{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T19:54:02Z","timestamp":1790452442332,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":86,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,12]],"date-time":"2017-09-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1505174400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Urol Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,12]],"date-time":"2017-09-12T01:15:06Z","timestamp":1505178906000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Lifetime Radiation Exposure in Patients with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Mohamed A.","family":"Elkoushy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sero","family":"Andonian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"731_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1817","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x","volume":"63","author":"KK Stamatelou","year":"2003","unstructured":"Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976\u20131994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817\u201323.","journal-title":"Kidney Int"},{"key":"731_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.03.052","volume":"62","author":"CD Scales Jr","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"731_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.03.016","volume":"184","author":"JS Cho","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cho JS, Fulgham PF, Clark AR, et al. Follow-up imaging after urologic imaging studies: comparison of radiologists\u2019 recommendation and urologists\u2019 practice. J Urol. 2010;184:254.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"731_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2016.154","volume":"13","author":"W Brisbane","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MW. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(11):654\u201362.","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"},{"key":"731_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1038\/ki.2012.419","volume":"83","author":"CW Fwu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fwu CW, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, et al. Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int. 2013;83:479\u201386.","journal-title":"Kidney Int"},{"key":"731_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMra072149","volume":"357","author":"DJ Brenner","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277\u201384.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"731_CR7","unstructured":"National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Report in Brief. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005."},{"key":"731_CR8","unstructured":"Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation NRC. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012. Available at: \nhttp:\/\/www.nap.edu\/catalog\/11340.html\n\n, accessed at January 2017."},{"key":"731_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1667\/0033-7587(2000)154[0178:RRCRAL]2.0.CO;2","volume":"154","author":"DA Pierce","year":"2000","unstructured":"Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 2000;154:178\u201386.","journal-title":"Radiat Res"},{"key":"731_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1667\/RR3232","volume":"162","author":"DL Preston","year":"2004","unstructured":"Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, et al. Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res. 2004;162:377\u201389.","journal-title":"Radiat Res"},{"key":"731_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1667\/RR0763.1","volume":"168","author":"DL Preston","year":"2007","unstructured":"Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958\u20131998. Rad Res. 2007;168:1\u201364.","journal-title":"Rad Res"},{"issue":"21","key":"731_CR12","first-page":"1","volume":"1991","author":"ICRP Publication 60","year":"1990","unstructured":"ICRP Publication 60. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 60. Ann ICRP. 1990;1991(21):1\u20133.","journal-title":"Ann ICRP"},{"key":"731_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.012","volume":"181","author":"MN Ferrandino","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol. 2009;181:668\u201373.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.07.1387","volume":"79","author":"NM Fahmy","year":"2012","unstructured":"\u2022 Fahmy NM, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Effective radiation exposure in evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis. Urology. 2012;79:43\u20137. The effective radiation dose associated with the evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis was calculated and not estimated, as mostly reported. In addition, it gave beyond-single-year follow-up of these patients","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"731_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.04.012","volume":"68","author":"M Kaynar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kaynar M, Tekinarslan E, Keskin S, et al. Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Cent Eur J Urol. 2015;68:348\u201352.","journal-title":"Cent Eur J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2307\/3579391","volume":"146","author":"DA Pierce","year":"1996","unstructured":"Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL, et al. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950\u20131990. Radiat Res. 1996;146:1\u201327.","journal-title":"Radiat Res"},{"key":"731_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.176.2.1760289","volume":"176","author":"DJ Brenner","year":"2001","unstructured":"Brenner DJ, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289\u201396.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"731_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1667\/RR0553.1","volume":"167","author":"E Cardis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167:396\u2013416.","journal-title":"Radiat Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2481071451","volume":"248","author":"FA Mettler Jr","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254\u201363.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"731_CR20","unstructured":"Andonian S, Atalla MA. Radiation safety in urology. AUA Update Ser. 2009, Lesson 26, 28:237\u2013247."},{"key":"731_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.178.2.1780379","volume":"178","author":"O Catalano","year":"2002","unstructured":"Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, et al. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:379\u201387.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"731_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/S0302-2838(02)00064-7","volume":"41","author":"A Heidenreich","year":"2002","unstructured":"Heidenreich A, Desgranschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol. 2002;41:351\u201362.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"731_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1089\/089277903772036118","volume":"17","author":"D Katz","year":"2003","unstructured":"Katz D, McGahan JP, Gerscovich EO, et al. Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB. J Endourol. 2003;17:847\u201350.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"731_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65272-X","volume":"167","author":"N Narepalem","year":"2002","unstructured":"Narepalem N, Sundaram CP, Boridy IC, et al. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. J Urol. 2002;167:1235\u20138.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"o","key":"731_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.06.013","volume":"190","author":"A Neisius","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u2022 Neisius A, Wang AJ, Wang C, et al. Radiation exposure in urology: a genito-urinary catalog for diagnostic imaging. J Urol. 2013;190(o):2117\u201323. Using anthropomorphic male phantom validated for human organ dosimetry measurements, the authors confirmed the validity of calculated effective dose derived from the dose-length product to estimate patient radiation exposure, while the effective dose varies considerable for different urological CT studies.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-003-1924-6","volume":"14","author":"T Ripolles","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J, et al. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs. unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study of 66 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:129\u201336.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"731_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-4295(89)90406-8","volume":"33","author":"B Goldwasser","year":"1989","unstructured":"Goldwasser B, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, et al. Role of linear tomography in evaluation of patients with nephrolithiasis. Urology. 1989;33:253\u20136.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"10","key":"731_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0255","volume":"27","author":"GM Astroza","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u2022 Astroza GM, Neisius A, Wang AJ, et al. Radiation exposure in the follow-up of patients with urolithiasis comparing digital tomosynthesis, non-contrast CT, standard KUB, and IVU. J Endourol. 2013;27(10):1187\u201391. While IVU or KUB with tomograms exposes patients to more ionizing radiation than low-dose CT protocol, digital tomosynthesis, however, has a lower effective dose than the different imaging modalities. Therefore, it can play a significant role in surveillance of patients with urolithiasis","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"842","key":"731_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.71.842.9579185","volume":"71","author":"M Muller","year":"1998","unstructured":"Muller M, Heicappell R, Steiner U, et al. The average dose-area product at intravenous urography in 205 adults. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(842):210\u20132.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"731_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.157.2.554-b","volume":"157","author":"BC Erwin","year":"1885","unstructured":"Erwin BC, Carroll BA, Summer FG. Re: US in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Radiology. 1885;157(2):554.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"S1","key":"731_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S89","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0584","volume":"31","author":"DT Tzou","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tzou DT, Usawachintachit M, Taguchi K, Chi T. Ultrasound use in urinary stones: adapting old technology for a modern-day disease. J Endourol. 2017;31(S1):S89\u201394.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"12","key":"731_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1404446","volume":"371","author":"R Smith-Bindman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J, et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(12):1100\u201310.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"731_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.03.175","volume":"196","author":"M Abdel-Gawad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdel-Gawad M, Kadasne RD, Elsobkr E, et al. A prospective comparative study of color Doppler ultrasound with twinkling and noncontrast computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute renal colic. J Urol. 2016;196:1\u20136.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.10.1619","volume":"31","author":"AZ Keilar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Keilar AZ, Shabana W, Vakili M, et al. Prospective evaluation of Doppler sonography to detect the twinkling artifact versus unenhanced computed tomography for identifying urinary tract calculi. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1619\u201325.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"731_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.05.111","volume":"195","author":"B Dunmire","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dunmire B, Harper JD, Cunitz BW, et al. Use of the acoustic shadow width to determine kidney stone size with ultrasound. J Urol. 2016;195:171\u20137.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0341","volume":"30","author":"PC May","year":"2016","unstructured":"May PC, Haider Y, Dunmire B, et al. Stone-mode ultrasound for determining renal stone size. J Endourol. 2016;30:958\u201362.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"731_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-1591.124208","volume":"30","author":"F Cabrera","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cabrera F, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. As low as reasonably achievable: methods for reducing radiation exposure during the management of renal and ureteral stones. Indian J Urol. 2014;30:55\u20139.","journal-title":"Indian J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/01.rct.0000191685.58838.ef","volume":"30","author":"C Kluner","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:44\u201350.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"731_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.06.0793","volume":"188","author":"PA Poletti","year":"2007","unstructured":"Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:927\u201333.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"731_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1433","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.05.089","volume":"192","author":"BD Pooler","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. Prospective trial of the detection of urolithiasis on ultralow dose (sub mSv) noncontrast computerized tomography: direct comparison against routine low dose reference standard. J Urol. 2014;192:1433\u20139. Using advanced ultra-low-dose refined reconstruction algorithms would help in reducing NCCT radiation dose to less than that of a typical 2-KUBs, without severely affecting its diagnostic accuracy to detect clinically significant calculi\n                        .","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.12271","volume":"203","author":"DI Glazer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Glazer DI, Maturen KE, Cohan RH, et al. Assessment of 1 mSv urinary tract stone CT with model-based iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:1230\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2762","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.08.042","volume":"182","author":"FC Jellison","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jellison FC, Smith JC, Heldt JP, et al. Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2762\u20137.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65178-6","volume":"167","author":"M Hamm","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hamm M, Knopfle E, Wartenberg S, et al. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol. 2002;167:1687\u201391.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.180.2.1800313","volume":"180","author":"DS Katz","year":"2003","unstructured":"Katz DS, Venkataramanan N, Napel S, et al. Can low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT be used for routine evaluation of suspected renal colic? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003b;180:313\u20135.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2511081084","volume":"251","author":"MW Ciaschini","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ciaschini MW, Remer EM, Baker ME, et al. Urinary calculi: radiation dose reduction of 50% and 75% at CT\u2014effect on sensitivity. Radiology. 2009;251(1):105\u201311.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"731_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1080\/02841850500216004","volume":"46","author":"BS Kim","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW, et al. Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:756\u201363.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"731_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.02.2568","volume":"188","author":"JP Heldt","year":"2012","unstructured":"Heldt JP, Smith JC, Anderson KM, et al. Ureteral calculi detection using low dose computerized tomography protocols is compromised in overweight and underweight patients. J Urol. 2012;188:124\u20139.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.12.016","volume":"79","author":"JK Mullins","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mullins JK, Semins MJ, Hyams ES, et al. Half-Fourier single-shot turbo-spin-magnetic resonance urography for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in pregnancy. Urology. 2012;79(6):1252\u20135.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.5041","volume":"196","author":"M Qu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Qu M, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Leng S, et al. Dual-energy dual-source CT with additional spectral filtration can improve the differentiation of non-uric acid renal stones: an ex vivo phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6):1279\u201387.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"5","key":"731_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.07.005","volume":"68","author":"M Ritter","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Michel MS. The Uro Dyna-CT allows three-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):880\u20134.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"731_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.3075","volume":"195","author":"K Mermuys","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mermuys K, De Geeter F, Bacher K, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:161\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1001","key":"731_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/95862259","volume":"84","author":"IT Wells","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wells IT, Raju VM, Rowberry BK, et al. Digital tomosynthesis\u2014a new lease of life for the intravenous urogram? Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1001):464\u20138.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"731_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.10.004","volume":"83","author":"A Neisius","year":"2014","unstructured":"Neisius A, Astroza GM, Wang C, et al. Digital tomosynthesis: a new technique for imaging nephrolithiasis. Specific organ doses and effective doses with the renal stone protocol noncontrast computed tomography. Urology. 2014;83(2):282\u20137.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"731_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.04.1838","volume":"186","author":"SI Katz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, et al. Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1120\u20134.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"731_CR55","first-page":"429","volume":"22","author":"BS John","year":"2008","unstructured":"John BS, Patel U, Anson K. What radiation exposure can a patient expect during a single stone episode? J Endourol. 2008;22:429\u20132.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"731_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1747","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0695","volume":"25","author":"JE Jamal","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jamal JE, Armenakas NA, Sosa RE, et al. Perioperative patient radiation exposure in the endoscopic removal of upper urinary tract calculi. J Endourol. 2011;25(11):1747\u201351.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"731_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.10.031","volume":"189","author":"PF Fulgham","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, et al. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1203\u201313. This review article addresses the optimal use of imaging studies in the management of patients with suspected or documented ureteral calculi, considering the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various imaging modalities and associated risk of radiation exposure","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.04.118","volume":"194","author":"TT Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Chen TT, Wang C, Ferrandino MN, et al. Radiation exposure during the evaluation and management of nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2015;194:878\u201385. This review article described increased trends in the use of CT, risks associated with low-dose radiation exposure, exposure from different diagnostic imaging studies and discussed methods to reduce radiation exposure for patients with nephrolithiasis\n                        .","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0333","volume":"26","author":"M Ritter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ritter M, Krombach P, Martinschek A, et al. Radiation exposure during endourologic procedures using over-the-table fluoroscopy sources. J Endourol. 2012;26(1):47\u201351.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"731_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2012.06.041","volume":"80","author":"W Brisbane","year":"2012","unstructured":"Brisbane W, Smith D, Schlaifer A, et al. Fluoro-less ureteral stent placement following uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal: a feasibility study. Urology. 2012;80:766\u201370.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1007\/s00120-012-2992-5","volume":"52","author":"G Z\u00f6ller","year":"2013","unstructured":"Z\u00f6ller G, Virsik-K\u00f6pp P, Vowinkel C. Patient radiation exposure during ureteroscopic stone extraction. Urologe A. 2013;52(1):60\u20134.","journal-title":"Urologe A"},{"issue":"3","key":"731_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.10.159","volume":"187","author":"ME Lipkin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lipkin ME, Wang AJ, Toncheva G, et al. Determination of patient radiation dose during ureteroscopic treatment of urolithiasis using a validated model. J Urol. 2012;187(3):920\u20134.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"731_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0624","volume":"25","author":"TC Ngo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ngo TC, Macleod LC, Rosenstein DI, et al. Tracking intraoperative fluoroscopy utilization reduces radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):763\u20137.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0349","volume":"27","author":"MA Elkoushy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Variations among urology trainees in their use of fluoroscopy during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2012;27(1):19\u201323.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"12","key":"731_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1837","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0204","volume":"25","author":"PD Violette","year":"2011","unstructured":"Violette PD, Szymanski KM, Anidjar M, Andonian S. Factors determining fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1837\u201340.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"731_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.11.020","volume":"78","author":"DJ Greene","year":"2011","unstructured":"Greene DJ, Tenggadjaja CF, Bowman RJ, et al. Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Urology. 2011;78:286\u201390.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2012.01.027","volume":"79","author":"MA Elkoushy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elkoushy MA, Shahrour W, Andonian S. Pulsed fluoroscopy in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2012;79(6):1230\u20135.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"731_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.01.019","volume":"103","author":"TS Yecies","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yecies TS, Fombona A, Semins MJ. Single pulse-per-second setting reduces fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy. Urology. 2017;103:63\u20137.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"731_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000170232.58930.8f","volume":"174","author":"GO Hellawell","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hellawell GO, Mutch SJ, Thevendran E, et al. Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol. 2005;174:948\u201352.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.08.033","volume":"184","author":"JG Mancini","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mancini JG, Raymundo EM, Lipkin M, et al. Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2010;184(6):2373\u20137.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"731_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0178","volume":"26","author":"ME Lipkin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva T, et al. Organ-specific radiation dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(5):439\u201343.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"731_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0431","volume":"25","author":"ME Lipkin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Zilberman DE, et al. Reduced radiation exposure with the use of an air retrograde pyelogram during fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(4):563\u20137.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-012-0923-0","volume":"31","author":"M Ritter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ritter M, Siegel F, Krombach P, et al. Influence of surgeon\u2019s experience on fluoroscopy time during endourological interventions. World J Urol. 2013;31(1):183\u20137.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.05.114","volume":"190","author":"B Blair","year":"2013","unstructured":"Blair B, Huang G, Arnold D, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy protocol for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: feasibility, outcomes and effects on fluoroscopy time. J Urol. 2013;190:2112\u20136.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2012.10.004","volume":"81","author":"W Isac","year":"2013","unstructured":"Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X, et al. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology. 2013;81:251\u20136.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9e10","key":"731_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.2037","volume":"8","author":"AG Lantz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lantz AG, O\u2019Malley P, Ordon M, et al. Assessing radiation exposure during endoscopic-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(9e10):347\u201351.","journal-title":"Can Urol Assoc J"},{"issue":"4","key":"731_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajur.2015.08.001","volume":"2","author":"YA Noureldin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Asian J Urol. 2015;2(4):220\u20133.","journal-title":"Asian J Urol"},{"key":"731_CR78","unstructured":"UNSCEAR 2010. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, United Nations, New York."},{"key":"731_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/01.HP.0000196112.94905.dd","volume":"90","author":"P Sandilos","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sandilos P, Tsalafoutos I, Koutsokalis G, et al. Radiation doses to patients from extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Health Phys. 2006;90:583\u20137.","journal-title":"Health Phys"},{"issue":"6","key":"731_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0185","volume":"26","author":"DA Rebuck","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rebuck DA, Coleman S, Chen JF, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy: a comparison of intraoperative radiation exposure during the management of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):597\u2013601.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"731_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.09.013","volume":"79","author":"MA Elkoushy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elkoushy MA, Morehouse DD, Anidjar M, et al. Impact of radiological technologists on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2012;79(4):777\u201380.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"731_CR82","unstructured":"IAEA, 2010. Radiation protection of patients. \nhttp:\/\/rpop.iaea.org\n\n, accessed 14.2.2011."},{"key":"731_CR83","unstructured":"NCRP. Radiation protection for procedures performed outside the radiology department. NCRP Report 2000; 133. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, USA."},{"key":"731_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/01.RVI.0000079980.80153.4B","volume":"14","author":"DL Miller","year":"2003","unstructured":"Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study part I. Overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:711\u201327.","journal-title":"J Vasc Interv Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"731_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2014-1694","volume":"134","author":"GE Tasian","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tasian GE, Pulido JE, Keren R, et al. Use of and regional variation in initial CT imaging for kidney stones. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):909\u201315.","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"731_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2511081296","volume":"251","author":"A Sodickson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251(1):176\u201384.","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Current Urology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,25]],"date-time":"2017-10-25T03:04:31Z","timestamp":1508900671000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,12]]},"references-count":86,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["731"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-017-0731-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1527-2737","1534-6285"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1527-2737","type":"print"},{"value":"1534-6285","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,12]]},"article-number":"85"}}