{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T18:06:00Z","timestamp":1774548360739,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,22]],"date-time":"2016-10-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477094400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Urol Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,22]],"date-time":"2016-10-22T03:14:10Z","timestamp":1477106050000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Debjyoti","family":"Karmakar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter L.","family":"Dwyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"642_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(70)90362-5","volume":"106","author":"JE Morgan","year":"1970","unstructured":"Morgan JE. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106(3):369\u201377.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"642_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-196207000-00009","volume":"20","author":"FE Lane","year":"1962","unstructured":"Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20:72\u20137.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"642_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199206000-00017","volume":"4","author":"U Ulmsten","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ulmsten U, Petros P. Surgery for female urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4(3):456\u201362.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"642_CR4","first-page":"423","volume":"97","author":"RF Zacharin","year":"1963","unstructured":"Zacharin RF. The suspensory mechanism of the female urethra. J Anat. 1963;97:423\u20137.","journal-title":"J Anat"},{"key":"642_CR5","first-page":"501","volume":"202","author":"KA Jones","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979-2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:501\u2013e1.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"642_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.017","volume":"212","author":"N Haya","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):755.e1\u2013755.e27. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.017 .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"642_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5","volume":"22","author":"H Abed","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789\u201398.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"642_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.01.004","volume":"16","author":"CR Rardin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rardin CR, Washington BB. New considerations in the use of vaginal mesh for prolapse repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:360\u20134. PubMed: 19423069.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"642_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1677-3","volume":"23","author":"GW Davila","year":"2012","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L. Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:S7\u2013S14. This document provides guidance from the IUGA regarding patient individualisation and expertise in the use of vaginal graft. The guidance aims to reduce morbidity from graft use and safeguard clinicians and patients alike from adverse outcomes.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"642_CR10","unstructured":"SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), The safety of surgical meshes used in urogynecological surgery. http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/health\/scientific_committees\/emerging\/docs\/scenihr_o_049.pdf . Accessed 3 Dec 2015."},{"key":"642_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022Ow LL, Lim YN, Dwyer PL, Karmakar D, Murray C, Thomas E, et al. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1313\u201320.\u00a0This series of native tissue and mesh vaginal repairs provides a realistic picture of the advantages and risks of surgery for POP over a 10-year period.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3069-6"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"642_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318203e6a5","volume":"117","author":"MI Withagen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):242\u201350.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"642_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1272-3","volume":"16","author":"C Achtari","year":"2005","unstructured":"Achtari C, Hiscock R, O\u2019Reilly BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL. Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene\/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(5):389\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"642_CR14","unstructured":"Brill AI. The hoopla over mesh: what it means for practice. Obstetrics and Gynecology News. 2012;14\u201315."},{"key":"642_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Araco F,\u00a0Gravante G,\u00a0Sorge R,\u00a0Overton J,\u00a0De Vita D,\u00a0Primicerio M,\u00a0Dati S,\u00a0Araco P,\u00a0Piccione E.The influence of BMI, smoking, and age on vaginal erosions after synthetic mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapses. A multicenter study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.\u00a02009;88(7):772\u201380. doi: 10.1080\/00016340903002840 .","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903002840"},{"key":"642_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, HaDuc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M. Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:315.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-0003-8"},{"key":"642_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):629\u201336.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ada95"},{"issue":"4","key":"642_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00820.x","volume":"34","author":"F Caquant","year":"2008","unstructured":"Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, et al. Safety of transvaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(4):449\u201356. PubMed: 18937698.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"642_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000192","volume":"21","author":"MJ Kuhlmann-Capek","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022Kuhlmann-Capek MJ, Kilic GS, Shah AB, Diken ZM, Snyder RR, Phelps III JY. Enmeshed in controversy: use of vaginal mesh in the current medicolegal environment. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):241\u20133. This article evaluates the current medicolegal situation and controversies surrounding vaginal mesh. It is a good guide for readers to understand the basis of medicolegal claims with vaginal mesh and is a useful reference in the context of the review.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"642_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2481-z","volume":"25","author":"PL Dwyer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dwyer PL. Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1151\u20132.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"642_CR21","unstructured":"\u2022Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Consent Advice No. 5. October 2009. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/ca5-15072010.pdf .\u00a0This reference document is a useful guidance for surgeons on the appropriate consenting and documentation of the same patients prior to surgery. This document covers areas vital to address patient\u2019s expectations and shared decision making."},{"issue":"11","key":"642_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1622","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200111000-00002","volume":"83","author":"JN Katz","year":"2001","unstructured":"Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(11):1622\u20139.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"6","key":"642_CR23","first-page":"867","volume":"96","author":"AM Weber","year":"2000","unstructured":"Weber AM, Walters MD. Burch procedure compared with sling for stress urinary incontinence: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):867\u201373.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"642_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2011.578776","volume":"31","author":"M Bandarian","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bandarian M, Ghanbari Z, Asgari A. Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(6):518\u201320.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"642_CR25","unstructured":"Risk of de novo postoperative stress urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Publically published calculators; Cleveland Clinic. 2012. Available at: http:\/\/www.r-calc.com\/ExistingFormulas.aspx?filter5CCQHS . Accessed 14 Oct 2015."},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"642_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827d8fdb","volume":"121","author":"S Zebede","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zebede S, Smith AL, Plowright LN, et al. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):279\u201384.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"642_CR27","unstructured":"Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse.Green-top Guideline No. 46 RCOG\/BSUG Joint Guideline | July 2015. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg-46.pdf ."},{"key":"642_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u200bTyson MD, Wolter CE. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(2):151\u20135. doi: 10.1002\/nau.22522 .","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22522"},{"key":"642_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u200bFreeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377\u201384.\u00a0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x"},{"key":"642_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u200bHiggs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1134\u20138.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00646.x"},{"key":"642_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u200bTeleman P, Laurikainen E, Kinne I, Pogosean R, Jakobsson U, Rudnicki M. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):195\u2013200. doi: 10.1007\/s00192-014-2434-6 .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2434-6"},{"key":"642_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rachedi LS, Lesavre M, Pourcelot AG, Fournet S, Capmas P, Fernandez HJ. [Assessment patient\u2019s sexuality after prolapse repair using the Elevate\u2122 kit]. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(7):661\u201372. [Article in French].","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.11.002"},{"issue":"5","key":"642_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2564-x","volume":"26","author":"K Jirschele","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"642_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cbca4d","volume":"115","author":"B Feiner","year":"2010","unstructured":"Feiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:325\u201330.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"642_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weber AM, Walter MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1610\u201315.","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107436"},{"key":"642_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim Y, Edwards G, Lee JK. Functional outcomes following surgical management of pain, exposure or extrusion following a suburethral tape insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):235\u20139.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2207-7"},{"key":"642_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ng S-C, Chen G-D. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women aged 70 years and over. Taiwanese J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;55(1):68\u201371.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2015.07.002"},{"key":"642_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Moen M, Noone M, Vassallo B. Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):857\u201362.\u00a0This reference highlights the importance of surgeon experience and role of surgical volume in setting realistic expectations in patients and improving patient reported outcomes.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2345-6"},{"key":"642_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ellington DR,\u00a0Richter HE. The\u00a0role\u00a0of\u00a0vaginal\u00a0mesh\u00a0procedures\u00a0in\u00a0pelvic\u00a0organ\u00a0prolapse\u00a0surgery\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0complication\u00a0risk. Obstet Gynecol Int.\u00a02013;2013:356960. doi: 10.1155\/2013\/356960","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/356960"}],"container-title":["Current Urology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,14]],"date-time":"2019-09-14T18:51:53Z","timestamp":1568487113000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,22]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["642"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0642-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1527-2737","1534-6285"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1527-2737","type":"print"},{"value":"1534-6285","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,22]]},"article-number":"87"}}