{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T20:58:26Z","timestamp":1790456306501,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790380800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790380800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T03:17:55Z","timestamp":1790392675000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery-centered outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Lin","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chenglu","family":"Ruan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2024.2359705","volume":"34","author":"M Wang Xinyu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang Xinyu M, Rui H, Tiewei X, Hao Z, Cheng Y (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 34(1):35\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645706.2024.2359705","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02222-7","volume":"19","author":"M Kossenas Konstantinos","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kossenas Konstantinos M, Olga G, Filippos (2025) Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients\u2009\u2265\u200965 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Surg 19(1):60. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02222-7","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3995_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003374","volume":"67","author":"K-C Chung","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chung K-C, Kung-Chuan WK-LSY-LC, Chien-En T, Ling-Chiao S et al (2024) Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 75 Years and Older: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Dis Colon Rectum 67(9):1121\u20131130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003374","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"4","key":"3995_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01332-2","volume":"16","author":"DV Palomba Giuseppe","year":"2022","unstructured":"Palomba Giuseppe DV, Paola C, Marianna A, Pietro M, De Marco PG, Domenico et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience. J Robot Surg 16(4):981\u2013987. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01332-2","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-023-04481-y","volume":"38","author":"H-G Pacheco Felipe","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pacheco Felipe H-G, Sarah L, Emmanuel Z, Jad, Kamel Mohamed K, Solh Wael A (2023) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma in the elderly population: a propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int J Colorectal Dis 38(1):183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04481-y","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"3995_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1857","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01575-1","volume":"17","author":"M Thompson Hannah","year":"2023","unstructured":"Thompson Hannah M, Williams Hannah, Omer Dana M, Yuval Jonathan B, Verheij Floris S, Fiasconaro Megan et al (2023) Comparison of short-term outcomes and survival between minimally invasive colectomy and open colectomy in patients 80 years of age and older. J Robot Surg 17(4):1857\u20131865. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01575-1","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"3995_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3860","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-11756-8","volume":"39","author":"Z-N Huang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Huang Z-N, Wen-Wu Q, Li LT-YZ, Jun-Jun S, Bao-Qing J et al (2025) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 39(6):3860\u20133872. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-11756-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"8","key":"3995_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6902","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-026-13045-4","volume":"40","author":"K Terajima Daiki","year":"2026","unstructured":"Terajima Daiki K, Takahiro U, Ayumi S, Koichiro T, Takayuki Y, Mitsumasa et al (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 40(8):6902\u20136912. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-026-13045-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3995_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-026-03292-2","author":"S Jinushi Koichi","year":"2026","unstructured":"Jinushi Koichi S, Takuro F, Kaoru N, Shigeto H, Takaomi M, Kota et al (2026) The benefit of robotic gastrectomy in minimally invasive surgery for elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Today. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03292-2","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e70368","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.70368","volume":"19","author":"S Kubota Rufuto","year":"2026","unstructured":"Kubota Rufuto S, Sho F, Yu H, Minoru T, Yusuke U, Kohdai et al (2026) Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy in Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Robotic Gastrectomy in Non-Elderly Patients and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy in Elderly. Asian J Endosc Surg 19(1):e70368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ases.70368","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"3995_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5516","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-026-12716-6","volume":"40","author":"B Miki Yuichiro","year":"2026","unstructured":"Miki Yuichiro B, Tsubasa K, Ryota Y, Mami I, Yasutaka K, Kenji et al (2026) Comparative benefits of robotic gastrectomy over laparoscopic surgery across different age and BMI groups. Surg Endosc 40(7):5516\u20135525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-026-12716-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"3995_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-026-13237-y","author":"C Delvecchio Antonella","year":"2026","unstructured":"Delvecchio Antonella C, Silvio M, Rebecca A, Remo C, Simone A, Laura et al (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: a multicentre propensity-weighted analysis. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-026-13237-y","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"3995_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.70065","volume":"132","author":"V Parente Alessandro","year":"2025","unstructured":"Parente Alessandro V, Kevin E, Mohamed, Anderson Blaire L, Dajani Khaled Z, Srinivasan Parthi et al (2025) Evaluating Laparoscopic and Robotic Liver Resection in Elderly Patients: A NSQIP Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. J Surg Oncol 132(5):908\u2013916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.70065","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"3995_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112051","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2026.112051","volume":"52","author":"V Marchese Tiziana","year":"2026","unstructured":"Marchese Tiziana V, Valentina I, Benedetto C, Di Annalisa F, Gregorio B, Leonardo et al (2026) Distal pancreatectomy in octogenarians: A comparative analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches from an international multicenter cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 52(10):112051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2026.112051","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3995_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1809161","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2026.1809161","volume":"16","author":"L Zhang","year":"2026","unstructured":"Zhang L, Kexuan W, Guanghui W, Chenhao H, Chao Y, Yujie L et al (2026) Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life for robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with mid-low rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study with inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. Front Oncol 16:1809161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1809161","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"3995_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1177\/10926429261444874","volume":"36","author":"ES Kahana Noam","year":"2026","unstructured":"Kahana Noam ES, Hany P, Michal B, Elad H, Nir B, Zubair et al (2026) Robotic-Assisted Compared to Laparoscopic Resection of Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged\u2009\u2265\u200965 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the NCDB. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 36(9):633\u2013640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10926429261444874","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/s40520-024-02833-4","volume":"36","author":"C-C Lu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lu C-C, Kai-Yen LC-TC, Wang C-L (2024) Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005\u20132018. Aging Clin Exp Res 36(1):193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40520-024-02833-4","journal-title":"Aging Clin Exp Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"3995_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12874","volume":"9","author":"H Yamamoto Takehito","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yamamoto Takehito H, Koya G, Kentaro F, Meiki I, Susumu H, Hiroki et al (2025) Risk factors for postoperative complications in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery for octogenarians with colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 9(2):319\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ags3.12874","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"key":"3995_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zijin L, Fuhai M, Gang Z (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in older colorectal cancer patients: a comparison of clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers. BMC Geriatr 26(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12877-026-07069-7","DOI":"10.1186\/s12877-026-07069-7"},{"key":"3995_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liu Qi L, Xiaoyong W, Tingting H, Sibo W, Cong (2026) Liu Nan. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients. JSLS 30(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2025.00128","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2025.00128"},{"key":"3995_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wadhawan Randeep VD, Kizhakke B, Priti B, Arun (2025) Verma Naveen Kumar. Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. JSLS 29(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2025.00005","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2025.00005"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02676-9","volume":"19","author":"W-S Sadlecki Pawel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Sadlecki Pawel W-S, Malgorzata (2025) Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 19(1):497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02676-9","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-025-03141-3","volume":"29","author":"S Gahunia","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gahunia S, Wyatt J, Powell SG, Mahdi S, Ahmed S, Altaf K (2025) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 29(1):98. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03141-3","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"3995_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alshowaikh Khadija K-L, Katarzyna A, Jashvini P, Gokul I, Jayarathna Anuruddhika I et al (2021) Salibindla Divya Bala Anthony Manisha R,. Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. ;13(8):e16828. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.16828","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.16828"},{"key":"3995_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006976","author":"E Gangemi Antonio","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gangemi Antonio E, Amir, Lisi Anthony P, Argnani Lisa N, Marianna C, Matteo et al (2025) The CONVERSION Study: Open Conversion Risk in Robotic vs Laparoscopic Surgery-A 20-Year Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006976","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"3995_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5549","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002567","volume":"111","author":"PdaC Gabriela","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gabriela PdaC, Tijs H, Besselink Marc J, Alzoubi Mohammad G (2025) Swijnenburg Rutger-Jan, Abu Hilal Mohammad. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Surg 111(8):5549\u20135571. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002567","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"3995_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sipas.2026.100338","volume":"25","author":"X Song Guangna","year":"2026","unstructured":"Song Guangna X, Dingwei C, Manqin ZZYH, Haoyang H et al (2026) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Surg Pract Sci 25:100338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sipas.2026.100338","journal-title":"Surg Pract Sci"},{"key":"3995_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1638414","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1638414","volume":"12","author":"M El-Ahmar","year":"2025","unstructured":"El-Ahmar M, Hardt J, Reissfelder C, Ritz J-P, Peters F, Seyfried S (2025) RERAS-robotic colorectal resections and ERAS\u00ae in older adults: optimizing recovery or adding complexity? Front Surg 12:1638414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1638414","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"3995_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgo.2025.102205","volume":"16","author":"E Van Ellen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Van Ellen E, Manu V, Lore D, Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen Daniel (2025) Outcome of robotic colon surgery in older patients with colon cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 16(3):102205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgo.2025.102205","journal-title":"J Geriatr Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"3995_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7592","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-12085-6","volume":"39","author":"J Brosnihan Paul","year":"2025","unstructured":"Brosnihan Paul J, Moazzez Ashkan O-C, Junko J, Perez Christian, Yetasook Amy K (2025) 30-day outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc 39(11):7592\u20137597. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12085-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"3995_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7179","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-024-11294-9","volume":"38","author":"F Bauerle Wayne","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bauerle Wayne F, Daniel A, Anthony E, Joseph R, Vanessa S, Jill et al (2024) Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 38(12):7179\u20137186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-024-11294-9","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"9","key":"3995_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e68523","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.68523","volume":"16","author":"G Marthandam Srikanth","year":"2024","unstructured":"Marthandam Srikanth G, Mallikarjun J, Surendra A, Ramya, Reddy Y, Satish M, Venkatesh (2024) A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Cholecystectomies Based on the Parkland Grading Scale. Cureus 16(9):e68523. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.68523","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"3995_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2024.08.006","volume":"178","author":"B Maegawa Felipe","year":"2025","unstructured":"Maegawa Felipe B, Stetler Jamil P, Dipan P, Snehal, Serrot Federico J, Lin E et al (2025) Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program comparative analysis. Surgery 178:108772. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2024.08.006","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"3995_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13766","volume":"157","author":"T Raffone Antonio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Raffone Antonio T, Antonio R, Diego B, Dominga V, Martino V, Paolo et al (2022) Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(1):1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13766","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"3995_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2431","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2431","volume":"18","author":"F Hannan Enda","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hannan Enda F, Gerard FU, Mohammad C, Eoghan CJ, Calvin P, Colin (2022) Robotic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: A single-centre experience. Int J Med Robot 18(5):e2431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.2431","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"key":"3995_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3995_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7414","key":"3995_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557\u2013560. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"3995_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","volume":"7","author":"R DerSimonian","year":"1986","unstructured":"DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"issue":"7650","key":"3995_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","volume":"336","author":"GH Guyatt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924\u2013926. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3995_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1186\/s12877-023-03822-4","volume":"23","author":"Y Xue","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xue Y, Li S, Guo S et al (2023) Evaluation of the advantages of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. BMC Geriatr 23:105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12877-023-03822-4","journal-title":"BMC Geriatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"3995_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-015-0560-6","volume":"19","author":"N Okumura","year":"2016","unstructured":"Okumura N, Son T, Kim YM et al (2016) Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly. Gastric Cancer 19(4):1125\u20131134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10120-015-0560-6","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"11","key":"3995_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2018.0115","volume":"28","author":"N de\u2019Angelis","year":"2018","unstructured":"de\u2019Angelis N, Abdalla S, Bianchi G et al (2018) Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(11):1334\u20131345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2018.0115","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"3995_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2679","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-14808-2","volume":"31","author":"ZW Zheng","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zheng ZW, Lin M, Zheng HL et al (2024) Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Individuals: A Propensity Score-Matching Study. Ann Surg Oncol 31:2679\u20132688. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-023-14808-2","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T20:02:21Z","timestamp":1790452941000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3995"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-026-03995-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 September 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. This review synthesized published aggregate data.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Purpose-written scripts and a large language model assisted file organization, de-duplication, calculation checks, language editing and document preparation. Both authors independently completed eligibility screening, full-text assessment, data verification and risk-of-bias review, adjudicated disagreements against the source reports, and accept responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"1024"}}