{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T08:55:05Z","timestamp":1791363305956,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) is common and robotic-assisted techniques (RIHR) are increasingly being implemented. Current literature is indecisive on whether RIHR offers clinical and ergonomical benefits. This systematic review compares LIHR and RIHR specifically focusing on surgeon workload and ergonomics. A literature search was performed in four databases to find randomized controlled trials comparing RIHR and LIHR. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Tool and results were synthesized as pooled estimate, odds ratio or narrative review. Four trials were identified, encompassing 482 patients. The groups showed similar baseline characteristics across studies. A broad range of surgeon experience could be observed between trials. All studies showed a significant difference in operative time, but while three studies found RIHR to take longer, one study reported shorter operative time with RIHR, altogether leading to a non-significant pooled estimate (MD 17.14; 95% CI \u22123.22 to 37.49). While one study showed significantly better ergonomics with RIHR, the other study reporting on that topic found ergonomics between the two approaches to be comparable. Surgeon task load varied substantially between the trials. The pooled estimate slightly favored RIHR but did not reach statistical significance (MD \u20134.50; 95% CI \u201316.78 to 7.78). Postoperative complication rate was not significantly different overall (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.90), although one study reported significantly less complications after RIHR. RIHR shows comparable patient-centered outcomes to LIHR. At the moment, there is no evidence for significant benefits regarding task load and ergonomics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T08:41:28Z","timestamp":1791362488000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Surgeon task load, ergonomics, and clinical outcomes in laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-6717-5251","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"R\u00fcmmele-Vogt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6929-6709","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julian","family":"S\u00fcsstrunk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-4838-8671","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marie-Th\u00e9r\u00e8se","family":"B\u00f6ttcher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8137-9232","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Johannes","family":"Baur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8552-8538","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Beat P","family":"M\u00fcller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4111-2909","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel C","family":"Steinemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5450-3100","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fiorenzo V","family":"Angehrn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"3805_CR1","unstructured":"Eurostat (2026) Surgical operations and procedures statistics. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/eurostat\/statistics-explained\/index.php?title= Surgical_operations_and_procedures_statistics. Accessed 10 July 2026"},{"key":"3805_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-017-1668-x","author":"MP Simons","year":"2018","unstructured":"Simons MP et al (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-017-1668-x","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-021-02419-3","author":"TJ Holleran","year":"2022","unstructured":"Holleran TJ, Napolitano MA, Sparks AD, Duncan JE, Garrett M, Brody FJ (2022) Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-021-02419-3","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01312-6","author":"L Solaini","year":"2022","unstructured":"Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, Rocco G, Ercolani G (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01312-6","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0298989","author":"X Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li X, Li YJ, Dong H, Wang DC, Wei J (2024) Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia. PLoS ONE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0298989","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"3805_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-025-03550-1","author":"F Brucchi","year":"2026","unstructured":"Brucchi F et al (2026) Robotic vs. laparoscopic TAPP: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on short-term outcomes. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-025-03550-1","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.60959","author":"T Khewater","year":"2009","unstructured":"Khewater T et al (2009) Comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.60959","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"3805_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14030990","author":"S Huerta","year":"2025","unstructured":"Huerta S, Garza AM (2025) A systematic review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair: management of inguinal hernias in the 21st century. J Clin Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14030990","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"3805_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3805_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3805_CR11","unstructured":"GRADEpro GDT (2023) GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. 2023. McMaster University and Evidence Prime. (Computer Program)"},{"key":"3805_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.17830","author":"SW Bell","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bell SW et al (2022) The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index: NASA-TLX: evaluation of its use in surgery. ANZ J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.17830","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0166-4115(08)62386-9","author":"S Hart","year":"1988","unstructured":"Hart S, Staveland L (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0166-4115(08)62386-9","journal-title":"Adv Psychol"},{"key":"3805_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-6870(93)90080-S","author":"L McAtamney","year":"1993","unstructured":"McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0003-6870(93)90080-S","journal-title":"Appl Ergon"},{"key":"3805_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-6870(99)00039-3","author":"S Hignett","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hignett S, McAtamney L (2000) Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0003-6870(99)00039-3","journal-title":"Appl Ergon"},{"key":"3805_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR17","unstructured":"R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (Computer Program)"},{"key":"3805_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"3805_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0034","author":"AS Prabhu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Prabhu AS et al (2020) Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0034","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaf283","author":"FV Angehrn","year":"2026","unstructured":"Angehrn FV et al (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (the ROGER trial). Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znaf283","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaf074","author":"A Valorenzos","year":"2025","unstructured":"Valorenzos A et al (2025) Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS). Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znaf074","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2025.116429","author":"F Dixon","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dixon F, Qureshi A, Vitish-Sharma P, Khanna A, Keeler BD (2025) Robotic assisted surgery reduces ergonomic risk during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: the VOLTAIRE randomised controlled trial. Am J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2025.116429","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-025-03402-y","author":"D Arunthavanathan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Arunthavanathan D, Liu R, Inan I, Oztoprak M, Nielsen MF (2025) Shorter operative times following robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) compared to laparoscopic TAPP: the Danish Inguinal Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT). Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-025-03402-y","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09320-9","author":"BT Miller","year":"2023","unstructured":"Miller BT et al (2023) Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: 1- and 2-year outcomes from the RIVAL trial. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-022-09320-9","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-08165-4","author":"F Proietti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Proietti F, La Regina D, Pini R, Di Giuseppe M, Cianfarani A, Mongelli F (2021) Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-08165-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00058","author":"MA Awad","year":"2020","unstructured":"Awad MA et al (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair outcomes: operative time and cost analysis. JSLS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2020.00058","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"3805_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2150","author":"A Aghayeva","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aghayeva A et al (2020) Learning curve analysis of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Int J Med Robot. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.2150","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"key":"3805_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08462-6","author":"OY Kudsi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kudsi OY et al (2022) Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08462-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14196699","author":"G Geropoulos","year":"2025","unstructured":"Geropoulos G, Massias S, Pajaziti Q, Thapa B, Mohsin SN, Patel V (2025) What do randomised trials reveal about robotic surgery? A critical appraisal across colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreaticobiliary, and general surgical specialties. J Clin Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14196699","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"3805_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10275-8","author":"M Kawka","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kawka M, Fong Y, Gall TMH (2023) Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-023-10275-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-12136-y","author":"DT Krauss","year":"2025","unstructured":"Krauss DT et al (2025) Evaluation of posture in four different robotic surgical systems. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12136-y","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/js9.0000000000004691","author":"C Wang","year":"2026","unstructured":"Wang C et al (2026) Ergonomic advantages of the open console system in robotic colorectal resection: reduced musculoskeletal strain with preserved technical performance \u2013 a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/js9.0000000000004691","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-008-0412-y","author":"P van Hanswijck de Jonge","year":"2008","unstructured":"van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Lloyd A, Horsfall L, Tan R, O\u2019Dwyer PJ (2008) The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-008-0412-y","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-06606-9","author":"WF Abdelmoaty","year":"2019","unstructured":"Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM, Neighorn C, Swanstrom LL, Hammill CW (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-06606-9","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znae122.374","author":"J Marques-Antunes","year":"2024","unstructured":"Marques-Antunes J, Rodrigues E, Magalh\u00e3es J, Guimar\u00e3es M, Nora M, Pereira A (2024) Recurrence after minimally invasive repair of inguinal hernia: incidence and associated factors. Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znae122.374","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3805_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-11614-7","author":"H Lund","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lund H et al (2025) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a self-adherent mesh: a patient-reported follow-up study. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-11614-7","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-021-02407-7","author":"A Aiolfi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aiolfi A et al (2021) Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-021-02407-7","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"3805_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004703.pub3","author":"K Andresen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Andresen K, Rosenberg J (2024) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD004703.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"3805_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09433-1","author":"O Kudsi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kudsi O, Bou-Ayash N, Kaoukabani G et al (2023) Comparison of perioperative and mid-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-022-09433-1","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3805_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-025-03492-8","author":"M Rodriguez Valladares","year":"2026","unstructured":"Rodriguez Valladares M, P\u00e9rez-Soto R, Kothandaraman J et al (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic elective inguinal hernia repair: a NSQIP study robotl hernia repair: a NSQIP study. Hernia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10029-025-03492-8","journal-title":"Hernia"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T08:41:30Z","timestamp":1791362490000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3805"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03805-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 July 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"As analysis was conducted using already published material, no further ethics approval was needed.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to participate\/Consent to publish","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"1070"}}