{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T18:02:03Z","timestamp":1780164123700,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1776211200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1776211200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005005","name":"Ben-Gurion University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005005","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["OBES SURG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Comparative data on early complications after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remain limited.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare 60-day postoperative morbidity between SG and OAGB while accounting for confounding.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Soroka University Medical Center, Israel.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This is a retrospective cohort study assessing 60-day morbidity in patients undergoing SG and OAGB between 2009 and 2024. Propensity scores (sex, height, BMI, number of previous bariatric surgeries, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, fatty liver, hiatal hernia, cholecystectomy during index surgery, and band removal during index surgery) were used for 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching without replacement. Any potential postoperative events were flagged by utilization triggers (length of stay\u2009&gt;\u20097 days, ICU admission, blood transfusion, CT or upper endoscopy within 60 days) and verified by chart review. The primary outcome of this study was any complication occurring\u2009\u2264\u200960 days from the operation; secondary outcomes included complication types and severity by Clavien-Dindo classification.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Of 3,317 patients (SG\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20091,816; OAGB\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20091,501), 1,191 matched pairs were analyzed. Overall, 60-day complications were higher after SG than OAGB (15.4% vs. 11.8%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.012). SG patients exhibited more Clavien\u2013Dindo grade II (5.1% vs. 2.4%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&gt;\u20090.001), IIIa events (1.3% vs. 0.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.003) and IVb events (0.7% vs. 0.1%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.039). SG patients experienced higher rates of leak (1.8% vs. 0.8%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.019), abscess (1.2% vs. 0%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), pleural and abdominal fluid collection (1.2% vs. 0.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.007), bleeding (1.6% vs. 0.7%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.033) and dysphagia\/vomiting (3.2% vs. 1.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001) compared with OAGB patients. OAGB patients presented with more endoscopically diagnosed ulcers (0.7% vs. 0%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.008) and respiratory complaints (2.2% vs. 0.6%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001) compared to SG patients. Among complicated patients, upper endoscopy within 60 days was more frequent after SG (29.3% vs. 17.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.005); ICU length of stay was not different between the groups (0.8\u2009\u00b1\u20095.4 days in OAGB vs. 1.2\u2009\u00b1\u20099.1 days in SG,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.5).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In a large propensity-matched single-center cohort study, SG showed higher 60-day morbidity than OAGB, primarily of intermediate severity. Limitations include retrospective design, temporal bias, trigger-based ascertainment, and lack of capture of care delivered at external hospitals.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T07:45:25Z","timestamp":1776239125000},"page":"2458-2464","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Early 60-Day Morbidity after Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Propensity-Matched Single-Center Cohort of 2,382 Patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2207-7127","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ohad","family":"Guetta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Illia","family":"Vasyliev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3404-8673","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anton","family":"Osyntsov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alex","family":"Vakhrushev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1820-9278","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sharon","family":"Daniel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuval","family":"Arnon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5995-4237","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oleg","family":"Dukhno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10431","key":"8650_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02750-2","volume":"403","author":"NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)","year":"2024","unstructured":"NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1027\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02750-2. Epub 2024 Feb 29. PMID: 38432237; PMCID: PMC7615769.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"8650_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-024-07118-3","volume":"34","author":"L Angrisani","year":"2024","unstructured":"Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Palma R, Kow L, Prager G, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2020-2021: current trends for bariatric and metabolic procedures. Obes Surg. 2024;34(4):1075\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-024-07118-3.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"8650_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182a67426","volume":"258","author":"R Peterli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Peterli R, Borb\u00e9ly Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M, et al. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):690\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182a67426.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"8650_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-016-2395-6","volume":"27","author":"J Melissas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Melissas J, Stavroulakis K, Tzikoulis V, Peristeri A, Papadakis JA, Pazouki A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data from IFSO-European chapter center of excellence program. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):847\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-016-2395-6.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"8650_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.7052","volume":"160","author":"M Kraljevic","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kraljevic M, S\u00fcsstrunk J, W\u00f6lnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Bueter M, Gero D, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2025;160(4):369\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.7052.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"8650_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4754","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-021-05628-y","volume":"31","author":"MS Altieri","year":"2021","unstructured":"Altieri MS, Irish W, Pories WJ, Shah A, DeMaria EJ. Examining the rates of obesity and bariatric surgery in the United States. Obes Surg. 2021;31(11):4754\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-021-05628-y.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"8650_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2021.09.015","volume":"17","author":"M Gagner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gagner M, et al. Staple-line reinforcement in sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(12):2050\u20138.","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"11","key":"8650_CR8","first-page":"742","volume":"8","author":"A Nath","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nath A, et al. Gastric sleeve stenosis: evaluation and endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8(11):742\u201351.","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"10","key":"8650_CR9","first-page":"1605","volume":"29","author":"M Beran","year":"2023","unstructured":"Beran M, et al. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(10):1605\u201321.","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"3","key":"8650_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2017.12.011","volume":"14","author":"SB Kumar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):264\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2017.12.011.","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"8650_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1038\/s41366-021-01048-1","volume":"46","author":"R Singhal","year":"2022","unstructured":"Singhal R, Cardoso VR, Wiggins T, Super J, Ludwig C, Gkoutos GV, et al. 30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy, roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis of the GENEVA data. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46(4):750\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41366-021-01048-1.","journal-title":"Int J Obes (Lond)"},{"issue":"2","key":"8650_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","volume":"250","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"8650_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1509","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2085-3","volume":"26","author":"AR Aurora","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-011-2085-3.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"8650_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1466","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-022-05950-z","volume":"32","author":"A Aiolfi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Aiolfi A, Gagner M, Zappa MA, Lastraioli C, Lombardo F, Panizzo V, et al. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1466\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-022-05950-z.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"8650_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004950","volume":"1","author":"A Highet","year":"2023","unstructured":"Highet A, Johnson EH, Bonham AJ, Hutton DW, Zhou S, Thalji AS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2023;1(1):121\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004950.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"8650_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5709-4","volume":"32","author":"V Deslauriers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Deslauriers V, Beauchamp A, Garofalo F, Atlas H, Denis R, Garneau P, et al. Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):601\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5709-4.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"8","key":"8650_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5324","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-11843-w","volume":"39","author":"M Eguchi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Eguchi M, Nogueira R, Balthazar da Silveira CA, Vidotto L, Kasakewitch JPG, Lech GE, Perim V, Lima DL, Camacho D. Endoscopic management of gastric stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2025;39(8):5324\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-11843-w. Epub 2025 Jul 2. PMID: 40603612.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"8650_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1066","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-023-05619-7","volume":"27","author":"A Beran","year":"2023","unstructured":"Beran A, Shaear M, Al-Mudares S, Sharma I, Matar R, Al-Haddad M, et al. Predictors of marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(6):1066\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-023-05619-7.","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"8650_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2884","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-023-06762-5","volume":"33","author":"S Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee S, Supparamaniam S, Varghese C, Mahawar K. Marginal ulcers following one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33(9):2884\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-023-06762-5.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"8650_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amsu.2021.102248","volume":"64","author":"B Keleidari","year":"2021","unstructured":"Keleidari B, Dehkordi MM, Shahraki MS, Ahmadi ZS, Heidari M, Hajian A, et al. Bile reflux after one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery: a review study. Ann Med Surg. 2021;64:102248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amsu.2021.102248.","journal-title":"Ann Med Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"8650_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2021.11.009","volume":"18","author":"JJ Jung","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jung JJ, Park AK, Witkowski ER, Hutter MM. Comparison of short-term safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(3):326\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2021.11.009.","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"8650_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cireng.2023.02.014","volume":"101","author":"M Dolores Frutos Bernal","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dolores Frutos Bernal M. Bile reflux after bariatric surgery. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2023;101(4):63\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cireng.2023.02.014.","journal-title":"Cir Esp (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"5","key":"8650_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1428","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-022-05977-2","volume":"32","author":"TA Eldredge","year":"2022","unstructured":"Eldredge TA, Bills M, Ting YY, Dimitri M, Watson MM, Harris MC, et al. Once in a bile - the incidence of bile reflux post-bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1428\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-022-05977-2.","journal-title":"Obes Surg"}],"container-title":["Obesity Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T17:58:25Z","timestamp":1780163905000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["8650"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-026-08650-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-8923","1708-0428"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-8923","type":"print"},{"value":"1708-0428","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 January 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 April 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 April 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the participating institution (Soroka University Medical Center). To preserve blinded peer review, the approval number is withheld. All procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional policy and the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical\/Board Approval"}},{"value":"Given the retrospective design and use of de-identified data, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. No patient-identifiable information is reported.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed Consent"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}