{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T18:22:27Z","timestamp":1790706147625,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765756800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765756800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Tokai University, Isehara Campus"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiol Phys Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To minimize radiation exposure to the eye lens during head computed tomography examinations, we performed a high-precision Monte Carlo simulation using the particle and heavy ion transport code system to investigate the effects of gantry tilt angle and scan range on the dose to the lens and other radiosensitive organs. Utilizing a source model with a 2\u202fmm beam width, we visualized the sharp dose peak and the subsequent gradually attenuating tail in the dose distribution to the lens, quantitatively demonstrating that even minor adjustments in the tilt angle or slice position can markedly impact the lens dose. The tilt angle was defined relative to the orbitomeatal line; an upward tilt of +5\u02da or more reduced the lens dose by up to 87%. Additionally, a -35\u02da downward tilt substantially reduced the lens dose, which is attributed to the presence of high-attenuation tissues in the x-ray path. For organs such as the salivary glands, thyroid, and oral mucosa, scan range adjustments affect the effective dose, with up to a 1.5-fold difference observed depending on whether the eyeballs were included in the scan. These findings underscore the critical importance of a precise protocol design, including the gantry tilt and slice range, in minimizing radiation exposure to multiple organs and provide valuable insights into radiation protection and protocol optimization.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T13:35:05Z","timestamp":1765805705000},"page":"77-90","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Optimizing lens and organ dose evaluation in head CT examinations using monte carlo simulation: influence of gantry tilt and scan range"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7017-6472","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yasushi","family":"Katsunuma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kaoru","family":"Sato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takayuki","family":"Hasegawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yusuke","family":"Koba","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"980_CR1","first-page":"2008","volume-title":"Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes","author":"United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR","year":"2008","unstructured":"United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations; 2008. p. 2008."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"980_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.icrp.2012.02.001","volume":"41","author":"FA Stewart","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, MacVittie TJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs \u2013 threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(1\u20132):1\u2013322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.icrp.2012.02.001.","journal-title":"Ann ICRP"},{"issue":"1","key":"980_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.184.1.1609066","volume":"184","author":"LJ Yeoman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Yeoman LJ, Howarth L, Britten A, et al. Gantry angulation in brain CT: dosage implications, effect on posterior fossa artifacts, and current international practice. Radiology. 1992;184(1):113\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiology.184.1.1609066.","journal-title":"Radiology."},{"key":"980_CR4","unstructured":"R.W. Harbron , E.A. Ainsbury , S.G.R. Barnard , C. Lee, K. McHugh, A. Berrington de Gonzalez , S. Edyvean , M.S. Pearce \u201cRadiation dose to the lens from CT of the head in young people\u201d https:\/\/www.clinicalradiologyonline.net\/article\/S0009-9260(19)30325-3\/fulltext"},{"key":"980_CR5","unstructured":"AuntMinnie.com editorial team. Iterative reconstruction cuts critical eye lens dose. AuntMinnie.com. 2024. https:\/\/www.auntminnie.com\/clinical-news\/ct\/article\/15602157\/iterative-reconstruction-cuts-critical-eye-lens-dose. Accessed 8 Jun 2025."},{"key":"980_CR6","unstructured":"European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1999. Available at: https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/en\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/915cb631-d747-4d8f-af93-530fc7dbb7bb. Accessed 9 Sep 2014."},{"issue":"1","key":"980_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.12763","volume":"204","author":"U Nikupaavo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):164\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.14.12763.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol."},{"issue":"4","key":"980_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1088\/0952-4746\/35\/4\/891","volume":"35","author":"Y Chung","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chung Y, Han B, Lee J, et al. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot. 2015;35(4):891\u2013909. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0952-4746\/35\/4\/891.","journal-title":"J Radiol Prot."},{"issue":"14","key":"980_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5601","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/60\/14\/5601","volume":"60","author":"A Ding","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ding A, Gao Y, Liu H, et al. VirtualDose: a software for reporting organ doses from CT for adult and pediatric patients. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(14):5601\u201325.","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"980_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncr333","volume":"147","author":"N Ban","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ban N, Takahashi F, Sato K, et al. Development of a web-based CT dose calculator: WAZA-ARI. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;147(1\u20132):333\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncr333","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"980_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.15669\/pnst.1.517","volume":"1","author":"F Takahashi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Takahashi F, Endo A, Sato K, et al. Analysis of organ doses from CT examination by the radiation transport calculation to develop the dosimetry system WAZA-ARI. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;1:517\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15669\/pnst.1.517.","journal-title":"Prog Nucl Sci Technol."},{"key":"980_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1186\/s41747-019-0130-5","volume":"4","author":"C De Mattia","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Mattia C, Campanaro F, Rottoli F, Clemente S, Paolicchi F, Caramella D, et al. Patient organ and effective dose estimation in CT: comparison of four software applications. Eur Radiol Exp. 2020;4:14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41747-019-0130-5.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol Exp."},{"key":"980_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"SatoT, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, et al. Recent improvements of the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System\u2014PHITS version 3.33. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2024;61(2):127\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00223131.2023.2270578","DOI":"10.1080\/00223131.2023.2270578"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"980_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncr160","volume":"146","author":"F Takahashi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Takahashi F, Endo A, Sato K, et al. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for x-ray CT examinations. I: radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;146(1\u20133):241\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncr160.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"980_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.15669\/pnst.2.153","volume":"2","author":"F Takahashi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Takahashi F, Endo A, Sato K, et al. Effects of human model configuration in Monte Carlo calculations on organ doses from CT examinations. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;2:153\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15669\/pnst.2.153.","journal-title":"Prog Nucl Sci Technol"},{"issue":"2","key":"980_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1097\/HP.0000000000000299","volume":"109","author":"F Takahashi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Takahashi F, Sato K, Endo A, et al. Numerical analysis of organ doses delivered during computed tomography examinations using Japanese adult phantoms with the WAZA-ARI dosimetry system. Health Phys. 2015;109(2):104\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/HP.0000000000000299.","journal-title":"Health Phys"},{"issue":"1","key":"980_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncr405","volume":"149","author":"K Sato","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sato K, Takahashi F. The contemporary JAEA Japanese voxel phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;149(1):43\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncr405.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"980_CR18","unstructured":"American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR\u2013AAPM Practice Parameter for Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses in Medical X-ray Imaging. Revised 2018. https:\/\/www.acr.org\/-\/media\/ACR\/Files\/Practice-Parameters\/diag-ref-levels.pdf. Accessed 8 Jun 2025."},{"issue":"2\u20134","key":"980_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.icrp.2007.10.003","volume":"37","author":"ICRP","year":"2007","unstructured":"ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2\u20134):1\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.icrp.2007.10.003.","journal-title":"Ann ICRP."},{"issue":"8","key":"980_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3618","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4745-8","volume":"27","author":"R Booij","year":"2017","unstructured":"Booij R, Dijkshoorn ML, van Straten ME. Efficacy of a dynamic collimator for overranging dose reduction in a second- and third-generation dual source CT scanner. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3618\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-017-4745-8.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"980_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2522081845","volume":"252","author":"PD Deak","year":"2009","unstructured":"Deak PD, Langner O, Lell M, Kalender WA. Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. Radiology. 2009;252(1):140\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2522081845.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"980_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A3473","volume":"35","author":"M Ibrahim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ibrahim M, Parmar H, Christodoulou E, Mukherji S. Raise the bar and lower the dose: current and future strategies for radiation dose reduction in head and neck imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(4):619\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3174\/ajnr.A3473.","journal-title":"AJNR Am J Neuroradiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"980_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.12763","volume":"204","author":"U Nikupaavo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Ahonen SM, Kortesniemi M. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):145\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.14.12763.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol."},{"issue":"9","key":"980_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1628","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A0814","volume":"28","author":"AB Smith","year":"2007","unstructured":"Smith AB, Dillon WP, Gould R. Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1628\u201332.","journal-title":"AJNR Am J Neuroradiol"},{"key":"980_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tanki N, Katsuda T, Sasaki M, et al. The visualisation of two-dimensional dose distribution on X-ray CT using radiochromic film. arXiv. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2104.10803","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2104.10803"},{"issue":"4","key":"980_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncad090","volume":"195","author":"J Tarkiainen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tarkiainen J, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Kortelainen A, Kortesniemi M. Radiation dose of the eye lens in CT examinations of the brain in clinical practice \u2014 the effect of radiographer training to optimise gantry tilt and scan length. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2023;195(4):311\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncad090","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim."}],"container-title":["Radiological Physics and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T16:30:42Z","timestamp":1781627442000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["980"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12194-025-00980-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0333","1865-0341"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-0333","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-0341","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 October 2025","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 October 2025","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 December 2025","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 December 2025","order":6,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":7,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This article has been updated to amend the wrong affiliation of the third author.","order":8,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The first author and all coauthors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics Approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Publish"}}]}}