{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T23:10:13Z","timestamp":1792365013591,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738108800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738108800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T00:25:01Z","timestamp":1738110301000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Ruo-Zeng","family":"Rong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pan","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mei","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cui-E","family":"He","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"2217_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2012.12.027","volume":"49","author":"J Ferlay","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374\u20131403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejca.2012.12.027","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"2217_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdz056","volume":"30","author":"B Escudier","year":"2019","unstructured":"Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al (2019) Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up\u2020. Ann Oncol 30(5):706\u2013720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdz056","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.09.017","volume":"181","author":"WC Huang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P (2009) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors\u2013is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181(1):55\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2008.09.017","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"2217_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-14646-2","author":"W Attawettayanon","year":"2023","unstructured":"Attawettayanon W, Kazama A, Yasuda Y et al (2023) Thermal ablation versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal mass in a solitary kidney: a matched cohort comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-023-14646-2","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2217_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.06.049","volume":"64","author":"MT Gettman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914\u2013918. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2004.06.049","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"13","key":"2217_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4277","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5411-0","volume":"23","author":"B Peyronnet","year":"2016","unstructured":"Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23(13):4277\u20134283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-016-5411-0","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2217_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.04.100","volume":"198","author":"S Campbell","year":"2017","unstructured":"Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME et al (2017) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 198(3):520\u2013529. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2017.04.100","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2217_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.04.028","volume":"66","author":"JC Hu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP et al (2014) Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol 66(3):542\u2013549. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.04.028","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2217_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2018.08.003","volume":"4","author":"L Marconi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Marconi L, Challacombe B (2018) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: Rretro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol Focus 4(5):632\u2013635. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2018.08.003","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"7","key":"2217_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0337","volume":"21","author":"K Kieran","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kieran K, Montgomery JS, Daignault S, Roberts WW, Wolf JS (2007) Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 21(7):754\u2013759. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2007.0337","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.02.057","volume":"77","author":"M Marszalek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM et al (2011) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology 77(1):109\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2010.02.057","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"10","key":"2217_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3299","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.3888","volume":"10","author":"J Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou J, Liu ZH, Cao DH et al (2021) Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better? Cancer Med 10(10):3299\u20133308. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cam4.3888","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"2217_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4175","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03741-2","volume":"39","author":"U Carbonara","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carbonara U, Eun D, Derweesh I et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis. World J Urol 39(11):4175\u20134182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-021-03741-2","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"2217_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"2217_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2520","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280219889080","volume":"29","author":"S McGrath","year":"2020","unstructured":"McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, Thombs BD, Benedetti A (2020) DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 29(9):2520\u20132537. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0962280219889080","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"issue":"7568","key":"2217_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.333.7568.597","volume":"333","author":"J Lau","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333(7568):597\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.333.7568.597","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"2217_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-014-1312-7","volume":"32","author":"SH Choo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH et al (2014) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol 32(6):1523\u20131529. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-014-1312-7","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2217_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2021.21008","volume":"47","author":"A Eraky","year":"2021","unstructured":"Eraky A, Hamann C, Harke NN, Tropmann-Frick M, J\u00fcnemann KP, Osmonov D (2021) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center matched-pair analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach. Turk J Urol 47(4):305\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/tud.2021.21008","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2217_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2020.08.012","volume":"7","author":"NN Harke","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harke NN, Darr C, Radtke JP et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7(6):1363\u20131370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2020.08.012","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"2","key":"2217_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000483","volume":"28","author":"AA Laviana","year":"2018","unstructured":"Laviana AA, Tan HJ, Hu JC, Weizer AZ, Chang SS, Barocas DA (2018) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing. Curr Opin Urol 28(2):108\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000483","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2217_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0603","volume":"31","author":"MJ Maurice","year":"2017","unstructured":"Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31(2):158\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2016.0603","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2217_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02903-7","volume":"38","author":"HR Mittakanti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF, Porter JR (2020) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol 38(5):1093\u20131099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-019-02903-7","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2018.0313","volume":"29","author":"DJ Paulucci","year":"2019","unstructured":"Paulucci DJ, Beksac AT, Porter J et al (2019) A multi-institutional propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 posterior tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29(1):29\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2018.0313","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"9","key":"2217_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2283","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-04101-4","volume":"40","author":"G Sharma","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sharma G, Shah M, Ahluwalia P et al (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis of VCQI database. World J Urol 40(9):2283\u20132291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04101-4","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01086-3","volume":"15","author":"T Takagi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Takagi T, Yoshida K, Kondo T et al (2021) Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. J Robotic Surg 15(1):99\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-020-01086-3","journal-title":"J Robotic Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2217_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0023","volume":"27","author":"A Hughes-Hallett","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869\u2013874. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2013.0023","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"2217_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2062-0","volume":"35","author":"SP Stroup","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35(11):1721\u20131728. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-017-2062-0","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2217_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0076","volume":"29","author":"EH Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS (2015) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol 29(10):1137\u20131142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2015.0076","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-04796-7","volume":"42","author":"N Shrivastava","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shrivastava N, Bhargava P, Sharma G, Choudhary GR (2024) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 42(1):83. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-024-04796-7","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2217_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d","volume":"239","author":"AR Lanfranco","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2217_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07084-3","volume":"34","author":"Q Yan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yan Q, Xu LB, Ren ZF, Liu C (2020) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(2):501\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-019-07084-3","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"2217_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2053","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000065238.06490.8a","volume":"169","author":"LE Ponsky","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ponsky LE, Cherullo EE, Banks KLW et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: incorporating advantages of hand assisted and standard laparoscopy. J Urol 169(6):2053\u20132056. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.ju.0000065238.06490.8a","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2217_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.12.013","volume":"59","author":"H Van Poppel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W et al (2011) A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 59(4):543\u2013552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.12.013","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"2217_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0641","volume":"27","author":"K Tanaka","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Furukawa J et al (2013) Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in japan. J Endourol 27(11):1384\u20131388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2012.0641","journal-title":"J Endourol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:19:09Z","timestamp":1767489549000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2217"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 January 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical standard"}}],"article-number":"56"}}