{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T11:01:28Z","timestamp":1784890888618,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784851200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784851200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethical Inquiry"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T10:11:19Z","timestamp":1784887879000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Reflections on Conscientious Objection in Australia Through an Ethic of Solidarity"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-4731-7774","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bolarinwa Ayomide","family":"Harrison","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ademola Kazeem","family":"Fayemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"10555_CR1","unstructured":"Australian Medical Association. 2019. Conscientious objection \u2013 2019. https:\/\/www.ama.com.au\/articles\/conscientious-objection-2019."},{"key":"10555_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9076-y","volume":"29","author":"D Brock","year":"2008","unstructured":"Brock, D. 2008. Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: Who is obligated to do what, and why? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 187\u2013200.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"10555_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12233","volume":"30","author":"C Cowley","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cowley, C. 2016. A defence of conscientious objection in medicine: A reply to Schuklenk and Savulescu. Bioethics 30: 358\u2013364.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"10555_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1093\/phe\/phz008","volume":"12","author":"B Davies","year":"2019","unstructured":"Davies, B., and J. Savulesco. 2019. Solidarity and responsibility in health care. Public Health Ethics 12(2): 133\u2013144.","journal-title":"Public Health Ethics"},{"key":"10555_CR5","first-page":"1","volume":"38","author":"HT Engelhardt Jr","year":"2012","unstructured":"Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 2012. Secular morality after foundations: Moral pluralism, christianity, and the culture wars. Preprints and working articles of the centre for advanced study in bioethics 38: 1\u201319","journal-title":"Preprints and working articles of the centre for advanced study in bioethics"},{"key":"10555_CR6","unstructured":"European Court of Human Rights. 2022. Factsheet\u2014Freedom of religion. https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/documents\/d\/echr\/FS_Freedom_religion_ENG. Accessed July 18, 2023."},{"key":"10555_CR7","unstructured":"Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"10555_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9833.2007.00371.x","volume":"38","author":"CC Gould","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gould, C.C. 2007. Transnational solidarities. Journal of Social Philosophy 38(1): 148\u2013164.","journal-title":"Journal of Social Philosophy"},{"key":"10555_CR9","unstructured":"International Medical Advisory Panel (IMAP). 2016. Statement on conscientious objection: Refusal of care and professional conduct of reproductive services in the context of legal restrictions. https:\/\/www.ippf.org\/sites\/default\/files\/201701\/IMAP%20Statement%20on%20conscientious%20objection.pdf. Accessed on July\u00a011, 2023."},{"issue":"1","key":"10555_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-019-0346-1","volume":"20","author":"LA Keogh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Keogh, L.A., L. Gillam, M. Bismark, et al. 2019. Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: Perspectives of abortion service providers.\u00a0BMC Medical Ethics 20(1): 1\u201310.","journal-title":"BMC Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"10555_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13501","volume":"62","author":"C Melville","year":"2022","unstructured":"Melville, C. 2022. Abortion care in Australasia: A matter of health, not politics or religion. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 62(2): 187\u2013189.","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10555_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Millar, E., and B. Baird. 2021. Abortion is no longer a crime in Australia. But legal hurdles to access remain. The Conversation, March 4. https:\/\/theconversation.com\/abortion-is-no-longer-a-crime-in-australia-but-legal-hurdles-to-access-remain-156215. Accessed July 17, 2023","DOI":"10.64628\/AA.ap4enhafg"},{"issue":"15","key":"10555_CR13","first-page":"2","volume":"15","author":"EMK Nordsberg","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nordsberg, E.M.K., H. Skirbekk, and M. Magelssen. 2021. Consciousness objection to referrals for abortion: Pragmatic\u00a0solution or threat to women\u2019s rights? BMC Medical Ethics 15(15): 2\u20139.","journal-title":"BMC Medical Ethics"},{"key":"10555_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781139696593","volume-title":"Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond","author":"B Prainsack","year":"2017","unstructured":"Prainsack, B., and A. Buyx. 2017. Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"7536","key":"10555_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7536.294","volume":"332","author":"J Savulescu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Savulescu, J. 2006. Conscientious objection in medicine. British Medical Journal 332(7536): 294\u2013297.","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"10555_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Savulescu, J., and U. Schuklenk. 2016. Doctors have no right to refuse medical assistance in dying, abortion or contraception. Bioethics 31(3): 162\u2013170.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bioe.12288.","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12288"},{"issue":"4","key":"10555_CR17","first-page":"900","volume":"22","author":"R Sifris","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sifris, R. 2015. Tasmania\u2019s reproductive health (access to terminations) Act 2013: An\u00a0analysis of conscientious objection to abortion and the \u201cobligation to refer.\u201d Journal of Law and Medicine 22(4): 900\u2013914.","journal-title":"Journal of Law and Medicine"},{"key":"10555_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.4337\/9781839108150.00015","volume-title":"Research Handbook on International Abortion Law","author":"R Sifris","year":"2023","unstructured":"____. 2023. Abortion in Australia: Law, policy, and the advancement of reproductive Rights. In Research Handbook on International Abortion Law, 124\u2013140. Edward Elgar Publishing."},{"issue":"3","key":"10555_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12381","DOI":"10.1111\/nup.12381","volume":"23","author":"M Tieu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tieu, M., A. Mudd, T. Conroy, A. Pinero de Plaza, and A. Kitson. 2022. The trouble with personhood and person\u2010centred care. Nursing Philosophy 23(3): e12381.","journal-title":"Nursing Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"10555_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1177\/09685332221119503","volume":"22","author":"ZL Tongue","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tongue, Z.L. 2022. On conscientious objection to abortion: Questioning mandatory referral as a compromise in the international human rights framework. Medical Law International 22(4): 349\u2013371.","journal-title":"Medical Law International"},{"key":"10555_CR21","unstructured":"Tronto, J.C. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge."},{"key":"10555_CR22","unstructured":"Victorian Current Acts. 2012. Abortion Law Reform 2008 - Sect 8. http:\/\/www5.austlii.edu.au\/au\/legis\/vic\/consol_act\/alra2008209\/s8.html. Accessed July 5, 2023."},{"issue":"1","key":"10555_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1017\/S096318011600061X","volume":"26","author":"M Wicclair","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wicclair, M. 2017. Conscientious objection in healthcare and moral integrity. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 26(1): 7\u201317.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics"}],"container-title":["Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T10:11:21Z","timestamp":1784887881000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["10555"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-026-10555-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1176-7529","1872-4353"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1176-7529","type":"print"},{"value":"1872-4353","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declares that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this work.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of Interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}