{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T23:10:14Z","timestamp":1792365014137,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T07:51:05Z","timestamp":1756713065000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A comparative analysis of pre-operative factors, intra-operative events and post-operative outcomes assessing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for robotic partial nephrectomy in T1 renal cancer: a multicenter international experience"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Modassar T.","family":"Awan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maida","family":"Bada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Japnit","family":"Dham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ioannis","family":"Loufopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Riccardo","family":"Autorino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Giulianelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maurizio","family":"Buscarini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2708_CR1","unstructured":"Chien M, Wang Y, Patel A (2024) Robotic partial nephrectomy: Indications, patient selection, and setup for success. Urol Oncol 17:S1078\u2013S1439"},{"key":"2708_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.12.086","volume":"200","author":"GE Cacciamani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cacciamani GE, Medina LG, Gill T et al (2018) Impact of surgical factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 200:258\u2013274","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"2708_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0023","volume":"27","author":"A Hughes-Hallett","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869\u2013874","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2708_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.04.028","volume":"66","author":"JC Hu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, McLaren I, Xiong S, Stepanian S et al (2014) Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol 66(3):542\u2013549","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2708_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0211","volume":"32","author":"N Pavan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pavan N, Derweesh I, Hampton LJ et al (2018) Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative outcomes. J Endourol 32:591\u2013596","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"2708_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou J, Liu Z-H, Cao D-H, Peng Z-F et al (2021) Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot\u2010assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better? Cancer Med 10:3299\u20133308.","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.3888"},{"key":"2708_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sharma G, Shah M, Ahluwalia P, Dasgupta P et al (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis of VCQI database. World J Urol 40(9): 2283\u20132291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04101-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-04101-4"},{"key":"2708_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2020.08.012","author":"NN Harke","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harke NN, Darr C, Radtke JP et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis. Eur Urol Focus. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2020.08.012","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"2708_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tao M, Cheng K, Xu W, Qian Z, Pan P (2024) Comparison of the effects of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12669\/pjms.40.10.10613","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.40.10.10613"},{"key":"2708_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4295","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07919-4","volume":"35","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Mari A, Amparore D et al (2021) Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (the RECORD 2 project). Surg Endosc 35:4295\u20134304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07919-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2708_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xia L, Zhang X, Wang X, Xu T et al (2016) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 30:109\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.04.023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.04.023"},{"key":"2708_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2022.03.015","volume":"40","author":"U Carbonara","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carbonara U, Crocerossa F, Campi R et al (2022) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 40:27\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euros.2022.03.015","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"key":"2708_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2563","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01685-w","volume":"17","author":"A Bourgi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bourgi A, Ayoub E, Merhej S et al (2023) A comparison of perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. J Robotic Surg 17:2563\u20132574. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01685-w","journal-title":"J Robotic Surg"},{"key":"2708_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01963-1","volume":"18","author":"P Xu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xu P, Luo J, Shuai H et al (2024) Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robotic Surg 18:186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01963-1","journal-title":"J Robotic Surg"},{"key":"2708_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gu L, Zhao W, Xu J, Wang B et al (2022) Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for patients with complete upper pole renal tumors. Front Oncol https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2021.773345","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2021.773345"},{"key":"2708_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12020722","volume":"12","author":"W Zhao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhao W, Ding Y, Chen D, Xuan Y, Chen Z et al (2023) Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for patients with completely lower pole renal tumors. J Clin Med 12:722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12020722","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"2708_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.20230168","volume":"64","author":"C Xiao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xiao C, Ma X (2023) Comparison of the efficacy of robotic-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopy and traditional retroperitoneal laparoscopy in partial nephrectomy among patients with renal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Investig Clin Urol 64:579\u2013587. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4111\/icu.20230168","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"key":"2708_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.06.026","volume":"120","author":"S Arora","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arora S, Heulitt G, Menon M et al (2018) Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting. Urology 120:131\u2013137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2018.06.026","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2708_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","volume":"19","author":"R-Z Rong","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rong R-Z, Zhang P, Zhao M, He C-E (2025) Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies. J Robot Surg 19:56. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02217-4","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"2708_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16653","author":"S Kalble","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kalble S, Engelmann SU, Schrutz H, Zeman F et al (2025) Randomised controlled feasibility trial of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the ROPARN study. BJU Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16653","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2708_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tang H, Shen T, Zhou K, Xu F, Lv H, Ge J (2022) Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy through transabdominal or retroperitoneal approaches in patients with T1b renal tumor. BMC Urol 22:208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-022-01162-w","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-022-01162-w"},{"key":"2708_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McLean A, Mukherjee A, Phukan C et al (2020) Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 14:1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-00973-8"},{"key":"2708_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Okhawere KE, Rich JM, Beksac AT et al (2023) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 33(9):835\u2013840. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2023.0142","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2023.0142"},{"key":"2708_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Barns M, O\u2019Neill S, Barber N (2022) New trends in robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. In: Urologic cancers. Exon Publications, Brisbane, Australia. ISBN: 978\u20130\u20136453320\u20135\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36255\/exon-publications-urologic-cancers","DOI":"10.36255\/exon-publications-urologic-cancers"},{"key":"2708_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-04796-7","volume":"42","author":"N Shrivastava","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shrivastava N, Bhargava P, Sharma G et al (2024) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 42:83. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-024-04796-7","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"2708_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thomsen FF, Petersson RD, Schou\u2011Jensen KS et al (2025) Transperitoneal robot\u2011assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of operative and oncological outcomes between posterior and anterolateral tumours. Int Urol Nephrol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-025-04372-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-025-04372-x"},{"key":"2708_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dell\u2019Oglio P, De Naeyer G, Xiangjun L, Hamilton Z, ERUS Educational Working Group and the YAU working group on robot-assisted surgery et al (2020) The impact of surgical strategy in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it beneficial to treat anterior tumours with transperitoneal access and posterior tumours with retroperitoneal access? Eur Urol Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euo.2018.12.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2018.12.010"},{"key":"2708_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF et al (2020) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol 38:1093\u20131099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-019-02903-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02903-7"},{"key":"2708_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Porreca A, D\u2019Agostino D, Dente D, Dandrea M et al (2018) Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: technique and early outcomes. 44(1):63\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0104","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0104"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T01:20:50Z","timestamp":1767489650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2708"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02708-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 August 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 September 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}}],"article-number":"543"}}