{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T16:22:46Z","timestamp":1790526166295,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]],"date-time":"2023-07-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689033600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]],"date-time":"2023-07-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689033600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]],"date-time":"2023-07-11T18:02:13Z","timestamp":1689098533000},"page":"2415-2419","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7191-4174","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Takahiro","family":"Nozaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-7680-4928","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kosuke","family":"Matsuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8780-2254","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Keiko","family":"Kagami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8990-9899","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ikuko","family":"Sakamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"1673_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2026","author":"M Akazawa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Akazawa M, Lee SL, Liu WM (2019) Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute. Int J Med Robot. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.2026","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"2","key":"1673_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12785289143837","volume":"14","author":"MS Walid","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walid MS, Heaton RL (2010) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri over one kilogram. JSLS 14(2):178\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/108680810X12785289143837","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"3","key":"1673_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13693422521755","volume":"17","author":"DA Silasi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Silasi DA, Gallo T, Silasi M, Menderes G, Azodi M (2013) Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri. JSLS 17(3):400\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/108680813X13693422521755","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"4","key":"1673_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.009","volume":"20","author":"S Uccella","year":"2013","unstructured":"Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Casarin J, Formenti G, Ghezzi F (2013) Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(4):505\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"1673_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2016.00098","author":"TE Ito","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ito TE, Vargas MV, Moawad GN et al (2017) Minimally invasive hysterectomy for uteri greater than one kilogram. JSLS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2016.00098","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"5","key":"1673_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.06.015","volume":"219","author":"M Louie","year":"2018","unstructured":"Louie M, Strassle PD, Moulder JK, Dizon AM, Schiff LD, Carey ET (2018) Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(5):480. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.06.015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1673_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005","volume":"215","author":"MM M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4","year":"2016","unstructured":"M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM, Nieminen K, Tom\u00e1s EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 JU (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(5):588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1673_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.4274\/jtgga.2018.0018","volume":"19","author":"MA Borahay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Borahay MA, Tap\u0131s\u0131z \u00d6L, Alanbay \u0130, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 GS (2018) Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. J Turkish Ger Gynecol Assoc 19(2):72\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4274\/jtgga.2018.0018","journal-title":"J Turkish Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"1673_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.16828","author":"K Alshowaikh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Alshowaikh K, Karpinska-Leydier K, Amirthalingam J et al (2021) Surgical and patient outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. Cureus. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.16828","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"4","key":"1673_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","volume":"11","author":"GN Moawad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moawad GN, Abi Khalil ED, Tyan P et al (2017) Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights. J Robot Surg 11(4):433\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"1673_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00091","author":"M Carbonnel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carbonnel M, Moawad GN, Tarazi MM et al (2021) Robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: what have we learned from a decade? JSLS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00091","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"2","key":"1673_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"1673_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1038\/bmt.2012.244","volume":"48","author":"Y Kanda","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software \u201cEZR\u201d for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bmt.2012.244","journal-title":"Bone Marrow Transplant"},{"issue":"1","key":"1673_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.09.016","volume":"18","author":"KA O\u2019Hanlan","year":"2011","unstructured":"O\u2019Hanlan KA, McCutcheon SP, McCutcheon JG (2011) Laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of uterine size. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(1):85\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.09.016","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1673_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.05.005","volume":"197","author":"RM Kho","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(1):113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.05.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1673_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.288","volume":"6","author":"P Iranmanesh","year":"2010","unstructured":"Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot 6(1):57\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.288","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"2","key":"1673_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01101-7","volume":"15","author":"P Tyan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tyan P, Klebanoff JS, Frangieh M et al (2021) Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights. J Robot Surg 15(2):259\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-020-01101-7","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"1673_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318265b61a","volume":"120","author":"D Sarlos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Von FS, Sch\u00e4r G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120(3):604\u2013611. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318265b61a","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1673_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.008","volume":"208","author":"MF Paraiso","year":"2013","unstructured":"Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ et al (2013) A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(5):368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1673_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm12122042","author":"SY Jeong","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jeong SY, Kim K, Ryu JW, Cha J, Park ST, Park SH (2022) Comparison of surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy of large uterus with gynecologic benign disease. J Pers Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jpm12122042","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1673_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.147718","volume":"11","author":"LH Chiu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chiu LH, Chen CH, Tu PC, Chang CW, Yen YK, Liu WM (2015) Comparison of robotic surgery and laparoscopy to perform total hysterectomy with pelvic adhesions or large uterus. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):87\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0972-9941.147718","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T05:13:08Z","timestamp":1694236388000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1673"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 April 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}},{"value":"This is an observational study. Approval was granted by the Yamanashi Central Hospital institutional review board (March 17, 2023\/2022-51).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}}]}}