{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T14:49:06Z","timestamp":1788878946493,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773187200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773187200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Single-incision robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) is an emerging minimally invasive approach for breast cancer and prophylactic surgery, yet its safety and feasibility remain to be confirmed. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the single-incision RNSM perioperative parameters and complications. A bibliographic search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines across four databases. Following deduplication and exclusion, thirteen studies were eligible and constituted this study. Data were combined using random-effects models. Forest plots were generated to estimate pooled proportions using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, and heterogeneity was assessed via I\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    statistics. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. This study was registered on the PROSPERO registry. The pooled mean operative time was 273\u00a0min, and the mean blood loss was 82\u00a0ml. Pooled complication rates were relatively low, including skin-flap necrosis (2.4%), nipple-areolar complex necrosis (0.4%), delayed wound healing (4.7%), surgical-site infection (3.8%), deep infection (1.2%), hematoma (2.4%), and seroma (5.8%). Pooled estimate of positive margin rate was\u2009&lt;\u20091%. Locoregional and distant recurrence rates were 0.8% and 0.4%, respectively. No conversions to open surgery or procedure-related deaths were reported. The single-incision RNSM is a modern surgical approach with acceptable perioperative parameters and satisfactory complication rates. However, heterogeneity across studies and the relative rarity of long-term oncological data warranted cautious interpretation. Prospective comparative trials are necessary to prove the oncological safety and economic effectiveness compared with other approaches.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T03:18:03Z","timestamp":1773199083000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Feasibility and outcomes of single-incision robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Hasan","family":"Asfour","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hussein","family":"Lubbad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ewa Anna","family":"Sobczak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Walid","family":"Sasi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"3297_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6970","volume":"97","author":"JE Rusby","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH (2010) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 97:305\u2013316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.6970","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.21037\/gs.2017.09.02","volume":"7","author":"AY Ashikari","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR, Tastan B, Salzberg CA, Ashikari RH (2018) Nipple sparing mastectomy techniques: a literature review and an inframammary technique. Gland Surg 7:273\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/gs.2017.09.02","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12542","volume":"22","author":"CH Wei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, Miller HC, Klassen AF, Jhanwar SM et al (2016) Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J 22:10\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12542","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"3297_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2909","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-018-6585-4","volume":"25","author":"A Romanoff","year":"2018","unstructured":"Romanoff A, Zabor EC, Stempel M, Sacchini V, Pusic A, Morrow M (2018) A comparison of patient-reported outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy with reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2909\u20132916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-018-6585-4","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-08159-0","volume":"27","author":"MS Hallbeck","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hallbeck MS, Law KE, Lowndes BR, Linden AR, Morrow M, Blocker RC et al (2020) Workload differentiates breast surgical procedures: NSM associated with higher workload demand than SSM. Ann Surg Oncol 27:1318\u20131326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-019-08159-0","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.6004\/jadpro.2021.12.5.5","volume":"12","author":"L Parks","year":"2021","unstructured":"Parks L (2021) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: impact on surgical resection, oncologic safety, and psychological well-being. J Adv Pract Oncol 12:499\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6004\/jadpro.2021.12.5.5","journal-title":"J Adv Pract Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e28","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001397","volume":"266","author":"A Toesca","year":"2017","unstructured":"Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O et al (2017) Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: first report of surgical technique. Ann Surg 266:e28-30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001397","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.87972","volume":"17","author":"T Branco","year":"2025","unstructured":"Branco T, Rodrigues A, Martins AR (2025) Robotics in breast surgery: current advantages, disadvantages, and applications. Cureus 17:e87972. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.87972","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"3297_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01547-5","volume":"17","author":"G la De Cruz-Ku","year":"2023","unstructured":"la De Cruz-Ku G, Chambergo-Michilot D, Perez A, Valcarcel B, Pamen L, Linshaw D et al (2023) Outcomes of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 17:1493\u20131509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01547-5","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znad336","author":"A Nessa","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nessa A, Shaikh S, Fuller M, Masannat YA, Kastora SL (2024) Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znad336","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02388-0","volume":"19","author":"M Maes-Carballo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Maes-Carballo M, G\u00f3mez-Fandi\u00f1o Y, Bra\u00f1a PMS, Mart\u00ednez-Mart\u00ednez C, Alberca-Remigio C, C\u00e1mara-Mart\u00ednez C et al (2025) Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis with conventional and endoscopic techniques through a systematic review. J Robot Surg 19:220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02388-0","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2023.12.009","volume":"24","author":"A Doll","year":"2024","unstructured":"Doll A, Kopkash K, Baker J (2024) Emerging role of robotic surgery in the breast. Clin Breast Cancer 24:286\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clbc.2023.12.009","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"3297_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005924","volume":"279","author":"H-W Lai","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lai H-W, Chen D-R, Liu L-C, Chen S-T, Kuo Y-L, Lin S-L et al (2024) Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Prospectively Designed Multicenter Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes, Medical Cost, and Patient-reported Outcomes (RCENSM-P). Ann Surg 279:138\u2013146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005924","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12937","volume":"24","author":"B Sarfati","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sarfati B, Honart J-F, Leymarie N, Rimareix F, Al Khashnam H, Kolb F (2018) Robotic da Vinci Xi-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: first clinical report. Breast J 24:373\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12937","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"3297_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.108602","volume":"50","author":"SM Jung","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jung SM, Kim YJ, Lee K-T, Jeon B-J, Mun G-H, Pyon J-K et al (2024) Learning curve for robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single institution experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 50:108602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.108602","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.4048\/jbc.2018.21.e45","volume":"21","author":"HS Park","year":"2018","unstructured":"Park HS, Kim JH, Lee DW, Song SY, Park S, Kim SI et al (2018) Gasless robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a case report. J Breast Cancer 21:334\u2013338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4048\/jbc.2018.21.e45","journal-title":"J Breast Cancer"},{"key":"3297_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.26915","volume":"126","author":"J Go","year":"2022","unstructured":"Go J, Ahn JH, Park JM, Choi SB, Lee J, Kim JY et al (2022) Analysis of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy using the da Vinci SP system. J Surg Oncol 126:417\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.26915","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.106143","volume":"95","author":"J-J Huang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Huang J-J, Chuang EY-H, Cheong DC-F, Kim B-S, Chang FC-S, Kuo W-L (2021) Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: feasibility and aesthetic results \u2013 case series. Int J Surg 95:106143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.106143","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2022.0708","volume":"24","author":"W-P Wu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wu W-P, Lai H-W, Liao C-Y, Lin J, Huang H-I, Chen S-T et al (2023) Use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating residual breast tissue after robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with early breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 24:640\u2013646. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3348\/kjr.2022.0708","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"key":"3297_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2023.6999","volume":"159","author":"DE Farr","year":"2024","unstructured":"Farr DE, Haddock NT, Tellez J, Radi I, Alterio R, Sayers B et al (2024) Safety and feasibility of single-port robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. JAMA Surg 159:269\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2023.6999","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011105","volume":"154","author":"SH Kim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kim SH, Park S, Lee DW, Park HS, Lew DH, Song SY (2024) Early experience of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix after robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 154:512\u2013520. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011105","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n160","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n160","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3297_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000054","volume":"13","author":"Z Munn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C (2015) Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc 13:147\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000054","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthc"},{"key":"3297_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/2049-3258-72-39","volume":"72","author":"VN Nyaga","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M (2014) Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 72:39. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/2049-3258-72-39","journal-title":"Arch Public Health"},{"key":"3297_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2020.09.001","volume":"158","author":"LM Spineli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spineli LM, Pandis N (2020) Problems and pitfalls in subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158:901\u2013904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2020.09.001","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"3297_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/03610926.2025.2560629","volume":"0","author":"X Liu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Liu X, Liu F, Liu W, Huang Y, Li Z, Wu Q et al (2025) Sample size planning for proportions based on Wilson score confidence intervals with precision and assurance. Commun Stat Theory Methods 0:1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03610926.2025.2560629","journal-title":"Commun Stat Theory Methods"},{"key":"3297_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1007\/s40279-023-01927-9","volume":"54","author":"J Afonso","year":"2024","unstructured":"Afonso J, Ramirez-Campillo R, Clemente FM, B\u00fcttner FC, Andrade R (2024) The perils of misinterpreting and misusing \u201cpublication bias\u201d in meta-analyses: an education review on funnel plot-based methods. Sports Med 54:257\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40279-023-01927-9","journal-title":"Sports Med"},{"key":"3297_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d4002","volume":"343","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.d4002","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3297_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3046","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-07590-7","volume":"26","author":"A Toesca","year":"2019","unstructured":"Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G, Girardi A, Peradze N, Lissidini G et al (2019) Update on the feasibility and progress on robotic breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 26:3046\u20133051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-019-07590-7","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004969","volume":"276","author":"A Toesca","year":"2022","unstructured":"Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL et al (2022) A randomized trial of robotic mastectomy versus open surgery in women with breast cancer or BrCA mutation. Ann Surg 276:11\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004969","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2024.12.013","volume":"25","author":"Y-MC Lin","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lin Y-MC, Lui SA, Chen M-Y, Chou Y-Y, Cheng FT-F (2025) Safety and feasibility of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction \u2013 insights from the one of the largest centers in Asia. Clin Breast Cancer 25:277\u2013282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clbc.2024.12.013","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"3297_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004492","volume":"275","author":"JM Ryu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ryu JM, Kim JY, Choi HJ, Ko B, Kim J, Cho J et al (2022) Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea Robot-endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG). Ann Surg 275:985\u2013991. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004492","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.4174\/astr.2024.107.1.8","volume":"107","author":"Y-H Hwang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hwang Y-H, Han HH, Eom JS, Yoo T-KR, Kim J, Chung IY et al (2024) Evaluation of safety and operative time in tumescent-free robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Ann Surg Treat Res 107:8\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4174\/astr.2024.107.1.8","journal-title":"Ann Surg Treat Res"},{"key":"3297_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-03074-x","volume":"20","author":"R Ouyang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ouyang R, Jia X, Liang Y, Li B, Qing M, Hu J (2025) Single-port robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of safety and process outcomes. J Robot Surg 20:106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-03074-x","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.2977","volume":"159","author":"JH Kim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kim JH, Ryu JM, Bae SJ, Ko BS, Choi JE, Kim KS et al (2024) Minimal access vs conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. JAMA Surg 159:1177\u20131186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.2977","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2025.08.019","author":"S Elghazaly","year":"2025","unstructured":"Elghazaly S, Fakeh S, Elbarbary S, Mahmoud K, Hilali AE, Gamal P et al (2025) Robot-assisted versus open surgery in early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clbc.2025.08.019","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"3297_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7331","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-09964-2","volume":"28","author":"H-W Lai","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lai H-W, Chen S-T, Mok CW, Chang Y-T, Lin S-L, Lin Y-J et al (2021) Single-port three-dimensional (3D) videoscope-assisted endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy in the management of breast cancer: technique, clinical outcomes, medical cost, learning curve, and patient-reported aesthetic results from 80 preliminary procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 28:7331\u20137344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-021-09964-2","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.10.009","volume":"31","author":"A Toesca","year":"2017","unstructured":"Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M et al (2017) Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: feasibility and safety study. Breast 31:51\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.breast.2016.10.009","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"3297_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-019-1567-y","volume":"17","author":"G Houvenaeghel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S, Barrou J, Heinemann M, Van Troy A et al (2019) Breast cancer robotic nipple sparing mastectomy: evaluation of several surgical procedures and learning curve. World J Surg Oncol 17:27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12957-019-1567-y","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s12609-025-00587-0","volume":"17","author":"N Rademacher","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rademacher N, Curwick LA, Parker CC (2025) A brief history and the current state of robotic mastectomy: a review. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 17:31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12609-025-00587-0","journal-title":"Curr Breast Cancer Rep"},{"key":"3297_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-025-18733-4","author":"CW Kim","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kim CW, Yoo T-K, Kim J, Chung I-Y, Ko BS, Kim HJ et al (2025) Postoperative outcomes of single-port robot-assisted versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-025-18733-4","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109622","author":"W-L Kuo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kuo W-L, Huang J-J, Chu C-H, Chang S-C, Lin Y-J, Chuang Y-H et al (2025) Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109622","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znad336","author":"A Nessa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nessa A, Shaikh S, Fuller M, Masannat YA, Kastora SL (2023) Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znad336","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3241","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4739-1","volume":"22","author":"L De La Cruz","year":"2015","unstructured":"De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM (2015) Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3241\u20133249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-015-4739-1","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3297_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2014.04.001","volume":"209","author":"KE Poruk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Poruk KE, Ying J, Chidester JR, Olson JR, Matsen CB, Neumayer L et al (2015) Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution\u2019s experience. Am J Surg 209:212\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2014.04.001","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"3297_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S104807","volume":"9","author":"A Althubaiti","year":"2016","unstructured":"Althubaiti A (2016) Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc 9:211\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/JMDH.S104807","journal-title":"J Multidiscip Healthc"},{"key":"3297_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1136\/jech-2013-203104","volume":"67","author":"JJ Barendregt","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, Norman RE, Vos T (2013) Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 67:974\u2013978. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jech-2013-203104","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"3297_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.5114\/pm.2025.150082","volume":"24","author":"P Pluta","year":"2025","unstructured":"Pluta P, Rathat G, Blay L, Gentilini OD, Huber DE, Daniel M et al (2025) Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy \u2013 the current European landscape. Prz Menopauzalny 24:66\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5114\/pm.2025.150082","journal-title":"Prz Menopauzalny"},{"key":"3297_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2025.115","author":"J Lee","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lee J, Go J, Lee SJ, Kwon Y, Kim NH, Kim JY et al (2025) Comparative study of mastectomy using conventional techniques, multiport and single-port robotic surgical systems. Cancer Res Treat. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4143\/crt.2025.115","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:47:20Z","timestamp":1781639240000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3297"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03297-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 February 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"341"}}