{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T10:32:59Z","timestamp":1792665179493,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]],"date-time":"2018-09-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1537920000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Gastroenterol Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]],"date-time":"2018-09-26T07:46:23Z","timestamp":1537947983000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Wireless 24, 48, and 96\u00a0Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Soojong","family":"Chae","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joel E.","family":"Richter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"659_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x","volume":"101","author":"N Vakil","year":"2006","unstructured":"Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, the Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900\u201320.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2012-304269","volume":"63","author":"HB El-Serag","year":"2014","unstructured":"El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a system review. Gut. 2014;63:871\u201380.","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"659_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2012.444","volume":"108","author":"PO Katz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308\u201328.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2003.07398.x","volume":"98","author":"JE Pandolfino","year":"2003","unstructured":"Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, Guardino JM, Chapman J, Kahrilas PJ. Ambulatory pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:740\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2050.2012.01384.x","volume":"26","author":"JE Richter","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u2022 Richter JE, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF, et al. Utilization of wireless pH monitoring technology: A summary of the proceedings of the Esophageal Diagnostic Working Group. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:755\u201365 An evidence-based summary of the wireless pH monitoring capsule and provides an algorithm for patients with GERD not responding to medical therapy.","journal-title":"Dis Esophagus"},{"key":"659_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1016\/S1542-3565(05)00529-X","volume":"3","author":"I Hirano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hirano I, Zhang Q, Pandolfino JE, Kahrias PJ. Four-day Bravo pH capsule monitoring with and without proton pump inhibitor therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1083\u20135.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"659_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/S1542-3565(05)00021-2","volume":"3","author":"C Prakash","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakash C, Clouse RE. Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluation gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroetnerol Hepatol. 2005;3:329\u201334.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroetnerol Hepatol"},{"issue":"12","key":"659_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2642","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2007.01461.x","volume":"102","author":"G Scarpulla","year":"2007","unstructured":"Scarpulla G, Camilleri S, Galante P, Manganaro M, Fox M. The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(12):2642\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"7","key":"659_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1097\/MCG.0000000000000638","volume":"51","author":"R Patel","year":"2017","unstructured":"\u2022 Patel R, Chae S, Kumar A, Richter JE. Sedation and afternoon placement of the 48-hr wireless ambulatory capsule results in more reflux on the first day. J Clinical Gastroenterol. 2017;51(7):594\u20138 In 225 patients, morning versus afternoon placement of wireless motility capsule were compared. The median DeMeester score was 15.3 for morning placement and 24.7 for afternoon placement.","journal-title":"J Clinical Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patel R, Chae S, Jacobs J, Kumar A, Richter J. 96-hour esophageal pH monitoring: the tiebreaker for abnormal DeMeester score and symptom index. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):S-487\u20137.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5085(18)31852-3"},{"key":"659_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1631","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2008.01829.x","volume":"103","author":"CP Garrean","year":"2008","unstructured":"Garrean CP, Zhang Q, Gonsalves N, Hirano I. Acid reflux detection and symptom-reflux association using 4-day wireless pH recording combining 48- hour periods off and on PPI therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1631\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2014.10.009","volume":"29","author":"B Chang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chang B, MacNeil SD, Morrison MD, Lee PK. The reliability of the reflux finding score among general otolaryngologists. J Voice. 2015;29:572\u20137.","journal-title":"J Voice"},{"key":"659_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2982.2011.01726.x","volume":"23","author":"E Chiou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chiou E, Rosen R, Jiang H, Nurko S. Diagnosis of supra-esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro-esophageal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:717\u2013e326.","journal-title":"Neurogastroenterol Motil"},{"key":"659_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"980","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.23738","volume":"123","author":"D Ummarion","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ummarion D, Vandermeulen L, Roosens B, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux evaluation in patients affected by chronic cough: Restech versus multichannel intraluminal impedance\/pH Metry. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:980\u20134.","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"659_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e-315","DOI":"10.1111\/nmo.12109","volume":"25","author":"ES Yuksel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yuksel ES, Slaughter JC, Muktar N, Ochieng M, et al. An oropharyngeal pH monitoring device to evaluate patients with chronic laryngitis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:e-315\u2013e323.","journal-title":"Neurogastroenterol Motil"},{"key":"659_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wiener GJ, Tsukashima R, Kelly C, Wolf E, Schmeltzer M, Bankert C, et al. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for the detection of liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux. J Voice. 2009;23:498\u2013504.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2007.12.005"},{"key":"659_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2016.145","volume":"111","author":"R Yadlapati","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u2022 Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Lidder AK, Shabeeb N, et al. Oropharyngeal pH testing does not predict response to proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with laryngeal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1517\u201324 34 patients underwent video laryngoscopy and 24\u00a0h oropharyngeal pH monitoring followed by an 8- to 12-week trial of omeprazole 40\u00a0mg daily. Oropharyngeal acid exposure was no different between those who responded to PPI therapy, no response to PPI, and partial response to PPI. In secondary analysis, there was an inverse relation between PPI response and oropharyngeal acid exposure.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2982.1991.tb00061.x","volume":"3","author":"J Silny","year":"1991","unstructured":"Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electrical impedance procedures for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1991;3:151\u201362.","journal-title":"Neurogastroenterol Motil"},{"key":"659_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2010.04358.x","volume":"32","author":"GE Boeckxstaens","year":"2010","unstructured":"Boeckxstaens GE, Smout A. Systematic review: role of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in GERD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:334\u201343.","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"659_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2006.11.015","volume":"5","author":"A Hilal","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hilal A, Agrawal A, Castell DO. Combined multi-channel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:172\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"659_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2446","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2008.02033.x","volume":"103","author":"GJM Hemmerink","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hemmerink GJM, Bedenoord AJ, Wiresten BLAM, et al. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: \u201con\u201d or \u201coff\u201d proton pump inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2446\u201353.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2012.10.041","volume":"11","author":"F Zerbid","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Zerbid F, Roman S, Bruley Des Varannes S, et al. Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24 hour impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:366\u201372 Basis for normal values on and off PPIs from 46 healthy controls. Analysis of esophageal events were reproducible, but analyses of pharyngeal events was not.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"659_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1956","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2006.00711.x","volume":"101","author":"F Zerbid","year":"2006","unstructured":"Zerbid F, Romn S, Ropert A, et al. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1956\u201363.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.3109\/00365521.2010.531483","volume":"46","author":"GJ Hemmink","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hemmink GJ, Bredenoord AJ, Aanen MC, et al. Computer analysis of 24 hour esophageal impedance signals. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:271\u20136.","journal-title":"Scand J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2017.10.039","volume":"16","author":"A Koop","year":"2018","unstructured":"\u2022 Koop A, Francis DL, DeVault KR. Visual and automated computer analysis differ substantially in detection of acidic reflux in MII-pH monitoring. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2018;16:979\u201380 The visual and automated computer analysis of 33 M11-pH studies agreed in only 78% of pH drops to <\u2009pH4.","journal-title":"Clin Gastro Hepatol"},{"key":"659_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.2005.087668","volume":"55","author":"I Mainie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicenter study using combined ambulatory impedance \u2013 pH monitoring. Gut. 2006;55:1398\u2013402.","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"659_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kline MM, Ewing M, Simpson N et al. The utility of intraluminal impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms but normal endoscopy and 24 hour pH testing, Clin Gastroenterology Hepatology 2008; 6:880\u2013889.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2008.01.016"},{"key":"659_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2014.63","volume":"109","author":"A Patel","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Patel A, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Acid-based parameters on pH impedance testing predict symptom improvement with medical management better than impedance parameters. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:836\u201344 Performing pH \u2013impedance testing off PPIs best predicts response to antireflux therapy. Key predictors are acid exposure time and correlation between symptoms and reflux events detected by impedance.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"659_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1902","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21165","volume":"121","author":"DO Francis","year":"2011","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Francis DO, Goutte M, Slaughter JC, et al. Traditional reflux parameters and not impedance monitoring predict outcomes after fundoplication in extraesophageal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1902\u20139 Based on over 100 patients going to surgery, the best predictions of success was % time pH\u2009>\u200910%, presence of heartburn\/regurgitation and large hiatal hernia. Neither symptom correlation or impedance parameters were predictive.","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"659_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1136\/flgastro-2017-100840","volume":"8","author":"S Sanagapallis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sanagapallis S, Sweis R. Combined pH impedance testing for reflux: current state of play and future challenges. Frontline Gastroenterology. 2017;8:154\u20135.","journal-title":"Frontline Gastroenterology"},{"key":"659_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2009.02.022","volume":"7","author":"JM Pritchett","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pritchett JM, Aslam M, Slaughter JC, Ness RM, Garrett CG, Vaezi MF. Efficacy of esophageal impedance\/pH monitoring in patients with GERD on and off therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:743\u20138.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"659_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2861-3","volume":"27","author":"M Frazzon","year":"2013","unstructured":"Frazzon M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, et al. Refractory GERD as diagnosed by impedance pH monitoring can be cured by laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2940\u20136.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"659_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1111\/apt.13777","volume":"44","author":"A Patel","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u2022 Patel A, Wang D, Sainami N, et al. Distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance on pH impedance monitoring predicts reflux burden and symptomatic outcome in GERD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:890\u20138 Distal esophageal means nocturnal baseline impedance negatively correlates with acid exposure time. When assessed off PPIs, this measure is independently predictive of symptomatic improvement following anti-reflux therapy.","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"659_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Frazzoni M, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, et al. Analyses of the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance parameters increase the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH monitoring of patients with reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:\u201340, 6 Study in 68 esophagitis and 221 NERD patients suggesting high diagnostic yield of nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2015.06.026"}],"container-title":["Current Gastroenterology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]],"date-time":"2019-09-25T23:38:04Z","timestamp":1569454684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]}},"alternative-id":["659"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11894-018-0659-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1522-8037","1534-312X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1522-8037","type":"print"},{"value":"1534-312X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 September 2018","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"Soojong Chae and Joel Richter declare no conflict of interest. Dr. Richter is the Editor in Chief of Current Gastroenterology Reports, but this paper was reviewed by Section Editor Satish Rao.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent"}}],"article-number":"52"}}