{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T12:21:59Z","timestamp":1790770919325,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786060800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786060800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Robotic technology has progressively expanded within colorectal surgery owing to its enhanced instrument articulation and superior operative visualization. Despite these technical benefits, its adoption remains constrained by concerns regarding acquisition and procedural costs. Furthermore, the influence of surgeon proficiency and learning-curve progression on economic outcomes has rarely been considered in existing assessments of value. An umbrella review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and reported in compliance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from January 2021 through March 2026 evaluating robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Review quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 tool, while redundancy among included reviews was quantified through the Corrected Covered Area method. Twenty-seven eligible reviews encompassing more than 180 original studies and over 110,000 patients were analyzed. Across the available evidence, robotic colorectal surgery achieved perioperative and oncological outcomes comparable to those reported for laparoscopy, including rates of postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage. A consistent advantage was observed in the reduction of conversion to open surgery, particularly among patients undergoing rectal cancer resection and those with obesity. Although robotic procedures generally required longer operative times, this difference appeared closely linked to the initial phase of surgeon training. Economic analyses demonstrated greater upfront expenditures associated with robotic platforms; nevertheless, evidence from several methodologically robust reviews indicated that these disparities may narrow substantially once institutional and surgeon experience mature, especially in high-volume settings. Robotic colorectal surgery represents a reliable and effective minimally invasive approach that may provide specific technical benefits in challenging operative scenarios. Available cost-effectiveness studies may not fully reflect its long-term economic value, as improvements related to accumulated experience and learning-curve completion are seldom incorporated into current evaluation models.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T03:59:26Z","timestamp":1786075166000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Is robotic colorectal surgery worth the cost? An umbrella review integrating clinical outcomes, learning curve, and economic evidence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Silvia","family":"Martinelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessio","family":"Lucarini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Aurello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gianfranco","family":"Damiani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Niccolo","family":"Petrucciani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"3716_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J et al (2017) Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 24 ottobre. ;318(16):1569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7219"},{"key":"3716_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rehman MU, Moussa R, Ahmed N, Brodie A, Tarrar T, Rehman A et al Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery During the Early Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus [Internet]. 17 giugno 2025 [citato 9 giugno 2026]; Disponibile su: https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/368432-clinical-outcomes-of-robotic-versus-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-during-the-early-learning-curve-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.86196"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-023-04361-5","volume":"38","author":"AY Chok","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chok AY, Zhao Y, Tan IEH, Au MKH, Tan EJKW (2023) Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 29 marzo 38(1):86","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis 29 marzo"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs5.50235","volume":"4","author":"NA Soomro","year":"2020","unstructured":"Soomro NA, Hashimoto DA, Porteous AJ, Ridley CJA, Marsh WJ, Ditto R et al (2020) Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery. BJS Open febbraio 4(1):27\u201344","journal-title":"BJS Open febbraio"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20566","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-24665-w","volume":"12","author":"CY Lin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lin CY, Liu YC, Chen MC, Chiang FF (2022) Learning curve and surgical outcome of robotic assisted colorectal surgery with ERAS program. Sci Rep 29 novembre 12(1):20566","journal-title":"Sci Rep 29 novembre"},{"issue":"3","key":"3716_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000055","volume":"13","author":"E Aromataris","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P (2015) Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc settembre 13(3):132\u2013140","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthc settembre"},{"key":"3716_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 29 marzo; n: 71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"issue":"4","key":"3716_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007","volume":"67","author":"D Pieper","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pieper D, Antoine SL, Mathes T, Neugebauer EAM, Eikermann M (2014) Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. J Clin Epidemiol aprile 67(4):368\u2013375","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol aprile"},{"key":"3716_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J et al. (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 21 settembre; j4008.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008"},{"issue":"7650","key":"3716_CR10","first-page":"924","volume":"336","author":"GH Guyatt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 26 aprile 336(7650):924\u2013926","journal-title":"BMJ 26 aprile"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2604610","DOI":"10.1080\/24699322.2025.2604610","volume":"31","author":"H Wu","year":"2026","unstructured":"Wu H, Zheng L, Xu T, Zhao B, Yang H (2026) Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Assist Surg 31 dicembre 31(1):2604610","journal-title":"Comput Assist Surg 31 dicembre"},{"issue":"7","key":"3716_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1224","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.70098","volume":"132","author":"MDO Filho","year":"2025","unstructured":"Filho MDO, Lenzi MC, De Lima PEC, Amaral MA, Avelino PAS, Almeida PL et al (2025) Redefining Precision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Robotic\u2010Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. J Surg Oncol dicembre 132(7):1224\u20131234","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol dicembre"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02755-x","volume":"19","author":"C Liu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Liu C, Wu Y, Liu H, Zhao D, Wang S (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid\u2013low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological, perioperative, and survival-related outcomes. J Robot Surg 6 settembre 19(1):570","journal-title":"J Robot Surg 6 settembre"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02628-3","volume":"19","author":"W Mirza","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mirza W, Dadan S, Khan HM, Yasmin S (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating functional recovery, complication risk, and oncologic quality. J Robot Surg 6 agosto 19(1):457","journal-title":"J Robot Surg 6 agosto"},{"issue":"8","key":"3716_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2025.0088","volume":"35","author":"BF Pompeu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Pompeu BF, De Moraes Alves LEB, Pigossi BD, Barone GL, Delgado LM, Guedes LSDSP et al (2025) Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 1 agosto 35(8):621\u2013639","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 1 agosto"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02358-6","volume":"19","author":"X Li","year":"2025","unstructured":"Li X, Xu L, Shen X, Li H (2025) Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Robot Surg 27 aprile 19(1):177","journal-title":"J Robot Surg 27 aprile"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-025-03141-3","volume":"29","author":"S Gahunia","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gahunia S, Wyatt J, Powell SG, Mahdi S, Ahmed S, Altaf K (2025) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctology dicembre 29(1):98","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctology dicembre"},{"key":"3716_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li H, Xu L, Shen X, Li X (2025) The perioperative results of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 7 aprile. ;23(1):123","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-025-03781-7"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-025-02805-z","volume":"25","author":"J Zou","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zou J, Zhu H, Tang Y, Huang Y, Chi P, Wang X (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 28 febbraio 25(1):86","journal-title":"BMC Surg 28 febbraio"},{"issue":"4","key":"3716_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.19319","volume":"95","author":"T McKechnie","year":"2025","unstructured":"McKechnie T, Khamar J, Chu C, Hatamnejad A, Jessani G, Lee Y et al (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery for patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg aprile 95(4):675\u2013689","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg aprile"},{"key":"3716_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asmat MLV, Caballero-Alvarado J, Lozano-Peralta K, Mari\u00f1as HV, Zavaleta-Corvera C (2024) Robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, and mortality. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 22 novembre. ;409(1):353","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-024-03545-z"},{"issue":"11","key":"3716_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6464","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-024-11222-x","volume":"38","author":"A Abdelsamad","year":"2024","unstructured":"Abdelsamad A, Mohammed MK, Serour ASAS, Khalil I, Wesh ZM, Rashidi L et al (2024) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc novembre 38(11):6464\u20136475","journal-title":"Surg Endosc novembre"},{"issue":"10","key":"3716_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.108538","volume":"50","author":"M Ishizuka","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Hachiya H, Nishi Y, Kono T, Takayanagi M et al (2024) Robotic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of circumferential resection margin positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol ottobre 50(10):108538","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol ottobre"},{"issue":"4","key":"3716_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2659","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2659","volume":"20","author":"G Cao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cao G, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Man D, Wang F, Cai X (2024) Comparing the long-term follow\u2010up anal function between robot\u2010assisted and laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: A meta\u2010analysis and systematic review. Int J Med Robot agosto 20(4):e2659","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot agosto"},{"issue":"5","key":"3716_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2024.2360094","volume":"33","author":"CA Ammirati","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ammirati CA, Passera R, Beltrami E, Peluso C, Francis N, Arezzo A (2024) Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ottobre 33(5):253\u2013269","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ottobre"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2024.2359705","volume":"34","author":"X Wang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang X, Ma R, Hou T, Xu H, Zhang C, Ye C (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2 gennaio 34(1):35\u201343","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2 gennaio"},{"key":"3716_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.21037\/tgh-23-73","volume":"9","author":"A Singh","year":"2024","unstructured":"Singh A, Kaur M, Baig MK, Swaminathan C, Subramanian A, Sajid MS (2024) Cost-comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections: a mapped systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol aprile 9:21\u201321","journal-title":"Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol aprile"},{"key":"3716_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Zlong, Du QL, Zhu Y, bin, Wang H (2024) fei. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients. J Robot Surg. 9 aprile ;18(1):167","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01934-6"},{"issue":"10","key":"3716_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6282","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000001380","volume":"110","author":"C Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang C, Tan H, Xu H, Ding J (2024) The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg ottobre 110(10):6282\u20136296","journal-title":"Int J Surg ottobre"},{"key":"3716_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1273378","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1273378","volume":"13","author":"Z Huang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Huang Z, Huang S, Huang Y, Luo R, Liang W (2023) Comparison of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Oncol 26 ottobre 13:1273378","journal-title":"Front Oncol 26 ottobre"},{"issue":"7","key":"3716_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinre.2023.102176","volume":"47","author":"L Yang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yang L, Fang C, Bi T, Han J, Zhang R, Zhou S (2023) Efficacy of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopy surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol agosto 47(7):102176","journal-title":"Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol agosto"},{"issue":"36","key":"3716_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e27158","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000027158","volume":"100","author":"C Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu C, Li X, Wang Q (2021) Postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis of recently published studies. Med (Baltimore) 10 settembre 100(36):e27158","journal-title":"Med (Baltimore) 10 settembre"},{"issue":"10","key":"3716_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000002572","volume":"65","author":"MA Abbass","year":"2022","unstructured":"Abbass MA (2022) Research Perspective on Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum ottobre 65(10):1205\u20131205","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum ottobre"},{"issue":"11","key":"3716_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2806","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.15843","volume":"23","author":"J Flynn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, Waters PS, Warrier SK, Heriot A (2021) The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis novembre 23(11):2806\u20132820","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis novembre"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-021-02128-2","volume":"19","author":"B Tang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tang B, Lei X, Ai J, Huang Z, Shi J, Li T (2021) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol dicembre 19(1):38","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol dicembre"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07361-1","volume":"35","author":"KF Kowalewski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kowalewski KF, Seifert L, Ali S, Schmidt MW, Seide S, Haney C et al (2021) Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc gennaio 35(1):81\u201395","journal-title":"Surg Endosc gennaio"},{"issue":"6","key":"3716_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002523","volume":"267","author":"FP Prete","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A et al (2018) Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg giugno 267(6):1034\u20131046","journal-title":"Ann Surg giugno"},{"key":"3716_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Madarasz Z, Nowakowski K, Leitz M, Sturzu BC, Baltamar A, Baginski K et al (2026) Learning curves and outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery: A single-surgeon experience within a structured dual-console training program. J Robot Surg. 12 gennaio. ;20(1):170","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-03139-x"},{"issue":"19","key":"3716_CR39","first-page":"3420","volume":"16","author":"NW Wong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wong NW, Teo NZ, Ngu JCY (2024) Learning Curve for Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Cancers 8 ottobre 16(19):3420","journal-title":"Cancers 8 ottobre"},{"issue":"8","key":"3716_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1006602","volume":"363","author":"GI Barbash","year":"2010","unstructured":"Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New Technology and Health Care Costs \u2014 The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery. N Engl J Med 19 agosto 363(8):701\u2013704","journal-title":"N Engl J Med 19 agosto"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.3356","volume":"152","author":"PA Najjar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Najjar PA, Strickland M, Kaplan RS (2017) Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Surgical Episodes. JAMA Surg 1 gennaio 152(1):96","journal-title":"JAMA Surg 1 gennaio"},{"key":"3716_CR42","unstructured":"Drummond MF, Sculpher KC, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press"},{"issue":"1","key":"3716_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2021.11.1351","volume":"25","author":"D Husereau","year":"2022","unstructured":"Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C et al (2022) Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res gennaio 25(1):3\u20139","journal-title":"Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res gennaio"},{"issue":"2","key":"3716_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2025.8123","volume":"334","author":"Q Feng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, Tang B, Jia B, Zhou Y, REAL Study Group et al (2025) Robotic vs Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: The REAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 334(2):136\u2013148 PMID: 40455621; PMCID: PMC12131176","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"3716_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2062","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-12400-1","volume":"40","author":"ARL Stevenson","year":"2026","unstructured":"Stevenson ARL, Khan JS, Wilson K, O\u2019Connell RL, Pillinger S, Lynch C et al (2026) RoLaCaRT-1: pilot randomised phase II study of robotic vs laparoscopic hemicolectomy for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 40(3):2062\u20132077. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12400-1. Epub 2025 Dec 10. PMID: 41372621; PMCID: PMC12971845","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T03:59:28Z","timestamp":1786075168000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3716"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03716-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 July 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 August 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"805"}}