{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T13:09:15Z","timestamp":1790860155246,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]],"date-time":"2023-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687305600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]],"date-time":"2023-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687305600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006389","name":"University of Geneva","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006389","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Robotics facilitates the realization of intra-corporeal anastomosis during right hemicolectomy and allows extracting the operative specimen through a C-section, offering potential benefits in terms of post-operative recovery and incidence of incisional hernia. Therefore, we progressively implemented robotic right hemicolectomy (robRHC) in our centre, and would like to report our initial experience with the technique. Consecutive patients who underwent robRHC within a single centre were prospectively included. Variables related to patients\u2019 demographics, surgical procedures, post-operative recovery and pathological outcomes were collected. Sixty patients underwent robRHC in our centre. Indications for robRHC were colon cancer in 58 patients (96.7%) and polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection in 2 patients (3.3%). Fifty-eight patients underwent robRHC with D2 lymphadenectomy and central vessel ligation (96.7%), and two patients (3.3%) had robRHC associated with another procedure. All patients had intra-corporeal anastomosis. The mean\u2009\u00b1\u2009operative time was of 200.4\u2009\u00b1\u2009114.9\u00a0min. Two conversions (3.3%) to open surgery were performed. The mean\u2009\u00b1\u2009SD length of stay was of 5.4\u2009\u00b1\u20093.8\u00a0days. Seven patients (11.7%) experienced a post-operative complication with a Clavien\u2013Dindo score\u2009\u2265\u20092. Two patients (3.5%) had an anastomotic leak. The mean\u2009\u00b1\u2009SD number of harvested lymph nodes was of 22.4\u2009\u00b1\u20097.6. All patients had negative pathological margins (R0 resection). To conclude, robotic RHC is a safe procedure, which can be implemented with satisfying peri- and post-operative outcomes. The potential benefits of the technique remain to be demonstrated by randomized controlled trials.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]],"date-time":"2023-06-21T06:01:45Z","timestamp":1687327305000},"page":"2315-2321","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Implementation of totally robotic right hemicolectomy: lessons learned from a prospective cohort"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Jeremy","family":"Meyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"Wijsman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rogier","family":"Crolla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George","family":"van der Schelling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"1646_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2013.54.3694","volume":"32","author":"RH Kennedy","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32:1804\u20131811","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"1646_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3061","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2006.09.7758","volume":"25","author":"DG Jayne","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061\u20133068","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"1646_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5270-6","volume":"31","author":"CL Deijen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM et al (2017) Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 31:2607\u20132615","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(05)70221-7","volume":"6","author":"R Veldkamp","year":"2005","unstructured":"Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477\u2013484","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"1646_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2224","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)09290-5","volume":"359","author":"AM Lacy","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224\u20132229","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"1646_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31818b7595","volume":"248","author":"PJ Hewett","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728\u2013738","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2147","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-021-03966-y","volume":"36","author":"N Dohrn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dohrn N, Klein MF, Gogenur I (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:2147\u20132158","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"1646_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.041","volume":"223","author":"PE Miller","year":"2016","unstructured":"Miller PE, Dao H, Paluvoi N et al (2016) Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs robotic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:369\u2013373","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01319-z","volume":"16","author":"EM Clarke","year":"2022","unstructured":"Clarke EM, Rahme J, Larach T et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 16:927\u2013933","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4684-x","volume":"30","author":"R Shapiro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L et al (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823\u20133829","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2012.09.002","volume":"22","author":"R Cirocchi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1\u201313","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"1646_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.11389","volume":"107","author":"J Bollo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A et al (2020) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107:364\u2013372","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5967","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10245967","volume":"10","author":"A Biondi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Biondi A, Di Mauro G, Morici R et al (2021) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short-term outcomes. J Clin Med 10:5967","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"1646_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-020-03807-4","volume":"36","author":"B Creavin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Creavin B, Balasubramanian I, Common M et al (2021) Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:645\u2013656","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"1646_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003519","volume":"270","author":"ME Allaix","year":"2019","unstructured":"Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA et al (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270:762\u2013767","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.001914","volume":"58","author":"AS Vergis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD et al (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63\u201368","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5083","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5573-2","volume":"31","author":"L Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S et al (2017) Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5083\u20135093","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1219","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8841","volume":"99","author":"JS Park","year":"2012","unstructured":"Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219\u20131226","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciy839","volume":"69","author":"T Mulder","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mulder T, Crolla R, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MFQ et al (2019) Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: results from a before-after study. Clin Infect Dis 69:93\u201399","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"key":"1646_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4562","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6209-x","volume":"32","author":"R Crolla","year":"2018","unstructured":"Crolla R, Mulder PG, van der Schelling GP (2018) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections. Surg Endosc 32:4562\u20134570","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09568-1","volume":"37","author":"LJX Giesen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Giesen LJX, Dekker JWT, Verseveld M et al (2023) Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study. Surg Endosc 37:912\u2013920","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1635","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-022-04199-3","volume":"37","author":"TA Burghgraef","year":"2022","unstructured":"Burghgraef TA, Crolla R, Fahim M et al (2022) Local recurrence of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicentre cohort study evaluating the initial cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:1635\u20131645","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"1646_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2016.12.005","volume":"26","author":"A Parisi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J et al (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28\u201336","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"1646_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-012-1604-6","volume":"28","author":"S Trastulli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F et al (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807\u2013814","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"1646_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5980-4","volume":"32","author":"L Solaini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1104\u20131110","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2018.11.002","volume":"42","author":"S Ma","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42:589\u2013598","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2975","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6563-8","volume":"33","author":"JS Park","year":"2019","unstructured":"Park JS, Kang H, Park SY et al (2019) Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 33:2975\u20132981","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1646_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jviscsurg.2022.04.001","volume":"159","author":"N de\u2019Angelis","year":"2022","unstructured":"de\u2019Angelis N, Micelli-Lupinacci R, Abdalla S et al (2022) Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC). J Visc Surg 159:212\u2013221","journal-title":"J Visc Surg"},{"key":"1646_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0134062","volume":"10","author":"S Trastulli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach in colonic resections for cancer and benign diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0134062","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1646_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7819-12-274","volume":"12","author":"H Xu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Xu H, Li J, Sun Y et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 12:274","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T05:12:01Z","timestamp":1694236321000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1646"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01646-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 April 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 June 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 June 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Rogier Crolla and George van der Schelling are proctors for Intuitive Surgical.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}