{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T16:22:45Z","timestamp":1790526165058,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748649600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748649600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Beijing Natural Science Foundation","award":["7254423"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["7254423"]}]},{"name":"the Youth Independent Innovation Science Fund of PLA General Hospital","award":["22QNCZ037"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["22QNCZ037"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T13:41:38Z","timestamp":1748698898000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Surgical outcomes of\u00a0robotic hysterectomy for\u00a0large uterus weighing more than\u00a01000\u00a0g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Luyang","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiufeng","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nina","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jia","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wen","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wensheng","family":"Fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuanguang","family":"Meng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li\u2019an","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chenglei","family":"Gu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.010","volume":"19","author":"R Garry","year":"2005","unstructured":"Garry R (2005) Health economics of hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(3):451\u2013465. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.010","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004679","volume":"139","author":"JD Wright","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wright JD, Huang Y, Li AH, Melamed A, Hershman DL (2022) Nationwide estimates of annual inpatient and outpatient hysterectomies performed in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 139(3):446\u2013448. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004679","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"2422_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2021.07.002","volume":"49","author":"A Chevrot","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chevrot A, Margueritte F, Fritel X, Serfaty A, Huchon C, Fauconnier A (2021) Hysterectomy: practices evolution between 2009 and 2019 in France. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 49(11):816\u2013822. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2021.07.002","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2422_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1369","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818f3c17","volume":"112","author":"AG Visco","year":"2008","unstructured":"Visco AG, Advincula AP (2008) Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1369\u20131384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818f3c17","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.03.003","volume":"16","author":"AP Advincula","year":"2009","unstructured":"Advincula AP, Wang K (2009) Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):291\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.03.003","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2422_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4028-7","volume":"293","author":"C Iavazzo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID (2016) Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(6):1169\u20131183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4028-7","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2422_CR7","volume-title":"Williams Gynecology","author":"BL BookHoffman","year":"2020","unstructured":"BookHoffman BL, Schorge JO, Halvorson LM, Hamid CA, Corton MM, Schaffer JI (2020) Williams Gynecology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, USA","edition":"4"},{"issue":"4","key":"2422_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","volume":"11","author":"GN Moawad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moawad GN, Abi Khalil ED, Tyan P, Shu MK, Samuel D, Amdur R, Scheib SA, Marfori CQ (2017) Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights. J Robot Surg 11(4):433\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad","volume":"115","author":"TN Payne","year":"2010","unstructured":"Payne TN, Dauterive FR, Pitter MC, Giep HN, Giep BN, Grogg TW, Shanbour KA, Goff DW, Hubert HB (2010) Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices. Obstet Gynecol 115(3):535\u2013542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2422_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00068","author":"R Sinha","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sinha R, Bana R, Sanjay M (2019) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus. JSLS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00068","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"4","key":"2422_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-011-0271-x","volume":"5","author":"ME Orady","year":"2011","unstructured":"Orady ME, Karim Nawfal A, Wegienka G (2011) Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes. J Robot Surg 5(4):267\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-011-0271-x","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2422_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01101-7","volume":"15","author":"P Tyan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tyan P, Klebanoff JS, Frangieh M, North A, Smith S, Amdur R, Kazma J, Moawad GN (2021) Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights. J Robot Surg 15(2):259\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-020-01101-7","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2422_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2415","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0","volume":"17","author":"T Nozaki","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nozaki T, Matsuda K, Kagami K, Sakamoto I (2023) Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. J Robot Surg 17(5):2415\u20132419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01673-0","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e56602","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.56602","volume":"16","author":"N Higuchi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Higuchi N, Kanno K, Ochi Y, Sawada M, Sakate S, Yanai S, Andou M (2024) Effect of uterine weight on the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted hysterectomy in benign indications. Cureus 16(3):e56602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.56602","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"7","key":"2422_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14099","volume":"100","author":"J Keckstein","year":"2021","unstructured":"Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, Sillem M, Oppelt P, Schweppe KW, Krentel H, Janschek E, Exacoustos C, Malzoni M et al (2021) The #Enzian classification: a comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100(7):1165\u20131175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14099","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"2422_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den080","volume":"23","author":"L Mettler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mettler L, Hucke J, Bojahr B, Tinneberg HR, Leyland N, Avelar R (2008) A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy. Hum Reprod 23(5):1093\u20131100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/den080","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"2422_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490 e491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.003","volume":"219","author":"CE Bretschneider","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bretschneider CE, Frazzini Padilla P, Das D, Jelovsek JE, Unger CA (2018) The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(5):490 e491-490 e498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.02.005","volume":"17","author":"WS Wong","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wong WS, Lee TC, Lim CE (2010) Novel Vaginal \u201cpaper roll\u201d uterine morcellation technique for removal of large (>500 g) uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):374\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.02.005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2422_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.031","volume":"216","author":"TK Madhuri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Madhuri TK, Butler-Manuel S (2017) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216(6):619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.031","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"2422_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16828","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.16828","volume":"13","author":"K Alshowaikh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Alshowaikh K, Karpinska-Leydier K, Amirthalingam J, Paidi G, Iroshani Jayarathna AI, Salibindla D, Ergin HE (2021) Surgical and patient outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. Cureus 13(8):e16828. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.16828","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"1","key":"2422_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.005","volume":"25","author":"S Uccella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Uccella S, Morosi C, Marconi N, Arrigo A, Gisone B, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Borghi C, Ghezzi F (2018) Laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy for benign disease in uteri weighing >1 kg: a retrospective analysis on 258 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(1):62\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2422_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.002","volume":"23","author":"S Uccella","year":"2016","unstructured":"Uccella S, Casarin J, Marconi N, Cromi A, Morosi C, Gisone B, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F (2016) Laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy for benign disease in women with giant uteri (>\/=1500 g): feasibility and outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(6):922\u2013927. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.002","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2422_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-102695","volume":"77","author":"D Scholler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Scholler D, Taran FA, Wallwiener M, Schonfisch B, Kramer B, Abele H, Neis F, Wallwiener CW, Brucker S (2017) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with very large uteri: a retrospective single-center experience at a major university hospital. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77(3):251\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0043-102695","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"4","key":"2422_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.009","volume":"20","author":"S Uccella","year":"2013","unstructured":"Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Casarin J, Formenti G, Ghezzi F (2013) Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(4):505\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2422_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.027","volume":"158","author":"W Kondo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kondo W, Bourdel N, Marengo F, Botchorishvili R, Pouly JL, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Mage G, Canis M (2011) Is laparoscopic hysterectomy feasible for uteri larger than 1000 g? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(1):76\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.027","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2422_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2026","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2026","volume":"15","author":"M Akazawa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Akazawa M, Lee SL, Liu WM (2019) Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute. Int J Med Robot 15(5):e2026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.2026","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"4","key":"2422_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.05.015","volume":"12","author":"F Leonard","year":"2005","unstructured":"Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J, Mignon A, Chapron C (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(4):312\u2013317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.05.015","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"2422_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00091","author":"M Carbonnel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carbonnel M, Moawad GN, Tarazi MM, Revaux A, Kennel T, Favre-Inhofer A, Ayoubi JM (2021) Robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: what have we learned from a decade? JSLS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00091","journal-title":"JSLS"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:23:01Z","timestamp":1767489781000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2422"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02422-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 February 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 May 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The retrospective research protocol and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Chinese PLA General Hospital (Approval No. of Ethics Committee: 2022\u2013268-01).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}],"article-number":"253"}}