{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T23:01:13Z","timestamp":1784588473172,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784505600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    To summarize randomized evidence assessing robotic surgery in relation to conventional laparoscopic and open abdominal approaches for endometrial cancer treatment, with particular attention to perioperative outcomes and conversion to open surgery. Randomized controlled trials evaluating robot-assisted surgical treatment of endometrial cancer were identified across major biomedical databases up to December 2025. Eligible studies compared the robotic approach against laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery. Quantitative pooling was undertaken only when outcome reporting was sufficiently consistent across studies. Eight randomized trials including 647 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 322 patients underwent robotic surgery, 244 conventional laparoscopy, and 81 laparotomy. Most perioperative endpoints were reported heterogeneously, limiting formal pooling. Operative time varied across trials when robotics was compared with laparoscopy and was generally longer than laparotomy. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospitalization did not show consistent differences between the two minimally invasive approaches. Compared with laparotomy, the robotic approach was linked to reduced postoperative stay. Conversion to laparotomy occurred less frequently after robotic surgery than after laparoscopy (0.7% vs. 8.4%; OR 0.17;\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    = .03). Complication reporting was inconsistent, although trials comparing robotics with laparotomy generally favored the robotic approach. Direct procedural costs were higher for robotics, whereas indirect costs favored robotics in the single study evaluating them. The robotic approach resulted in a lower need for open conversion compared with conventional laparoscopy. Other perioperative outcomes appeared broadly comparable between the two minimally invasive approaches, while comparisons with laparotomy suggested shorter hospital stay and fewer postoperative complications, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited and heterogeneous randomized evidence.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T09:22:10Z","timestamp":1784539330000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review of randomized trials and pooled analysis of conversion rates"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Emanuele","family":"De Angelis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberta Maria","family":"Arseni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilaria","family":"Cuccu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Innocenza","family":"Palaia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giorgia","family":"Perniola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ludovico","family":"Muzii","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emanuele","family":"Perrone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giorgio","family":"Bogani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evangelos","family":"Kontopantelis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Vizzielli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Violante","family":"Di Donato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"3625_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cronin KA, Scott S, Firth AU et al (2022) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 128(24):4251\u20134284","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.34479"},{"key":"3625_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71(3):209\u2013249. doi: 10.3322\/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PMID: 33538338","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660"},{"issue":"6","key":"3625_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"828","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14228","volume":"46","author":"KH Clair","year":"2020","unstructured":"Clair KH, Tewari KS (2020) Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 46(6):828\u2013843","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"3625_CR4","first-page":"107","volume":"88","author":"R Rivas-L\u00f3pez","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rivas-L\u00f3pez R, Sandoval-Garc\u00eda-Traves\u00ed FA (2020) Robotic surgery in gynecology: review of literature. Cir Cir 88(1):107\u2013116","journal-title":"Cir Cir"},{"issue":"4","key":"3625_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.08.012","volume":"199","author":"JF Boggess","year":"2008","unstructured":"Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L et al (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):360e1\u2013360e9","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3625_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-016-0621-9","volume":"11","author":"IF Nevis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nevis IF, Vali B, Higgins C et al (2017) Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 11(1):1\u201316","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"3625_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3625_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM, Nieminen K, Tom\u00e1s EI et al (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 215(5):588.e1-588.e7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005"},{"issue":"8","key":"3625_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1788","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001073","volume":"27","author":"RK Vuorinen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vuorinen RK, M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM, Nieminen K et al (2017) Costs of Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(8):1788\u20131793","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"3625_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Silva E, Silva A, de Carvalho JPM, Anton C et al (2018) Introduction of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer into a Brazilian cancer service: a randomized trial evaluating perioperative clinical outcomes and costs. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 73(suppl 1):e522s","DOI":"10.6061\/clinics\/2017\/e522s"},{"issue":"2","key":"3625_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2020.05.010","volume":"158","author":"F Narducci","year":"2020","unstructured":"Narducci F, Bogart E, Hebert T et al (2020) Severe perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: Results of the randomized ROBOGYN-1004 trial. Gynecol Oncol 158(2):382\u2013389","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"12","key":"3625_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1671","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2018.1521987","volume":"57","author":"S Salehi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salehi S, Brandberg Y, \u00c5vall-Lundqvist E et al (2018) Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial. Acta Oncol 57(12):1671\u20131676","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"key":"3625_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.03.038","volume":"79","author":"S Salehi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Salehi S, \u00c5vall-Lundqvist E, Legerstam B et al (2017) Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 79:81\u201389","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"11","key":"3625_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001611","volume":"30","author":"ES Lundin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lundin ES, Carlsson P, Wodlin NB et al (2020) Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(11):1719\u20131725","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"3625_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lundin ES, Wodlin NB, Nilsson L et al (2019) A prospective randomized assessment of quality of life between open and robotic hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer May 7;29(4):721-727. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000285. PMID: 30923082","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000285"},{"issue":"16","key":"3625_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2626","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers17162626","volume":"17","author":"A Rychlik","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rychlik A, Kluz T, Szewczyk G et al (2025) Real Life Evolution of Surgical Approaches in the Management of Endometrial Cancer in Poland. Cancers (Basel) 17(16):2626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers17162626 PMID: 40867255; PMCID: PMC12384578","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"3625_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lu KH, Broaddus RR, Endometrial C (2020) N Engl J Med. 383(21):2053\u20132064 10.1056\/NEJMra1514010. PMID: 33207095. PMID: 33207095. PMID: 33207095 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMra1514010. PMID: 33207095","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMra1514010"},{"issue":"4","key":"3625_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000006017","volume":"146","author":"P Scalia","year":"2025","unstructured":"Scalia P, Levin G, Bar Noy T et al (2025) Conversion Rate for Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Cancer Surgery. Obstet Gynecol 146(4):563\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000006017 Epub 2025 Jul 24. PMID: 40706071","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3625_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.05.004","volume":"221","author":"MC Cusimano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cusimano MC, Simpson AN, Dossa F et al (2019) Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221(5):410\u2013428e19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.05.004 Epub 2019 May 10. PMID: 31082383","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"32","key":"3625_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5331","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2009.22.3248","volume":"27","author":"JL Walker","year":"2009","unstructured":"Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331\u20135336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2009.22.3248 Epub 2009 Oct 5. PMID: 19805679; PMCID: PMC2773219","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3625_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.11.016","volume":"156","author":"J Casarin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Casarin J, Song C, Multinu F et al (2020) Implementing robotic surgery for uterine cancer in the United States: Better outcomes without increased costs. Gynecol Oncol 156(2):451\u2013458 Epub 2019 Nov 25. PMID: 31780236","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3625_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e22","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004048","volume":"136","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons","year":"2020","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons (2020) Robot-Assisted Surgery for Noncancerous Gynecologic Conditions: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 810. Obstet Gynecol 136(3):e22\u2013e30 PMID: 32826597 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004048. PMID: 32826597. PMID: 32826597 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004048. PMID: 32826597","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3625_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-026-08349-8","volume":"313","author":"L Jung","year":"2026","unstructured":"Jung L, Taran FA, Huwer S et al (2026) Learning curves, safety, and experiences of a tertiary surgical center in the introduction of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 313(1):85. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08349-8 PMID: 41667699; PMCID: PMC12891032","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"3625_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ et al (2010) Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 11(8):763\u2009\u2013\u200971. doi: 10.1016\/S1470-2045(10)70143-1. Epub 2010 Jul 16. PMID: 20638901","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(10)70143-1"},{"issue":"10","key":"3625_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD006655","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006655.pub3","volume":"10","author":"K Galaal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Galaal K, Donkers H, Bryant A, Lopes AD (2018) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10):CD006655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD006655.pub3 PMID: 30379327; PMCID: PMC6517108","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"3625_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"He H, Zeng D, Ou H, Tang Y, Li J, Zhong H (2013 Jul-Aug) Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(4):413\u2013423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.01.005 Epub 2013 Mar 15. PMID: 23506718","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.01.005"},{"key":"3625_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5605","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5605","volume":"41","author":"Daniel Uwe","year":"2023","unstructured":"Daniel Uwe, Reimer et al (2023) Laparoscopic versus open-surgery in FIGO stage II endometrioid endometrium cancers: Is there a prognostic effect? J Clin Oncol 41:5605\u20135605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5605","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"3625_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e073990","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-073990","volume":"13","author":"A McCarthy","year":"2023","unstructured":"McCarthy A, Samarakoon D, Gray J et al (2023) Robotic and laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study and economic evaluation in England. BMJ Open 13(9):e073990. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-073990 PMID: 37770262; PMCID: PMC10546163","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"3625_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109630","volume":"51","author":"A \u010celebi\u0107","year":"2025","unstructured":"\u010celebi\u0107 A, Jakimovska Stefanovska M, Miladinovi\u0107 M, Calleja-Agius J, Stari\u010d KD (2025) Evaluating the role of robotic surgery in gynecological cancer treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 51(4):109630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109630 Epub 2025 Jan 28. PMID: 40348472","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3625_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2208","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002175","volume":"111","author":"WR Huang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Huang WR, Ou XY, Fang XZ et al (2025) Comparing robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer: a network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 111(2):2208\u20132215 PMID: 39784493 10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002175. PMID: 39784493 . PMID: 39784493 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002175. PMID: 39784493","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"3625_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kivek\u00e4s E, Staff S, Huhtala HSA, M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 JU, Nieminen K, Tom\u00e1s EI, M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM (2025) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 232(3):304.e. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.08.028. Epub 2024 Aug 23. PMID: 39181495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.08.028"},{"key":"3625_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2026.02.035","volume":"207","author":"SJ Boyle","year":"2026","unstructured":"Boyle SJ, Dona A, Vogel RI, Argenta P (2026) Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis. Gynecol Oncol 207:66\u201373 Epub 2026 Mar 16. PMID: 41844495","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3625_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1219371","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1219371","volume":"13","author":"KJ Eoh","year":"2023","unstructured":"Eoh KJ, Kim TJ, Park JY, Kim HS, Paek J, Kim YT (2023) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes. Front Oncol 13:1219371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2023.1219371 PMID: 37781200; PMCID: PMC10540847","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"3625_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2023.04.026","volume":"174","author":"H Fu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fu H, Zhang J, Zhao S, He N (2023) Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 174:55\u201367 Epub 2023 May 5. PMID: 37149906","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3625_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-022-12548-3","volume":"30","author":"J Hotton","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hotton J, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Marchal F (2023) Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon\u2019s Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial). Ann Surg Oncol 30(2):916\u2013923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-022-12548-3 Epub 2022 Sep 29. PMID: 36175710","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3625_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002845","volume":"271","author":"T Dalsgaard","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dalsgaard T, Jensen MD, Hartwell D, Mosgaard BJ, J\u00f8rgensen A, Jensen BR (2020) Robotic Surgery Is Less Physically Demanding Than Laparoscopic Surgery: Paired Cross Sectional Study. Ann Surg 271(1):106\u2013113 PMID: 29923873 10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002845 . PMID: 29923873 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002845. PMID: 29923873","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3625_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17242","volume":"130","author":"MAE Nobbenhuis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nobbenhuis MAE, Gul N, Barton-Smith P, O\u2019Sullivan O, Moss E, Ind TEJ (2023) Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper 71 (July 2022). BJOG 130(1):e1\u2013e8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17242 Epub 2022 Jul 17. PMID: 35844092","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"3625_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8397","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09105-0","volume":"36","author":"S Monfared","year":"2022","unstructured":"Monfared S, Athanasiadis DI, Umana L et al (2022) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk. Surg Endosc 36(11):8397\u20138402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-022-09105-0 Epub 2022 Feb 19. PMID: 35182219","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3625_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dinoi G, Tarantino V, Bizzarri N et al (2024) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 34(5):773\u2013776 10.1136\/ijgc-2023-005197. PMID: 38326228 . PMID: 38326228. PMID: 38326228 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2023-005197. PMID: 38326228","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2023-005197"},{"issue":"4","key":"3625_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD011422","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011422.pub2","volume":"4","author":"TA Lawrie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D et al (2019) Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD011422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011422.pub2 PMID: 30985921; PMCID: PMC6464707","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T22:01:49Z","timestamp":1784584909000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3625"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03625-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not Applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"<b>Consent to participate<\/b>","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"<b>Consent for publication<\/b>","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"659"}}