{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:55:41Z","timestamp":1781639741582,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772755200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772755200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Forensic Sci Med Pathol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    The present study aimed to assess how effective commonly used cleaning protocols are in removing residual DNA from forensic evidence examination tools, thereby evaluating their ability to prevent contamination. The research question focused on whether standard cleaning techniques reliably remove residual DNA to mitigate contamination risks in forensic casework.\u00a0Simulated forensic evidence samples\u2014including bloodstains, buccal swabs, clothing, and bench surfaces\u2014were processed using scissors, tweezers, and scalpels. After initial conservative cleaning, the tools were subjected to five experimental cleaning techniques derived from publicly available laboratory protocols. Each technique varied in terms of bleach concentration, ethanol use, and contact time, and all the techniques lacked an abrasive wiping motion. Swabs collected post-cleaning were subjected to DNA extraction (QIAamp\n                    <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                    DNA Investigator Kit) and quantitation (Qubit\u2122 4 Fluorometer). Residual DNA was classified as positive (&gt;\u20092.5 pg\/\u00b5L), near negative, or negative (&lt;\u20090.2 pg\/\u00b5L).\u00a0All the techniques resulted in detectable DNA in at least one trial. Among the 60 swabs, 11 were classified as positive for residual DNA, and 10 were classified as near negative for residual DNA. Only one technique incorporated a waiting period before removing bleach, and this was the only method that had no samples classified as positive for residual DNA. No tool type demonstrated lower contamination risk, and variability was observed across trials.\u00a0Current single-phase cleaning solution-only cleaning practices may be insufficient for complete DNA removal. These findings underscore the need for standardized, multistep cleaning protocols, enhanced analyst training, and quality control measures to minimize contamination risk in casework.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T09:59:40Z","timestamp":1772791180000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Residual DNA and cleaning protocols: a comparative analysis of forensic evidence examination methods"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-9075-2944","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine","family":"O\u2019Connor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kiran","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"1213_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsigen.2021.102491","volume":"53","author":"J Hedman","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hedman J, Akel Y, Jansson L, et al. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;53:102491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2021.102491.","journal-title":"Forensic Sci Int Genet"},{"key":"1213_CR2","unstructured":"Collecting DNA, Evidence at Property Crime Scenes | Second Priority | National Institute of Justice. National Institute of Justice. https:\/\/nij.ojp.gov\/nij-hosted-online-training-courses\/collecting-dna-evidence-at-property-crime-scenes\/evidence-collection\/collection-priority\/second-priority"},{"key":"1213_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsigen.2018.02.011","volume":"34","author":"AM Magee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Magee AM, Breathnach M, Doak S, Thornton F, Noone C, McKenna LG. Wearer and non-wearer DNA on the collars and cuffs of upper garments of worn clothing. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;34:152\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2018.02.011.","journal-title":"Forensic Sci Int Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"1213_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/genes13010162","volume":"13","author":"M Nilsson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nilsson M, et al. Evaluation of different cleaning strategies for removal of contaminating DNA molecules. Genes. 2022;13(1):162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/genes13010162.","journal-title":"Genes"},{"key":"1213_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e577","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsigss.2017.09.223","volume":"6","author":"ML Kampmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kampmann ML, B\u00f8rsting C, Morling N. Decrease DNA contamination in the laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2017;6:e577-8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigss.2017.09.223.","journal-title":"Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser"},{"issue":"3","key":"1213_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcla.22290","volume":"32","author":"Y Wu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wu Y, et al. DNA decontamination methods for internal quality management in clinical PCR laboratories. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(3):e22290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jcla.22290.","journal-title":"J Clin Lab Anal"},{"key":"1213_CR7","unstructured":"MSN.(n.d.).https:\/\/www.msn.com\/en-us\/news\/crime\/sloppy-lab-work-contaminat-s-dna-samples-nyc-medical-examiner-orders-review\/ar-AA1qIStI"},{"key":"1213_CR8","unstructured":"NY. Daily News https:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/2024\/11\/19\/more-tainted-dna-samples-linked-sloppy-work-nyc-chief-medical-examiners-lab\/"},{"issue":"4","key":"1213_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1080\/00450618.2015.1004195","volume":"47","author":"KN Ballantyne","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ballantyne KN, Salemi R, Guarino F, Pearson JR, Garlepp D, Fowler S, et al. DNA contamination minimisation \u2013 finding an effective cleaning method. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2015;47(4):428\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00450618.2015.1004195.","journal-title":"Aust J Forensic Sci"},{"key":"1213_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1787","DOI":"10.1007\/s00414-024-03232-0","volume":"138","author":"ML Kampmann","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kampmann ML, Tfelt-Hansen J, B\u00f8rsting C. Cleaning protocols in forensic genetic laboratories. Int J Legal Med. 2024;138:1787\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00414-024-03232-0.","journal-title":"Int J Legal Med"},{"key":"1213_CR11","unstructured":"Texas Department of Public Safety. Crime Laboratory Division Manual. March 21. 2022. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/txdpslabs.qualtraxcloud.com\/ShowDocument.aspx?ID=67475"},{"key":"1213_CR12","unstructured":"Louisiana State University Health New Orleans. Standard Operating Procedure for Laboratory Disinfection. November 27. 2013. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/www.lsuhsc.edu\/admin\/pfm\/ehs\/docs\/decon.pdf"},{"key":"1213_CR13","unstructured":"James Madison University. Procedure for Verified Decontamination of Equipment and Surfaces Prior to Decommissioning, Downgrading Biosafety Level, Relocation, or Repair. SOP No. 9. May 18. 2022. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/www.jmu.edu\/research\/integrity-compliance\/biosafety\/sops\/ibc_sop_9_verified_decontamination.pdf"},{"key":"1213_CR14","unstructured":"Forensic Lab Houston Biology\/DNA Division. DNA General Standard Operating Procedure. October 15. 2020. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/www.houstonforensicscience.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HFSC-Quality-Manual-effective-031522.pdf"},{"key":"1213_CR15","unstructured":"Austin Police Department Forensic Science Division. Crime Scene Standard Operating Procedures. January 11. 2016. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/austinforensics.qualtraxcloud.com\/ShowDocument.aspx?ID=1983"},{"key":"1213_CR16","unstructured":"Albuquerque Police Department. General Orders Standard Operating Procedure 1\u201387. February 09. 2022. Accessed October 21, 2024. https:\/\/www.cabq.gov\/police\/standard-operating-procedures"},{"issue":"4","key":"1213_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1556-4029.2006.00172.x","volume":"51","author":"J Tamariz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tamariz J, et al. The application of ultraviolet irradiation to exogenous sources of DNA in plasticware and water for the amplification of low copy number DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(4):790\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1556-4029.2006.00172.x.","journal-title":"J Forensic Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"1213_CR18","first-page":"358","volume":"12","author":"AM Prince","year":"1992","unstructured":"Prince AM, Andrus L. PCR: how to kill unwanted DNA. BioTechniques. 1992;12(3):358\u201360.","journal-title":"BioTechniques"},{"key":"1213_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1872","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsigen.2024.103159","volume":"74","author":"N Bal\u00e1zs Kocsis","year":"2025","unstructured":"Bal\u00e1zs Kocsis N, M\u00e1trai Guszt\u00e1v, T\u00f6m\u00f6ry B\u00e1r\u00e1nyGy\u00f6ngyv\u00e9r, Heinrich A. Bal\u00e1zs Egyed. Internal validation of the Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR panel v2 kit with locus-specific analytical threshold, and with special regard to mixtures and low template DNA detection. Forensic Sci International: Genet. 2025;74:1872\u20134973. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fsigen.2024.103159.","journal-title":"Forensic Sci International: Genet"}],"container-title":["Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:29:32Z","timestamp":1781638172000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["1213"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12024-026-01213-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-2891"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-2891","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}