{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T11:09:40Z","timestamp":1789988980368,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Orthop Relat Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Two-stage reimplantation has consistently yielded high rates of success for patients with chronic prosthetic joint infection, although results more than 5 years after reimplantation are not commonly reported. Numerous factors may contribute to the risk of reinfection, although these factors\u2014as well as the at-risk period after reimplantation\u2014are not well characterized.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Questions\/purposes<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>(1) What is the risk of reinfection after reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection at a minimum of 5 years? (2) Is the bacteriology of the index infection associated with late reinfection? (3) Is the presence of bacteria at the time of reimplantation associated with late reinfection?<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 97 two-stage revisions in 93 patients for prosthetic joint infection of the hip or knee, and all are included in this retrospective study. During that time, the indications for this procedure generally were (1) infections occurring more than 3 months after the index arthroplasty; and (2) more acute infections associated with prosthetic loosening or resistant organisms. One patient (1%) was lost to followup; all others have a minimum of 5 years of followup (mean, 11 years; range, 5-20 years) and all living patients have been seen within the last 2 years. Patients were considered free from infection if they did not have pain at rest or constitutional symptoms such as fever, chills, or malaise. The patients\u2019 bacteriology and resistance patterns of these organisms were observed with respect to recurrence of infection. Odds ratios and Fisher\u2019s exact test were performed to analyze the data. The incidence of reinfection was determined using cumulative incidence methods that considered death as a competing event.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Reinfection occurred in 12 of the 97 joints resulting in implant revision. The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of infection was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-23%) and incidence of infection from the same organism was 5% (95% CI, 1%-11%). Five occurred early or within 2 years and three were resistant pathogens (methicillin-resistant <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Staphylococcus aureus<\/jats:italic>, methicillin-resistant <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Staphylococcus epidermidis,<\/jats:italic> or vancomycin-resistant <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Enterococcus<\/jats:italic>). Seven late hematogenous infections occurred and all were &gt; 4 years after reimplantation and involved nonresistant organisms. Three of the five (60%) early infections were caused by resistant bacteria, whereas all seven late infections were caused by different organisms or a combination of different organisms than were isolated in the original infection. The early reinfections were more often caused by resistant organisms, whereas late infections involved different organisms than were isolated in the original infection and none involved resistant organisms. With the numbers available, we found no difference between patients in whom bacteria were detected at the time of reimplantation and those in whom cultures were negative in terms of the risk of reinfection 5 years after reimplantation (18.6% [18 of 97] versus 81.4% [79 of 97], odds ratio 1.56 [95% CI, 0.38-6.44]; p = 0.54); however, with only 93 patients, we may have been underpowered to make this analysis.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>In our study, resistant organisms were more often associated with early reinfection, whereas late failures were more commonly associated with new pathogens. We believe the most important finding in our study is that substantial risk of late infection remains even among patients who seemed free from infection 2 years after reimplantation for prosthetic joint infections of the hip or knee. This highlights the importance of educating our patients about the ongoing risk of prosthetic joint infection.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Level III, therapeutic study.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999.0000000000000050","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]],"date-time":"2018-02-21T13:47:55Z","timestamp":1519220875000},"page":"345-352","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Late Reinfection May Recur More Than 5 Years After Reimplantation of THA and TKA: Analysis of Pathogen Factors"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"476","author":[{"given":"Kevin L.","family":"Garvin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryan E.","family":"Miller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Todd M.","family":"Gilbert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anthony M.","family":"White","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth R.","family":"Lyden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1602","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.04.004","article-title":"Two-stage revision protocol in multidrug resistant periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty using a long interval between stages","volume":"30","author":"Babis","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R2-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1093\/jac\/dkp469","article-title":"Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology","volume":"65","author":"Bejon","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Antimicrob Chemother"},{"key":"R3-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2595-x","article-title":"Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality","volume":"471","author":"Berend","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R4-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/BLO.0b013e3180986753","article-title":"Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate?","volume":"462","author":"Biau","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R5-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B11.22026","article-title":"Two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection using an interim articulated Prostalac hip spacer: a 10- to 15-year follow-up study","volume":"91","author":"Biring","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R6-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jinf.2011.04.014","article-title":"Clinical outcome and microbiological findings using antibiotic-loaded spacers in two-stage revision of prosthetic joint infections","volume":"63","author":"Cabo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Infect"},{"key":"R7-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200210000-00005","article-title":"Periprosthetic total joint infections: staging, treatment, and outcomes","volume":"403","author":"Cierny","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R8-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.03.028","article-title":"Risk of reinfection after treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty","volume":"31","author":"Cochran","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R9-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2335","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0808-8","article-title":"Oral antibiotics are effective for highly resistant hip arthroplasty infections","volume":"467","author":"Cordero-Ampuero","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R10-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1229","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-1224-9","article-title":"Results after late polymicrobial, Gram-negative, and methicillin-resistant infections in knee arthroplasty","volume":"468","author":"Cordero-Ampuero","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R11-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4890-4","article-title":"The Mark Coventry, MD, Award: Oral antibiotics reduce reinfection after two-stage exchange: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial","volume":"475","author":"Frank","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R12-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4673-3","article-title":"Are frozen sections and MSIS criteria reliable at the time of reimplantation of two-stage revision arthroplasty?","volume":"474","author":"George","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R13-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1579-y","article-title":"Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty","volume":"469","author":"Gooding","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R14-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.0.CO;2-O","article-title":"Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators","volume":"18","author":"Gooley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R15-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.88B8.17445","article-title":"Two-stage revision of infected total knee replacements using articulating cement spacers and short-term antibiotic therapy","volume":"88","author":"Hart","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R16-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2004.12.055","article-title":"Ten-year experience using an articulating antibiotic cement hip spacer for the treatment of chronically infected total hip","volume":"20","author":"Hofmann","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R17-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198365080-00008","article-title":"Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty","volume":"65","author":"Insall","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R18-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200211000-00021","article-title":"Results of periprosthetic hip and knee infections caused by resistant bacteria","volume":"404","author":"Kilgus","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R19-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000194312.97098.0a","article-title":"Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty for deep periprosthetic infection","volume":"441","author":"Kraay","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R20-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2060","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1296-6","article-title":"Two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty: does resistance of the infecting organism influence the outcome?","volume":"468","author":"Kurd","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R21-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1725-6","article-title":"Two-stage total hip arthroplasty: how often does it control methicillin-resistant infection?","volume":"469","author":"Leung","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"Suppl 8","key":"R22-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S54","DOI":"10.5301\/HIP.2012.9571","article-title":"A two stage re-implantation protocol for the treatment of deep periprosthetic hip infection. mid to long-term results","volume":"22","author":"Macheras","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"R23-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2730","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2358-8","article-title":"Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA","volume":"470","author":"Mahmud","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R24-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200210000-00003","article-title":"Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system","volume":"403","author":"McPherson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R25-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1227","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200706000-00010","article-title":"Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection involving resistant organisms","volume":"89","author":"Mittal","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R26-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-201012000-00007","article-title":"AAOS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee","volume":"18","author":"Parvizi","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"R27-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.12.027","article-title":"Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: Outcome and role of reimplantation microbiology in 107 cases","volume":"29","author":"Puhto","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R28-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0480-4","article-title":"Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty","volume":"467","author":"Sanchez-Sotelo","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R29-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000144476.43661.10","article-title":"Systemic safety of high-dose antibiotic-loaded cement spacers after resection of an infected total knee arthroplasty","volume":"427","author":"Springer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R30-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.15.01469","article-title":"Positive culture during reimplantation increases the risk of subsequent failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty","volume":"98","author":"Tan","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R31-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2012.06.004","article-title":"Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection: influence of host health status and infecting microorganism","volume":"20","author":"Tigani","year":"2013","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"R32-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2008.07.004","article-title":"Treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol: update on 'our institution's' experience from 1989 to 2003","volume":"24","author":"Toulson","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R33-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.08.002","article-title":"Periprosthetic infection recurrence after 2-stage exchange arthroplasty: failure or fate?","volume":"32","author":"Triantafyllopoulos","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R34-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199604000-00005","article-title":"Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections","volume":"78","author":"Tsukayama","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R35-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3100","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-016-4238-3","article-title":"Articulated spacer provides long-term knee improvement after two-stage reimplantation","volume":"24","author":"Vasso","year":"2016","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"R36-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000143559.34143.3d","article-title":"Two-stage reimplantation of total joint infections: a comparison of resistant and non-resistant organisms","volume":"427","author":"Volin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R37-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e154","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.01289","article-title":"Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection","volume":"96","author":"Watts","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R38-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.07.017","article-title":"Modern treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol","volume":"25","author":"Westrich","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"R39-20230814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.02.021","article-title":"Recurrent periprosthetic joint infection: persistent or new infection?","volume":"28","author":"Zmistowski","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"}],"container-title":["Clinical Orthopaedics &amp; Related Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00003086-201802000-00029","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,14]],"date-time":"2023-08-14T05:54:49Z","timestamp":1691992489000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00003086-201802000-00029"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,17]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999.0000000000000050","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-921X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-921X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,17]]}}}