{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T11:20:58Z","timestamp":1785496858390,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]],"date-time":"2017-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1490227200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]],"date-time":"2017-03-23T15:27:12Z","timestamp":1490282832000},"page":"170-176","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Kristen","family":"Radcliff","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sean","family":"Siburn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hamadi","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Barrett","family":"Woods","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sheeraz","family":"Qureshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"18","key":"9399_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2533","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1982.03320430037027","volume":"247","author":"R Owen","year":"1982","unstructured":"Owen R. Reader bias. JAMA. 1982;247(18):2533\u20134.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"9399_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.14444\/3010","volume":"10","author":"MS Hisey","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u2022 Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical Total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:10. Multicenter prospective randomized IDE study in which 245 patients with cervical radiculopathy where enrolled and randomized to receive a single level Mobi-C CDR or ACDF. At 5\u00a0years, the CDR group showed maintained range of motion and significantly lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration and reoperation in comparison to the ACDF cohort","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"9399_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid Jr RW, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;1-13","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996"},{"key":"9399_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Argires PJ, Nian H, Harrell Jr FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;1-16","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589"},{"key":"9399_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gornet MF, McConnell J. R., Burkus J. K. et al. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus ACDF: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 24-month results. Paper presented at: 30th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society; October 2015, 2015; Chicago, IL.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.07.120"},{"issue":"10","key":"9399_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","volume":"40","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(10):674\u201383.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"8","key":"9399_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000822","volume":"40","author":"K Radcliff","year":"2015","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Zigler J, Zigler J. Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease. Spine. 2015;40(8):521\u20139.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"9399_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.8.SPINE15219","volume":"24","author":"RJ Jackson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA, et al. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(5):734\u201345.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9399_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2022 Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016:1\u201312. This study analyzed the five-year prospective multicenter IDE trial which evaluated patients with cervical spondylosis at two contiguous levels and were treated with Mobi-C CDR or ACDF. The CDR cohort reported significantly better outcomes (Neck Disability Index, SF-12 PCS, overall satisfaction) and had a lower reoperation rate than those treated with ACDF.","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15824"},{"issue":"6","key":"9399_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001263","volume":"41","author":"JE Zigler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Rogers RW, Ohnmeiss DD. Comparison of 1-level versus 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiographic follow-up at 60 months. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(6):463\u20139.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000185","volume":"28","author":"MS Hisey","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(4):237\u201343.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.07.436","volume":"16","author":"SW Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim SW, Paik SH, Oh JK, Kwak YH, Lee HW, You KH. The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement. Spine J. 2016;16(4):470\u20139.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31826a0c84","volume":"28","author":"JA Rihn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rihn JA, Radcliff K, Hipp J, et al. Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(3):106\u201313.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"1","key":"9399_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1037\/a0027128","volume":"17","author":"HR Rothstein","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rothstein HR, Bushman BJ. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012). Psychol Methods. 2012;17(1):129\u201336.","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"issue":"1","key":"9399_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-2-18","volume":"2","author":"TJ Clifford","year":"2002","unstructured":"Clifford TJ, Barrowman NJ, Moher D. Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):18.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.12.003","volume":"10","author":"BK Weiner","year":"2010","unstructured":"Weiner BK, Weiner JP, Smith HE. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance? Spine J. 2010;10(3):209\u201311.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"Pt 9","key":"9399_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1964","DOI":"10.1093\/brain\/123.9.1964","volume":"123","author":"PM Rothwell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rothwell PM, Martyn CN. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? Brain. 2000;123(Pt 9):1964\u20139.","journal-title":"Brain"},{"issue":"5","key":"9399_CR18","first-page":"1010","volume":"89","author":"JR Lynch","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):1010\u20138.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e10072","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010072","volume":"5","author":"RL Kravitz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Gerrity M, Byrne C, Tierney WM. Editorial peer reviewers\u2019 recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10072.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"9399_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ding F, Jia Z, Zhao Z, et al. Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Eur Spine J. 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4714-y"},{"issue":"9","key":"9399_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2023","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4096-6","volume":"24","author":"J Kang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kang J, Shi C, Gu Y, Yang C, Gao R. Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(9):2023\u201332.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12315","volume":"84","author":"P Thavaneswaran","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thavaneswaran P, Vandepeer M. Lumbar artificial intervertebral disc replacement: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(3):121\u20137.","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"S1","key":"9399_CR23","first-page":"59","volume":"3","author":"PV Mummaneni","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Amin BY, Wu JC, Brodt ED, Dettori JR, Sasso RC. Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing long-term follow-up results from two FDA trials. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3(S1):59\u201366.","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J."},{"issue":"S1","key":"9399_CR24","first-page":"31","volume":"3","author":"R Lehman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lehman R, Bevevino AJ, Brewer DD, Skelly AC, Anderson PA. A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3(S1):31\u20138.","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J."},{"issue":"S1","key":"9399_CR25","first-page":"19","volume":"3","author":"CK Kepler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kepler CK, Brodt ED, Dettori JR, Albert TJ. Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3(S1):19\u201330.","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J."},{"issue":"S1","key":"9399_CR26","first-page":"9","volume":"3","author":"PA Anderson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Hashimoto R. Total disc replacement in the cervical spine: a systematic review evaluating long-term safety. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3(S1):9\u201318.","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9399_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1583-7","volume":"20","author":"I Zechmeister","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(2):177\u201384.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"9399_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1445-3","volume":"19","author":"KD Eerenbeemt van den","year":"2010","unstructured":"van den Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, van Royen BJ, Peul WC, van Tulder MW. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(8):1262\u201380.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"9399_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S439","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-006-0186-9","volume":"15","author":"BJ Freeman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 3):S439\u201347.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9399_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-002-0500-0","volume":"12","author":"M Kleuver de","year":"2003","unstructured":"de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(2):108\u201316.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9399_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28857","DOI":"10.3402\/ljm.v10.28857","volume":"10","author":"OA Tashani","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tashani OA, El-Tumi H, Aneiba K. Quality of systematic reviews: an example of studies comparing artificial disc replacement with fusion in the cervical spine. Libyan J Med. 2015;10:28857.","journal-title":"Libyan J Med"},{"issue":"26","key":"9399_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2253","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000052","volume":"38","author":"K Verma","year":"2013","unstructured":"Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, et al. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2253\u20137.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"9399_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4707-5","volume":"474","author":"ZM Zhong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhong ZM, Zhu SY, Zhuang JS, Wu Q, Chen JT. Reoperation after cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(5):1307\u201316.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"9399_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj\/2015.18.E1","volume":"18","author":"L Manchikanti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, Hirsch JA. Medical journal peer review: process and bias. Pain Physician. 2015;18(1):E1\u2013E14.","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"8","key":"9399_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.15252\/embr.201540943","volume":"16","author":"DM Shaw","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shaw DM. Blinded by the light: anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees. EMBO Rep. 2015;16(8):894\u20137.","journal-title":"EMBO Rep"},{"issue":"12","key":"9399_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2229","DOI":"10.1185\/03007995.2011.624090","volume":"27","author":"JS Phillips","year":"2011","unstructured":"Phillips JS. Expert bias in peer review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(12):2229\u201333.","journal-title":"Curr Med Res Opin"},{"issue":"6","key":"9399_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.12013","volume":"21","author":"SJ O\u2019Connor","year":"2012","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor SJ. Peer review: problem or solution in relation to publication bias, transparency and the internationalisation of scientific research outputs? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(6):701\u20132.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)"},{"key":"9399_CR38","first-page":"21","volume":"4","author":"R Walker","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walker R, Barros B, Conejo R, Neumann K, Telefont M. Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study. F1000Res. 2015;4:21.","journal-title":"F1000Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"9399_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15824","volume":"25","author":"K Radcliff","year":"2016","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(2):213\u201324.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9399_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.14444\/3024","volume":"10","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell Jr FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP Disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:24.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"9399_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.06.018","volume":"8","author":"JD Auerbach","year":"2008","unstructured":"Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J. 2008;8(5):711\u20136.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2011.5.4.213","volume":"5","author":"M Quirno","year":"2011","unstructured":"Quirno M, Goldstein JA, Bendo JA, Kim Y, Spivak JM. The incidence of potential candidates for total disc replacement among lumbar and cervical fusion patient populations. Asian Spine J. 2011;5(4):213\u20139.","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"10","key":"9399_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827ecb1c","volume":"38","author":"J Oldenrijk van","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Oldenrijk J, van Berkel Y, Kerkhoffs GM, Bhandari M, Poolman RW. Do authors report surgical expertise in open spine surgery related randomized controlled trials? A systematic review on quality of reporting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(10):857\u201364.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"9399_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mancuso CA, Reid MC, Duculan R, Girardi FP. Improvement in pain after lumbar spine surgery: the role of preoperative expectations of pain relief. Clin J Pain. 2016.","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0000000000000383"},{"key":"9399_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mancuso CA, Duculan R, Cammisa FP, et al. Fulfillment of patients\u2019 expectations of lumbar and cervical spine surgery. Spine J. 2016.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.04.011"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11102412","volume":"259","author":"FG Miller","year":"2011","unstructured":"Miller FG, Kallmes DF, Buchbinder R. Vertebroplasty and the placebo response. Radiology. 2011;259(3):621\u20135.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyt270","volume":"43","author":"A Hrobjartsson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hrobjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):937\u201348.","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E201","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.120744","volume":"185","author":"A Hrobjartsson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hrobjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors. CMAJ. 2013;185(4):E201\u201311.","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"9399_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1119","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e1119","volume":"344","author":"A Hrobjartsson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hrobjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, et al. Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ. 2012;344:e1119.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"9399_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005","volume":"12","author":"K Singh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK, Pelton MA, An HS, Goldberg EJ. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J. 2012;12(5):372\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9399_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laxer EB, Brigham CD, Darden BV, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration following ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): does surgeon bias effect radiographic interpretation? Eur Spine J. 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4780-1"},{"issue":"9","key":"9399_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.05.018","volume":"15","author":"N Evaniew","year":"2015","unstructured":"Evaniew N, van der Watt L, Bhandari M, et al. Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey. Spine J. 2015;15(9):2066\u201376.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"12","key":"9399_CR53","first-page":"E205","volume":"37","author":"SN Khan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Khan SN, Mermer MJ, Myers E, Sandhu HS. The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008;37(12):E205\u201312. discussion E212","journal-title":"Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)"},{"issue":"9","key":"9399_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000161004.15308.b4","volume":"30","author":"RV Shah","year":"2005","unstructured":"Shah RV, Albert TJ, Bruegel-Sanchez V, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Grauer JN. Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(9):1099\u2013104. discussion 1105","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9399_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.047","volume":"14","author":"AR Amiri","year":"2014","unstructured":"Amiri AR, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey AT. Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? Spine J. 2014;14(2):308\u201314.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"9399_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1647","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.00224","volume":"92","author":"S Noordin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Noordin S, Wright JG, Howard A. Relationship between declared funding support and level of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(7):1647\u201351.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"9399_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200704000-00030","volume":"89","author":"K Okike","year":"2007","unstructured":"Okike K, Kocher MS. The legal and ethical issues surrounding financial conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):910\u20133.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00994","volume":"89","author":"K Okike","year":"2007","unstructured":"Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M. Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):608\u201313.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"9399_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e54583","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0054583","volume":"8","author":"P Sune","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sune P, Sune JM, Montoro JB. Positive outcomes influence the rate and time to publication, but not the impact factor of publications of clinical trial results. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54583.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"8","key":"9399_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.3109\/02713683.2014.957777","volume":"40","author":"M Mimouni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mimouni M, Krauthammer M, Gershoni A, Mimouni F, Nesher R. Positive results bias and impact factor in ophthalmology. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(8):858\u201361.","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"9399_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e104846","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0104846","volume":"9","author":"M Lent van","year":"2014","unstructured":"van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104846.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"9399_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pais P. Commercial conflict of interest and medical publication: what should the practising physician do about it?. Indian J Med Ethics. 2016;-(-):1\u20132.","DOI":"10.20529\/IJME.2016.066"},{"issue":"3","key":"9399_CR63","first-page":"167","volume":"1","author":"M Wilson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wilson M. The New England Journal of Medicine: commercial conflict of interest and revisiting the Vioxx scandal. Indian J Med Ethics. 2016;1(3):167\u201371.","journal-title":"Indian J Med Ethics"},{"key":"9399_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macklin R. Conflict of interest and bias in publication. Indian J Med Ethics. 2016;-(\u2212):1\u20134.","DOI":"10.20529\/IJME.2016.063"},{"issue":"6","key":"9399_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0127362","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0127362","volume":"10","author":"SJ Janssen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Janssen SJ, Bredenoord AL, Dhert W, de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Verlaan JJ. Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journals. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127362.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"6","key":"9399_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.06.001","volume":"11","author":"EJ Carragee","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carragee EJ, Ghanayem AJ, Weiner BK, Rothman DJ, Bono CM. A challenge to integrity in spine publications: years of living dangerously with the promotion of bone growth factors. Spine J. 2011;11(6):463\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"9399_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.04.023","volume":"11","author":"EJ Carragee","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471\u201391.","journal-title":"Spine J"}],"container-title":["Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,26]],"date-time":"2022-07-26T20:36:35Z","timestamp":1658867795000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9399"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9399-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-973X","1935-9748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-973X","type":"print"},{"value":"1935-9748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,23]]}}}