{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T14:42:53Z","timestamp":1787496173567,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]],"date-time":"2024-03-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]],"date-time":"2024-03-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing\uff0cChina","award":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"]}]},{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing\uff0cChina","award":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"]}]},{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing\uff0cChina","award":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"]}]},{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing\uff0cChina","award":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"]}]},{"name":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing\uff0cChina","award":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0120"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    The purpose was to investigate the safety and advantages of different surgical approaches applied to overweight or obese cervical cancer patients by comparing their surgical and oncological outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study. 382 patients with a body mass index of at least 24.0\u00a0kg\/m\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    and stage IB-IIA (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, FIGO 2009) cervical cancer were enrolled, and then were divided into three groups: open radical hysterectomy (ORH) group, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) group, and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) group according to the surgical approach. IBM SPSS version 25.0 was used to analyze data. There were 51 patients in ORH group, 225 patients in LRH group and 106 patients in RRH group. In the comparison of surgical outcomes, compared to LRH and ORH, RRH had the shortest operating time, the least estimated blood loss, the shortest postoperative hospital stay, and the shortest recovery time for bowel function (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). In the comparison of postoperative complications, ORH has the highest rate of postoperative infection and wound complication compared to LRH and RRH (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.05), and RRH has the highest proportion of urinary retention. After a median follow-up time of 61\u00a0months, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.262,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.453). In patients with overweight or obese cervical cancer, the long-term outcomes of the three surgical approaches were comparable, with RRH showing significant advantages over ORH and LRH in terms of surgical outcomes.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]],"date-time":"2024-03-04T03:02:52Z","timestamp":1709521372000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches for overweight or obese cervical cancer patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Wanli","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jialin","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yingyu","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lin","family":"Xiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"1863_CR1","unstructured":"Cervical cancer. https:\/\/www.iarc.who.int\/cancer-type\/cervical-cancer\/. Accessed 2023"},{"issue":"20","key":"1863_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","volume":"379","author":"PT Ramirez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895\u20131904","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.036","volume":"222","author":"A Obermair","year":"2020","unstructured":"Obermair A, Asher R, Pareja R et al (2020) Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 222(3):249.e1-249.e10","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"24","key":"1863_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4513","DOI":"10.1158\/0008-5472.CAN-22-3143","volume":"82","author":"KM Jungles","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jungles KM, Green MD (2022) Fat fuels the fire in cervical cancer. Cancer Res 82(24):4513\u20134514","journal-title":"Cancer Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"1863_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13870","volume":"155","author":"IA Wichmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wichmann IA, Cuello MA (2021) Obesity and gynecological cancers: a toxic relationship. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 155(Suppl 1):123\u2013134","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"1863_CR6","first-page":"727","volume":"96","author":"DE Cohn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cohn DE, Swisher EM, Herzog TJ, Rader JS, Mutch DG (2000) Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in obese women. Obstet Gynecol 96(5 Pt 1):727\u2013731","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.04.038","volume":"28","author":"M Brunes","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brunes M, Johannesson U, H\u00e4bel H, S\u00f6derberg MW, Ek M (2021) Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(2):228\u2013236","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318256ccc5","volume":"119","author":"JY Park","year":"2012","unstructured":"Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH (2012) Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 119(6):1201\u20131209","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR9","first-page":"83","volume":"15","author":"BF Zhou","year":"2002","unstructured":"Zhou BF (2002) Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults\u2013study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci 15(1):83\u201396","journal-title":"Biomed Environ Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-019-1689-2","volume":"17","author":"H Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li H, Zhou CK, Song J et al (2019) Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation. World J Surg Oncol 17(1):141","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.09.006","volume":"139","author":"JK Chan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients\u2014a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. Gynecol Oncol 139(2):300\u2013305","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.4274\/jtgga.2018.0018","volume":"19","author":"MA Borahay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Borahay MA, Tap\u0131s\u0131z \u00d6L, Alanbay \u0130, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 GS (2018) Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 19(2):72\u201377","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc."},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14209","volume":"160","author":"X Guo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Guo X, Tian S, Wang H, Zhang J, Cheng Y, Yao Y (2023) Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 160(1):28\u201337","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06248-8","volume":"306","author":"J Kampers","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kampers J, Gerhardt E, Sibbertsen P et al (2021) Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306(2):295\u2013314","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2018.01.092","volume":"44","author":"V Gallotta","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gallotta V, Conte C, Federico A et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a case matched control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(6):754\u2013759","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0193033","volume":"13","author":"YM Jin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jin YM, Liu SS, Chen J, Chen YN, Ren CC (2018) Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0193033","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01320-6","volume":"16","author":"R Sekhon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sekhon R, Naithani A, Makkar P et al (2022) Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India. J Robot Surg 16(4):935\u2013941","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.02.002","volume":"121","author":"MB Sert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sert MB, Abeler V (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon\u2019s experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):600\u2013604","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"33","key":"1863_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3075","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.19.02024","volume":"37","author":"KS Tewari","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tewari KS (2019) Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical carcinoma: interpreting the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial results. J Clin Oncol 37(33):3075\u20133080","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.033","volume":"213","author":"WZ Wysham","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wysham WZ, Kim KH, Roberts JM et al (2015) Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(1):33e1-37","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.09.042","volume":"228","author":"N Chakraborty","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chakraborty N, Rhodes S, Luchristt D, Bretschneider CE, Sheyn D (2023) Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy with longer operative time associated with a decreased benefit compared with total abdominal hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 228(2):205.e1-205.e12","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1863_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1008.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2015.07.003","volume":"21","author":"S Thelwall","year":"2015","unstructured":"Thelwall S, Harrington P, Sheridan E, Lamagni T (2015) Impact of obesity on the risk of wound infection following surgery: results from a nationwide prospective multicentre cohort study in England. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(11):1008.e1\u20138","journal-title":"Clin Microbiol Infect"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.04.001","volume":"27","author":"P Tyan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tyan P, Amdur R, Berrigan M et al (2020) Differences in postoperative morbidity among obese patients undergoing abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(2):464\u2013472","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR24","first-page":"CD012863","volume":"1","author":"A Aue-Aungkul","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aue-Aungkul A, Kietpeerakool C, Rattanakanokchai S et al (2021) Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1(1):CD012863","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR25","first-page":"27","volume":"12","author":"G Ralph","year":"1991","unstructured":"Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K (1991) Radicality of parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 12(1):27\u201330","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"1863_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1007\/s00276-003-0137-7","volume":"25","author":"A Ercoli","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P et al (2003) Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 25(3\u20134):200\u2013206","journal-title":"Surg Radiol Anat"},{"issue":"37","key":"1863_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000012353","volume":"97","author":"OC Neagoe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neagoe OC, Ionica M, Mazilu O (2018) The role of pelvic lymphocele in the development of early postoperative complications. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(37):e12353","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"9","key":"1863_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1704","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000555","volume":"25","author":"V Benito","year":"2015","unstructured":"Benito V, Romeu S, Esparza M et al (2015) Safety and feasibility analysis of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in pelvic gynecologic malignancies: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(9):1704\u20131710","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1509","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07366-1","volume":"34","author":"JH Hwang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hwang JH, Kim BW (2020) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies. Surg Endosc 34(4):1509\u20131521","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.07.008","volume":"27","author":"JH Hwang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hwang JH, Kim BW, Kim SR, Kim JH (2020) Robotic radical hysterectomy is not superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in perioperative urologic complications: a meta-analysis of 23 studies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(1):38\u201347","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"20","key":"1863_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1804923","volume":"379","author":"A Melamed","year":"2018","unstructured":"Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1905\u20131914","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2024.35.e9","volume":"35","author":"JH Hwang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hwang JH, Kim B (2024) Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 35(1):e9","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR33","first-page":"589","volume":"139","author":"BA Davidson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Davidson BA, Weber JM, Monuzsko KA, Truong T, Havrilesky LJ, Moss HA (2022) Evaluation of surgical morbidity after hysterectomy during an obesity epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 139(4):589\u2013596","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000558","volume":"29","author":"H Falconer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Falconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K et al (2019) Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(6):1072\u20131076","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S2213-8587(21)00045-0","volume":"9","author":"XF Pan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pan XF, Wang L, Pan A (2021) Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(6):373\u2013392","journal-title":"Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,24]],"date-time":"2024-12-24T19:04:22Z","timestamp":1735067062000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1863"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01863-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 December 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 March 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Human Ethics Committee of The First affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (K2023-176).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}],"article-number":"107"}}