{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T01:15:55Z","timestamp":1767143755184,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]],"date-time":"2017-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1490227200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]],"date-time":"2017-03-23T05:24:02Z","timestamp":1490246642000},"page":"147-152","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"I.","family":"David Kaye","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alan S.","family":"Hilibrand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"9396_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1227\/01.neu.0000489800.11738.0d","volume":"63","author":"BW Burkhardt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Burkhardt BW, Brielmeier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM. 311 smith-Robinson procedure with an autologous iliac crest bone graft with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for soft cervical disc herniation: report of 122 patients with an average follow-up of 25 years. Neurosurgery. 2016;63(Suppl 1):189\u201390.","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"9396_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200404000-00001","volume":"17","author":"J Goffin","year":"2004","unstructured":"Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spin Disorders Tech. 2004;17:79\u201385.","journal-title":"J Spin Disorders Tech"},{"key":"9396_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199309000-00005","volume":"75","author":"HH Bohlman","year":"1993","unstructured":"Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy: long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. JBJS (Am). 1993;75:1298\u2013307.","journal-title":"JBJS (Am)"},{"key":"9396_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199904000-00009","volume":"81","author":"AS Hilibrand","year":"1999","unstructured":"\u2022 Hilibrand AS, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. JBJS Am. 1999;81:519\u201328. Landmark study evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and radiographic progression of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease through a review of 374 patients (409 ACDF) with up to 21 year follow up. Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease occurred at 2.9% annually during the first ten post-operative years with 25.6% of patients predicted to develop ASD during that time. The authors found a reduced risk of ASD for multilevel fusions compared to single level (p<0.001).","journal-title":"JBJS Am"},{"key":"9396_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E571","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000846","volume":"40","author":"JC Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Lee JC, Lee SH, Peters C, Riew D. Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine. 2015;40:E571\u20137. Single surgeon series of 1038 patients undergoing ACDF which found a rate of adjacent segment re-operation of 2.4% annually and a 22.2% chance of requiring an operation 10 years after ACDF. Risk factors for re-operation were smoking, female sex, and fewer fusion levels (one or two vs three).","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769","volume":"15","author":"D Coric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:348.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09513","volume":"13","author":"JK Burkus","year":"2010","unstructured":"Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:308\u201318.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006","volume":"9","author":"D Murrey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9:275\u201386.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9396_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00476","volume":"93","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, et al. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1684\u201392.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"9396_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2253","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000052","volume":"38","author":"K Verma","year":"2013","unstructured":"Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff KE. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single level fusion. Meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine. 2013;38:2253\u20137.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","volume":"40","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, PC MA. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2015;40:674\u201383. 7 year follow up data from the IDE study of the PCM Cervical Disc (68 patients) compared to ACDF (42 patients) for single level degenerative cervical disease with radiculopathy and\/or myelopathy. PCM patients showed greater improvement in neck pain and neck disability scores and trended toward fewer secondary surgical surgeries. Although RASP was more frequent after ACDF (33.1% PCM, 50.9% ACDF; P=0.006), a direct correlation to clinical symptoms could not be drawn.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","volume":"21","author":"JK Burkus","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid Jr RW, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:516\u201328. 7 year follow up of IDE study for Prestige Cervical Disc (212 patients) compared to ACDF (182 patients) for single level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. There were statistically significant improvements in neck disability scores and in neurological status for the CDA compared to ACDF cohorts but only a trend towards reduced secondary procedures at adjacent levels.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR13","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. IJSS."},{"key":"9396_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","volume":"97","author":"ME Janssen","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022\u2022 Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden II BV, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven year follow-up of the prospective randomized US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. JBJS Am. 2015;97:1738\u201347. 7 year follow up IDE study of the ProDisc-C (103 patients) compared to ACDF (106 patients). 22 procedures in 13 patients were performed for adjacent segments in the ACDF cohort compared to only six procedures in six patients in the ProDisc-C cohort (p=0.01).","journal-title":"JBJS Am"},{"key":"9396_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199072080-00008","volume":"72","author":"SD Boden","year":"1990","unstructured":"Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. JBJS Am. 1990;72:1178\u201384.","journal-title":"JBJS Am."},{"key":"9396_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B1.7929","volume":"80","author":"M Matsumoto","year":"1998","unstructured":"Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. JBJS Br. 1998;80:19\u201324.","journal-title":"JBJS Br"},{"key":"9396_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819c2003","volume":"34","author":"E Okada","year":"2009","unstructured":"Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Hashimoto T, Ogawa J, Watanabe M, Takahata T. Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine. 2009;34:706\u201312.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190S","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.007","volume":"4","author":"AS Hilibrand","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4:190S\u20134S.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9396_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d","volume":"35","author":"M Matsumoto","year":"2010","unstructured":"Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine. 2010;35:36\u201343.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199015100-00009","volume":"15","author":"HN Herkowitz","year":"1990","unstructured":"Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP. Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine. 1990;15:1026\u201330.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1227\/00006123-198311000-00004","volume":"13","author":"CM Henderson","year":"1983","unstructured":"Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey Jr HM, Shackelford EG. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:504\u201312.","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"9396_CR22","first-page":"1761","volume":"6","author":"JC Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee JC, Lee SH. Peters C, KD Riew. Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations. JBJS Am. 2014;6:1761\u20137.","journal-title":"JBJS Am"},{"key":"9396_CR23","first-page":"98","volume-title":"Clinical biomechanics of the spine","author":"AA White III","year":"1990","unstructured":"White III AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Ed. 2 ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1990. p. 98.","edition":"Ed. 2"},{"key":"9396_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822174b3","volume":"37","author":"PD Nunley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty. 2 to 4 year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine. 2012;37:445\u201351.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2013.07.028","volume":"21","author":"JS Song","year":"2014","unstructured":"Song JS, Choi BW, Song KJ. Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: comparison between fusion methods. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:794\u20138.","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"9396_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200503000-00012","volume":"87","author":"JB Park","year":"2005","unstructured":"Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:558\u201363.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"9396_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181913872","volume":"34","author":"A Nassr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, et al. Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine. 2009;34:189\u201392.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2431","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211150-00003","volume":"27","author":"JC Eck","year":"2002","unstructured":"Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431\u20134.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.006","volume":"10","author":"BW Cunningham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J. 2010;10:341\u20139.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9396_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000162441.23824.95","volume":"30","author":"AE Dmitriev","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2005;30:1165\u201372.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1388","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2014.06.013","volume":"82","author":"J Park","year":"2014","unstructured":"Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1388\u201393.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"9396_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199904010-00011","volume":"24","author":"S Matsunaga","year":"1999","unstructured":"Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine. 1999;24:670\u20135.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ec5c7d","volume":"36","author":"MP Kelly","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kelly MP, et al. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial. Spine. 2011;36:1171\u20139.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318150d121","volume":"21","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sasso RC, et al. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:393\u20139.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"9396_CR35","unstructured":"Fleck S, Langner S, Rosenstengel C, Kessler R, Matthes M, M\u00fcller J, Langner I, Marx S, Schroeder HWS. 3 Tesla kinematic MRI of the cervical spine for evaluation of adjacent level disease after monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty: results of 2-year follow-up. Spine."},{"issue":"suppl3","key":"9396_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1916-1","volume":"20","author":"CV Maldonado","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maldonado CV, Paz RD, Martin CB. Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(suppl3):403\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9396_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001537","volume":"41","author":"Y Zhu","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u2022 Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2016;41:1493\u2013502. Meta-analysis of RCT comparing CDA and ACDF (14 total studies, 3235 patients) with 2-7 year follow up which aimed to evaluate the differences in rates of ASD. In this study, CDA was superior to ACDF regarding ASD (RR 0.57, P\u200a=\u200a0.009) as well as lower rates of re-operation (RR 0.47, P\u200a=\u200a0.0002).","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9396_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.10.032","volume":"16","author":"MF Shriver","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shriver MF, Lubelski D, Sharma AM, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2016;16:168\u201381.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"e4171","key":"9396_CR39","first-page":"27","volume":"95","author":"L Kong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kong L, Cao J, Wang L, Shen Y. Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(e4171):27.","journal-title":"Medicine"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9447-y","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,18]],"date-time":"2017-10-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1508284800000}}],"container-title":["Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,17]],"date-time":"2017-05-17T02:12:32Z","timestamp":1494987152000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9396"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9396-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-973X","1935-9748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-973X","type":"print"},{"value":"1935-9748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]}}}