. When a gizmo can invent a gizmo. The New York Times, November 25. Circuits section. https:\/\/archive.nytimes.com\/www.nytimes.com\/library\/tech\/99\/11\/circuits\/articles\/25next.html. Accessed 20 June 2025."},{"key":"10429_CR11","unstructured":"European Patent Office. No date.\u00a0Artificial intelligence. News and events. Accessed July 10, 2021.\u00a0https:\/\/www.epo.org\/news-events\/in-focus\/ict\/artificial-intelligence.html. Accessed 20 June 2025."},{"issue":"2","key":"10429_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.58217\/joce-ip.v17i2.350","volume":"17","author":"A Farhan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Farhan, A. 2023. The impact of artificial intelligence on human workers.\u00a0Journal of Communication Education\u00a017(2): 93\u2013104.","journal-title":"Journal of Communication Education"},{"key":"10429_CR13","unstructured":"Firth-Butterfield, K., Y. Chae, B. Allgrove, and I. Kitsara. 2018. Artificial intelligence collides with patent law. White Paper, World Economic Forum, Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, April 1\u201323. https:\/\/www3.weforum.org\/docs\/WEF_48540_WP_End_of_Innovation_Protecting_Patent_Law.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2025."},{"key":"10429_CR14","unstructured":"Fisher, M. 2007.\u00a0Fundamentals of patent law: Interpretation and scope of protection. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Accessed December 1, 2024. ProQuest Ebook Central."},{"issue":"3","key":"10429_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.2966\/scrip.130316.305","volume":"13","author":"E Fraser","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fraser, E. 2016. Computers as inventors: Legal policy implications of artificial intelligence on patent law.\u00a0SCRIPTed\u00a013(3): 305\u2013333.","journal-title":"SCRIPTed"},{"key":"10429_CR16","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"D Gervais","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gervais, D. 2019. Exploring the interfaces between big data and intellectual property law.\u00a0Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 3: 1\u201325.","journal-title":"Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law"},{"issue":"5","key":"10429_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2021.104226","volume":"50","author":"ER Gold","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gold, E.R.\u00a02021. The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science.\u00a0Research Policy\u00a050(5): 104226.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"10429_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-46238-2_25","volume-title":"Applications of generative AI","author":"S Ivanov","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ivanov, S. 2024. The economics of generative AI. In\u00a0Applications of generative AI, edited by Z. Lyu, 491\u2013501. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing.","edition":"1st"},{"issue":"1","key":"10429_CR19","first-page":"51","volume":"18","author":"E Kavu\u015fturan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kavu\u015fturan, E. 2020. Reforming U.S. patent law to enable access to essential medicines in the era of artificial intelligence.\u00a0Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property\u00a018(1): 51\u201390.","journal-title":"Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property"},{"issue":"2","key":"10429_CR20","first-page":"2","volume":"11","author":"KR Knutson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Knutson, K.R. 2020. Anything you can do, AI can\u2019t do better: An analysis of conception as a requirement for patent inventorship and a rationale for excluding AI inventors. Cybaris 11(2): Article 2.","journal-title":"Cybaris"},{"key":"10429_CR21","volume-title":"The age of AI: And our human future","author":"HA Kissinger","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kissinger, H.A., E. Schmidt, and D. Huttenlocher. 2021.\u00a0The age of AI: And our human future.\u00a0New York: Little, Brown and Company."},{"key":"10429_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.4337\/9781789904871.00015","volume-title":"Research handbook on intellectual property and moral rights","author":"N Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee, N. 2023 Inventor\u2019s moral right and morality of patents, in\u00a0Research handbook on intellectual property and moral rights, edited by Y. Gendreau, 96\u2013122. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing."},{"issue":"2","key":"10429_CR23","first-page":"275","volume":"14","author":"CE Mammen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mammen, C.E., and C. Richey. 2020. AI and IP: Are creativity and inventorship inherently human activities?\u00a0FUI Law Review 14(2): 275\u2013292.","journal-title":"FUI Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR24","first-page":"57","volume":"42","author":"G Mandel","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mandel, G. 2008. The non-obvious problem: How the indeterminate non-obviousness standard produces excessive patent grants.\u00a0University of California Davis Law Review\u00a042: 57\u2013128.","journal-title":"University of California Davis Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-004-3422-1","volume":"6","author":"A Matthias","year":"2004","unstructured":"Matthias, A. 2004. The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata.\u00a0Ethics and Information Technology\u00a06: 175\u2013183.","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10429_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.21552\/eplr\/2020\/1\/5","volume":"4","author":"F Mazzi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mazzi, F. 2020. Patentability of AI-generated drugs.\u00a0European Pharmaceutical Law Review\u00a04(1): 17\u201333.","journal-title":"European Pharmaceutical Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McLaughlin, M. 2018. Computer-generated inventions. Working Paper: 1\u201332.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3097822"},{"key":"10429_CR28","volume-title":"The law of patents","author":"CA Nard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nard, C. A. 2008.\u00a0The law of patents.\u00a0Frederick: Aspen Publishers."},{"issue":"2","key":"10429_CR29","first-page":"1","volume":"24","author":"R Pearlman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pearlman R (2018) Recognizing artificial intelligence (AI) as authors and inventors under U.S. intellectual property law. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 24(2):1\u201338","journal-title":"Richmond Journal of Law & Technology"},{"key":"10429_CR30","unstructured":"Ramalho, A. 2017. Patentability of AI-generated inventions: Is a reform of the patent system needed? Summary report, published under the 2017 Collaborative Research Project on Harmonization of Industrial Property Right Systems. https:\/\/www.iip.or.jp\/e\/summary\/pdf\/detail2017\/e29_02_Ramalho.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2025."},{"issue":"Fall","key":"10429_CR31","first-page":"113","volume":"29","author":"W Samore","year":"2013","unstructured":"Samore, W. 2013. Artificial intelligence and the patent system: Can a new tool render a once patentable idea obvious?\u00a0Syracuse Journal of Science and Technology Law\u00a029(Fall): 113\u2013142.","journal-title":"Syracuse Journal of Science and Technology Law"},{"key":"10429_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-021-00450-x","volume":"34","author":"F Santoni de Sio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Santoni de Sio, F. and G. Mecacci. 2021. Four responsibility gaps with artificial intelligence: Why they matter and how to address them.\u00a0Philosophy and Technology\u00a034: 1057\u20131084.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10429_CR33","first-page":"1945","volume":"75","author":"WM Schuster","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schuster, W.M. 2018. Artificial intelligence and patent ownership.\u00a0Washington and Lee Law Review 75(4): 1945\u20132004.","journal-title":"Washington and Lee Law Review"},{"key":"10429_CR34","unstructured":"Senior, A., J. Jumper, D. Hassabis, and P. Kohl. 2020. AlphaFold: Using AI for scientific discovery. https:\/\/www.deepmind.com\/blog\/alphafold-using-ai-for-scientific-discovery-2020. Accessed 20 June 2025."},{"key":"10429_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2024.103328","volume":"157","author":"S Sharma","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sharma, S. 2024. Benefits or concerns of AI: A multistakeholder responsibility.\u00a0Futures 157: 103328.","journal-title":"Futures"},{"key":"10429_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shemtov, N., and G. Gabison. 2022. The inventive step requirement and the rise of the AI machines.\u00a0Queen Mary Law Research Paper\u00a0375\/2022.","DOI":"10.4337\/9781800881907.00031"},{"issue":"1","key":"10429_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.12728\/culj.12.5","volume":"7","author":"S Tripathi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tripathi, S., and C. Ghatak. 2017. Artificial intelligence and intellectual property law.\u00a0Christ University Law Journal\u00a07(1): 83\u201397.","journal-title":"Christ University Law Journal"},{"key":"10429_CR38","unstructured":"U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2024 Inventorship guidance for AI-Assisted inventions: A notice by the Patent and Trademark Office."},{"key":"10429_CR39","volume-title":"Patent law","author":"JB Waite","year":"1920","unstructured":"Waite, J.B. 1920.\u00a0Patent law.\u00a0Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"10429_CR40","first-page":"169","volume-title":"Artificial Intelligence","author":"HJ Wilson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wilson, H.J., and P. Daugherty. 2019.\u00a0Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. In Artificial Intelligence, edited by T.H. Davenport, E. Brynjolfsson, A. McAfee, and H.J. Wilson, 169\u2013203. Harvard Business Review Press."},{"key":"10429_CR41","unstructured":"World Intellectual Property Organisation. No date. Opposition and administrative revocation mechanisms. Accessed February 11, 2024. https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/scp\/en\/revocation_mechanisms\/."},{"key":"10429_CR42","unstructured":"Wong, M.\u00a02017. Big ideas are getting harder to find.\u00a0Stanford Business. https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/big-ideas-are-getting-harder-find. Accessed February 27, 2024."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T09:46:54Z","timestamp":1761817614000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10429"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-025-10429-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1176-7529","1872-4353"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1176-7529","type":"print"},{"value":"1872-4353","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 January 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"As the study did not involve ethical concerns, ethics approval is not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics Approval"}},{"value":"The authors have no financial or non- financial interests to disclose.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"As the study did not involve human subjects, consent is not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent"}}]}}