{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T18:42:37Z","timestamp":1778697757050,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]],"date-time":"2025-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750723200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]],"date-time":"2025-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750723200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]],"date-time":"2025-06-24T08:09:04Z","timestamp":1750752544000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination vs. standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of two-arm comparative studies on functional and oncological outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Tingxuan","family":"Lv","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiaowan","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiaoyan","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bolin","family":"Yuan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Baolin","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Long","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiurui","family":"Han","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"2486_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, et al (2025) Cancer statistics, 2025. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 75:10\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21871","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21871"},{"key":"2486_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-020-2135-x","volume":"580","author":"J Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li J, Xu C, Lee HJ et al (2020) A genomic and epigenomic atlas of prostate cancer in Asian populations. Nature 580:93\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-020-2135-x","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2486_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pharmthera.2021.107932","volume":"228","author":"M Adamaki","year":"2021","unstructured":"Adamaki M, Zoumpourlis V (2021) Prostate Cancer Biomarkers: From diagnosis to prognosis and precision-guided therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther 228:107932. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pharmthera.2021.107932","journal-title":"Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"2486_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.057","volume":"62","author":"F Montorsi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 62:368\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.057","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156","volume":"4","author":"SY Wu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu SY, Chang CL, Chen CI, Huang CC (2021) Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2120156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"2486_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2023.11.021","volume":"7","author":"F Pellegrino","year":"2024","unstructured":"Pellegrino F, Falagario UG, Knipper S et al (2024) Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years\u2019 Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. European urology oncology 7:888\u2013896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euo.2023.11.021","journal-title":"European urology oncology"},{"key":"2486_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10521.x","volume":"108","author":"VR Patel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Patel VR, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Schatloff O et al (2011) Critical review of \u201cpentafecta\u201d outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres. BJU Int 108:1007\u20131017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10521.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:ED000142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.ED000142","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.ED000142"},{"key":"2486_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"(2016) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 354:i4086. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4086","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4086"},{"key":"2486_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 366:l4898. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical research ed)"},{"key":"2486_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical research ed)"},{"key":"2486_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X05282643","volume":"25","author":"AE Ades","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JPT (2005) The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making 25:646\u2013654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989X05282643","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"2486_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15256","volume":"127","author":"E Dinneen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dinneen E, Haider A, Grierson J et al (2021) NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 127:676\u2013686. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15256","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(25)00091-9","volume":"26","author":"E Dinneen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dinneen E, Almeida-Magana R, Al-Hammouri T et al (2025) Effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence in patients with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 26:447\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1470-2045(25)00091-9","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"2486_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.12.014","volume":"66","author":"B Beyer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Beyer B, Schlomm T, Tennstedt P et al (2014) A Feasible and Time-efficient Adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 66:138\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.12.014","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1038\/s41391-020-00266-4","volume":"24","author":"F Preisser","year":"2020","unstructured":"Preisser F, Gandaglia G, Arad F et al (2020) Association of neurovascular bundle preservation with oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24:193\u2013201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41391-020-00266-4","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"key":"2486_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1111\/his.15291","volume":"85","author":"LJ Kroon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kroon LJ, Remmers S, Busstra MB et al (2024) Centralized prostatectomy with intraoperative NeuroSAFE margin assessment improves surgical margin control. Histopathology 85:760\u2013768. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/his.15291","journal-title":"Histopathology"},{"key":"2486_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1002\/pros.24295","volume":"82","author":"C Leitsmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Leitsmann C, Uhlig A, Bremmer F et al (2021) Impact of mpMRI targeted biopsy on intraoperative nerve-sparing (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Prostate 82:493\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pros.24295","journal-title":"Prostate"},{"key":"2486_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2019.1693625","volume":"53","author":"SD Foss\u00e5","year":"2019","unstructured":"Foss\u00e5 SD, Beyer B, Dahl AA et al (2019) Improved patient-reported functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy by using NeuroSAFE technique. Scandinavian Journal of Urology 53:385\u2013391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21681805.2019.1693625","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology"},{"key":"2486_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clgc.2023.06.014","volume":"21","author":"E K\u00f6seo\u011flu","year":"2023","unstructured":"K\u00f6seo\u011flu E, Kula\u00e7 \u0130, Armutlu A et al (2023) Intraoperative Frozen Section via Neurosafe During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Era of Preoperative Risk Stratifications and Primary Staging With mpMRI and PSMA-PET CT: Is There a Perfect Candidate? Clin Genitourin Cancer 21:602\u2013611. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clgc.2023.06.014","journal-title":"Clin Genitourin Cancer"},{"key":"2486_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41391-024-00851-x","author":"F Ambrosini","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ambrosini F, Preisser F, Tilki D et al (2024) Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE): results after 20 years of experience. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41391-024-00851-x","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"key":"2486_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15771","volume":"130","author":"MA van der Slot","year":"2022","unstructured":"van der Slot MA, den Bakker MA, Tan TSC et al (2022) NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome. BJU Int 130:628\u2013636. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15771","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.04.057","volume":"62","author":"T Schlomm","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Huxhold C et al (2012) Neurovascular Structure-adjacent Frozen-section Examination (NeuroSAFE) Increases Nerve-sparing Frequency and Reduces Positive Surgical Margins in Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience After 11 069 Consecutive Patients. Eur Urol 62:333\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.04.057","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01324-2","volume":"16","author":"J No\u00ebl","year":"2021","unstructured":"No\u00ebl J, Spencer NH, Lodia S et al (2021) Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: outcomes from 500 consecutive cases in the UK. J Robot Surg 16:951\u2013956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01324-2","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"2486_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-014-1273-x","volume":"33","author":"A Becker","year":"2014","unstructured":"Becker A, Coelius C, Adam M et al (2014) Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 33:77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-014-1273-x","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14078","volume":"121","author":"G Mirmilstein","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mirmilstein G, Rai BP, Gbolahan O et al (2017) The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting \u2013 a prospective observational comparative study. BJU Int 121:854\u2013862. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14078","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16437","volume":"134","author":"N Kinnear","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kinnear N, Fonseca PC, Ogbechie C et al (2024) Impact of frozen section on long-term outcomes in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 134:608\u2013614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16437","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01324-2","volume":"16","author":"J No\u00ebl","year":"2022","unstructured":"No\u00ebl J, Spencer NH, Lodia S et al (2022) Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: outcomes from 500 consecutive cases in the UK. J Robot Surg 16:951\u2013956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01324-2","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"2486_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41391-024-00891-3","author":"F Ditonno","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ditonno F, Bologna E, Licari LC et al (2024) Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41391-024-00891-3","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"key":"2486_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2020.1894","volume":"3","author":"MW Witthaus","year":"2020","unstructured":"Witthaus MW, Bloom JB (2020) Financial Impact of Positive Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy and the Odds of Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 3:e201894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2020.1894","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"2486_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(18)30357-7","volume":"19","author":"GD Coughlin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19:1051\u20131060. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1470-2045(18)30357-7","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"2486_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.11.018","volume":"66","author":"P Sooriakumaran","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Shariat SF et al (2014) A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 66:450\u2013456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.11.018","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.08.037","volume":"65","author":"MA Preston","year":"2014","unstructured":"Preston MA, Blute ML (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: does it matter? Eur Urol 65:314\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.08.037","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2486_CR34","unstructured":"Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, et al (2011) Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology 63:191\u20138"},{"key":"2486_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.02.017","volume":"183","author":"JL Wright","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wright JL, Dalkin BL, True LD et al (2010) Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 183:2213\u20132218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2010.02.017","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"24","key":"2486_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2024.12.008","volume":"S2588\u20139311","author":"LJ Kroon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kroon LJ, van der Slot MA, van den Bergh RCN et al (2024) Neurovascular Structure-adjacent Frozen-section Examination (NeuroSAFE) During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol S2588\u20139311(24):00290\u201300296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euo.2024.12.008","journal-title":"Eur Urol Oncol"},{"key":"2486_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14880","volume":"124","author":"A Heidenreich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Heidenreich A, Pfister D (2019) PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy needs more than standard therapeutic options to improve outcomes. BJU Int 124:716\u2013718. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14880","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2014.09.039","volume":"91","author":"T Wiegel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wiegel T, Bartkowiak D, Bottke D et al (2015) Prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy as a predictive factor of clinical relapse-free survival and overall survival: 10-year data of the ARO 96\u201302 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:288\u2013294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2014.09.039","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"key":"2486_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.11.023","volume":"65","author":"TE Ahlering","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Chou D, Skarecky DW (2005) Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 65:994\u2013997. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2004.11.023","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2486_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2006.06266.x","volume":"98","author":"A Tewari","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E et al (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:314\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2006.06266.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2486_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.24109","volume":"113","author":"P Sooriakumaran","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sooriakumaran P, Dev HS, Skarecky D, Ahlering T (2016) The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 113:310\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.24109","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2486_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.11.115","volume":"199","author":"M Menon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199:1210\u20131217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2017.11.115","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:22:21Z","timestamp":1767489741000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2486"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02486-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 June 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This manuscript is a review of existing data. The institutional research committee's ethical standards, as well as the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions or equivalent ethical standards, were followed in all studies involving human subjects. Official approval was not necessary for this research. None of the authors conducted any research on animals for this article.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics statement"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"321"}}