{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T13:57:39Z","timestamp":1775743059591,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]],"date-time":"2017-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1490140800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]],"date-time":"2017-03-22T06:10:56Z","timestamp":1490163056000},"page":"189-198","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Pintauro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Duffy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Payman","family":"Vahedi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Rymarczuk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Heller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1093\/clinids\/1.5.754","volume":"1","author":"FL Sapico","year":"1979","unstructured":"Sapico FL, Montgomerie JZ. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1979;1(5):754\u201376.","journal-title":"Rev Infect Dis"},{"issue":"10","key":"9401_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E609","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318240d57d","volume":"37","author":"C Ammendolia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ammendolia C, Stuber K, de Bruin LK, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA, Rampersaud YR, et al. Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review. Spine. 2012;37(10):E609\u201316. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318240d57d\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2005.53254.x","volume":"53","author":"Y Chang","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chang Y, Singer DE, Wu YA, Keller RB, Atlas SJ. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(5):785\u201392. doi:\n10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2005.53254.x\n\n.","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc"},{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200003010-00005","volume":"25","author":"SJ Atlas","year":"2000","unstructured":"Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2000;25(5):556\u201362.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"14","key":"9401_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d","volume":"35","author":"JN Weinstein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 2010;35(14):1329\u201338. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"9401_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","volume":"32","author":"A Malmivaara","year":"2007","unstructured":"Malmivaara A, Sl\u00e4tis P, Heli\u00f6vaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(1):1\u20138. doi:\n10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"9401_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD001352","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.01.003","volume":"19","author":"JNA Gibson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gibson JNA, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;19(4):CD001352. doi:\n10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.01.003\n\n.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"9401_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.07.004","volume":"124","author":"F Puzzilli","year":"2014","unstructured":"Puzzilli F, Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Panagiotopoulos K, Bolognini A, et al. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;124:166\u201374. doi:\n10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.07.004\n\n.","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"9401_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Huang W, Chang Z, Zhang J, Song R, Yu X. Interspinous process stabilization with rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 16:328. doi:\n10.1186\/s12891-015-0786-9\n\n.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0786-9"},{"issue":"2","key":"9401_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000691","volume":"40","author":"G L\u00f8nne","year":"2015","unstructured":"L\u00f8nne G, Johnsen LG, Rossvoll I, Andresen H, Storheim K, Zwart JA, et al. Minimally invasive decompression versus X-Stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Spine. 2015a;40(2):77\u201385. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000691\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"9401_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0492-x","volume":"17","author":"OJ Verhoof","year":"2008","unstructured":"Verhoof OJ, Bron JL, Wapstra FH, et al. High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(2):188\u201392.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-0945-7","volume":"17","author":"D Daentzer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Daentzer D, Hurschler C, Seehaus F, Noll C, Schwarze M. Posterior dynamic stabilization in the lumbar spine\u201424 months results of a prospective clinical and radiological study with an interspinous distraction device. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:90. doi:\n10.1186\/s12891-016-0945-7\n\n.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"10","key":"9401_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2156","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3487-4","volume":"23","author":"GDJ Marsh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Marsh GDJ, Mahir S, Leyte A. A prospective randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine with the Wallis ligament. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(10):2156\u201360. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-014-3487-4\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"9401_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.12.016","volume":"22","author":"Y Jiang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jiang Y, Che W, Wang H, Li R, Li X, Dong J. Minimum 5 year follow-up of multi-segmental lumbar degenerative disease treated with discectomy and the Wallis interspinous device. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(7):1144\u20139. doi:\n10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.12.016\n\n.","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"8","key":"9401_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1304","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1697-6","volume":"20","author":"J Buric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Buric J, Pulidori M. Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1304\u201311. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-011-1697-6\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lu K, Liliang P-C, Wang H-K, Liang C-L, Chen J-S, Chen T-B, et al. Reduction in adjacent-segment degeneration after multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion with proximal DIAM implantation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(2):190\u20136. doi:\n10.3171\/2014.12.SPINE14666\n\n.","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.12.SPINE14666"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"9401_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S20","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1753-2","volume":"20","author":"AP Fabrizi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fabrizi AP, Maina R, Schiabello L. Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and aperius devices. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 1):S20\u20136. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-011-1753-2\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9401_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1177\/1591019915622163","volume":"22","author":"S Masala","year":"2016","unstructured":"Masala S, Marcia S, Taglieri A, Chiaravalloti A, Calabria E, Raguso M, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with aperius\u2122 PerCLID\u2122 system and Falena\u00ae interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22(2):217\u201326. doi:\n10.1177\/1591019915622163\n\n.","journal-title":"Interv Neuroradiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"9401_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2015","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2790-9","volume":"22","author":"F Beyer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Beyer F, Yagdiran A, Neu P, Kaulhausen T, Eysel P, Sobottke R. Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(9):2015\u201321. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-013-2790-9\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.14444\/2015","volume":"9","author":"HW Bae","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022 Bae HW, Lauryssen C, Maislin G, Leary S, Musacchio MJ. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:15. doi:\n10.14444\/2015\n\n. Four-year RCT demonstrating the viability of the Coflex interlaminar device for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"9401_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2014.8.2.161","volume":"8","author":"N Kumar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kumar N, Shah SM, Ng YH, Pannierselvam VK, DasDe S, Shen L. Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(2):161. doi:\n10.4184\/asj.2014.8.2.161\n\n.","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.08.069","volume":"85","author":"N Lee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee N, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Shin HC, et al. Paradoxical radiographic changes of coflex interspinous device with minimum 2-year follow-up in lumbar spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:177\u201384. doi:\n10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.08.069\n\n.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000735","volume":"40","author":"VV Patel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patel VV, Whang PG, Haley TR, Bradley WD, Nunley PD, Davis RP, et al. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial. Spine. 2015a;40(5):275\u201382. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000735\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9401_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.2147\/JPR.S92633","volume":"8","author":"VV Patel","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022 Patel VV, Nunley PD, Whang PG, Haley TR, Bradley WD, Davis RP, et al. Superion(\u00ae) InterSpinous spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res. 2015b;8:657\u201362. doi:\n10.2147\/JPR.S92633\n\n. A 3-year RCT demonstrating the Superion device to provide clinical improvement in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.","journal-title":"J Pain Res"},{"key":"9401_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.2147\/CIA.S23656","volume":"6","author":"S Shabat","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shabat S, Miller LE, Block JE, Gepstein R. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer. Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:227\u201333. doi:\n10.2147\/CIA.S23656\n\n.","journal-title":"Clin Interv Aging"},{"key":"9401_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e176936","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/176936","volume":"2014","author":"A Alexandre","year":"2014","unstructured":"Alexandre A, Alexandre AM, De Pretto M, Coro L, Saggini R, et al. One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device, one-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:e176936. doi:\n10.1155\/2014\/176936\n\n.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"9401_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.14444\/1032","volume":"8","author":"W Yingsakmongkol","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yingsakmongkol W, Chaichankul C, Limthongkul W. Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2014;8:32. doi:\n10.14444\/1032\n\n.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e97142","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0097142","volume":"9","author":"AM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu AM, Zhou Y, Li QL, et al. Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97142. doi:\n10.1371\/journal.pone.0097142\n\n.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"8","key":"9401_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.053","volume":"14","author":"CG Patil","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u2022 Patil CG, Sarmiento JM, Ugiliweneza B, Mukherjee D, Nuno M, Liu JC, et al. Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1484\u201392. doi:\n10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.053\n\n. A retrospective comparative study analyzing complication rates, reoperation rates, and costs in patients receiving an IPD vs. laminectomy.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"10","key":"9401_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.08.419","volume":"11","author":"R Postacchini","year":"2011","unstructured":"Postacchini R, Ferrari E, Cinotti G, Menchetti PPM, Postacchini F. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2011;11(10):933\u20139. doi:\n10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.08.419\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"12","key":"9401_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2330-z","volume":"21","author":"JV Meirhaeghe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Meirhaeghe JV, Fransen P, Morelli D, Craig NJA, Godde G, Mihalyi A, et al. Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS\u00ae. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(12):2565\u201372. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-012-2330-z\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9401_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2222-2","volume":"21","author":"MF Surace","year":"2012","unstructured":"Surace MF, Fagetti A, Fozzato S, Cherubino P. Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with aperius perclid interspinous system. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(1):69\u201374. doi:\n10.1007\/s00586-012-2222-2\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823509","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/823509","volume":"2012","author":"LE Miller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Miller LE, Block JE. Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:823509. doi:\n10.1155\/2012\/823509\n\n.","journal-title":"Pain Res Treat"},{"issue":"1","key":"9401_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.5812\/aapm.5173","volume":"2","author":"N Heyrani","year":"2012","unstructured":"Heyrani N, Picinic Norheim E, Elaine Ku Y, Nick SA. Interspinous process implantation for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;2(1):36\u201341. doi:\n10.5812\/aapm.5173\n\n.","journal-title":"Anesth Pain Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"9401_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-012-0986-z","volume":"23","author":"H-Y Kim","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kim H-Y, Choi B-W. Change of radiological parameters after interspinous implantation (X-stop\u00ae) in degenerative spinal stenosis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012;23(3):281\u20135. doi:\n10.1007\/s00590-012-0986-z\n\n.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"17","key":"9401_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ba413","volume":"38","author":"BH Str\u00f6mqvist","year":"2013","unstructured":"Str\u00f6mqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, M\u00f6ller A, Sahlstrand T, et al. X-Stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2013;38(17):1436\u201342. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ba413\n\n. This study compared X-STOP with decompressive surgery and found a greater need for reoperation in patients receiving X-stop.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"9401_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318227ea2b","volume":"26","author":"A Nandakumar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nandakumar A, Clark NA, Smith FW, Wardlaw D. Two-year results of X-stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(1):1\u20137. doi:\n10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318227ea2b\n\n.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"5","key":"9401_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.5137\/1019-5149.JTN.9465-13.0","volume":"24","author":"B Pan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pan B, Zhang Z-J, Lu Y-S, Xu W-G, Fu C-D. Experience with the second-generation Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization device implanted in degenerative lumbar disease: a case series of 50 patients. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(5):713\u20139. doi:\n10.5137\/1019-5149.JTN.9465-13.0\n\n.","journal-title":"Turk Neurosurg"},{"issue":"10","key":"9401_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1038\/sc.2014.100","volume":"52","author":"G Grasso","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grasso G, Giambartino F, Iacopino DG. Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(10):740\u20133. doi:\n10.1038\/sc.2014.100\n\n.","journal-title":"Spinal Cord"},{"key":"9401_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S59194","volume":"6","author":"J Schmier","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schmier J, Halevi M, Maislin G, Ong K. Comparative cost effectiveness of Coflex & interlaminar stabilization versus instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:125\u201331. doi:\n10.2147\/CEOR.S59194\n\n.","journal-title":"Clinicoecon Outcomes Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"9401_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E14","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.FOCUS15244","volume":"39","author":"R Gazzeri","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Fiore C, Faiola A, Puzzilli F, et al. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(4):E14. doi:\n10.3171\/2015.7.FOCUS15244\n\n.","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"4","key":"9401_CR42","first-page":"6097","volume":"8","author":"X Liu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Liu X, Liu Y, Lian X, Xu J. Magnetic resonance imaging on disc degeneration changes after implantation of an interspinous spacer and fusion of the adjacent segment. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6097\u2013102.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"issue":"22","key":"9401_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.9722.ebo101","volume":"97","author":"P Huddleston","year":"2015","unstructured":"Huddleston P. X-stop resulted in a higher reoperation rate than minimally invasive decompression, but both decreased symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(22):1889. doi:\n10.2106\/JBJS.9722.ebo101\n\n.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"8","key":"9401_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000798","volume":"40","author":"G L\u00f8nne","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u2022 L\u00f8nne G, Johnsen LG, Aas E, Lydersen S, Andresen H, R\u00f8nning R, et al. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2015b;40(8):514\u201320. doi:\n10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000798\n\n. This randomized clinical trial was terminated early because of high complication rate in the X-STOP group (33%).","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9401_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0561-y","volume":"16","author":"K Wang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wang K, Zhu Z, Wang B, Zhu Y, Liu H. Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:117. doi:\n10.1186\/s12891-015-0561-y\n\n.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"23","key":"9401_CR46","first-page":"4481","volume":"19","author":"Z-J Yue","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yue Z-J, Liu R-Y, Lu Y, Dong L-L, Li Y-Q, Lu EB. Middle-period curative effect of posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion (PLIF) and interspinous dynamic fixation (Wallis) for treatment of L45 degenerative disease and its influence on adjacent segment degeneration. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(23):4481\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"9401_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.10.017","volume":"16","author":"ME Van den Akker-van Marle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Van den Akker-van Marle ME, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLAM, Peul WC. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis. Spine J. 2016;16(6):702\u201310. doi:\n10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.10.017\n\n.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9401_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.92172","volume":"3","author":"NE Epstein","year":"2012","unstructured":"Epstein NE. A review of interspinous fusion devices: high complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:7. doi:\n10.4103\/2152-7806.92172\n\n.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"}],"container-title":["Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,17]],"date-time":"2017-05-17T02:14:28Z","timestamp":1494987268000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9401"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9401-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-973X","1935-9748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-973X","type":"print"},{"value":"1935-9748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]]}}}