{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T09:36:35Z","timestamp":1773308195204,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]],"date-time":"2019-07-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562371200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]],"date-time":"2019-07-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562371200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]],"date-time":"2019-07-06T10:04:09Z","timestamp":1562407449000},"page":"241-248","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4823-2647","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Najib Isse","family":"Dirie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mahad A.","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shaogang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2008.09.001","volume":"5","author":"TE Helmy","year":"2009","unstructured":"Helmy TE et al (2009) Surgical management of failed pyeloplasty in children: single-center experience. J Pediatr Urol 5(2):87\u201389","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"issue":"4 Pt 2","key":"997_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.11.010","volume":"195","author":"GW Dy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dy GW et al (2016) National trends in secondary procedures following pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 195(4 Pt 2):1209\u20131214","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.06.053","volume":"65","author":"R Autorino","year":"2014","unstructured":"Autorino R et al (2014) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65(2):430\u2013452","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"997_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","volume":"53","author":"AM Abdrabuh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abdrabuh AM et al (2018) Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: a single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 53(11):2250\u20132255","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2014.10.009","volume":"11","author":"M Asensio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Asensio M et al (2015) Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible? J Pediatr Urol 11(2):69e1\u201369e6","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"997_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.10.062","volume":"197","author":"PR Moscardi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moscardi PR et al (2017) Reoperative laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair in children: safety and efficacy of the technique. J Urol 197(3 Pt 1):798\u2013804","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382012000100011","volume":"38","author":"MR Thom","year":"2012","unstructured":"Thom MR et al (2012) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: outcomes for primary and secondary repairs, a single institution experience. Int Braz J Urol 38(1):77\u201383","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.10.019","volume":"79","author":"A Sivaraman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sivaraman A et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. Urology 79(2):351\u2013355","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.06.024","volume":"180","author":"PW Mufarrij","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mufarrij PW et al (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391\u20131396","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"997_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.10.072","volume":"79","author":"BE Niver","year":"2012","unstructured":"Niver BE et al (2012) Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases. Urology 79(3):689\u2013694","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"997_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","volume":"4","author":"D Moher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moher D et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"997_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"25","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle\u2013Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603\u2013605","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"997_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1368-5031.2006.00701.x","volume":"60","author":"F Atug","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atug F et al (2006) Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Clin Pract 60(1):9\u201311","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"5","key":"997_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2016.0691","volume":"28","author":"M Baek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baek M et al (2018) Quantifying the additional difficulty of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic re-do pyeloplasty: a comparison of primary and re-do procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(5):610\u2013616","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13693422519839","volume":"18","author":"MF Chammas Jr","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chammas MF Jr et al (2014) Robotic laparoscopic pyeloplasty. JSLS 18(1):110\u2013115","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"997_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/401613","author":"RA Beasley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Beasley RA (2012) Medical robots: current systems and research directions. J Robot 2012.\u00a0\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/401613","journal-title":"J Robot"},{"key":"997_CR18","unstructured":"Intuitive Surgical I (2018) Intuitive Surgical Inc. Annual Report.\u00a0\nhttps:\/\/last10k.com\/search\/loadpdf?u=https:\/\/last10k.com\/sec-filings\/1035267\/000103526719000012\/isrg-20181231x10k.htm.pdf\n\n. Accessed 10 Apr 2019"},{"key":"997_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14635","volume":"123","author":"JH Kaouk","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kaouk JH, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Robot-assisted surgery for benign distal ureteral strictures: step-by-step technique using the SP surgical system. BJU Int 123 (4):733\u2013739","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2213-y","volume":"36","author":"PP Rao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rao PP (2018) Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition! World J Urol 36(4):537\u2013541","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.03.001","volume":"67","author":"NM Buffi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Buffi NM et al (2015) Robot-assisted, single-site, dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with the new da Vinci platform: a stage 2a study. Eur Urol 67(1):151\u2013156","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"997_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2008.02091.x","volume":"15","author":"AK Hemal","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hemal AK et al (2008) Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol 15(8):744\u2013746","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"997_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2016.04.045","volume":"12","author":"TD Davis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Davis TD et al (2016) Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol 12(6):394e1\u2013394e7","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12454","volume":"113","author":"M Vannahme","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vannahme M et al (2014) The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction\u2014a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy. BJU Int 113(1):108\u2013112","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.4103\/UA.UA_100_18","volume":"10","author":"HH Alhazmi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alhazmi HH (2018) Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann 10(4):347\u2013353","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0026","volume":"25","author":"T Patel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Patel T et al (2011) Efficacy of endopyelotomy in patients with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Endourol 25(4):587\u2013591","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"997_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.5114\/wiitm.2011.24692","volume":"6","author":"Z Wu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wu Z et al (2011) Ureteroscopic holmium: YAG laser endopyelotomy is effective in distinctive ureteropelvic junction obstructions. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech 6(3):144","journal-title":"Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-7796.150489","volume":"7","author":"GP Abraham","year":"2015","unstructured":"Abraham GP et al (2015) Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty. Urol Ann 7(2):183\u2013187","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"997_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2308","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000143904.17666.0b","volume":"172","author":"C Eden","year":"2004","unstructured":"Eden C et al (2004) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2308\u20132311","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"997_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2017.1347819","volume":"51","author":"A Hammady","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hammady A et al (2017) Laparoscopic repyeloplasty after failed open repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a case-matched multi-institutional study. Scand J Urol 51(5):402\u2013406","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12686","volume":"22","author":"M Nishi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nishi M et al (2015) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term results. Int J Urol 22(4):368\u2013371","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"997_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1951-y","volume":"35","author":"SN Ambani","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ambani SN, Yang DY, Wolf JS Jr (2017) Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 35(6):951\u2013956","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"997_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.10.070","volume":"71","author":"R Madi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Madi R, Roberts WW, Wolf JS Jr (2008) Late failures after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urology 71(4):677\u2013680 (discussion 680\u2013681)","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13408","volume":"118","author":"N Abdullah","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdullah N et al (2016) Multicentre outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy after major open abdominal surgery. BJU Int 118(2):298\u2013301","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"997_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-018-1317-6","volume":"16","author":"X Wei","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wei X et al (2018) Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy? World J Surg Oncol 16(1):10","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"997_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.01.068","volume":"81","author":"DA Leavitt","year":"2013","unstructured":"Leavitt DA et al (2013) Nature of crossing vessels in patients with radiographically normal ureteropelvic junctions: prevalence and anatomic characteristics. Urology 81(6):1168\u20131172","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"997_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2015.08.014","volume":"11","author":"HJ Corbett","year":"2015","unstructured":"Corbett HJ, Mullassery D (2015) Outcomes of endopyelotomy for pelviureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: a systematic review. J Pediatr Urol 11(6):328\u2013336","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"997_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2003.09.049","volume":"63","author":"BE Knudsen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Knudsen BE et al (2004) Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology 63(2):230\u2013234","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"997_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajur.2018.03.001","volume":"5","author":"J Rassweiler","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rassweiler J, Klein J, Goezen AS (2018) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic non-dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels: a matched-paired analysis and review of literature. Asian J Urol 5(3):172\u2013181","journal-title":"Asian J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"997_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0512","volume":"30","author":"A Roosen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Roosen A et al (2016) Is one early renographic follow-up adequate to measure the success of robotic pyeloplasty? J Endourol 30(12):1301\u20131305","journal-title":"J Endourol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,4]],"date-time":"2020-07-04T23:16:14Z","timestamp":1593904574000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}},"alternative-id":["997"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00997-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2483","1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2483","type":"print"},{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 May 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 July 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Najib Isse Dirie, Mahad A. Ahmed, Shaogang Wang declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}