{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T03:11:07Z","timestamp":1792638667470,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":100,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]],"date-time":"2025-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747440000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]],"date-time":"2025-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747440000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]],"date-time":"2025-05-17T03:24:04Z","timestamp":1747452244000},"page":"491-503","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Brynn","family":"Charron","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maia","family":"Ross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patrick","family":"Thornley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.06.008","volume":"20","author":"A Sivaganesan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sivaganesan A, Khan I, Pennings JS, Roth SG, Nolan ER, Oleisky ER, et al. Why are patients dissatisfied after spine surgery when improvements in disability and pain are clinically meaningful? Spine J. 2020;20(10):1535\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.06.008.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001211","volume":"41","author":"JZ Guzman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guzman JZ, Cutler HS, Connolly J, Skovrlj B, Mroz TE, Riew KD, et al. Patient-reported outcome instruments in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(5):429\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001211.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199801000-00020","volume":"86","author":"LJ DeLoach","year":"1998","unstructured":"DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(1):102\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000539-199801000-00020.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"9981_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100934","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2022.100934","volume":"2","author":"P Adhikari","year":"2022","unstructured":"Adhikari P, \u00c7etin E, \u00c7etinkaya M, Nabi V, Y\u00fcksel S, Vila Casademunt A, et al. Ability of visual analogue scale to predict Oswestry disability index improvement and surgical treatment decision in patients with adult spinal deformity. Brain Spine. 2022;2:100934. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bas.2022.100934.","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"9981_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1860","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.027","volume":"14","author":"FK Ruiz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ruiz FK, Bohl DD, Webb ML, Russo GS, Grauer JN. Oswestry disability index is a better indicator of lumbar motion than the visual analogue scale. Spine J. 2014;14(9):1860\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.027.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9981_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aoki Y, Sugiura S, Nakagawa K, Nakajima A, Takahashi H, Ohtori S, et al. Evaluation of nonspecific low back pain using a new detailed visual analogue scale for patients in motion, standing, and sitting: characterizing nonspecific low back pain in elderly patients. Pain Res Treat. 2012;680496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/680496.","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/680496"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2475-6","volume":"20","author":"H Takahashi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Takahashi H, Aoki Y, Saito J, Nakajima A, Sonobe M, Akatsu Y, et al. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar Canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-019-2475-6.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E29","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000657","volume":"40","author":"S Sugiura","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sugiura S, Aoki Y, Toyooka T, Shiga T, Otsuki K, Aikawa E, et al. Characteristics of low back pain in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis evaluated using a detailed visual analogue scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(1):E29\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000657.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE1732","volume":"28","author":"A MacDowall","year":"2018","unstructured":"MacDowall A, Skeppholm M, Robinson Y, Olerud C. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):227\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE1732.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x","volume":"67","author":"AS Zigmond","year":"1983","unstructured":"Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.","journal-title":"Acta Psychiatr Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.3171\/2023.12.SPINE23860","volume":"40","author":"N Deshpande","year":"2024","unstructured":"Deshpande N, Hadi M, Mansour TR, Telemi E, Hamilton T, Hu J, et al. The impact of anxiety and depression on lumbar spine surgical outcomes: a Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;40(6):741\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2023.12.SPINE23860.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9981_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.11.014","volume":"88","author":"O Adogwa","year":"2016","unstructured":"Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Cheng J, Bagley C. Pretreatment of anxiety before cervical spine surgery improves clinical outcomes: A prospective, single-institution experience. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:625\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.11.014.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.01.017","volume":"13","author":"O Adogwa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Bydon A, Cheng JS, et al. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery. Spine J. 2013;13(5):501\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.01.017.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"19","key":"9981_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1614","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000474","volume":"39","author":"O Adogwa","year":"2014","unstructured":"Adogwa O, Carr K, Fatemi P, Verla T, Gazcon G, Gottfried O, et al. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(19):1614\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000474.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568219845662","volume":"10","author":"LY Carreon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Carreon LY, Jespersen AB, St\u00f8ttrup CC, Hansen KH, Andersen MO. Is the hospital anxiety and depression scale associated with outcomes after lumbar spine surgery? Global Spine J. 2020;10(3):266\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568219845662.","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.3109\/02688697.2011.644821","volume":"26","author":"EC Maratos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Maratos EC, Trivedi R, Richards H, Seeley H, Laing RJ. Psychological distress does not compromise outcome in spinal surgery. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26(4):466\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/02688697.2011.644821.","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-3999(96)00216-4","volume":"42","author":"C Herrmann","year":"1997","unstructured":"Herrmann C. International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression Scale\u2013a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42(1):17\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-3999(96)00216-4.","journal-title":"J Psychosom Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4660-8","volume":"26","author":"L Tetreault","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, et al. The modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale: Establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(1):78\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-016-4660-8.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9981_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E115","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000591","volume":"31","author":"JM Rhee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rhee JM, Shi WJ, Cyriac M, Kim JY, Zhou F, Easley KA, et al. The P-mJOA: A patient-derived, self-reported outcome instrument for evaluating cervical myelopathy: comparison with the mJOA. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31(2):E115\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000591.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1595","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-024-00931-x","volume":"12","author":"OM Sergeenko","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sergeenko OM, Savin DM, Evsyukov AV, Burtsev AV. Reliability and validity of the pediatric adaptation of the mJOA scale for evaluating cervical spine disorders. Spine Deform. 2024;12(6):1595\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-024-00931-x.","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2016.10.3.488","volume":"10","author":"S Azhari","year":"2016","unstructured":"Azhari S, Azimi P, Shazadi S, Khayat Kashany H, Nayeb Aghaei H, Mohammadi HR. Surgical outcomes and correlation of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale and modified Japanese orthopedic association assessment scales in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(3):488\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4184\/asj.2016.10.3.488.","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"16","key":"9981_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002610","volume":"43","author":"PG Passias","year":"2018","unstructured":"Passias PG, Horn SR, Bortz CA, Ramachandran S, Burton DC, Protopsaltis T, et al. The relationship between improvements in myelopathy and sagittal realignment in cervical deformity surgery outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(16):1117\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002610.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"21","key":"9981_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001127","volume":"40","author":"L Tetreault","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tetreault L, Nouri A, Kopjar B, C\u00f4t\u00e9 P, Fehlings MG. The minimum clinically important difference of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(21):1653\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001127.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"9981_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wnsx.2023.100267","volume":"21","author":"AC Friesen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Friesen AC, Detombe SA, Doyle-Pettypiece P, Ng W, Gurr K, Bailey C, et al. Characterizing mJOA-defined post-surgical recovery patterns in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. World Neurosurg X. 2024;21:100267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wnsx.2023.100267.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg X"},{"key":"9981_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102853","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2024.102853","volume":"4","author":"C Treanor","year":"2024","unstructured":"Treanor C, Gallagher C, Lenehan W, Gantly H, Bolger C, Malone A. Flipping the mJOA: clinical utility of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score as a tool for detecting degenerative cervical myelopathy. Brain Spine. 2024;4:102853. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bas.2024.102853.","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"9981_CR26","first-page":"271","volume":"66","author":"JC Fairbank","year":"1980","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O\u2019Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271\u20133.","journal-title":"Physiotherapy"},{"issue":"22","key":"9981_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","volume":"25","author":"JC Fairbank","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940\u201352.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.9.SPINE13344","volume":"20","author":"JC Fairbank","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fairbank JC. Why are there different versions of the Oswestry disability index?? J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(1):83\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.9.SPINE13344.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.09.020","volume":"17","author":"DS Brodke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brodke DS, Goz V, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Neese A, Hung M. Oswestry disability index: a psychometric analysis with 1,610 patients. Spine J. 2017;17(3):321\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.09.020.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-023-02307-w","volume":"24","author":"K Koivunen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Koivunen K, Widbom-Kolhanen S, Pernaa K, Arokoski J, Saltychev M. Reliability and validity of Oswestry disability index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-023-02307-w.","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006","volume":"8","author":"AG Copay","year":"2008","unstructured":"Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry disability index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008;8(6):968\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1177\/02692155241296802","volume":"39","author":"M Selhorst","year":"2025","unstructured":"Selhorst M, Degenhart T, Jackowski M, Meyer S, Rospert A. The Oswestry disability index is not a good measure for low back pain in adolescents: A Rasch analysis of data from 200 people. Clin Rehabil. 2025;39(1):58\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02692155241296802.","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0527-3","volume":"17","author":"H Saberi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Saberi H, Isfahani AV. Higher preoperative Oswestry disability index is associated with better surgical outcome in upper lumbar disc herniations. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(1):117\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-007-0527-3.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9981_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E118","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003732","volume":"46","author":"CE Cook","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cook CE, Garcia AN, Wright A, Shaffrey C, Gottfried O. Measurement properties of the Oswestry disability index in recipients of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46(2):E118\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003732.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004960","volume":"49","author":"O Jalali","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jalali O, Smith JS, Bess S, Hostin R, Lafage R, Lafage V, et al. Validation of the Oswestry disability index in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024;49(10):682\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004960.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"9981_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.03.003","volume":"102","author":"A Jain","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jain A, Kebaish KM, Sciubba DM, Hassanzadeh H, Scheer JK, Neuman BJ, et al. Early patient-reported outcomes predict 3-year outcomes in operatively treated patients with adult spinal deformity. World Neurosurg. 2017;102:258\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.03.003.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"7","key":"9981_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmpt.2008.08.006","volume":"14","author":"H Vernon","year":"1991","unstructured":"Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.","journal-title":"J Manipulative Physiol Ther"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-015-2534-1","volume":"157","author":"J Sundseth","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sundseth J, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Nygaard OP, Andresen H, et al. The neck disability index (NDI) and its correlation with quality of life and mental health measures among patients with single-level cervical disc disease scheduled for surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(10):1807\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-015-2534-1.","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"issue":"8","key":"9981_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002373","volume":"43","author":"RJ Owen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Owen RJ, Zebala LP, Peters C, McAnany S. PROMIS physical function correlation with NDI and mJOA in the surgical cervical myelopathy patient population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(8):550\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002373.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"8","key":"9981_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0161593","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0161593","volume":"11","author":"R Donk","year":"2016","unstructured":"Donk R, Verbeek A, Verhagen W, Groenewoud H, Hosman A, Bartels R. The qualification of outcome after cervical spine surgery by patients compared to the neck disability index. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0161593. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0161593.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"23","key":"9981_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5415","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2024.2304644","volume":"46","author":"M Saltychev","year":"2024","unstructured":"Saltychev M, Pylk\u00e4s K, Karklins A, Juhola J. Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(23):5415\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2024.2304644.","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-3066-0","volume":"23","author":"J Wibault","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wibault J, \u00f6berg B, Dedering \u00c5, L\u00f6fgren H, Zsigmond P, Persson L, et al. Individual factors associated with neck disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy scheduled for surgery: a study on physical impairments, psychosocial factors, and life style habits. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(3):599\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-013-3066-0.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"9981_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001459","volume":"36","author":"TJ Hartman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hartman TJ, Nie JW, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Singh K. Neck disability index as a prognostic factor for outcomes following cervical disc replacement. Clin Spine Surg. 2023;36(8):310\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001459.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.06.002","volume":"9","author":"BA Young","year":"2009","unstructured":"Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the neck disability index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9(10):802\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.06.002.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22","volume":"31","author":"JA Cleland","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(5):598\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199206000-00002","volume":"30","author":"JE Ware","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473\u201383.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1080\/02688690902730731","volume":"23","author":"MR Guilfoyle","year":"2009","unstructured":"Guilfoyle MR, Seeley H, Laing RJ. The short form 36 health survey in spine disease\u2013validation against condition-specific measures. Br J Neurosurg. 2009;23(4):401\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02688690902730731.","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.79b1.1269","volume":"79","author":"M Grevitt","year":"1997","unstructured":"Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb J, Mulholland R, Shepperd J. The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(1):48\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.79b1.1269.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000049924.94414.BB","volume":"28","author":"F Schwab","year":"2003","unstructured":"Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M, Gamez L, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(6):602\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000049924.94414.BB.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2 Suppl","key":"9981_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2002.97.2.0180","volume":"97","author":"JT King","year":"2002","unstructured":"King JT, Roberts MS. Validity and reliability of the short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(2 Suppl):180\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/spi.2002.97.2.0180.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007","volume":"10","author":"LY Carreon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck disability index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(6):469\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9981_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682231200136","volume":"15","author":"R Chen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chen R, Liu J, Zhao Y, Diao Y, Chen X, Pan S, et al. Predictive value of preoperative short Form-36 survey scale for postoperative axial neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Global Spine J. 2025;15(2):540\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/21925682231200136.","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.11.SPINE181031","volume":"30","author":"K Kin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kin K, Yasuhara T, Tomita Y, Umakoshi M, Morimoto J, Date I. SF-36 scores predict postoperative delirium after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(6):777\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2018.11.SPINE181031.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"39","key":"9981_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e30231","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000030231","volume":"101","author":"S Ko","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ko S, Choi W. Usefulness of preoperative short Form-36 mental component score as a prognostic factor in patients who underwent decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Med (Baltim). 2022;101(39):e30231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000030231.","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"issue":"17","key":"9981_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000229252.30903.b9","volume":"31","author":"J Slover","year":"2006","unstructured":"Slover J, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and Oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17):1974\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000229252.30903.b9.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000200049.94329.f4","volume":"31","author":"SM Lai","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D, Estimating. SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(4):473\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000200049.94329.f4.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44","volume":"31","author":"A Singh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A. Quality of life assessment using the short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(6):639\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"11","key":"9981_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199411000-00004","volume":"32","author":"DA Ruta","year":"1994","unstructured":"Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated index. Med Care. 1994;32(11):1109\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005650-199411000-00004.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.8.1.22","volume":"8","author":"DA Ruta","year":"1999","unstructured":"Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Russell IT. Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Qual Health Care. 1999;8(1):22\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/qshc.8.1.22.","journal-title":"Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.013","volume":"17","author":"JK Scheer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Scheer JK, Keefe M, Lafage V, Kelly MP, Bess S, Burton DC, et al. Importance of patient-reported individualized goals when assessing outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD): initial experience with a patient generated index (PGI). Spine J. 2017;17(10):1397\u2013405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.013.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-020-00155-9","volume":"8","author":"B Lonner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lonner B, Castillo A, Jain A, Sponseller P, Samdani A, Kelly M, et al. The patient generated index and decision regret in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(6):1231\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-020-00155-9.","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.21885\/wvmj.2019.10","volume":"115","author":"P Dekeseredy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dekeseredy P, Marsh R, Sedney CL. Using the patient generated index in spine surgery in an Appalachian population. W V Med J. 2019;115(3):21\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21885\/wvmj.2019.10.","journal-title":"W V Med J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200301010-00015","volume":"28","author":"M Asher","year":"2003","unstructured":"Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):63\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200301010-00015.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b","volume":"30","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, Berven S, Glassman S, Farcy JP, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(4):455\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea","volume":"31","author":"MA Asher","year":"2006","unstructured":"Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(5):593\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200301010-00016","volume":"28","author":"M Asher","year":"2003","unstructured":"Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):70\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200301010-00016.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"20","key":"9981_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2220","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814cf120","volume":"32","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton WC, Lenke LG, et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2220\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814cf120.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"23","key":"9981_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2079","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c61fd7","volume":"35","author":"LY Carreon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sucato DJ, Sturm PF, Glassman SD, et al. The minimum clinically important difference in scoliosis research Society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(23):2079\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c61fd7.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"9981_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000761","volume":"40","author":"CH Crawford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(6):377\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000761.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181cabe75","volume":"35","author":"EC Parent","year":"2010","unstructured":"Parent EC, Wong D, Hill D, Mahood J, Moreau M, Raso VJ, et al. The association between scoliosis research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(3):315\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181cabe75.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"7","key":"9981_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2018.07.009","volume":"104","author":"H Yoshihara","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yoshihara H, Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Watanabe K. Relationship between sagittal radiographic parameters and disability in patients with spinal disease using 3D standing analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(7):1017\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2018.07.009.","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000280","volume":"39","author":"MD Daubs","year":"2014","unstructured":"Daubs MD, Hung M, Neese A, Hon SD, Lawrence BD, Patel AA, et al. Scoliosis research Society-22 results in 3052 healthy adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(10):826\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000280.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004620","volume":"48","author":"LE Stone","year":"2023","unstructured":"Stone LE, Upasani VV, Pahys JM, Fletcher ND, George SG, Shah SA, et al. SRS-22r Self-Image after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(10):683\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004620.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-021-00458-5","volume":"10","author":"TP Bastrom","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bastrom TP, Howard R, Bartley CE, Newton PO, Lenke LG, Sponseller PD, et al. Are patients who return for 10-year follow-up after AIS surgery different from those who do not? Spine Deform. 2022;10(3):527\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-021-00458-5.","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jspd.2018.05.010","volume":"7","author":"DN Bernstein","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bernstein DN, Papuga MO, Sanders JO, Rubery PT, Menga EN, Mesfin A. Evaluating the correlation and performance of PROMIS to SRS questionnaires in adult and pediatric spinal deformity patients. Spine Deform. 2019;7(1):118\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jspd.2018.05.010.","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.07.014","volume":"19","author":"M Raad","year":"2019","unstructured":"Raad M, Jain A, Huang M, Skolasky RL, Sciubba DM, Kebaish KM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of PROMIS in adult spinal deformity: the need for a self-image domain. Spine J. 2019;19(1):50\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.07.014.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.7.SPINE17661","volume":"28","author":"BS Boody","year":"2018","unstructured":"Boody BS, Bhatt S, Mazmudar AS, Hsu WK, Rothrock NE, Patel AA. Validation of Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):268\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.7.SPINE17661.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE18422","volume":"31","author":"RJ Owen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Owen RJ, Khan AZ, McAnany SJ, Peters C, Zebala LP. PROMIS correlation with NDI and VAS measurements of physical function and pain in surgical patients with cervical disc herniations and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(4):519\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE18422.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"9981_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000895","volume":"32","author":"ME Steinhaus","year":"2019","unstructured":"Steinhaus ME, Iyer S, Lovecchio F, Khechen B, Stein D, Ross T, et al. Minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit using PROMIS CAT in cervical spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(9):392\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000895.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000786","volume":"32","author":"B Khechen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khechen B, Patel DV, Haws BE, Cardinal KL, Guntin JA, Ahn J, et al. Evaluating the concurrent validity of PROMIS physical function in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(10):449\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000786.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00300","volume":"27","author":"S Bhatt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bhatt S, Boody BS, Savage JW, Hsu WK, Rothrock NE, Patel AA. Validation of Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system computer adaptive tests in lumbar disk herniation surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(3):95\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00300.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"21","key":"9981_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002648","volume":"43","author":"AA Patel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Patel AA, Dodwad SM, Boody BS, Bhatt S, Savage JW, Hsu WK, et al. Validation of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(21):1521\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002648.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"21","key":"9981_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1512","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002661","volume":"43","author":"TE Purvis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Purvis TE, Neuman BJ, Riley LH, Skolasky RL. Discriminant ability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients with lumbar degenerative disease undergoing decompression with or without arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(21):1512\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002661.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"9981_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.04.131","volume":"115","author":"M Sharma","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sharma M, Ugiliweneza B, Beswick J, Boakye M. Concurrent validity and comparative responsiveness of PROMIS-SF versus legacy measures in the cervical and lumbar spine population: longitudinal analysis from baseline to postsurgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:e664\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.04.131.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"11","key":"9981_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011","volume":"63","author":"D Cella","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005\u20132008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.10.009","volume":"22","author":"A Ziedas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ziedas A, Abed V, Bench C, Rahman T, Makhni MC. Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2022;22(4):646\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.10.009.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.8.SPINE18608","volume":"30","author":"BE Haws","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haws BE, Khechen B, Bawa MS, Patel DV, Bawa HS, Bohl DD, et al. The Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system in spine surgery: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):405\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2018.8.SPINE18608.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-021-07106-6","volume":"31","author":"PG Passias","year":"2022","unstructured":"Passias PG, Pierce KE, Krol O, Williamson T, Naessig S, Ahmad W, et al. Health-related quality of life measures in adult spinal deformity: can we replace the SRS-22 with PROMIS? Eur Spine J. 2022;31(5):1184\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07106-6.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"9981_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.8.SPINE191551","volume":"34","author":"A Ibaseta","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ibaseta A, Rahman R, Andrade NS, Skolasky RL, Kebaish KM, Sciubba DM, et al. Determining validity, discriminant ability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important differences for PROMIS in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;34(5):725\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2020.8.SPINE191551.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"9981_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e720","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000002190","volume":"42","author":"SL Mitchell","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mitchell SL, McLaughlin KH, Bachmann KR, Sponseller PD, Reider LM. Construct validity of pediatric PROMIS computerized adaptive testing measures in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(7):e720\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BPO.0000000000002190.","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"9981_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E162","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002796","volume":"44","author":"MJ Moses","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moses MJ, Tishelman JC, Stekas N, Jevotovsky DS, Vasquez-Montes D, Karia R, et al. Comparison of patient reported outcome measurement information system with neck disability index and visual analog scale in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(3):E162\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002796.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"12","key":"9981_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001965","volume":"42","author":"DS Brodke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Hung M. PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(12):921\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001965.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9981_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000097","volume":"39","author":"M Hung","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hung M, Hon SD, Franklin JD, Kendall RW, Lawrence BD, Neese A, et al. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(2):158\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000097.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9981_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.06.355","volume":"19","author":"M Hung","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hung M, Saltzman CL, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Kendall R, Spiker R, et al. Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), neck disability index (NDI) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders. Spine J. 2019;19(1):34\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.06.355.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9981_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-022-05428-y","volume":"165","author":"JW Nie","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nie JW, Hartman TJ, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Singh K. Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;165(2):325\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-022-05428-y.","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"9981_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e352","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.03.087","volume":"175","author":"JW Nie","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nie JW, Hartman TJ, Zheng E, Oyetayo OO, MacGregor KR, Federico VP, et al. Establishing minimum clinically important difference thresholds for physical function and pain in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2023;175:e352\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.03.087.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"9981_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.12.016","volume":"23","author":"M Squires","year":"2023","unstructured":"Squires M, Schultz L, Schwalb J, Park P, Chang V, Nerenz D, et al. Correlation of mJOA, PROMIS physical function, and patient satisfaction in patients with cervical myelopathy: an analysis of the Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) database. Spine J. 2023;23(4):550\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.12.016.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9981_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nguyen AA, Fabrigar LR, Visual Analog S. In: The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation [Internet].. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2018. [1797\u2013\u2009800]. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781506326139.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781506326139"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2027","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000419","volume":"476","author":"M Hung","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, et al. What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2027\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000419.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"9981_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2334","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001892","volume":"479","author":"RD Hays","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hays RD. Letter to the editor: what are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(10):2334\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001892.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"}],"container-title":["Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,6]],"date-time":"2025-09-06T14:44:25Z","timestamp":1757169865000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]]},"references-count":100,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["9981"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-025-09981-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-9748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-9748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 May 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 May 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"Maia Ross, Brynn Charron, and Patrick Thornley declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}]}}