{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,4]],"date-time":"2026-04-04T16:40:39Z","timestamp":1775320839179,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]],"date-time":"2025-04-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744416000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]],"date-time":"2025-04-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744416000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Fluid collections are common after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Literature about surgical techniques to reduce fluid collections after extraperitoneal single-port (SP) RARP is limited. This study evaluates the proposed technique of bilateral peritoneal windows and abdominal binder to reduce postoperative fluid collections in extraperitoneal SP RARP. An analysis of extraperitoneal SP RARP cases (January 2019\u2013May 2024) was conducted using IRB-approved retrospective and prospective databases. Two surgeons implemented the bilateral peritoneal windows plus abdominal binder intervention. Patients were divided into pre-intervention and post-intervention groups. Outcomes, demographics, and complications between groups were compared. One hundred ninety-five pre-intervention and 194 post-intervention SP RARP patients were analyzed. Post-intervention patients had higher BMI (28.9 kg\/m\n                    <jats:sup>2\u00a0<\/jats:sup>\n                    vs. 27.7\u00a0kg\/m\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    ,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009= 0.018) and lymph node dissection rates (92.0% vs. 88.7%,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009= 0.002), with shorter operating times (126.3 vs. 145.1 min,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt; 0.001). Fluid collection rates decreased post-intervention (5.64% vs. 2.1%,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009= 0.11), with fewer symptomatic cases (5.1% vs. 2.1%) and drainage requirements (2.0% vs. 1.54%). Non-fluid complications were significantly lower post-intervention during hospital stays (5.1% vs. 0%,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009= 0.001). This study demonstrates that bilateral peritoneal windows and abdominal binder in extraperitoneal SP RARP may reduce incidence of postoperative fluid collection. The technique proved safe and efficient, with no bowel-related complications and shorter operating times. These findings highlight the efficacy of this approach and minimize patient burden due to this common complication.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]],"date-time":"2025-04-12T02:27:52Z","timestamp":1744424872000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Use of peritoneal window and abdominal binder to reduce fluid collection after single-port robotic radical prostatectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-9614-0043","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sonam","family":"Saxena","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mubashir S.","family":"Billah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Angelo","family":"Cadiente","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Implicito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Thiemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Brink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aisha","family":"Kourouma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ruth","family":"Sanchez de la Rosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael D.","family":"Stifelman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mutahar","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"2330_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10094.x","volume":"108","author":"MA Orvieto","year":"2011","unstructured":"Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel VR (2011) Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 108(7):1185\u20131190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10094.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"2330_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.044","volume":"62","author":"G Novara","year":"2012","unstructured":"Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431\u2013452. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.044","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2330_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13425","volume":"118","author":"MS Keskin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Keskin MS, Argun OB, Obek C et al (2016) The incidence and sequela of lymphocele formation after robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 118(1):127\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.13425","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"2330_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.03.057","volume":"65","author":"G Ploussard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A et al (2014) Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy. Limit Complicat - A System Rev Literature, Eur Urol 65(1):7\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.03.057","journal-title":"Limit Complicat - A System Rev Literature, Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2330_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.10.072","volume":"179","author":"M Musch","year":"2008","unstructured":"Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D (2008) Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J Urol 179(3):923\u2013928. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2007.10.072","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2330_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15497","volume":"128","author":"RM Pose","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pose RM, Knipper S, Wurnschimmel C et al (2021) Significant reduction of lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 128(6):723\u2013733. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15497","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"2330_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-008-0327-3","volume":"26","author":"J Stolzenburg","year":"2008","unstructured":"Stolzenburg J, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R et al (2008) Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol 26(6):581\u2013586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-008-0327-3","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2330_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-014-1289-6","volume":"19","author":"MW Christofferson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Christofferson MW, Olsen BH, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2015) Randomized clinical trial on the postoperative use of an abdominal binder after laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia 19(1):147\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-014-1289-6","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"issue":"10","key":"2330_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0153","volume":"31","author":"D Horovitz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Horovitz D, Lu X, Feng C, Messing EM, Joseph JV (2017) Rate of symptomatic lymphocele formation after extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Endourol 31(10):1037\u20131043. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2017.0153","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2330_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.02.039","volume":"68","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2006","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Tarabuzzi R et al (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology 68(2):376\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2006.02.039","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2330_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.02.221","author":"J Kreshover","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kreshover J, Harnisch B, Tuerk I (2011) 153 incidence of lymphocele after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy does surgical approach matter? J Urol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2011.02.221","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2330_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2016.10.008","volume":"50","author":"MA Thaler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Thaler MA, Bietenbeck A, Schulz C, Luppa PB (2017) Establishment of triglyceride cut-off values to detect chylous ascites and pleural effusions. Clin Biochem 50(3):134\u2013138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2016.10.008. (Epub 2016 Oct 15 PMID: 27750038)","journal-title":"Clin Biochem"},{"issue":"10","key":"2330_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-014-0445-y","volume":"15","author":"HJ Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee HJ, Kane CJ (2014) How to minimize lymphoceles and treat clinically symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 15(10):445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-014-0445-y. (PMID: 25129450)","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"2330_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.02.039","volume":"68","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2006","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Tarabuzzi R, Billia M, Grande S, Musso F, Burruni R, Renard J, Scarpa RM (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urol 68(2):376\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2006.02.039","journal-title":"Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2330_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0222","volume":"25","author":"JS Chung","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chung JS, Kim WT, Ham WS, Yu HS, Chase Y, Chung SH, Choi YD (2011) Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon\u2019s experience. J Endourol 25(5):787\u2013792. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2010.0222","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2330_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12854","volume":"22","author":"M Akand","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, Ates M (2015) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Intl J Urol 22(10):916\u2013921. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iju.12854","journal-title":"Intl J Urol"},{"key":"2330_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2024.07.110","volume":"67","author":"G Pettenuzzo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Pettenuzzo G, Ditonno F, Cannoletta D, Pacini M, Morgantini L, Sauer RC, Torres-Anguiano JR, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Bartoletti R, Veccia A, Bertolo R, Antonelli A, Crivellaro S (2024) Pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparison among extraperitoneal single-port and transperitoneal multiport radical prostatectomy - a single-center experience. Eur Urol Open Sci 67:69\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euros.2024.07.110","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"key":"2330_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2022.10.001","volume":"171","author":"MA Zeinab","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zeinab MA, Beksac AT, Ferguson E, Kaviani A, Moschovas MC, Joseph J, Kim M, Crivellaro S, Nix J, Patel V, Kaouk J (2023) (2022) Single-port extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional propensity-score matched study. Urology 171:140\u2013145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2022.10.001","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"2330_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0635","volume":"25","author":"M Waldert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Waldert M, Remzi M, Klatte T, Klinger HC (2011) FloSeal reduces the incidence of lymphoceles after lymphadenectomies in laparoscopic and robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(6):969\u2013973. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2010.0635. (Epub 2011 May 4)","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2330_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2009.03.011","author":"A Naselli","year":"2010","unstructured":"Naselli A, Andreatta R, Introini C, Fontana V, Puppo P (2010) Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after lymph node excision and radical prostatectomy. Urology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2009.03.011","journal-title":"Urology"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:19:03Z","timestamp":1767489543000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2330"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02330-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Michael D. Stifelman, MD is on the Advisory Board of Intuitive Surgical and is a consultant for Vascular Technology. Mutahar Ahmed, MD is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Ethicon, and BioTissue. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study received Institutional Review Board approval (Pro2020 -\u20091293).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}],"article-number":"151"}}