{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T03:15:39Z","timestamp":1778555739138,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778544000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778544000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"name":"Clinical Research \u201cClimbing\u201d Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University","award":["YYZS2024006"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["YYZS2024006"]}]},{"name":"the Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation","award":["2025GXNSFDA069002"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2025GXNSFDA069002"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T03:00:16Z","timestamp":1778554816000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The influence of robotic-assisted systems on the surgical approach and outcomes in hysterectomy for benign and malignant diseases"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Hang","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hao","family":"Liang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xuzhi","family":"Liang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Huisi","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shiyu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dunke","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jiangtao","family":"Fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"3423_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e155","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002112","volume":"129","author":"Committee Opinion 701","year":"2017","unstructured":"Committee Opinion 701 (2017) Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol 129(6):e155\u2013159","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"3423_CR2","first-page":"CD003677","volume":"8","author":"MP Charlotte","year":"2023","unstructured":"Charlotte MP, Dachel DS, Ben Willem JM et al (2023) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8):CD003677","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"3423_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2025.102968","volume":"54","author":"O Riccardo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Riccardo O, Antonello F, Cherif A et al (2025) Is vaginal hysterectomy outdated? A systematic overview of reviews with future perspectives. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 54(7):102968","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"3423_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1860","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers16101860","volume":"16","author":"N Purushothaman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Purushothaman N, Gayathri D, Lucy D et al (2024) Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 16(10):1860","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"2","key":"3423_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s00428-020-03007-z","volume":"478","author":"C Nicole","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nicole C, Carien LC, Ignace V et al (2021) ESGO\/ESTRO\/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 478(2):153\u2013190","journal-title":"Virchows Arch"},{"issue":"3","key":"3423_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.12.023","volume":"28","author":"BS Anna Jo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Anna Jo BS, Tiffany NJ, Diana M et al (2021) Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(3):544\u2013555","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"3423_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2020.1694","volume":"6","author":"N Roni","year":"2020","unstructured":"Roni N, Pedro TR, Michael F et al (2020) Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 6(7):1019\u20131027","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"13","key":"3423_CR8","first-page":"1159081","volume":"6","author":"L Xuzhi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xuzhi L, Haijing H, Yingjin L et al (2023) An optimized robotic surgical technique for cervical cancer: investigating whether the use of the pulling robotic arm has better surgical outcomes. Front Oncol 6(13):1159081","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"3423_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e31741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e31741","volume":"10","author":"Y Hang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hang Y, Haijing H, Xuzhi L et al (2024) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: The more experienced the bedside assistant. better? Heliyon 10(11):e31741","journal-title":"better? Heliyon"},{"issue":"4","key":"3423_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01552-8","volume":"17","author":"B Adnan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Adnan B, Hamza A, Victor A et al (2023) Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery vs open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors. J Robot Sur 17(4):1571\u20131578","journal-title":"J Robot Sur"},{"key":"3423_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2024.01.041","volume":"185","author":"SS Rudy","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rudy SS, Charlotte CS, Amy KS (2024) Determination of quality of life-related health utilities for surgical complications in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 185:101\u2013107","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3423_CR12","first-page":"1158","volume":"23","author":"LJ Elizabth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Elizabth LJ, Michael S, Gloria B et al (2013) Preference-based utility scores for adverse events associated with the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(6):1158\u20131166","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"3423_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006572","volume":"281","author":"R Rocco","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rocco R, Usha SK, Ana Y et al (2025) The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence. Ann Surg 281(5):748\u2013763","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"3423_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2647","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01724-6","volume":"17","author":"L Louis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Louis L, Geoffroy C, J\u00e9r\u00e9mie B et al (2023) Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 17(6):2647\u20132662","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3423_CR15","first-page":"e2023","volume":"27","author":"KP Courtney","year":"2023","unstructured":"Courtney KP, Lianteng Z, Matthew KH (2023) Uterine Weight and Perioperative Morbidity in Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. JSLS 27(4):e2023","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"3423_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755781","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.755781","volume":"8","author":"LE Shahzia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shahzia LE, Michel B, Patrick P et al (2021) Operative Complications and Outcomes Comparing Small and Large Uterine Weight in Case of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for a Benign Indication. Front Surg 8:755781","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3423_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005607","volume":"144","author":"MM Mamta","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mamta MM, Shunaha KF, Linda Y et al (2024) Hysterectomy Techniques and Outcomes for Benign Large Uteri: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol 144(1):40\u201352","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3423_CR18","first-page":"480","volume":"219","author":"L Michelle","year":"2018","unstructured":"Michelle L, Paula DS, Janelle KM et al (2018) Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(5):480","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3423_CR19","first-page":"304","volume":"232","author":"K Elina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Elina K, Synn\u00f6ve S, Heini SA et al (2025) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 232(3):304","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3423_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2023.02.014","volume":"172","author":"L C\u00e9line","year":"2023","unstructured":"C\u00e9line L, Juliette B, Marie-Claude et al (2023) Robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer is safe in morbidly and extremely morbidly obese patients. Gynecol Oncol 172:15\u201320","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3423_CR21","first-page":"1","volume":"157","author":"R Antonio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Antonio R, Antonio T, Diego R et al (2022) Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(1):1\u201310","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"3423_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2020.10.005","volume":"47","author":"A Kakkos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kakkos A, Ver Eecke C, Ongaro S et al (2021) Robot-assisted surgery for women with endometrial cancer: Surgical and oncologic outcomes within a Belgium gynecological oncology group cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(5):1117\u20131123","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3423_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005698","volume":"277","author":"MLJ Mario","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mario MLJ, Usha SK, Vincent L et al (2023) The RECOURSE Study: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Associated With Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Procedures for Endometrial, Cervical, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 277(3):387\u2013396","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3423_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102421","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102421","volume":"92","author":"C Anna","year":"2024","unstructured":"Anna C, Annie J, Esther M (2024) Robotic-assisted surgery in high-risk surgical patients with endometrial cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 92:102421","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3423_CR25","first-page":"304","volume":"232","author":"K Elina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Elina K, Synn\u00f6ve S, Heini SAH et al (2025) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 232(3):304","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3423_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.11.041","volume":"224","author":"W Jenny","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jenny W, Teresa L, Samantha JK et al (2021) Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 224(4):348\u2013358","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"23","key":"3423_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2741","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.23.02335","volume":"42","author":"TR Pedro","year":"2024","unstructured":"Pedro TR, Kristy PR, Michael F et al (2024) LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol 42(23):2741\u20132746","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"3423_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001506","volume":"30","author":"C Luis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Luis C, Vanna Z, Denis Q et al (2020) SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(9):1269\u20131277","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"3423_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.108240","volume":"50","author":"S Yue-Lin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yue-Lin S, Rui-Zhe L, Bo-Jie F et al (2024) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 50(4):108240","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3423_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2023.34.e5","volume":"34","author":"F Atsushi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Atsushi F, Hiroyuki K, Shiho T et al (2023) Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review. J Gynecol Oncol 34(1):e5","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3423_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-27430-9","volume":"13","author":"M Greg","year":"2023","unstructured":"Greg M, Ahmed TM, Ahmed A et al (2023) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Sci Rep 13(1):273","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"3423_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgc.2025.101760","volume":"35","author":"ML Mario","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mario ML, Kristin LB, Dana MC et al (2025) ROCC\/GOG-3043(NCT04831580): a randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 35(7):101760","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T03:00:19Z","timestamp":1778554819000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3423"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03423-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and all the terms related to human study participants. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospita (IRB No.2025-E0925). All participants signed an informed consent form.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The current investigation obtained approval from the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and followed the guidelines set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics statement"}}],"article-number":"484"}}