{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T16:41:53Z","timestamp":1787503313917,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,1]],"date-time":"2008-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1228089600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Indian J Pediatr"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,3]],"date-time":"2009-02-03T05:01:50Z","timestamp":1233637310000},"page":"1249-1252","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"K.K.","family":"Roy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jinee","family":"Baruah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunesh","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.K.","family":"Deorari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.B.","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Debjyoti","family":"Karmakar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"245_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11571.x","volume":"107","author":"J. Hornbuckle","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Abrans KR, Thornton JG. Bayesian interpretation of trials: the example of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 3\u201310.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"245_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S113","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00181-7","volume":"110","author":"P. Olofsson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Olofsson P. Current status of intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography versus cardiotocography + ST analysis of the fetal ECG. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Rep Biol 2003; 110: S113\u2013S118.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Rep Biol"},{"key":"245_CR3","volume-title":"Intrapartum fetal surveillance","author":"J.P. Nielson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Nielson JP, Grant AM. The randomized trails of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. In Spencer JA, Ward RH, eds. Intrapartum fetal surveillance. London; RCOG Press, 1993."},{"key":"245_CR4","volume-title":"Guidelines for Vaginal Delivery after a Previous Cesarean Birth, ACOG Committee Opinion No. 64","author":"American college of ObstetriciansGynecologists","year":"1988","unstructured":"American college of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Guidelines for Vaginal Delivery after a Previous Cesarean Birth, ACOG Committee Opinion No. 64. Washington; DC, ACOG, 1988."},{"key":"245_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500119671","volume":"25","author":"E.E. Onah","year":"2005","unstructured":"Onah EE, Ibeziako N, Umezulike AC, Effetie ER, Ogboukiri CM. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 342\u2013346.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"245_CR6","volume-title":"Proceedings of Fourth International Scientific Meeting of the RCOG","author":"J.P. Dwyer","year":"1999","unstructured":"Dwyer JP. Decision to delivery time in emergency caesarean section. Proceedings of Fourth International Scientific Meeting of the RCOG. London; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 1999."},{"key":"245_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1330","volume":"322","author":"D.J. Tufnell","year":"2001","unstructured":"Tufnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section -are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ 2001; 322: 1330\u20131333.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"245_CR8","first-page":"975","volume":"48","author":"S.P. Chauhan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, Scardo JA, Hendrix NW, Martin JN Jr. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings: compliance with ACOG Guidelines. J Rep Med 2003; 48: 975\u2013981.","journal-title":"J Rep Med"},{"key":"245_CR9","first-page":"347","volume":"42","author":"S.P. Chauhan","year":"1997","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Roach H, Naef RW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference? J Rep Med 1997; 42: 347\u2013352.","journal-title":"J Rep Med"},{"key":"245_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619109027807","volume":"11","author":"B.C. Dunphy","year":"1991","unstructured":"Dunphy BC, Robinson JN, Sheil OM, Nicholls JSD, Gillmer MDG. Cesarean section for fetal distress, the interval from decision to delivery and the relative risk of poor neonatal condition. J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 11: 241\u2013244.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(93)90046-F","volume":"48","author":"V. Wareham","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wareham V, Bain C, Cruickshank D. Caesarean section audit by peer review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 1993; 48: 9\u201314.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol"},{"key":"245_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70515-1","volume":"182","author":"E.H. Dellinger","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dellinger EH, Boehm FH, Crane MM. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 214\u2013220.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR13","first-page":"696","volume":"69","author":"P.H. Shiono","year":"1987","unstructured":"Shiono PH, McNellis D, Rhoads GG. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978\u20131984. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 696\u2013700.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199603073341001","volume":"334","author":"K.R. Nelson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Nelson KR, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. The New England J of Med 1996; 334: 613\u2013617.","journal-title":"The New England J of Med"},{"key":"245_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70674-9","volume":"174","author":"W. V. Wijngaarden","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wijngaarden WJ V, Sahota DS, James DK, Farrell T, Mires GJ, Wilcox M, Chang A. Improved intrapartum surveillance with PR interval analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram: A randomized trial showing a reduction in fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1295\u20131462.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chawla R, Deppe G, Ahart S, Gleicher N. Hemorrhage after fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149\u2013192.","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90304-1"},{"key":"245_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-2115(96)02496-7","volume":"86","author":"N.N. Reed","year":"1996","unstructured":"Reed NN, Mohajer MP, Sahota DS, James DK, Symonds EM. The potential impact of PR interval analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) on intrapartum fetal monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 1996; 86: 87\u201392.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol"},{"key":"245_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00119-0","volume":"88","author":"W. V. Wijngarden","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wijngarden WJ V, Strachan BK, Sahota DS, James DK. Improving intrapartum surveillance: an individualized T\/QRS ratio? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 2000; 88: 43\u201348.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol"},{"key":"245_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.01.003","volume":"97","author":"C. Vayssiere","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vayssiere C, Haberstich R, Sebahoun V, David E, Roth E, Langer B. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis. Int J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 97: 110\u2013114.","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR20","first-page":"151","volume":"179","author":"C.W. Schauberger","year":"1994","unstructured":"Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Beguin EA, Schaper AM, Spindler J. Evaluating the 30 minute interval in emergency caesarean sections. Am J Surg 1994; 179: 151\u2013155.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"245_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14","volume":"108","author":"S.L. Bloom","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bloom SL, Leveno Kenneth, Spong CY et al. Decision to incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet & Gynecol 2006; 108: 6\u201311","journal-title":"Obstet & Gynecol"},{"key":"245_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.00491.x","volume":"109","author":"W.H. Helmy","year":"2002","unstructured":"Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision to delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? BJOG 2002; 109: 505\u2013508.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"245_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01323.x","volume":"109","author":"I.Z. MacKenzie","year":"2002","unstructured":"MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision to delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG 2002; 109: 498\u2013504.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"245_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1334","volume":"322","author":"I.Z. Mackenzie","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mackenzie IZ, Cooke I. Prospective 12 months study of 30 minute decision to delivery interval for \u2018emergency\u2019 caesarean section. BMJ 2001; 322: 1334\u20131335","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["The Indian Journal of Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T23:54:15Z","timestamp":1559433255000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}},"alternative-id":["245"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12098-008-0245-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0019-5456","0973-7693"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0019-5456","type":"print"},{"value":"0973-7693","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}}}