{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,9]],"date-time":"2026-11-09T23:55:08Z","timestamp":1794268508090,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]],"date-time":"2024-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704844800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]],"date-time":"2024-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704844800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100012921","name":"Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100012921","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ir J Med Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The objective was to investigate the current evidence and discern urinary continence rates post robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A systematic review of the literature was carried out, searching the Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases between 1 January 2000 and 1 May 2020. The search terms \u201c\n                      <jats:italic>Robotic prostatectomy<\/jats:italic>\n                      AND\n                      <jats:italic>continence<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u201d were employed. Articles were selected in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using the programme R; cumulative analysis of percentage of men continent was calculated.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 3101 abstracts and 50 full text articles were assessed, with 22 publications included (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20092813 patients). There were 21 randomised controlled trials and one partly randomised controlled trial with four publications comparing RALP to other prostate cancer treatments. Thirteen studies explored different RALP techniques, and five studies examined vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). There were statistically significant improvements in early urinary continence rates in three studies analysing reconstructive techniques (83% vs 60%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.04; 26.5% vs 15.4%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.016; 77% vs 44.1%, p\u2009\u2264\u20090.001). Long-term continence rates were not significantly improved across all studies assessing reconstruction. One study comparing RALP vs laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in continence at 3\u00a0months (80% vs 73.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001); 6\u00a0months (83.3% vs 81.4%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001); 12\u00a0months (95% vs 83.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and 24\u00a0months (96.7% vs 85%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Early continence was less favourable for RALP when compared to brachytherapy (BT) patients at 3\u00a0months (86% vs 98.7%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05) and 6\u00a0months (90.5% vs 98.7%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Early continence rates were improved across numerous techniques in RALP. These results were not translated into significantly improved long-term outcomes. Continence rates following RALP were favourable compared to LRP, similar to ORP and less favourable compared to BT. Our findings suggest that post-RALP continence can be further improved with alterations in robotic technique.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]],"date-time":"2024-01-10T12:02:27Z","timestamp":1704888147000},"page":"1603-1612","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"193","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8970-5634","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Keith","family":"Geraghty","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Keane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Niall","family":"Davis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"3603_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1491","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6605341","volume":"101","author":"NL Sharma","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sharma NL, Shah NC, Neal DE (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Br J Cancer 101(9):1491\u20131496","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.01.036","volume":"55","author":"V Ficarra","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037\u20131063","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.045","volume":"62","author":"V Ficarra","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405\u2013417","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"3603_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Checcucci E, Veccia A, Fiori C et al (2019) Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) V.S. standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. BJU International. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14887","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14887"},{"issue":"1","key":"3603_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825","volume":"22","author":"D Moher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Moher D, Altman DG, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J (2011) PRISMA statement. Epidemiology 22(1):128","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"3603_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781444342673","volume-title":"The philosophy of evidence-based medicine","author":"JH Howick","year":"2011","unstructured":"Howick JH (2011) The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. John Wiley & Sons"},{"key":"3603_CR7","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Green S (2013) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011."},{"key":"3603_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"8","key":"3603_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(18)30357-7","volume":"19","author":"GD Coughlin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19(8):1051\u20131060","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3603_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2016.11.007","volume":"4","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R et al (2018) Five-year outcomes for a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 4(1):80\u201386","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2011.02215.x","volume":"8","author":"AD Asimakopoulos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Asimakopoulos AD, Fraga CTP, Annino F et al (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8(5):1503\u20131512","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"3603_CR12","first-page":"8728","volume":"24","author":"C Giberti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Giberti C, Gallo F, Schenone M et al (2017) Robotic prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for the treatment of low risk prostate cancer. Can J Urol 24(2):8728\u20138733","journal-title":"Can J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.11.115","volume":"199","author":"M Menon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199(5):1210\u20131217","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3603_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.08.122","volume":"197","author":"HG Nguyen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nguyen HG, Punnen S, Cowan JE et al (2017) A randomized study of intraoperative autologous retropubic urethral sling on urinary control after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 197(2):369\u2013375","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3603_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.01.010","volume":"196","author":"CD Bahler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bahler CD, Sundaram CP, Kella N et al (2016) A parallel randomized clinical trial examining the return of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with or without a small intestinal submucosa bladder neck sling. J Urol 196(1):179\u2013184","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"3603_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0292","volume":"29","author":"A Cestari","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cestari A, Ferrari M, Ghezzi M et al (2015) Retropubic intracorporeal placement of a suburethral autologous sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: preliminary data. J Endourol 29(12):1379\u20131385","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3603_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0672-6","volume":"11","author":"A Cestari","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cestari A, Ferrari M, Sangalli M et al (2017) Simple vs six-branches autologous suburethral sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: prospective randomized study. J Robot Surg 11(4):415\u2013421","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3603_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0654","volume":"26","author":"F Atug","year":"2012","unstructured":"Atug F, Kural AR, Tufek I et al (2012) Anterior and posterior reconstruction technique and its impact on early return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 26(4):381\u2013386","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3603_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10849.x","volume":"110","author":"X Hurtes","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hurtes X, Roupr\u00eat M, Vaessen C et al (2012) Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. BJU Int 110(6):875\u2013883","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.10.023","volume":"193","author":"CW Jeong","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jeong CW, Lee JK, Oh JJ et al (2015) Effects of new 1-step posterior reconstruction method on recovery of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, single-blind, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 193(3):935\u2013942","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3603_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.11.085","volume":"185","author":"DE Sutherland","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sutherland DE, Linder B, Guzman AM et al (2011) Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. J Urol 185(4):1262\u20131267","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"3603_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12854","volume":"22","author":"M Akand","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, Ates M (2015) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol 22(10):916\u2013921","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3603_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-34657-4","volume":"8","author":"LM Huynh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Huynh LM, Skarecky D, Porter J et al (2018) A randomized control trial of anti-inflammatory regional hypothermia on urinary continence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Sci Rep 8(1):1\u20137","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"3603_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-018-0847-9","volume":"13","author":"A Antonelli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Antonelli A, Palumbo C, Veccia A et al (2019) Standard vs delayed ligature of the dorsal vascular complex during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Robot Surg 13(2):253\u2013260","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.01.013","volume":"64","author":"I Geraerts","year":"2013","unstructured":"Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N et al (2013) Influence of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with postoperative PFMT on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 64(5):766\u2013772","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3603_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.4103\/1008-682X.139258","volume":"17","author":"SK Choi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Choi SK, Park S, Ahn H (2015) Randomized clinical trial of a bladder neck plication stitch during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Asian J Androl 17(2):304","journal-title":"Asian J Androl"},{"key":"3603_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kov\u00e1\u010dik V, Maciak M, Bal\u00e1\u017e V et al (2019) Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes. World J Urol 1\u20139","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02975-5"},{"issue":"10","key":"3603_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10763.x","volume":"109","author":"KC Zorn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zorn KC, Trinh QD, Jeldres C et al (2012) Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit. BJU Int 109(10):1526\u20131532","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.05.032","volume":"71","author":"V Student Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"Student V Jr, Vidlar A, Grepl M et al (2017) Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: one-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 71(5):822\u2013830","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3603_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.05.052","volume":"76","author":"JD Sammon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sammon JD, Muhletaler F, Peabody JO et al (2010) Long-term functional urinary outcomes comparing single-vs double-layer urethrovesical anastomosis: two-year follow-up of a two-group parallel randomized controlled trial. Urology 76(5):1102\u20131107","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14716","volume":"124","author":"M Manfredi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Manfredi M, Checcucci E, Fiori C et al (2019) Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures. BJU Int 124(3):477\u2013486","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"7","key":"3603_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14071644","volume":"14","author":"RM Pinkhasov","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pinkhasov RM, Lee T, Huang R et al (2022) Prediction of incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of a 24-month incontinence nomogram. Cancers 14(7):1644","journal-title":"Cancers"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)64568-5","volume":"168","author":"FV Coakley","year":"2002","unstructured":"Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW et al (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168(3):1032\u20131035","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.06.023","volume":"71","author":"SF Mungovan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O et al (2017) Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 71(3):368\u2013378","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3603_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.4103\/aja.aja_145_19","volume":"22","author":"C Kannady","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kannady C, Clavell-Hern\u00e1ndez J (2020) Orgasm-associated urinary incontinence (climacturia) following radical prostatectomy: a review of pathophysiology and current treatment options. Asian J Androl 22(6):549","journal-title":"Asian J Androl"},{"issue":"6","key":"3603_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2562","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2006.07.158","volume":"176","author":"J Lee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lee J, Hersey K, Lee CT, Fleshner N (2006) Climacturia following radical prostatectomy: prevalence and risk factors. J Urol 176(6):2562\u20132565","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3603_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11269.x","volume":"111","author":"A Mehta","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mehta A, Deveci S, Mulhall JP (2013) Efficacy of a penile variable tension loop for improving climacturia after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 111(3):500\u2013504","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"3603_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1208","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10506.x","volume":"109","author":"R Jain","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jain R, Mitchell S, Laze J, Lepor H (2012) The effect of surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence (UI) on post-prostatectomy UI during sexual activity. BJU Int 109(8):1208\u20131212","journal-title":"BJU Int"}],"container-title":["Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,26]],"date-time":"2024-05-26T22:31:02Z","timestamp":1716762662000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]}},"alternative-id":["3603"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11845-023-03603-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-1265","1863-4362"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-1265","type":"print"},{"value":"1863-4362","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 August 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 December 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}