{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T16:30:49Z","timestamp":1791045049885,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751587200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751587200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Single Port (SP) surgery is the most relevant surgical innovation of the past six years. Few data are available on the advantages and disadvantages of SP Robotic-Assisted reconstructive urology. In the present systematic review, we summarize the results of available literature exploring the feasibility of SP reconstructive urological procedures and comparing the SP and Multi Port (MP) approaches. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library Databases were systematically searched for articles evaluating outcomes of SP robotic-assisted pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, Boari Flap, fistula repair, bladder diverticulectomy and vaginoplasty. After meticulous study selection, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of SP and MP robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (SP-RP and MP-RP). Regarding ureteric reimplantation, Boari Flap, bladder diverticulectomy, fistula repair and vaginoplasty, we underwent a structured narrative synthesis, since meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or insufficient study numbers. The meta-analysis included a total of six retrospective cohort studies and 202 patients. SP-RP demonstrated significantly lower Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) (SMD\u2009\u2212\u20090.45, 95%CI\u2009\u2212\u20090.80 to \u2009\u2212\u20090.09,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.01,\n                    <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    \u2009=\u20090%) and better cosmetic results (MD 1.83, 95%CI 0.98\u20132.68,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The mean length of hospital stay was shorter for patients submitted to SP-RP, but the difference did not reach significance (SMD\u2009=\u2009\u2009\u2212\u20090.68, 95%CI\u2009\u2212\u20091.43 to 0.07,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.08,\n                    <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    \u2009=\u200980%). There were no significant differences in terms of complication rates, operative times, success rate and renal function increase between the two approaches (p\u2009&gt;\u20090.05). Respectively, a total of four, one, two, one and two articles evaluating robotic-assisted SP ureteral reimplantation, Boari Flap, bladder diverticulectomy, fistula repair, and vaginoplasty, were included for the final structured summary. The included studies consistently suggest the feasibility and safety of the SP approach, however, available evidence predominantly consists of small retrospective series or individual case reports, and statistical validation is not possible. SP-RP has been successfully described, with possible advantages in terms of shorter hospital stays, better pain control and cosmetic results. Although successful cases of other major reconstructive urological procedures are reported in the literature, the available evidence remains limited and of low quality. Hopefully, the encouraging findings regarding SP-RP will increase the popularity of the SP robotic system among reconstructive urologic surgeons and the availability of more robust data.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T06:29:57Z","timestamp":1751610597000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Current status of single port robotic-assisted reconstructive urology: a systematic review, meta-analysis and structured summary of the available literature"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Valerio","family":"Santarelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabio Maria","family":"Valenzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hakan Bahad\u0131r","family":"Haberal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca A.","family":"Morgantini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arianna","family":"Biasatti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhannad","family":"Aljoulani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Filippo","family":"Carletti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandru","family":"Turcan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Flavia","family":"Tamborino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Del Giudice","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Salciccia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Sciarra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Simone","family":"Crivellaro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"2509_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e3283314129","volume":"19","author":"CRJ Woodhouse","year":"2009","unstructured":"Woodhouse CRJ (2009) Reconstructive urology. Curr Opin Urol 19:555","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pcl.2012.05.008","volume":"59","author":"H-GO Mesrobian","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mesrobian H-GO, Mirza SP (2012) Hydronephrosis: a view from the inside. Pediatr Clin N Am 59:839\u2013851","journal-title":"Pediatr Clin N Am"},{"issue":"233","key":"2509_CR3","first-page":"e1","volume":"17","author":"DK Bowen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bowen DK, Mittal S, Aghababian A, Eftekharzadeh S, Dinardo L, Weaver J et al (2021) Pyeloplasty is a safe and effective surgical approach for low functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol 17(233):e1-233.e7","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2018.03.06","volume":"7","author":"JY Sun","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sun JY, Granieri MA, Zhao LC (2018) Robotics and urologic reconstructive surgery. Transl Androl Urol 7:545\u2013557","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1097\/UPJ.0000000000000340","volume":"9","author":"LA Morgantini","year":"2022","unstructured":"Morgantini LA, Del Pino M, Bharadwaj A, Alzein A, Ganesh A, Egan E et al (2022) Single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted procedures from the patient\u2019s perspective: a retrospective cohort study. Urol Pract 9:575\u2013579","journal-title":"Urol Pract"},{"key":"2509_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1177\/1756287211411357","volume":"3","author":"T Clements","year":"2011","unstructured":"Clements T, Raman JD (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Ther Adv Urol 3:141\u2013149","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers16172994","author":"JS Chavali","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chavali JS, Pedraza AM, Soputro NA, Ramos-Carpinteyro R, Mikesell CD, Kaouk J (2024) Single-port extraperitoneal vs. multiport transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancers (Basel). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers16172994","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"63","key":"2509_CR8","first-page":"e1","volume":"43","author":"KE Okhawere","year":"2025","unstructured":"Okhawere KE, Beksac AT, Ferguson E, Zuluaga L, Saini I, Ucpinar B et al (2025) Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multiport retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 43(63):e1-63.e6","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"key":"2509_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2509_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2020-209567","volume":"37","author":"M Amir-Behghadami","year":"2020","unstructured":"Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A (2020) Population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J 37:387","journal-title":"Emerg Med J"},{"key":"2509_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2509_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.52.6.377","volume":"52","author":"SH Downs","year":"1998","unstructured":"Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377\u2013384","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"2509_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","volume":"7","author":"R DerSimonian","year":"1986","unstructured":"DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177\u2013188","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"2509_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Onen A. Grading of Hydronephrosis: An Ongoing Challenge. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fped.2020.00458. PMID:\n32984198; PMCID: PMC7481370.","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2020.00458"},{"key":"2509_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2014.240","volume":"11","author":"F Khan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Khan F, Ahmed K, Lee N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2014) Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Nat Rev Urol 11:629\u2013638","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.03.063","volume":"56","author":"LHP Braga","year":"2009","unstructured":"Braga LHP, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol 56:848\u2013857","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0544","volume":"25","author":"H Mei","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, Zhang H, Zheng L, Tong Q (2011) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 25:727\u2013736","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2509_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2021.10.013","volume":"160","author":"AT Beksac","year":"2022","unstructured":"Beksac AT, Wilson CA, Lenfant L, Kim S, Aminsharifi A, Zeinab MA et al (2022) Single-port mini-pfannenstiel robotic pyeloplasty: establishing a non-narcotic pathway along with a same-day discharge protocol. Urology 160:130\u2013135","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0406","volume":"49","author":"F Ditonno","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ditonno F, Franco A, Manfredi C, Chow AK, Vourganti S, Cherullo EE et al (2023) Single port robotic pyeloplasty: early single-center experience. Int Braz J Urol 49:757\u2013762","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2021.09.038","volume":"160","author":"R Harrison","year":"2022","unstructured":"Harrison R, Ahmed M, Billah M, Caviasco C, Cheng N, Sanders A et al (2022) Single port vs multiport robotic pyeloplasty: propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative and follow-up outcomes. Urology 160:124\u2013129","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3841","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2024.03.175","volume":"47","author":"JE Heo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Heo JE, Han HH, Lee J, Choi YD, Jang WS (2024) Single-port robot-assisted pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system versus multi-port pyeloplasty: comparison of outcomes and costs. Asian J Surg 47:3841\u20133846","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"2509_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000003551","volume":"210","author":"JM Smith","year":"2023","unstructured":"Smith JM, Hernandez AD, DeMarco RT, Bayne CE (2023) Early experience with pediatric single-port robotic pyeloplasty compared to multiport robotic cohorts. J Urol 210:236\u2013238","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.20200569","volume":"62","author":"SK Kang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SH, Kim SW, Han SW, Lee YS (2021) Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children. Investig Clin Urol 62:592\u2013599","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-04875-9","volume":"42","author":"S Ziewers","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ziewers S, Dotzauer R, Thomas A, Brandt MP, Haferkamp A, Frees S et al (2024) Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison. World J Urol 42:194","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pcl.2012.05.012","volume":"59","author":"FF Fonseca","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fonseca FF, Tanno FY, Nguyen HT (2012) Current options in the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Clin N Am 59:819\u2013834","journal-title":"Pediatr Clin N Am"},{"key":"2509_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1007\/s00383-020-04749-2","volume":"36","author":"VVS Chandrasekharam","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R (2020) Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical versus conventional laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation for pediatric primary vesicoureteric reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 36:1371\u20131378","journal-title":"Pediatr Surg Int"},{"key":"2509_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14635","volume":"123","author":"JH Kaouk","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kaouk JH, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Robot-assisted surgery for benign distal ureteral strictures: step-by-step technique using the SP surgical system. BJU Int 123:733\u2013739","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2509_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-024-01862-z","volume":"29","author":"S Lin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lin S, Xu H, He Y, Xu X, You G, Chen J et al (2024) Single-port-plus-one robot-assisted laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir direct nipple ureteral extravesical reimplantation in pediatric primary obstructive megaureter, comparing to laparoscopic cohen. Eur J Med Res 29:274","journal-title":"Eur J Med Res"},{"key":"2509_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-024-01467-y","volume":"24","author":"J Chen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chen J, Kang Y, Lin S, He S, He Y, Xu X et al (2024) Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes. BMC Urol 24:81","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.20230005","volume":"64","author":"JE Heo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Heo JE, Kang SK, Lee J, Koh D, Kim MS, Lee YS et al (2023) Outcomes of single-port robotic ureteral reconstruction using the da Vinci SP\u00ae system. Invest Clin Urol 64:373\u2013379","journal-title":"Invest Clin Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13502","volume":"118","author":"J-U Stolzenburg","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stolzenburg J-U, Rai BP, Do M, Dietel A, Liatsikos E, Ganzer R et al (2016) Robot-assisted technique for boari flap ureteric reimplantation: replicating the techniques of open surgery in robotics. BJU Int 118:482\u2013484","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2509_CR32","first-page":"775","volume":"37","author":"TD Corse","year":"2023","unstructured":"Corse TD, Dayan L, Cheng N, Brown A, Krishnan N, Mishra K et al (2023) A multi-institutional experience utilizing boari flap in robotic urinary reconstruction. J Endourol 37:775\u2013780","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2509_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-024-04714-w","author":"GG Zhu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zhu GG, Siegel CL, Rogers DM, Sagel J, Morrell G, Olpin JD et al (2025) Urinary bladder diverticula: imaging features and complications. Abdom Radiol (NY). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04714-w","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol (NY)"},{"key":"2509_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1159\/000319421","volume":"85","author":"J Moreno Sierra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Moreno Sierra J, Galante-Romo I, Ortiz-Oshiro E, Castillon-Vela IT, Fernandez-Perez C, Silmi-Moyano A (2010) Bladder diverticulum robotic surgery: systematic review of case reports. Urol Int 85:381\u2013385","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"key":"2509_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1089\/089277904322836721","volume":"18","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2004","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Tarabuzzi R, Cossu M, Vacca F, Terrone C, Fiori C et al (2004) Is laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate safe and effective? comparison with open surgery. J Endourol 18:73\u201376","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2509_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.02.012","volume":"85","author":"AJ Davidiuk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davidiuk AJ, Meschia C, Young PR, Thiel DD (2015) Robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomy: assessment of outcomes and modifications of technique. Urology 85:1347\u20131351","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2020.05.018","volume":"142","author":"PM Gurung","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gurung PM, Witthaus M, Campbell T, Rashid HH, Ghazi AE, Wu G et al (2020) Transvesical versus transabdominal\u2014which is the best approach to bladder diverticulectomy using the single port robotic system? Urology 142:248","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR38","first-page":"101753","volume":"39","author":"M Tonzi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tonzi M, Watson MJ, Singh A (2021) Bladder diverticulectomy using a pre-peritoneal, -vesicle approach with the SP platform: a novel approach. Urol Case Rep 39:101753","journal-title":"Urol Case Rep"},{"key":"2509_CR39","first-page":"296","volume":"46","author":"AD Meneses","year":"2020","unstructured":"Meneses AD, Oliveira AQ, de Araujo DA, Santos DT, de Carvalho LY, Filho EWMN et al (2020) Transabdominal and transvesical laparoscopic correction of vesico-vaginal fistula: 42 cases experience. Int Braz J Urol 46:296\u2013297","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1159\/000519369","volume":"105","author":"J Colenbrander","year":"2021","unstructured":"Colenbrander J, Heesakkers J, Martens F (2021) Vesico-vaginal fistula repair by a vaginal approach. Urol Int 105:1113\u20131118","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"key":"2509_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0749","volume":"47","author":"A Antonelli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Antonelli A, Veccia A, Morena T, Furlan M, Peroni A, Simeone C (2021) Robot-assisted vesico-vaginal fistula repair: technical nuances. Int Braz J Urol 47:684\u2013685","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1779","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0049","volume":"24","author":"NP Gupta","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gupta NP, Mishra S, Hemal AK, Mishra A, Seth A, Dogra PN (2010) Comparative analysis of outcome between open and robotic surgical repair of recurrent supra-trigonal vesico-vaginal fistula. J Endourol 24:1779\u20131782","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2509_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2022.04.013","volume":"18","author":"RG Bhalla","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bhalla RG, Li B, Adams MC, Neblett WW, Thomas JC (2022) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of a congenital rectourethral fistula with duplicated urethra. J Pediatr Urol 18:404\u2013405","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2021.05.027","volume":"154","author":"KJ Hebert","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hebert KJ, Naik N, Allawi A, Kelley SR, Behm KT, Viers BR (2021) Rectourethral fistula repair using robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) approach. Urology 154:338","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0146","volume":"50","author":"D Cannoletta","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cannoletta D, Pellegrino A, Pettenuzzo G, Pacini M, Sauer RC, Torres-Anguiano JR et al (2024) Single-port transvesical vesico-vaginal fistula repair: an initial experience. Int Braz J Urol 50:502\u2013503","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.1111\/jsm.12915","volume":"12","author":"FM Lecl\u00e8re","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lecl\u00e8re FM, Casoli V, Weigert R (2015) Outcome of vaginoplasty in male-to-female transgenders: a systematic review of surgical techniques. J Sex Med 12:1655\u20131656","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"key":"2509_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008198","volume":"148","author":"MS Jun","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jun MS, Gonzalez E, Zhao LC, Bluebond-Langner R (2021) Penile inversion vaginoplasty with robotically assisted peritoneal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:439\u2013442","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2509_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2019.11.043","volume":"138","author":"O Acar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Acar O, Sofer L, Dobbs RW, Greenwald DT, Halgrimson WR, Crivellaro S et al (2020) Single port and multiport approaches for robotic vaginoplasty with the davydov technique. Urology 138:166\u2013173","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2020.06.040","volume":"79","author":"GW Dy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dy GW, Jun MS, Blasdel G, Bluebond-Langner R, Zhao LC (2021) Outcomes of gender affirming peritoneal flap vaginoplasty using the da vinci single port versus xi robotic systems. Eur Urol 79:676\u2013683","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2009.04.089","volume":"74","author":"CR Tracy","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2009) Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 74:1029\u20131034","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10153.x","volume":"107","author":"P Dasgupta","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dasgupta P (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int 107:816","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2509_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4402","DOI":"10.21037\/tau-21-850","volume":"10","author":"Y Wei","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wei Y, Ji Q, Zuo W, Wang S, Wang X, Zhu Q (2021) Efficacy and safety of single port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 10:4402\u20134411","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"key":"2509_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0188","volume":"38","author":"TT Nguyen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nguyen TT, Ngo XT, Duong NX, Dobbs RW, Vuong HG, Nguyen D-D et al (2024) Single-port multiport robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 38:253\u2013261","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2509_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2020.08.092","volume":"148","author":"R Abaza","year":"2021","unstructured":"Abaza R, Murphy C, Bsatee A, Brown DH Jr, Martinez O (2021) Single-port robotic surgery allows same-day discharge in majority of cases. Urology 148:159\u2013165","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2509_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957790","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2022.957790","volume":"10","author":"J Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen J, Xu H, Lin S, He S, Tang K, Xiao Z et al (2022) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a comparison of single-port-plus-one and multiport surgery. Front Pediatr 10:957790","journal-title":"Front Pediatr"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:22:20Z","timestamp":1767489740000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2509"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02509-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"349"}}