{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T23:41:16Z","timestamp":1792453276396,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,21]],"date-time":"2012-04-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1334966400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Urol Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,20]],"date-time":"2012-04-20T00:24:41Z","timestamp":1334881481000},"page":"247-255","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Evaluation of Current Biologic Meshes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Ashley","family":"Cox","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sender","family":"Herschorn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"252_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123819","volume":"186","author":"SL Hendrix","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hendrix SL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"252_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"252_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kobashi KC. Evaluation of patients with urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse. In: A. Wein, et al., editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Elseveir: Baltimore; 2012. p. 1896.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4160-6911-9.00064-5"},{"issue":"5","key":"252_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-200210000-00015","volume":"14","author":"C Birch","year":"2002","unstructured":"Birch C, Fynes MM. The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(5):527\u201335.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)66090-9","volume":"166","author":"JM Choe","year":"2001","unstructured":"Choe JM, Bell T. Genetic material is present in cadaveric dermis and cadaveric fascia lata. J Urol. 2001;166(1):122\u20134.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"252_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00917.x","volume":"86","author":"MP Fitzgerald","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fitzgerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L. The antigenicity of fascia lata allografts. BJU Int. 2000;86(7):826\u20138.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"252_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00343-2","volume":"88","author":"VL Handa","year":"1996","unstructured":"Handa VL, et al. Banked human fascia lata for the suburethral sling procedure: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(6):1045\u20139.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"252_CR8","first-page":"93","volume":"53","author":"RM Liscic","year":"1999","unstructured":"Liscic RM, et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a patient with a lyophilized dura mater graft. Acta Med Croatica. 1999;53(2):93\u20136.","journal-title":"Acta Med Croatica"},{"issue":"2","key":"252_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31804b184c","volume":"50","author":"CC Chen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chen CC, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MF. Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(2):383\u2013411.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382008000100012","volume":"34","author":"GB Taylor","year":"2008","unstructured":"Taylor GB, et al. Posterior repair with perforated porcine dermal graft. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(1):84\u20138. discussion 89\u201390.","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"10\u201312","key":"252_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1012833720931","volume":"12","author":"E Jorge-Herrero","year":"2001","unstructured":"Jorge-Herrero E, et al. Calcification and identification of metalloproteinases in bovine pericardium after subcutaneous implantation in rats. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12(10\u201312):1013\u20137.","journal-title":"J Mater Sci Mater Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a81b41","volume":"114","author":"NL Guerette","year":"2009","unstructured":"Guerette NL, et al. Anterior repair with or without collagen matrix reinforcement: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):59\u201365.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"252_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pierce LM, et al. Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long-term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009;200(5):549 e1-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.041"},{"issue":"5","key":"252_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1970","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000121377.61788.ad","volume":"171","author":"CD Dora","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dora CD, et al. Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1970\u20133.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"252_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00194.x","volume":"111","author":"PL Dwyer","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dwyer PL, O'Reilly BA. Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG. 2004;111(8):831\u20136.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"252_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109654","volume":"184","author":"AG Visco","year":"2001","unstructured":"Visco AG, et al. Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):297\u2013302.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2006.08.100","volume":"177","author":"M Meschia","year":"2007","unstructured":"Meschia M, et al. Porcine skin collagen implants to prevent anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence: a multicenter, randomized study. J Urol. 2007;177(1):192\u20135.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"252_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ward RM, et al. Vaginal paravaginal repair with an AlloDerm graft: long-term outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197(6):670 e1-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.067"},{"issue":"4","key":"252_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1581","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000115956.25769.0a","volume":"171","author":"A Gomelsky","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gomelsky A, Rudy DC, Dmochowski RR. Porcine dermis interposition graft for repair of high grade anterior compartment defects with or without concomitant pelvic organ prolapse procedures. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1581\u20134.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"252_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0933-7","volume":"20","author":"SM Botros","year":"2009","unstructured":"Botros SM, et al. Arcus-anchored acellular dermal graft compared to anterior colporrhaphy for stage II cystoceles and beyond. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(10):1265\u201371.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"252_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2490-10-21","volume":"10","author":"HB Goldstein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Goldstein HB, et al. A multicenter prospective trial evaluating fetal bovine dermal graft (Xenform(R) Matrix) for pelvic reconstructive surgery. BMC Urol. 2010;10:21.","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"252_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1832","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.005","volume":"195","author":"AJ Simsiman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Simsiman AJ, Luber KM, Menefee SA. Vaginal paravaginal repair with porcine dermal reinforcement: correction of advanced anterior vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1832\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"252_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1649","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.02.061","volume":"192","author":"S Gandhi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gandhi S, et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1649\u201354.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"252_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1018-3","volume":"21","author":"U Hviid","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hviid U, Hviid TV, Rudnicki M. Porcine skin collagen implants for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised prospective controlled study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):529\u201334.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"252_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Dahlgren E, Kjolhede P. Long-term outcome of porcine skin graft in surgical treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. An open randomized controlled multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90(12):1393\u2013401. This randomized trial failed to show a benefit of cystocele recurrence with the use of Pelvicol\u2122.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01270.x"},{"key":"252_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Natale F, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20(1):75\u201381. This randomized trial found a better success rate with synthetic mesh versus biological graft in terms of recurrence rates. There was a decreased complication rate with biological grafts.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0732-6"},{"issue":"9","key":"252_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1163-8","volume":"21","author":"PC Feldner Jr","year":"2010","unstructured":"Feldner Jr PC, et al. Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1057\u201363.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"252_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Maher CM, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(11):1445\u201357. This is a recent metatanalysis on the surgical management of POP.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9"},{"issue":"9","key":"252_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1153-x","volume":"21","author":"R Ramanah","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ramanah R, et al. Evaluating the porcine dermis graft InteXen in three-compartment transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1151\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"252_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, et al. Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(6):1473\u201380; discussion 1481\u20132.","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.129160"},{"issue":"4","key":"252_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","volume":"104","author":"IE Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard IE, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805\u201323.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"252_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Tate SB, et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(2):137\u201343. This study reports the long-term results of the ranomized controlled trial by Culligan et al. [33].","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1249-3"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000165824.62167.c1","volume":"106","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):29\u201337.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"252_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.10.034","volume":"67","author":"D Altman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Altman D, et al. Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh. Urology. 2006;67(4):719\u201324.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"252_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quiroz LH, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(5):557 e1-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.050"},{"key":"252_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Altman D, et al. Functional and anatomic outcome after transvaginal rectocele repair using collagen mesh: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(6):1233\u201341; discussion 1241\u20132; author reply 1242.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-005-0023-y"},{"issue":"10","key":"252_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1636","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-0656-2","volume":"47","author":"K Nieminen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nieminen K, et al. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636\u201342.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1007\/s003840050008","volume":"15","author":"JH Dam van","year":"2000","unstructured":"van Dam JH, et al. Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15(1):54\u20137.","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"252_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199312000-00022","volume":"36","author":"AC Richardson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):976\u201383.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"252_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-002-1013-4","volume":"14","author":"N Kohli","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kohli N, Miklos JR. Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(2):146\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"252_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kobashi KC, et al. Initial experience with rectocele repair using nonfrozen cadaveric fascia lata interposition. Urology 2005;66(6):1203\u20137; discussion 1207\u20138.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.06.130"},{"key":"252_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dell JR, O'Kelley KR. PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16(1):44\u20137; discussion 47.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1217-x"},{"issue":"1","key":"252_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000192547.58102.ab","volume":"107","author":"D Altman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Altman D, et al. A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):59\u201365.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"252_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1762","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.026","volume":"195","author":"MF Paraiso","year":"2006","unstructured":"Paraiso MF, et al. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1762\u201371.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"252_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01845.x","volume":"115","author":"X Jia","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jia X, et al. Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and\/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2008;115(11):1350\u201361.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7","key":"252_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5","volume":"22","author":"H Abed","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abed H, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789\u201398.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"252_CR47","unstructured":"FDA, U.S. FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. 2011 [cited 2012 2012-03-15]; Available from: http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/MedicalDevices\/Safety\/AlertsandNotices\/ucm262435.htm ."},{"key":"252_CR48","unstructured":"SUFU. UPDATE 01\/04\/2012. 2012 [cited 2012 2012-03-15]; Available from: http:\/\/www.sufuorg.com\/ ."}],"container-title":["Current Urology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,27]],"date-time":"2019-06-27T15:47:04Z","timestamp":1561650424000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,21]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]}},"alternative-id":["252"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0252-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1527-2737","1534-6285"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1527-2737","type":"print"},{"value":"1534-6285","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,21]]}}}