{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T20:58:54Z","timestamp":1776891534636,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]],"date-time":"2022-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646438400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]],"date-time":"2022-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646438400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Urol Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]],"date-time":"2022-03-05T06:02:57Z","timestamp":1646460177000},"page":"75-81","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1772-8877","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alejandro","family":"Carvajal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gerard D.","family":"Henry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"1090_CR1","unstructured":"Salonia A, Bettochi C, Carvalho J, Corona G, et al. Sexual and reproductive health. Eur Assoc Urol Guidel. 2020."},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2016.05.003","volume":"4","author":"H Carrion","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carrion H, et al. A history of the penile implant to 1974. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(3):285\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sxmr.2016.05.003.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"1090_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S851","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2017.04.02","volume":"6","author":"KM Rodriguez","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rodriguez KM, Pastuszak AW. A history of penile implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 5):S851\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tau.2017.04.02.","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2017.03.007","volume":"6","author":"NL Kavoussi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kavoussi NL, et al. Are urine cultures necessary prior to urologic prosthetic surgery?. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6(1):157\u201361.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"1090_CR5","first-page":"10418","volume":"27","author":"PH Chung","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chung PH, Leong JY, Teplitsky S, Shenot PJ, Das AK, Gomella LG. Next-generation DNA sequencing for infected genitourinary implants: How I do it. Can J Urol. 2020;27(5):10418\u201323.","journal-title":"Can J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14076","volume":"121","author":"M Habous","year":"2018","unstructured":"Habous M, et al. Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection. BJU Int. 2018;121(2):293\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14076.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"1090_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-020-0232-x","volume":"32","author":"A Carvajal","year":"2020","unstructured":"Carvajal A, Benavides J, Garc\u00eda-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32(6):587\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41443-020-0232-x.","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"1090_CR8","first-page":"659","volume":"153","author":"SK Wilson","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wilson SK, Delk JR. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153(3 Pt 1):659\u201361.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/s0090-4295(00)00876-1","volume":"57","author":"DC Cuellar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Cuellar DC, Sklar GN. Penile prosthesis in the organ transplant recipient. Urology. 2001;57(1):138\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0090-4295(00)00876-1.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2016.03.003","volume":"4","author":"M Pineda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pineda M, Burnett AL. Penile prosthesis infections-a review of risk factors, prevention, and treatment. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(4):389\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sxmr.2016.03.003.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"1090_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00344-7","volume":"175","author":"D-H Zermann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Zermann D-H, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, Schubert J, Loeffler U. Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term followup. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):1041\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00344-7.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esxm.2018.11.007","volume":"7","author":"MJ Lipsky","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lipsky MJ, et al. Diabetes is a risk factor for inflatable penile prosthesis infection: analysis of a large statewide database. Sex Med. 2019;7(1):35\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esxm.2018.11.007.","journal-title":"Sex Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.5534\/wjmh.180123","volume":"37","author":"KJ Hebert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hebert KJ, Kohler TS. Penile prosthesis infection: myths and realities. World J Mens Health. 2019;37(3):276\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5534\/wjmh.180123.","journal-title":"World J Mens Health"},{"key":"1090_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gross M, Vollstedt A, Cleves M, Glina S, et al. Multicenter investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection. Int J Imp Res. 2019.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-019-0148-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2016.12.169","volume":"14","author":"MS Gross","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gross MS, et al. 180 multicenter investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection. J Sex Med. 2017;14(2):e75\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsxm.2016.12.169.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.05.004","volume":"200","author":"AL Burnett","year":"2018","unstructured":"Burnett AL, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200(3):633\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.05.004.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2017.01.007","volume":"14","author":"MS Gross","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gross MS, et al. Multicenter investigation of the micro-organisms involved in penile prosthesis infection: an analysis of the efficacy of the AUA and EAU guidelines for penile prosthesis prophylaxis. J Sex Med. 2017;14(3):455\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsxm.2017.01.007.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"1090_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2019.05.003","volume":"16","author":"MS Gross","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gross MS, et al. Multicenter investigation of fungal infections of inflatable penile prostheses. J Sex Med. 2019;16(7):1100\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsxm.2019.05.003.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.086","volume":"189","author":"LL Yeung","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yeung LL, Grewal S, Bullock A, Lai HH, Brandes SB. A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;189(1):136\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.086.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0810988","volume":"362","author":"RO Darouiche","year":"2010","unstructured":"Darouiche RO, et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(1):18\u201326.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"1090_CR21","unstructured":"Lee I, Agarwal RK, Lee BY, Fishman NO, Umscheid CA. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidem."},{"issue":"6","key":"1090_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suc.2014.08.008","volume":"94","author":"PY Young","year":"2014","unstructured":"Young PY, Khadaroo RG. Surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(6):1245\u201364.","journal-title":"Surg Clin North Am"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-019-0874-8","volume":"20","author":"SD Lokeshwar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lokeshwar SD, Bitran J, Madhusoodanan V, Kava B, Ramasamy R. A surgeon\u2019s guide to the various antibiotic dips available during penile prosthesis implantation. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(2):11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-019-0874-8.","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2016.01.002","volume":"4","author":"JF Eid","year":"2016","unstructured":"Eid JF. Penile implant: review of a No-Touch technique. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(3):294\u2013300.","journal-title":"Sex. Med. Rev."},{"issue":"6","key":"1090_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.11.076","volume":"79","author":"JF Eid","year":"2012","unstructured":"Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and \u201cno touch\u201d surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310\u20135.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.09.094","volume":"185","author":"CC Carson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch MR. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup. J Urol. 2011;185(2):614\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2010.09.094.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1090_CR27","unstructured":"Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA). Position statements: razors and preoperative preparation of the male genitalia."},{"issue":"4S","key":"1090_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(08)60997-0","volume":"179","author":"TT John","year":"2008","unstructured":"John TT, Marilynn F, Dhabuwala CB. Inflatable penile prosthesis components \u2013 an in vitro comparative study of antibacterial activity. J Urol. 2008;179(4S):340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5347(08)60997-0.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1090_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.05.028","volume":"119","author":"K Jani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jani K, et al. Infection retardant coatings impact on bacterial presence in penile prosthesis surgery: a multicenter study. Urology. 2018;119:104\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2018.05.028.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1090_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0061","volume":"42","author":"S Ciftci","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ciftci S, et al. Non-infected penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery; comparison between antibiotic coated and non - coated devices. Int braz j urol. 2016;42:1183\u20139.","journal-title":"Int braz j urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(98)00186-1","volume":"52","author":"BB Garber","year":"1998","unstructured":"Garber BB, Marcus SM. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?. Urology. 1998;52(2):291\u20133.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2018.03.007","volume":"6","author":"F Palmisano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Palmisano F, et al. Comparison of infrapubic vs penoscrotal approaches for 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement: do we have a winner?. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6(4):631\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sxmr.2018.03.007.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"4S","key":"1090_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e569","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.02.1086","volume":"193","author":"K Edward","year":"2015","unstructured":"Karpman E, et al. PD26-10 outcomes of IPP placement by surgical approach, penoscrotal vs infrapubic, results from a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2015;193(4S):e569\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2015.02.1086.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-018-0026-6","volume":"30","author":"BD Montgomery","year":"2018","unstructured":"Montgomery BD, Lomas DJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Trost LW. Infection risk of undergoing multiple penile prostheses: an analysis of referred patient surgical histories. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30(4):147\u201352.","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2011.02524.x","volume":"9","author":"GD Henry","year":"2012","unstructured":"Henry GD, et al. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):309\u201315.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-019-0881-9","volume":"20","author":"A Wintner","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wintner A, Lentz AC. Inflatable penile prosthesis: considerations in revision surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(4):1\u20137.","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2011.02428.x","volume":"9","author":"SK Wilson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wilson SK, Costerton JW. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: a review. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):44\u201353.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"1090_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1177\/039139880502801103","volume":"28","author":"JW Costerton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28(11):1062\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Artif Organs"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000146717.62215.6f","volume":"173","author":"GD Henry","year":"2005","unstructured":"Henry GD, et al. Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2005;173(1):89\u201392.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1090_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2018.09.05","volume":"7","author":"AS Herati","year":"2018","unstructured":"Herati AS, Lo EM. Penile prosthesis biofilm formation and emerging therapies against them. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(6):960\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tau.2018.09.05.","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2017.01.002","volume":"5","author":"LE Dawn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dawn LE, Henry GD, Tan GK, Wilson SK. Biofilm and infectious agents present at the time of penile prosthesis revision surgery: times are a changing. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5(2):236\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sxmr.2017.01.002.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.02.028","volume":"84","author":"S Grewal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grewal S, Vetter J, Brandes SB, Strope SA. A population-based analysis of contemporary rates of reoperation for penile prosthesis procedures. Urology. 2014;84(1):112\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2014.02.028.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2491-4","volume":"37","author":"K Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li K, et al. Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal. World J Urol. 2019;37(4):639\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-018-2491-4.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-019-0875-7","volume":"20","author":"RJ Carrasquillo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Carrasquillo RJ, Munarriz RM, Gross MS. Infection prevention considerations for complex penile prosthesis recipients. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(3):12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-019-0875-7.","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)65860-9","volume":"156","author":"JP Jarow","year":"1996","unstructured":"Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol. 1996;156(2):402\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)65860-9.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1090_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.05.080","volume":"189","author":"PJ Muench","year":"2013","unstructured":"Muench PJ. Infections versus penile implants: the war on bugs. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1631\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2012.05.080.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.157","volume":"181","author":"GD Henry","year":"2009","unstructured":"Henry GD, et al. Centers of excellence concept and penile prostheses: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1264\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.157.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-5347(17)35650-1","volume":"150","author":"DK Montague","year":"1993","unstructured":"Montague DK. Penile prosthesis corporotomy closure: a new technique. J Urol. 1993;150(3):924\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-5347(17)35650-1.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1090_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.06.002","volume":"108","author":"AT Rozanski","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rozanski AT, et al. Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose (Fibrillar) Reduces Risk of Postoperative Corporal Bleeding Following Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery. Urology. 2017;108:190\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2017.06.002.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1090_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2019.08.05","volume":"9","author":"AR Wolfe","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wolfe AR, et al. An update on oxidized regenerated cellulose (fibrillar\u2122) in reducing postoperative corporal bleeding following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(1):43\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tau.2019.08.05.","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1090_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ijir.3901354","volume":"17","author":"H Sadeghi-Nejad","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sadeghi-Nejad H, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(6):535\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.ijir.3901354.","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"1090_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S832","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2017.06.07","volume":"6","author":"TK O\u2019Rourke Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"O\u2019Rourke TK Jr, Erbella A, Zhang Y, Wosnitzer MS. Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 5):S832\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tau.2017.06.07.","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1090_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2010.02088.x","volume":"8","author":"A Kramer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kramer A, Goldmark E, Greenfield J. Is a closed-suction drain advantageous for penile implant surgery? The debate continues. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):601\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2010.02088.x.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(09)61273-8","volume":"181","author":"C Rojas-Cruz","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rojas-Cruz C, Sarquella J, Vazquez A. Drain cultures in penile prosthesis implants. J Urol. 2009;181(4):448.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1090_CR55","first-page":"634A","volume":"55","author":"S Wilson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wilson S, Cleves M, Delk JI. Hematoma formation following penile prosthesis implantation: to drain or not to drain. J Urol. 1996;55:634A.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2008.01200.x","volume":"6","author":"GD Henry","year":"2009","unstructured":"Henry GD. The Henry mummy wrap and the Henry finger sweep surgical techniques. J Sex Med. 2009;6(3):619\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2008.01200.x.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1090_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000000578","volume":"203","author":"BM Dropkin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dropkin BM, et al. Penile prosthesis insertion in the era of antibiotic stewardship-are postoperative antibiotics necessary?. J Urol. 2020;203(3):611\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000000578.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1090_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.05.048","volume":"82","author":"RO Darouiche","year":"2013","unstructured":"Darouiche RO, et al. North American consensus document on infection of penile prostheses. Urology. 2013;82(4):937\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2013.05.048.","journal-title":"Urology"}],"container-title":["Current Urology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]],"date-time":"2022-04-20T04:46:06Z","timestamp":1650429966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]}},"alternative-id":["1090"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-022-01090-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1527-2737","1534-6285"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1527-2737","type":"print"},{"value":"1534-6285","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 February 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"Alejandro Carvajal has participated as a proctor, consultant for Boston Scientific. Gerard Henry: Boston Scientific proctor\/consultant\/study investigator; Coloplast proctor\/consultant\/study investigator; Signati consultant; Microgen Dx consultant.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent"}}]}}