{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T08:02:02Z","timestamp":1777104122990,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]],"date-time":"2019-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1557792000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]],"date-time":"2019-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1557792000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]],"date-time":"2019-05-14T10:36:03Z","timestamp":1557830163000},"page":"1-9","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Andrew","family":"McLean","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ankur","family":"Mukherjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chandan","family":"Phukan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rajan","family":"Veeratterapillay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naeem","family":"Soomro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bhaskar","family":"Somani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bhavan Prasad","family":"Rai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"973_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.09.008","volume":"118","author":"BP Rai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rai BP, Jones P, Tait C, Amitharaj R, Gowda R, Bhatti A et al (2018) Is cryotherapy a genuine rival to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in the management of suspected renal malignancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology 118:6\u201311","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"973_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0734-9","volume":"11","author":"T Stonier","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stonier T, Rai BP, Trimboli M, Abroaf A, Patel A, Gowrie-Mohan S et al (2017) Early vs. standard unclamping technique in minimal access partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies and the Lister cohort. J Robot Surg 11(4):389\u2013398","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"973_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2018.08.003","volume":"4","author":"L Marconi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Marconi L, Challacombe B (2018) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: retro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol Focus 4(5):632\u2013635","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"973_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.04.023","volume":"30","author":"L Xia","year":"2016","unstructured":"Xia L, Zhang X, Wang X, Xu T, Qin L, Zhang X et al (2016) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 30:109\u2013115","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"973_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0211","volume":"32","author":"N Pavan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pavan N, Derweesh I, Hampton LJ, White WM, Porter J, Challacombe BJ et al (2018) Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative outcomes. J Endourol 32(7):591\u2013596","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"973_CR6","unstructured":"Higgins JPT. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0: the cochrane collaboration. 2011"},{"issue":"7650","key":"973_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","volume":"336","author":"GH Guyatt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924\u2013926","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"973_CR8","unstructured":"Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. \nhttp:\/\/handbook.cochrane.org\n\n. Accessed Mar 2017"},{"key":"973_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.06.026","volume":"120","author":"S Arora","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arora S, Heulitt G, Menon M, Jeong W, Ahlawat RK, Capitanio U et al (2018) Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting. Urology 120:131\u2013137","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"973_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-014-1312-7","volume":"32","author":"SH Choo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Jeon SS et al (2014) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol 32(6):1523\u20131529","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"973_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0023","volume":"27","author":"A Hughes-Hallett","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869\u2013874","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"973_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2062-0","volume":"35","author":"SP Stroup","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT, Lee HJ, Berquist SW, Hassan AS et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35(11):1721\u20131728","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"973_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0641","volume":"27","author":"K Tanaka","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Furukawa J, Ishimura T, Muramaki M, Miyake H et al (2013) Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan. J Endourol 27(11):1384\u20131388","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"973_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000483","volume":"28","author":"AA Laviana","year":"2018","unstructured":"Laviana AA, Tan HJ, Hu JC, Weizer AZ, Chang SS, Barocas DA (2018) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing. Curr Opin Urol 28(2):108\u2013114","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"973_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0076","volume":"29","author":"EH Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS (2015) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol 29(10):1137\u20131142","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"973_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paulucci DJ, Beksac AT, Porter J, Abaza R, Eun DD, Bhandari A, et al. A multi-institutional propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 posterior tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A;2018","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2018.0313"},{"issue":"2","key":"973_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0603","volume":"31","author":"MJ Maurice","year":"2017","unstructured":"Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Rogers CG et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31(2):158\u2013162","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"973_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.03.010","volume":"4","author":"C Camp","year":"2018","unstructured":"Camp C, O\u2019Hara J, Hughes D, Adshead J (2018) Short-term outcomes and costs following partial nephrectomy in England: a population-based study. Eur Urol Focus 4(4):579\u2013585","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"6","key":"973_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13401","volume":"117","author":"D Hughes","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hughes D, Camp C, O\u2019Hara J, Adshead J (2016) Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 117(6):940\u2013947","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"973_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002794","volume":"269","author":"A Hirst","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, Campbell B, Campbell M, Feinberg J et al (2018) No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 269:211\u2013220","journal-title":"Ann Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,12]],"date-time":"2020-05-12T23:18:25Z","timestamp":1589325505000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["973"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2483","1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2483","type":"print"},{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 March 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 May 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 May 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Andrew McLean, Ankur Mukherjee, Chandan Phukan, Rajan Veeratterapillay, Naeem Soomro, Bhaskar Somani, and Bhavan Prasad Rai declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}