{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T16:36:11Z","timestamp":1791909371015,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]],"date-time":"2023-11-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1699488000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]],"date-time":"2023-11-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1699488000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"name":"JSPS KAKENHI","award":["20K16781"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["20K16781"]}]},{"name":"Japan's MEXT KAKENHI","award":["18K18412"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["18K18412"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann Nucl Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]],"date-time":"2023-11-09T12:02:11Z","timestamp":1699531331000},"page":"131-138","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparative study of physiological FDG uptake in small structures between silicon photomultiplier-based PET and conventional PET"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Shiro","family":"Watanabe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0036-8975","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kenji","family":"Hirata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keiichi","family":"Magota","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Junki","family":"Takenaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naoto","family":"Wakabayashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daiki","family":"Shinyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koichi","family":"Yasuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akihiro","family":"Homma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kohsuke","family":"Kudo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"1884_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frach T, Prescher G, Degenhardt C, de Gruyter R, Schmitz A, Ballizany R. The digital silicon photomultiplier \u2014 Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance. 2009 IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec NSSMIC. 2009. p. 1959\u201365.","DOI":"10.1109\/NSSMIC.2009.5402143"},{"key":"1884_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2021.629096","volume":"8","author":"O Delcroix","year":"2021","unstructured":"Delcroix O, Bourhis D, Keromnes N, Robin P, Le Roux P-Y, Abgral R, et al. Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability With Digital PET\/CT System. Front Med. 2021;8: 629096.","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"key":"1884_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1745","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0","volume":"46","author":"F Fuentes-Ocampo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fuentes-Ocampo F, L\u00f3pez-Mora DA, Flotats A, Paillahueque G, Camacho V, Duch J, et al. Digital vs analog PET\/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1745\u201350.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-017-3727-z","volume":"44","author":"CS Van Der Vos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Van Der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, Arends AJ, Boellaard R, Van Dalen JA, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:4\u201316.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-020-01489-0","volume":"34","author":"I Kojima","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kojima I, Takanami K, Ogawa T, Sakamoto M, Nagai H, Miyashita H, et al. High detection sensitivity and reliable morphological correlation of PET with a silicon photomultiplier for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:643\u201352.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s13139-020-00661-8","volume":"54","author":"SH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim SH, Song B-I, Kim HW, Won KS. Comparison of Image Quality and Semi-quantitative Measurements with Digital PET\/CT and Standard PET\/CT from Different Vendors. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;54:233\u201340.","journal-title":"Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s13550-018-0448-7","volume":"8","author":"J Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang J, Maniawski P, Knopp MV. Performance evaluation of the next generation solid-state digital photon counting PET\/CT system. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:97.","journal-title":"EJNMMI Res"},{"key":"1884_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-019-0377-6","volume":"19","author":"J Oddstig","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oddstig J, Leide Svegborn S, Almquist H, Bitz\u00e9n U, Garpered S, Hedeer F, et al. Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19:81.","journal-title":"BMC Med Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1383","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-019-4260-z","volume":"46","author":"DA L\u00f3pez-Mora","year":"2019","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez-Mora DA, Flotats A, Fuentes-Ocampo F, Camacho V, Fern\u00e1ndez A, Ruiz A, et al. Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET\/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1383\u201390.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-020-01500-8","volume":"34","author":"K Miwa","year":"2020","unstructured":"Miwa K, Wagatsuma K, Nemoto R, Masubuchi M, Kamitaka Y, Yamao T, et al. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET\/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:762\u201371.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0105682","volume":"9","author":"K Hirata","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hirata K, Kobayashi K, Wong K-P, Manabe O, Surmak A, Tamaki N, et al. A semi-automated technique determining the liver standardized uptake value reference for tumor delineation in FDG PET-CT. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e105682.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1884_CR12","first-page":"547","volume":"52","author":"SH Hyun","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hyun SH, Choi JY, Lee K-H, Choe YS, Kim B-T. Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary gland: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2011;52:547\u201350.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-014-2844-1","volume":"41","author":"J Kunikowska","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kunikowska J, Matyskiel R, Toutounchi S, Grabowska-Derlatka L, Koperski L, Kr\u00f3licki L. What parameters from 18F-FDG PET\/CT are useful in evaluation of adrenal lesions? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2273\u201380.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"1884_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E81","DOI":"10.1002\/ajh.26073","volume":"96","author":"A Higgins","year":"2021","unstructured":"Higgins A, Kim H, Harper L, Habermann TM, Nowakowski GS, Thompson CA, et al. Testicular FDG-PET\/CT uptake threshold in aggressive lymphomas. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:E81\u20133.","journal-title":"Am J Hematol"},{"key":"1884_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-014-3456-0","volume":"60","author":"J Stagg","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stagg J, Farukhi I, Lazaga F, Thompson C, Bradshaw L, Kaif M, et al. Significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of PET to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1335\u201342.","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"key":"1884_CR16","first-page":"129","volume":"61","author":"J van Sluis","year":"2020","unstructured":"van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Somasundaram A, van Snick PH, Borra RJH, Dierckx RAJO, et al. Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements on the Biograph Vision PET\/CT System: Initial Experiences and Comparison with the Biograph mCT. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2020;61:129\u201335.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1186\/s40658-020-00337-4","volume":"7","author":"K Wagatsuma","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wagatsuma K, Sakata M, Ishibashi K, Hirayama A, Kawakami H, Miwa K, et al. Direct comparison of brain [18F]FDG images acquired by SiPM-based and PMT-based PET\/CT: phantom and clinical studies. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:70.","journal-title":"EJNMMI Phys"},{"key":"1884_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-020-01496-1","volume":"34","author":"Y Tsutsui","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tsutsui Y, Awamoto S, Himuro K, Kato T, Baba S, Sasaki M. Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET\/CT and PMT-PET\/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:725\u201335.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-022-01758-0","volume":"36","author":"TL de Jong","year":"2022","unstructured":"de Jong TL, Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Tegelaar A, van Dijk JD, Stevens H, et al. Performance of digital PET\/CT compared with conventional PET\/CT in oncologic patients: a prospective comparison study. Ann Nucl Med. 2022;36:756\u201364.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"1884_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-021-01608-5","volume":"35","author":"P-A Zimmermann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zimmermann P-A, Houdu B, C\u00e9saire L, Nakouri I, De Pontville M, Lasnon C, et al. Revisiting detection of in-transit metastases in melanoma patients using digital 18F-FDG PET\/CT with small-voxel reconstruction. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35:669\u201379.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"}],"container-title":["Annals of Nuclear Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,31]],"date-time":"2024-01-31T16:09:42Z","timestamp":1706717382000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["1884"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12149-023-01884-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0914-7187","1864-6433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0914-7187","type":"print"},{"value":"1864-6433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 October 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 November 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Daiki Shinyama was an employee of Philips Japan, Ltd. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest in regard to this manuscript.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}