{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T20:11:49Z","timestamp":1788639109373,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiol Phys Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen and pelvis is widely used for diagnostic imaging but contributes substantially to cumulative medical radiation exposure. Low tube voltage (kVp) imaging has gained attention as a practical strategy for radiation dose optimization while maintaining diagnostic image quality.The study aimed to map the current evidence on low-kVp techniques for radiation dose reduction in adult abdominopelvic CECT and evaluate their effects on radiation dose and image quality.\u00a0This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Arksey and O\u2019Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL identified studies published between 2000 and 2025 that reported low-kVp dose optimization strategies in adult patients. Data were extracted on scanner characteristics, tube voltage settings, reconstruction techniques, and reported dose reductions.\u00a0Thirteen studies (sample size: 30\u2013907) patients were included. Tube voltage settings ranged from 80 to 120 kVp, with 80 kVp consistently achieving substantial dose reductions (11\u201386%), particularly when combined with hybrid, model-based, or deep learning reconstruction algorithms that mitigated image noise and preserved diagnostic confidence. Automatic tube voltage selection and patient size\u2013adapted protocols further supported individualized dose optimization. However, considerable heterogeneity in imaging protocols, reconstruction methods, and dose metrics limited comparability across studies.\u00a0Low-kVp imaging is an effective approach for reducing radiation dose in contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT without compromising diagnostic adequacy. Standardized reporting and large prospective multicenter studies are needed to establish optimal protocols and support broader clinical implementation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T12:00:16Z","timestamp":1780488016000},"page":"899-909","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Low-kVp techniques for radiation dose optimization in abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced CT: a scoping review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Nitika C.","family":"Panakkal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajagopal","family":"Kadavigere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suresh","family":"Sukumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Ravishankar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shivanath","family":"Shanbhag","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Visakh Thrivikraman","family":"Nair","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"1063_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1007\/s11894-011-0214-8","volume":"13","author":"ML Chang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chang ML, Hou JK. Cancer Risk Related to Gastrointestinal Diagnostic Radiation Exposure. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011;13:449\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11894-011-0214-8.","journal-title":"Curr Gastroenterol Rep"},{"key":"1063_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5135","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v16i1.5135","volume":"16","author":"A Sabarudin","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sabarudin A, Mustafa Z, Nassir KM, Hamid HA, Sun Z. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT using tube current modulation: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;16:5135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1120\/jacmp.v16i1.5135.","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"key":"1063_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2312030767","volume":"231","author":"CI Lee","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP, Diagnostic CT, Scans. Assessment of Patient, Physician, and Radiologist Awareness of Radiation Dose and Possible Risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2312030767.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.07.009","volume":"72","author":"G Brix","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brix G, Nissen-Meyer S, Lechel U, Nissen-Meyer J, Griebel J, Nekolla EA, et al. Radiation exposures of cancer patients from medical X-rays: how relevant are they for individual patients and population exposure? Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:342\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.07.009.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics14151585","author":"MMUD Malik","year":"2024","unstructured":"Malik MMUD, Alqahtani M, Hadadi I, AlQhtani AGM, Alqarni A. An analysis of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in India compared to other countries. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics14151585.","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"1063_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2189","DOI":"10.37506\/ijphrd.v11i4.10960","volume":"11","author":"A Kayyum","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kayyum A, Panakkal NC, John AM. Evaluation of effective dose and associated radiation risks in common computed tomography procedures. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11:2189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37506\/ijphrd.v11i4.10960.","journal-title":"Indian J Public Health Res Dev"},{"key":"1063_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2078","DOI":"10.1001\/archinternmed.2009.427","volume":"169","author":"R Smith-Bindman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K-P, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinternmed.2009.427.","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"1063_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMra072149","volume":"357","author":"DJ Brenner","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography\u2013an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMra072149.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"1063_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2481071451","volume":"248","author":"FA Mettler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2481071451.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2511081296","volume":"251","author":"A Sodickson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251:175\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2511081296.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.3390\/tomography10050049","volume":"10","author":"HI Almohammed","year":"2024","unstructured":"Almohammed HI, Elshami W, Hamd ZY, Abuzaid M. Optimizing CT abdomen-pelvis scan radiation dose: examining the role of body metrics (waist circumference, hip circumference, abdominal fat, and body mass index) in dose efficiency. Tomography. 2024;10:643\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/tomography10050049.","journal-title":"Tomography"},{"key":"1063_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcl.2008.10.006","volume":"47","author":"CH McCollough","year":"2009","unstructured":"McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:27\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rcl.2008.10.006.","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"1063_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1177\/02841851211001539","volume":"63","author":"M Yoshida","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Oda S, Kidoh M, Nagayama Y, Uetani H, et al. Effects of tube voltage and iodine contrast medium on radiation dose of whole-body CT. Acta Radiol. 2022;63:458\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02841851211001539.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rxeng.2024.03.011","volume":"66","author":"A Villanueva Campos","year":"2024","unstructured":"Villanueva Campos A, Canales Lach\u00e9n E, Suevos Ballesteros C, Alarc\u00f3n Rodr\u00edguez J. Multi-energy CT and iodinated contrast. Radiolog\u00eda (English Edition). 2024;66:S29\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rxeng.2024.03.011.","journal-title":"Radiolog\u00eda (English Edition)"},{"key":"1063_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1922","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2015150048","volume":"35","author":"AR Seyal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Seyal AR, Arslanoglu A, Abboud SF, Sahin A, Horowitz JM, Yaghmai V. CT of the abdomen with reduced tube voltage in adults: a practical approach. Radiographics. 2015;35:1922\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.2015150048.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"1063_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.06.002","volume":"93","author":"MM Schreiner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schreiner MM, Platzgummer H, Unterhumer S, Weber M, Mistelbauer G, Loewe C, et al. A BMI-adjusted ultra-low-dose CT angiography protocol for the peripheral arteries-image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:149\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.06.002.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000601","volume":"55","author":"MM Lell","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lell MM, Kachelrie\u00df M. Recent and upcoming technological developments in computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:8\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000601.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.221257","volume":"306","author":"LR Koetzier","year":"2023","unstructured":"Koetzier LR, Mastrodicasa D, Szczykutowicz TP, van der Werf NR, Wang AS, Sandfort V, et al. Deep learning image reconstruction for CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology. 2023;306:e221257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.221257.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.01.019","volume":"84","author":"M Kanematsu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Miyoshi T, Goshima S, Noda Y, Tanahashi Y, et al. Whole-body CT with high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation\u2014effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:877\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.01.019.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nima.2015.10.080","volume":"807","author":"H Kato","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kato H, O\u05f3Rourke BE, Suzuki R, Wang J, Ooi T, Nakajima H. Development of an X-ray tube for irradiation experiments using a field emission electron gun. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016;807:41\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nima.2015.10.080.","journal-title":"Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A"},{"key":"1063_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1080\/13682199.2025.2470485","volume":"73","author":"MKM Alharbi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Alharbi MKM, Zhou A, Naunton M, Davidson R, Makanjee C. Innovations in X-ray tube design and instrumentation for conventional radiological applications: a scoping review. Imaging Sci J. 2025;73:653\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13682199.2025.2470485.","journal-title":"Imaging Sci J"},{"key":"1063_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics15060740","volume":"15","author":"M Abuzaid","year":"2025","unstructured":"Abuzaid M. Optimizing radiation dose in high-resolution chest CT: the impact of patient-specific factors and size-specific dose estimates. Diagnostics. 2025;15:740. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics15060740.","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"1063_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-004-0395-7","volume":"11","author":"MK Kalra","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kalra MK, Rizzo SMR, Novelline RA. Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11:267\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10140-004-0395-7.","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/app13095639","volume":"13","author":"S Ungania","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ungania S, Solivetti FM, D\u2019Arienzo M, Quagliani F, Sperduti I, Morrone A, et al. New-generation ASiR-V for dose reduction while maintaining image quality in CT: a phantom study. Applied Sciences. 2023;13:5639. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/app13095639.","journal-title":"Applied Sciences"},{"key":"1063_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.7117","volume":"198","author":"S Oda","year":"2012","unstructured":"Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Yonenaga K, Namimoto T, Nakaura T, et al. A hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm that improves the image quality of low-tube-voltage coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:1126\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.11.7117.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1063_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20201223","volume":"94","author":"D Ippolito","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ippolito D, Maino C, Pecorelli A, Salemi I, Gandola D, Riva L, et al. Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20201223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20201223.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2657","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2022.12.040","volume":"30","author":"H Sato","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sato H, Fujimoto S, Tomizawa N, Inage H, Yokota T, Kudo H, et al. Impact of a deep learning-based super-resolution image reconstruction technique on high-contrast computed tomography: a phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2023;30:2657\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acra.2022.12.040.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR28","volume-title":"Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines 2025","author":"European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Contrast Media Safety Committee","year":"2025","unstructured":"European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Contrast Media Safety Committee. Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines 2025. Vienna: ESUR; 2025."},{"key":"1063_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14132328","volume":"273","author":"WW Mayo-Smith","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, Sahani DV, Pavlicek W. How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2014;273:657\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.14132328.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2021.109735","volume":"139","author":"X Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang X, Zheng F, Xiao R, Liu Z, Li Y, Li J, et al. Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: a prospective study. Eur J Radiol. 2021;139:109735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2021.109735.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/1364557032000119616","volume":"8","author":"H Arksey","year":"2005","unstructured":"Arksey H, O\u2019Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1364557032000119616.","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"key":"1063_CR32","unstructured":"Lely J, Wickstrom J, Morris HC, Sasson N, Camarillo ND, Livinski AA, et al. How to Write a Scoping Review Protocol. Guidance and Template; 2023."},{"key":"1063_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.2174\/157340505774574718","volume":"1","author":"E Yekeler","year":"2005","unstructured":"Yekeler E, Ozdemir C, Yilmaz S, Topcu A, Genchellac H, Tunaci A, et al. Comparison of the image quality on low-dose urinary tract multidetector CT examinations with 80 kVp and 120 kVp (original research). Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2005;1:265\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/157340505774574718.","journal-title":"Curr Med Imaging Rev"},{"key":"1063_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.4545","volume":"196","author":"Y Yanaga","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Date S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients weighing 70 kg or less: initial trial of compact-bolus dynamic CT with low-dose contrast material at 80 kVp. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1324\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.10.4545.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1063_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1080\/10420150.2012.662976","volume":"167","author":"JH Cho","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cho JH, Lee HK, Kim HJ, Dong KR, Chung WK. Studies on the application of a low-voltage peak to the postsurgical follow-up CT scan in abdominal cancer patients in order to reduce the exposure of patients to radiation. Radiat Eff Defects Solids. 2012;167:782\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10420150.2012.662976.","journal-title":"Radiat Eff Defects Solids"},{"key":"1063_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1007\/s11604-013-0217-5","volume":"31","author":"T Ichikawa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Morisaka H, Sano K, Ali M, Araki T. Volumetric low-tube-voltage CT imaging for evaluating hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma; effects on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:521\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11604-013-0217-5.","journal-title":"Jpn J Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000024","volume":"37","author":"AD Hardie","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hardie AD, Tipnis SV, Rieter WJ, Rissing MS, De Cecco CN. Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37:932\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000024.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"1063_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000519","volume":"41","author":"YS Park","year":"2017","unstructured":"Park YS, Lee CH, Lee J, Choi JW, Kim KA, Park CM. Low\u2013tube voltage computed tomography during hepatic arterial phase: the effect of body habitus on image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41:401\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000519.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"1063_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000478","volume":"41","author":"D Knipp","year":"2017","unstructured":"Knipp D, Lane BF, Mitchell JW, Daly BD. Computed tomographic angiography of the abdomen and pelvis in azotemic patients utilizing 80-kV(p) technique and reduced dose iodinated contrast: comparison with routine 120-kV(p) technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41:141\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000478.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"1063_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1080\/15563650.2017.1377220","volume":"56","author":"H Bahrami-Motlagh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bahrami-Motlagh H, Mahboubi-Fooladi Z, Salevatipour B, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Mirhashemi SH. Comparison of low dose and standard dose abdominal CT scan in body stuffers. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018;56:348\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15563650.2017.1377220.","journal-title":"Clin Toxicol (Phila)"},{"key":"1063_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-018-1658-z","volume":"26","author":"F Moloney","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moloney F, James K, Twomey M, Ryan D, Grey TM, Downes A, et al. Low-dose CT imaging of the acute abdomen using model-based iterative reconstruction: a prospective study. Emerg Radiol. 2019;26:169\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10140-018-1658-z.","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncz302","volume":"188","author":"MH Choi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Choi MH, Lee YJ, Jung SE. A lesson from automatic tube voltage selection: feasibility of 100 kVp in portal venous phase abdominal CT. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2020;188:424\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncz302.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"1063_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7386","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-024-10793-6","volume":"34","author":"K Yoshida","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yoshida K, Nagayama Y, Funama Y, Ishiuchi S, Motohara T, Masuda T, et al. Low tube voltage and deep-learning reconstruction for reducing radiation and contrast medium doses in thin-slice abdominal CT: a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:7386\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10793-6.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-024-02811-w","volume":"24","author":"S Zhu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhu S, Zhang B, Tian Q, Li A, Liu Z, Hou W, et al. Reduced-dose deep learning iterative reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography with low tube voltage and tube current. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24:389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-024-02811-w.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"1063_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radmp.2025.09.006","volume":"6","author":"NC Panakkal","year":"2025","unstructured":"Panakkal NC, Kadavigere R, Sukumar S, Ravishankar N. Radiation dose reduction in abdominopelvic CT using BMI specific low kV protocol. Radiat Med Prot. 2025;6:291\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.radmp.2025.09.006.","journal-title":"Radiat Med Prot"},{"key":"1063_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-018-0928-x","volume":"123","author":"DH Sheafor","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sheafor DH, Kovacs MD, Burchett P, Picard MM, Davis B, Hardie AD. Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT. Radiol Med. 2018;123:918\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11547-018-0928-x.","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"1063_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1007\/s40134-014-0080-x","volume":"3","author":"W Huda","year":"2015","unstructured":"Huda W. CT radiation exposure: an overview. Curr Radiol Rep. 2015;3:80. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40134-014-0080-x.","journal-title":"Curr Radiol Rep"},{"key":"1063_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3264614","volume":"37","author":"L Yu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.3264614.","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"1063_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2263020205","volume":"226","author":"LM Hamberg","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology. 2003;226:762\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2263020205.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331031505","volume":"233","author":"MK Kalra","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kalra MK, Maher MM, Kamath RS, Horiuchi T, Toth TL, Halpern EF, et al. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. Radiology. 2004;233:241\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2331031505.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2373041655","volume":"237","author":"Y Nakayama","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology. 2005;237:945\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2373041655.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W384","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13241","volume":"204","author":"A Padole","year":"2015","unstructured":"Padole A, Ali Khawaja RD, Kalra MK, Singh S. CT radiation dose and iterative reconstruction techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W384-92. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.14.13241.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1063_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2989","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3333-4","volume":"24","author":"K Jensen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jensen K, Martinsen ACT, Tingberg A, Aal\u00f8kken TM, Fosse E. Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2989\u20133002. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3333-4.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12111082","volume":"264","author":"T Nakaura","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nakaura T, Nakamura S, Maruyama N, Funama Y, Awai K, Harada K, et al. Low contrast agent and radiation dose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT of thin adults at 256-detector row CT: effect of low tube voltage and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality. Radiology. 2012;264:445\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.12111082.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3510-5","volume":"25","author":"N Buls","year":"2015","unstructured":"Buls N, Van Gompel G, Van Cauteren T, Nieboer K, Willekens I, Verfaillie G, et al. Contrast agent and radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT by a combination of low tube voltage and advanced image reconstruction algorithms. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1023\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3510-5.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR56","unstructured":"European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Publications Office; 2000."},{"key":"1063_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.02.014","volume":"71","author":"C Zaehringer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zaehringer C, Euler A, Karwacki GM, Hohmann J, Pansini M, Szucs-Farkas Z, et al. Manual adjustment of tube voltage from 120 to 100 kVp during abdominal CT in patients with body weights\u2009\u2264\u200975 kg: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a prospective, randomised trial. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:615.e1-6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2016.02.014.","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.939228","volume":"29","author":"X Fang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fang X, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Wei W, Wang X, Li B, et al. A feasibility study to evaluate replacing conventional computed tomography at 120 KVP with low radiation dose and low iodine intake based on body mass index-adapted abdominal computed tomography angiography in 291 patients. Med Sci Monit. 2023;29:e939228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/MSM.939228.","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"1063_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2017.08.010","volume":"24","author":"L O\u2019Hora","year":"2018","unstructured":"O\u2019Hora L, Foley SJ. Iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage selection reduce clinical CT radiation doses and image noise. Radiography (Lond). 2018;24:28\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.radi.2017.08.010.","journal-title":"Radiography (Lond)"},{"key":"1063_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2394","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-023-10076-6","volume":"34","author":"R Smith-Bindman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Smith-Bindman R, Kang T, Chu PW, Wang Y, Stewart C, Das M, et al. Large variation in radiation dose for routine abdomen CT: reasons for excess and easy tips for reduction. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:2394\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-023-10076-6.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.1390","volume":"192","author":"F Tatsugami","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:635\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.08.1390.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1063_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11350","volume":"202","author":"A Gervaise","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gervaise A, Naulet P, Beuret F, Henry C, Pernin M, Portron Y, et al. Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: impact of body mass index. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:553\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.13.11350.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1063_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2014.10.002","volume":"70","author":"G Sun","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sun G, Hou YB, Zhang B, Yu L, Li SX, Tan LL, et al. Application of low tube voltage coronary CT angiography with low-dose iodine contrast agent in patients with a BMI of 26\u201330 kg\/m2. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:138\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2014.10.002.","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.09090094","volume":"254","author":"D Marin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, Richard S, Youngblood RS, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm\u2013initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010;254:145\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.09090094.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.211838","volume":"303","author":"CT Jensen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jensen CT, Gupta S, Saleh MM, Liu X, Wong VK, Salem U, et al. Reduced-dose deep learning reconstruction for abdominal CT of liver metastases. Radiology. 2022;303:90\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.211838.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1063_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2016150151","volume":"36","author":"UP Fulwadhva","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fulwadhva UP, Wortman JR, Sodickson AD. Use of dual-energy CT and iodine maps in evaluation of bowel disease. Radiographics. 2016;36:393\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.2016150151.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"1063_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1177\/02841851241288507","volume":"65","author":"F Tatsugami","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Kawashita I, Fujioka C, Nakamura Y, Takahashi S, et al. Deep-learning reconstruction enhances image quality of Adamkiewicz Artery in low-keV dual-energy CT. Acta Radiol. 2024;65:1569\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02841851241288507.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liu Y, Yu Z, Zou Y. Impact of covariance modeling in dual-energy spectral CT image reconstruction. In: Hoeschen C, Kontos D, Flohr TG, editors. Medical Imaging. 2015; Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 9412, SPIE; 2015, p. 94123Q. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.2082000","DOI":"10.1117\/12.2082000"},{"key":"1063_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2000","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-021-05127-3","volume":"51","author":"MJ Siegel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Siegel MJ, Mhlanga JC, Salter A, Ramirez-Giraldo JC. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between contrast-enhanced single- and dual-energy abdominopelvic computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51:2000\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00247-021-05127-3.","journal-title":"Pediatr Radiol"},{"key":"1063_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40336-025-00719-7","author":"C Picone","year":"2025","unstructured":"Picone C, Fusco R, Granata V, Porto A, Brunese MC, Zappia M, et al. Analysis of radiation dose reduction in oncological followup cases by using dual energy CT. Clin Transl Imaging. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40336-025-00719-7.","journal-title":"Clin Transl Imaging"}],"container-title":["Radiological Physics and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T20:03:43Z","timestamp":1788638623000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"references-count":70,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["1063"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01063-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0333","1865-0341"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-0333","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-0341","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 May 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This is a review study. The Institute Ethics Committee, Kasturba Hospital has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not available.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Informed consent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}